Journal of the American Chemical Society
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
14.4
SJR
5.489
CiteScore
24.4
Categories
Biochemistry
Catalysis
Chemistry (miscellaneous)
Colloid and Surface Chemistry
Areas
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Chemical Engineering
Chemistry
Years of issue
1879-2025
journal names
Journal of the American Chemical Society
J AM CHEM SOC
JACS
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of the American Chemical Society
(563046 citations)

Angewandte Chemie
(396940 citations)

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition
(330917 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Northwestern University
(2288 publications)

University of California, Berkeley
(1735 publications)

Massachusetts Institute of Technology
(1625 publications)

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
(611 publications)

Northwestern University
(362 publications)

University of Science and Technology of China
(354 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 690
Q1

Assessing the readiness and feasibility to implement a model of care for spine disorders and related disability in Cross Lake, an Indigenous community in northern Manitoba, Canada: a research protocol
Bussières A., Passmore S., Kopansky-Giles D., Tavares P., Ward J., Ladwig J., Glazebrook C., Mior S., Atkinson-Graham M., Moss J., Robak N., Broeckelmann E., Monias D.A., Mckay D.Z., Hamilton H., et. al.
Abstract
Background
Since the 1990s, spine disorders have remained the leading cause of global disability, disproportionately affecting economically marginalized individuals, rural populations, women, and older people. Back pain related disability is projected to increase the most in remote regions where lifestyle and work are increasingly sedentary, yet resources and access to comprehensive healthcare is generally limited. To help tackle this worldwide health problem, World Spine Care Canada, and the Global Spine Care Initiative (GSCI) launched a four-phase project aiming to address the profound gap between evidence-based spine care and routine care delivered to people with spine symptoms or concerns in communities that are medically underserved. Phase 1 conclusions and recommendations led to the development of a model of care that included a triaging system and spine care pathways that could be implemented and scaled in underserved communities around the world.
Methods
The current research protocol describes a site-specific customization and pre-implementation study (Phase 2), as well as a feasibility study (Phase 3) to be conducted in Cross Lake, an Indigenous community in northern Manitoba, Canada. Design: Observational pre-post design using a participatory mixed-methods approach. Relationship building with the community established through regular site visits will enable pre- and post-implementation data collection about the model of spine care and provisionally selected implementation strategies using a community health survey, chart reviews, qualitative interviews, and adoption surveys with key partners at the meso (community leaders) and micro (clinicians, patients, community residents) levels. Recruitment started in March 2023 and will end in March 2026. Surveys will be analyzed descriptively and interviews thematically. Findings will inform co-tailoring of implementation support strategies with project partners prior to evaluating the feasibility of the new spine care program.
Discussion
Knowledge generated from this study will provide essential guidance for scaling up, sustainability and impact (Phase 4) in other northern Canada regions and sites around the globe. It is hoped that implementing the GSCI model of care in Cross Lake will help to reduce the burden of spine problems and related healthcare costs for the local community, and serve as a scalable model for programs in other settings.
Q1

Public perception of chiropractic in the Taiwanese population: a cross-sectional survey
Chang H., de Luca K., Fernandez M., Quinton A.
Abstract
Background
Research on perception of chiropractic is abundant in Western contexts, yet sparse in Asia. This study aims to bridge this gap by examining the perceptions of chiropractic among Taiwanese adults, focusing on demographics, utilisation, beliefs, and understanding.
Methods
An adapted survey with 27 close-ended items was administered to assess Taiwanese adults’ perception of chiropractic. The electronic survey, using Qualtrics, was delivered worldwide via Taiwanese Facebook groups from January 31 to March 31, 2024. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies and cross tabulations, were performed.
Results
A total of 769 individuals were surveyed, with 475 participants providing complete data. Over half of the participants (62%) had never visited a chiropractor, but in those who had visited a chiropractor 78% reported satisfaction. Of 475 participants, 45% considered chiropractic care safe while 34% were unsure. Though almost half (42%) were unclear about what chiropractors do, most participants (67%) expressed interest in learning more. Among the 151 participants with prior experience of chiropractic care, the demographic profile was 54% women, and individuals aged 28 to 37 (44%), and those with an undergraduate degree (52%) were most common.
Conclusion
Overall, our study found a positive perception and high acceptance of chiropractic among the Taiwanese population; however, generalisability may be limited due to the risk of selection bias. An understanding of the chiropractic profession was notably limited. Hence, efforts are needed to enhance awareness of chiropractic accreditation, clinical competencies, and its potential role in public healthcare in Taiwan.
Q1

Development and preliminary validation of the Danish headache questionnaire
Dissing K.B., Jensen R.K., Christensen H.W., Jensen M.E., Lauridsen H.H.
Abstract
Background
The prevalence of headache disorders is imposing a growing burden on public health. Although most patients are seen in primary care, there is an absence of validated questionnaires designed to describe how clinicians manage patients with headache in primary care. The aim of this study was to develop a standardised headache questionnaire for use by primary care clinicians, covering diagnostic procedures, management strategies, and treatment modalities, and to assess the prevalence of consultations for headache in primary care.
Methods
The Danish Headache Questionnaire was developed through a three-phase process: a development phase, a content validation phase via iterative feedback, and a phase to create a generic English version. The Danish Headache Questionnaire includes a survey that covers diagnostic procedures, management strategies, and treatment modalities, and a logbook for tracking the prevalence of consultations for headaches. The questionnaire was tested by Danish chiropractors in primary care from 2020 to 2022.
Results
The Danish Headache Questionnaire underwent several modifications. The survey was expanded to include questions about the Danish profession-specific guideline for managing headaches, different headache types, medical history, radiographic imaging, and potential side effects. The logbook was revised to allow for the documentation of multiple headaches and included a separate form for recording the total number of consultations. The generic version was adapted by removing or adjusting profession-specific terms and questions to suit other clinical environments. The final Danish Headache Questionnaire is available in a generic and a chiropractic-specific format, and was translated to English through a cross-cultural adaptation process.
Conclusions
The Danish Headache Questionnaire has good content validity and is a feasible tool for assessing clinicians’ knowledge in managing patients with headaches and gathering data on headache prevalence in primary care. The generic version promotes a uniform approach and enables comparative analysis across different settings. The Danish Headache Questionnaire may be a valuable instrument guiding teaching a standardised assessment and for clinical assessment in primary care. Furthermore, it may have the potential to fill in gaps of knowledge which could improve the management of headache disorders in primary care.
Q1

A multi-level implementation strategy to increase adoption of chiropractic care for low back pain in primary care clinics: a randomized stepped-wedge pilot study protocol
Roseen E.J., Bussières A., Reichman R., Bora C., Trieu J., Austad K., Williams C., Fischer R.A., Parrilla D., Laird L.D., LaValley M., Evans R.L., Saper R.B., Morone N.E.
Abstract
Introduction
Limited adoption of first line treatments for low back pain (LBP) in primary care settings may contribute to an overreliance on pain medications by primary care providers (PCPs). While chiropractic care typically includes recommended nonpharmacologic approaches (e.g., manual therapy, exercise instruction, advice on self-care), implementation strategies to increase adoption of chiropractic care for LBP in primary care clinics are understudied, particularly in underserved communities.
Methods
We will use a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled pilot trial design to evaluate the feasibility of a multi-level implementation strategy to increase adoption of chiropractic care for LBP in primary care clinics at community health centers. Key barriers and facilitators identified by site champions and other key stakeholders will help us to develop and tailor implementation strategies including educational materials and meetings, developing a network of local chiropractors, and modifying the electronic health record to facilitate referrals. Three primary care clinics will be randomized to receive the implementation strategy first, second, or third over a fourteen-month study period. At our first clinic, we will have a four-month pre-implementation period, a two-month implementation deployment period, and a subsequent eight-month follow-up period. We will stagger the start of our implementation strategy, beginning in a new clinic every two months. We will evaluate the proportion of patients with LBP who receive a referral to chiropractic care in the first 21 days after their index visit with PCP. We will also evaluate adoption of other guideline concordant care (e.g., other nonpharmacologic treatments) and non-guideline concordant care (e.g., opioids, imaging) over the study period.
Discussion
LBP is currently the leading cause of disability worldwide. While there are several treatment options available for individuals with LBP, patients in underserved populations do not often access recommended nonpharmacologic treatment options such as chiropractic care. The results from this study will inform the development of practical implementation strategies that may improve access to chiropractic care for LBP in the primary care context. Furthermore, results may also inform policy changes needed to expand access to chiropractic care in underserved communities.
Clintrials.gov NCT#
NCT06104605.
Q1

Preliminary insights into the effects of spinal manipulation therapy of different force magnitudes on blood biomarkers of oxidative stress and pro-resolution of inflammation mediators
Duarte F.C., Funabashi M., Starmer D., Partata W.A.
Abstract
Background
Evidence has been reported that spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) leads to spine segmental hypoalgesia through neurophysiological and peripheral mechanisms related to regulating inflammatory biomarker function. However, these studies also showed substantial inter-individual variability in the biomarker responses. Such variability may be due to the incomplete understanding of the fundamental effects of force-based manipulations (e.g., patient-specific force-time characteristics) on a person’s physiology in health and disease. This study investigated the short-term effects of distinct SMT force-time characteristics on blood oxidative stress and pro-resolution of inflammation biomarkers.
Methods
Nineteen healthy adults between 18 and 45 years old were recruited between February and March 2020 before the COVID-19 pandemic and clustered into three groups: control (preload only), target total peak force of 400 N, and 800 N. A validated force-sensing table technology (FSTT®) determined the SMT force-time characteristics. Blood samples were collected at pre-intervention, immediately after SMT, and 20 min post-intervention. Parameters of the oxidant system (total oxidant status, lipid peroxidation and lipid hydroperoxide), the antioxidant system (total antioxidant capacity and bilirubin), and lipid-derived resolvin D1 were evaluated in plasma and erythrocytes through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and colorimetric assays.
Results
The COVID-19 global pandemic impacted recruitment, and our pre-established target sample size could not be reached. As a result, there was a small sample size, which decreased the robustness of the statistical analysis. Despite the limitations, we observed that 400 N seemed to decrease systemic total oxidant status and lipid peroxidation biomarkers. However, 800 N appeared to transitorily increase these pro-oxidant parameters with a further transitory reduction in plasma total antioxidant capacity and resolvin D1 mediator.
Conclusion
Despite the small sample size, which elevates the risk of type II error (false negatives), and the interruption of recruitment caused by the pandemic, our findings appeared to indicate that different single SMT force-time characteristics presented contrasting effects on the systemic redox signalling biomarkers and pro-resolution of inflammation mediators in healthy participants. The findings need to be confirmed by further research; however, they provide baseline information and guidance for future studies in a clinical population.
Q1

Insights into how manual therapists incorporate the biopsychosocial-enactive model in the care of individuals with CLBP: a qualitative study
Bianchi M., Rossettini G., Cerritelli F., Esteves J.E.
Abstract
Background
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) presents a significant challenge for manual therapists. Recent advancements in pain research have highlighted the limitations of the traditional biomedical and biopsychosocial models, prompting the exploration of alternatives. The biopsychosocial-enactive (BPS-E) model has emerged as a promising alternative. This study aims to explore the application of the BPS-E model by manual therapists in managing CLBP and to initiate a meaningful dialogue about its use.
Methods
This study adhered to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Guided by constructivist grounded theory, we conducted semi-structured interviews with ten manual therapists who are experts in the BPS-E model. Data collection, conceptualization, and analysis were systematically carried out to identify key themes and insights.
Results
The core theme identified was “The person-centred approach,” with three subthemes: “Opportunities in implementing the model”, “Utilizing and Integrating Diverse Skills for Holistic Care”, and “Challenges in implementing the model”.
Conclusion
This study provides insights into how manual therapists incorporate the BPS-E model in their practice, demonstrating its advantages over the traditional biopsychosocial model. The findings highlight the need for further research and training to effectively implement the BPS-E model in clinical settings. This research begins an essential discussion on the potential of the BPS-E model to enhance care for CLBP patients.
Q1

Supported biopsychosocial self-management for back-related leg pain: a randomized feasibility study integrating a whole person perspective
Leininger B., Evans R., Greco C.M., Hanson L., Schulz C., Schneider M., Connett J., Keefe F., Glick R.M., Bronfort G.
Abstract
Background
There is limited high-quality research examining conservative treatments for back-related leg pain (BRLP). This feasibility study was done in preparation for a full-scale trial comparing a whole-person supported self-management intervention to medical care for chronic BRLP.
Methods
Participants were randomized to 12 weeks of individualized supported self-management delivered by physical therapists and chiropractors or medical care consisting of guideline-based pharmacologic care. Supported self-management was based on a behavioral model that used a whole person approach to enhance participants capabilities, opportunities, and motivations to engage in self-care. It combined BRLP education with psychosocial strategies (e.g., relaxed breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, guided imagery, communication skills) and physical modalities such as exercise and spinal manipulation therapy. Providers were trained to address participants’ individualized needs and use behavior change and motivational communication techniques to develop a therapeutic alliance to facilitate self-management. Feasibility was assessed using pre-specified targets for recruitment and enrollment, intervention delivery, and data collection over the six-month study period. In addition, areas for potential refinement and optimization of processes and protocols for the full-scale trial were assessed.
Results
We met or exceeded nearly all feasibility targets. Forty-two participants were enrolled over a six-month period in 2022 and very few individuals declined participation due to preferences for one treatment. All but one participant received treatment and 95% of participants attended the minimum number of visits (self-management = 6, medical care = 2). At 12 weeks, 95% of participants in the self-management group reported engaging in self-management practices learned in the program and 77% of medical care participants reported taking medications as prescribed. Satisfaction with the self-management intervention was high with 85% of participants reporting satisfaction with the program overall. Self-management intervention providers delivered all required activities at 72% of visits. Providers also noted some challenges navigating the shared decision-making process and deciding what self-management tools to prioritize. Over the six-month study period, completion rates were 91% for monthly surveys and 86% for weekly surveys.
Conclusion
We were able to demonstrate that a full-scale randomized trial comparing a whole-person supported self-management intervention to medical care for chronic BRLP is feasible and identified important areas for optimization.
Q1

Patient preferences for chiropractors’ attire: a cross-sectional study of UQTR university-based chiropractic clinic
Leduc L., Théroux J., Marois C., Lavigne G., Blanchette M.
Abstract
Background
A significant body of research has examined how the attire of physicians and nurses affects patients’ perceptions, preferences, and outcomes. However, limited research has focused on the clothing worn by other health professionals, such as chiropractors. The present study aims to explore patients’ preferences and perceptions of chiropractors’ attire.
Methods
Using a cross-sectional image-based procedure, new patients to a university clinic were questioned regarding their preferences for four different attires (casual, formal, scrub, and white coat) worn by both a male and a female chiropractor. Patients also reported their perceptions in terms of chiropractors’ knowledge, trustworthiness, competence, professionalism, and comfortable for each photograph.
Results
From August 10, 2022, to January 23, 2023, 75 new patients participated in the study. Results indicated a strong preference for scrubs for both male and female chiropractors. Chiropractors in scrubs were also seen as more knowledgeable, trustworthy, competent, and professional, and comfortable. This was closely followed by those wearing white coats and formal attire. Notably, the white coat worn by the female chiropractor received significantly more positive ratings than when worn by her male counterpart.
Conclusion
In conclusion, our findings suggest that chiropractors’ attire influences patients’ perceptions and should be considered in the development of dress codes for public and private clinics. Further research is essential to understand better how the gender and age of care providers affect patient evaluations.
Q1

'Which treatment do you believe you received?' A randomised blinding feasibility trial of spinal manual therapy
Muñoz Laguna J., Kurmann A., Hofstetter L., Nyantakyi E., Braun J., Clack L., Bang H., Farshad M., Foster N.E., Puhan M.A., Hincapié C.A., Mühlemann M., Caviezel C., Ehrler M., Häusler M., et. al.
Abstract
Background
Blinding is essential for mitigating biases in trials of low back pain (LBP). Our main objectives were to assess the feasibility of blinding: (1) participants randomly allocated to active or placebo spinal manual therapy (SMT), and (2) outcome assessors. We also explored blinding by levels of SMT lifetime experience and recent LBP, and factors contributing to beliefs about the assigned intervention.
Methods
A two-parallel-arm, single-centre, placebo-controlled, blinding feasibility trial. Adults were randomised to active SMT (n = 40) or placebo SMT (n = 41). Participants attended two study visits for their assigned intervention, on average seven days apart. The primary outcome was participant blinding (beliefs about assigned intervention) using the Bang blinding index (BI) at two study visits. The Bang BI is arm-specific, chance-corrected, and ranges from − 1 (all incorrect beliefs) to 1 (all correct beliefs), with 0 indicating equal proportions of correct and incorrect beliefs. Secondary outcomes included factors contributing to beliefs about the assigned intervention.
Results
Of 85 adults screened, 81 participants were randomised (41 [51%] with SMT lifetime experience; 29 [39%] with recent LBP), and 80 (99%) completed follow-up. At study visit 1, 50% of participants in the active SMT arm (Bang BI: 0.50 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.26 to 0.74]) and 37% in the placebo SMT arm (0.37 [95% CI, 0.10 to 0.63]) had a correct belief about their assigned intervention, beyond chance. At study visit 2, BIs were 0.36 (0.08 to 0.64) and 0.29 (0.01 to 0.57) for participants in the active and placebo SMT arms, respectively. BIs among outcome assessors suggested adequate blinding at both study visits (active SMT: 0.08 [− 0.05 to 0.20] and 0.03 [− 0.11 to 0.16]; placebo SMT: − 0.12 [− 0.24 to 0.00] and − 0.07 [− 0.21 to 0.07]). BIs varied by participant levels of SMT lifetime experience and recent LBP. Participants and outcome assessors described different factors contributing to their beliefs.
Conclusions
Adequate blinding of participants assigned to active SMT may not be feasible with the intervention protocol studied, whereas blinding of participants in the placebo SMT arm may be feasible. Blinding of outcome assessors seemed adequate. Further methodological work on blinding of SMT is needed.
Trial registration number
NCT05778396.
Q1

Chiropractic international research collaborative (CIRCuit): the development of a new practice-based research network, including the demographics, practice, and clinical management characteristics of clinician participants
Young K.J., Aspinall S., Mior S., Gliedt J., Spencer J., Børsheim C., Nash J., Ricci M., Shurr J., Axén I.
Abstract
Objectives
To describe the structure and development of a new international, chiropractic, practice-based research network (PBRN), the Chiropractic International Research Collaborative (CIRCuit), as well as the demographic, practice, and clinical management characteristics of its clinician participants. An electronic survey was used to collect information on their demographics, practice, and clinical management characteristics from clinicians from 17 October through 28 November 2022. Descriptive statistics were used to report the results.
Background
PBRNs are an increasingly popular way of facilitating clinic-based studies. They provide the opportunity to collaboratively develop research projects involving researchers, clinicians, patients and support groups. We are unaware of any international PBRNs, or any that have a steering group comprised of equal numbers of clinicians representing the different international regions.
Results
77 chiropractors responded to the survey (0.7% of EBCN-FB members). 48 were men (62%), 29 women (38%). Thirty-six (47%) were in North America, 18 (23%) in Europe, and 15 (19%) in Oceania. Participants reported predominantly treating musculoskeletal issues, often with high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation (95%), but also with soft tissue therapy (95%), exercise (95%), and other home care (up to 100%).
Methods
The development of CIRCuit is described narratively. Members of the Evidence-Based Chiropractic Network Facebook group (EBCN-FB) were invited to become clinician participants by participating in the survey.
Conclusions
This paper describes the development of a new PBRN for chiropractors. It offers a unique opportunity to facilitate the engagement of clinical chiropractors with research, as well as for academics to readily be able to access an international cohort of clinicians to collaboratively develop and conduct research. Although the results of the survey are not statistically generalisable, the initial cohort of CIRCuit clinician participants use similar techniques on similar types of conditions as the profession at large. The international structure is unique among PBRNs and offers the opportunity to help develop innovative research projects.
Q1

The association between individual radiographic findings and improvement after chiropractic spinal manipulation and home exercise among older adults with back-related disability: a secondary analysis
Maiers M.J., Albertson A.K., Major C., Mendenhall H., Petrie C.P.
Abstract
Background
Some chiropractors use spinal x-rays to inform care, but the relationship between radiographic findings and outcomes is unclear. This study examined the association between radiographic findings and 30% improvement in back-related disability in older adults after receiving 12 weeks of chiropractic spinal manipulation and home exercise instruction.
Methods
This IRB-approved secondary analysis used randomized trial data of community-dwelling adults age ≥ 65 with chronic spinal pain and disability. Data were collected during the parent trial between January 2010-December 2014. The primary outcome of the parent study was ≥ 30% improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 12 weeks, a clinically important response to care. In this secondary analysis, two chiropractic radiologists independently assessed digital lumbar radiographs for pre-specified anatomic, degenerative, and alignment factors; differences were adjudicated. The unadjusted association between baseline radiographic factors and 30% ODI improvement was determined using chi-square tests.
Results
From the parent trial, 120 adults with baseline lumbar radiographs were included in this study. Mean age was 70.4 years (range 65–81); 59.2% were female. Mean baseline disability (ODI = 25.6) and back pain (5.2, 0–10 scale) were moderate. Disc degeneration (53.3% moderate, 13.3% severe), anterolisthesis (53.3%), retrolisthesis (36.6%) and scoliosis (35.0%) were common among the participant sample. After 12-weeks of treatment, 51 (42.5%) participants achieved 30% improvement in back disability. No alignment, degenerative, or anatomic factors were associated with ODI improvement at 12 weeks (all p > 0.05), regardless of severity of radiographic findings.
Conclusion
We found no association between a predetermined subset of radiographic findings and improvement in back-related disability among this sample of older adults. As such, this study provides preliminary data suggesting that imaging may be unhelpful for predicting response to chiropractic spinal manipulation and home exercise.
Q1

Provider kinematic strategies during the delivery of spinal manipulation and mobilization: a scoping review of the literature
Svoboda K., Howarth S.J., Funabashi M., Gorrell L.M.
Abstract
Background
Spinal manipulation (MAN) and mobilization (MOB) are biomechanically different yet both elicit pain reduction and increased range of motion. Previous investigations have focused on quantifying kinetics (e.g., applied forces) or, recipient kinematics (i.e., movements) during MAN and MOB. While these studies provide valuable information, they do not report on the strategies adopted by providers when performing the complex motor tasks of MAN and MOB. This review sought to synthesise the literature reporting on provider kinematics during the delivery of MAN and MOB.
Methods
This scoping literature review is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) statement. MEDLINE (Ovid), PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, PEDro, ICL and CINAHL databases were searched from inception to September 2023 for terms relating to provider kinematics during the delivery of MAN and MOB. Data were extracted and reported descriptively, including: general study characteristics, number and characteristics of individuals who delivered/received MAN and/or MOB, region treated, equipment used and kinematic parameters of the individual delivering the procedure.
Results
Of 4,844 records identified, five (0.1%) fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. Of these, provider kinematics were reported for the delivery of MAN in four (80%) and for the delivery of MOB in one (20%) article. Practitioners applied the procedure in all (100%) and students in one (20%) study. Spinal regions treated were: lumbar (n = 4), thoracic (n = 2) and cervical (n = 1). Data were reported heterogeneously but were most commonly captured using either video or motion capture equipment (n = 4, 80%). The direction of applied force was fully reported in one (20%) and only partially reported (one spinal region) in another study.
Conclusions
There are a small number of studies reporting heterogeneously on provider kinematics during the delivery of MAN and MOB. Clear reporting of the procedure from a biomechanical perspective and of the measurement equipment used could enable future meta-analysis of provider kinematic data, the use of provider kinematic data in the development of technique skills curricula and could feasibly be used to mitigate risk of injury for providers.
Q1

Diagnostic imaging in the management of older adults with low back pain: analysis from the BAck Complaints in Elders: Chiropractic – Australia cohort study
Jenkins H.J., Grace K., Young A., Parker F., Hartvigsen J., Rubinstein S.M., French S.D., de Luca K.
Abstract
Background
Diagnostic imaging is commonly used in the management of low back pain (LBP), with approximately one-quarter of those who present to primary care referred for imaging. Current estimates of imaging frequency commonly exclude older adults; however, pathology detected with imaging (e.g., osteoporosis, cancer) may occur more frequently in older populations. The aims of this study were to: (i) determine the frequency and forms of diagnostic imaging use in older adults presenting for chiropractic care for LBP in Australia; (ii) describe participant characteristics associated with imaging use; and (iii) describe the types of radiographic findings.
Methods
Data were collected from the BAck Complaints in Elders: Chiropractic-Australia (BACE: C-A) study, a 12-month, prospective cohort study of adults aged ≥ 55 years with a new episode of LBP. Self-reported frequency of imaging use (baseline, 2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months) was reported descriptively by imaging modality. Imaging reports were obtained, and imaging findings were independently extracted and categorised. Baseline characteristics were assessed for differences in those who received imaging compared to those who did not. Proportions of imaging use and imaging findings were presented descriptively with 95% confidence intervals.
Results
The BACE: C-A cohort comprised 217 participants of whom 60.8% reported receiving diagnostic imaging for their current episode of LBP. X-ray was performed most (44.7%), followed by computed tomography (CT) (30.8%). Participants receiving imaging reported higher low back disability, more healthcare use for LBP, more frequent leg pain, more suspected serious pathology, and stronger beliefs that imaging was important. Degenerative changes were the most common imaging finding (96.6%). Pathology of possible clinical significance, including compression fracture or suspected osteoporosis, was present in 15.5% of participants.
Conclusion
Three out of five older adults with LBP who sought chiropractic care received imaging over one-year. Participants receiving imaging tended to have more complex presentations (e.g., more disability, suspected underlying pathology) or stronger beliefs that imaging was necessary for the management of LBP. Degenerative changes were the most common imaging finding. Pathology of potential clinical relevance was present on approximately 15% of imaging reports received. No conditions requiring immediate medical attention were reported.
Q1

Factors that contribute to the perceived treatment effect of spinal manipulative therapy in a chiropractic teaching clinic: a qualitative study
Boylan P.
Abstract
Background
Despite the progress made in better understanding the potential mechanisms of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) and its treatment effects, a knowledge gap continues to exist when identifying the specific factors that contribute to the perceived treatment effect associated with SMT. The purpose of the study was to explore the perceptions of chiropractic clinicians, interns, and patients regarding what factors during a doctor-patient encounter contribute to the perceived treatment effect associated with SMT.
Methods
This study used convenience sampling to enroll participants from a chiropractic teaching clinic in the United States. Semi-structured interviews were used as the main form of data collection, which took place from January-April 2024. The data was subsequently analyzed using thematic analysis and organized into themes through an iterative open coding process.
Results
Six rounds of interviews were conducted for a total of 18 interviews. Each round consisted of one patient who received treatment including SMT, one intern who performed the treatment, and one clinician who oversaw the treatment. After analyzing the interview data, the following five themes were identified: Treatment Outcome, Therapeutic Alliance, Adjunctive Therapies, Significance of Cavitation, and Psychomotor Skills. Each theme consisted of multiple subthemes which were mentioned by the participant groups at varying frequencies. Patients frequently mentioned the importance of improvement in symptoms following treatment, as well as good communication skills and the use of adjunctive therapies. Interns valued functional change following treatment, while clinicians focused on confidence levels and psychomotor skills. There were differing views on the significance of cavitation, ranging from indifference to an indication of a successful treatment.
Conclusion
This qualitative study identified several themes which describe factors that may contribute to the perceived effect associated with SMT. In addition to the psychomotor skills required to perform SMT, educators and practitioners should consider factors such as the therapeutic alliance between patient and provider, use of adjunctive therapies, and assessment of the outcome associated with the intervention.
Q1

Cross cultural adaptation and validation of the Hindi version of foot function index
Sidiq M., Chahal A., Sharma J., Rai R.H., Kashoo F.Z., Jayavelu J., Kashyap N., Vajrala K.R., Veeragoudhaman T.S., Arasu V., Janakiraman B.
Abstract
Background
The Foot Function Index (FFI) is a reliable and widely used standardized questionnaire that measures the impact of foot pathology on function. With 571 million Hindi-speaking people living globally and an increasing incidence of foot-related pathologies, it is imperative to cross-culturally translate and adapt a Hindi version of the FFI (FFI-Hi). We aimed to translate, cross-cultural adapt, and psychometrically test the FFI-Hi for use in Hindi-speaking individuals with foot conditions.
Methods
The translation of FFI-Hi was performed according to guidelines given by MAPI Research Trust. A total of 223 Hindi-speaking participants afflicted with foot conditions completed the FFI-Hi alongside the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. The study duration spanned between October 2023 and January 2024. The initial phase was the translation and adaptation of FFI to cultural context. Followed by testing of psychometric properties involving of 133 participants for the test-retest reliability of FFI-Hi after a 7-day interval.
Results
The mean age of the participants was 47.10 (± 8.1) years. The majority of the participants were male (n = 148, 66.4%) and the most common foot condition was plantar fasciopathy (n = 91, 40.8%). The mean score of FF-Hi was 33.7 ± 11.7. The internal consistency of FFI-Hi was good with the Cronbach’s alpha (α) value of 0.891 and excellent reproducibility with the intra-class correlation of 0.90. The 95% minimal detectable change (MCD) and the standard error of measurement of the FFI-Hi was 22.02 and 7.94 respectively. Convergent validity between FFI-Hi subscales and SF-36 domains was moderate. Factor analysis corroborated the multidimensional nature of the FFI-Hi.
Conclusion
The FFI-Hindi version was successfully cross-culturally adapted, translated and demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties to be used in clinical practice and research. Further, the context-specific Hindi language version of FFI will enhance the utility of FFI in foot function evaluation and remove language barrier in patients reporting disability and activity limitation related to foot conditions.
Registration
Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2023/07/055734).
Top-100
Citing journals
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
|
|
Journal of the American Chemical Society
563046 citations, 4.21%
|
|
Angewandte Chemie
396940 citations, 2.97%
|
|
Angewandte Chemie - International Edition
330917 citations, 2.47%
|
|
Chemistry - A European Journal
237195 citations, 1.77%
|
|
Journal of Organic Chemistry
216649 citations, 1.62%
|
|
Inorganic Chemistry
216646 citations, 1.62%
|
|
Tetrahedron Letters
211586 citations, 1.58%
|
|
Chemical Communications
208993 citations, 1.56%
|
|
Tetrahedron
203991 citations, 1.52%
|
|
Organic Letters
194774 citations, 1.46%
|
|
Organometallics
141332 citations, 1.06%
|
|
Dalton Transactions
131641 citations, 0.98%
|
|
Journal of Organometallic Chemistry
124732 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry C
124710 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Chemical Reviews
123194 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry A
112731 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Physics
111160 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry B
110088 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
98353 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
96792 citations, 0.72%
|
|
RSC Advances
96074 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Chemical Science
94926 citations, 0.71%
|
|
ACS applied materials & interfaces
88304 citations, 0.66%
|
|
ACS Catalysis
87986 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan
80650 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Coordination Chemistry Reviews
79761 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry
79386 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Langmuir
77353 citations, 0.58%
|
|
European Journal of Organic Chemistry
75716 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Inorganica Chimica Acta
69159 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Macromolecules
65577 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Chemistry of Materials
65116 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Advanced Materials
59051 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Journal of Biological Chemistry
54556 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Chemical Physics Letters
54002 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Chemical Society Reviews
52554 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Nanoscale
52007 citations, 0.39%
|
|
European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
51155 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis
49997 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Biochemistry
49043 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Nature Communications
48972 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Analytical Chemistry
46521 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Advanced Functional Materials
44350 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Chemische Berichte
43869 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Polyhedron
43061 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Structure
43000 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Chemistry Letters
41986 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Small
40697 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Chemical Engineering Journal
40286 citations, 0.3%
|
|
ACS Nano
40019 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Helvetica Chimica Acta
39134 citations, 0.29%
|
|
CrystEngComm
38432 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Crystal Growth and Design
36498 citations, 0.27%
|
|
New Journal of Chemistry
35722 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Electrochimica Acta
34438 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Molecules
34135 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Structure THEOCHEM
33318 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Materials Chemistry C
33043 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
32442 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Organic Chemistry Frontiers
32408 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
30513 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Chemistry - An Asian Journal
27603 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Tetrahedron Asymmetry
27228 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Polymer Chemistry
26231 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Applied Surface Science
24405 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Chemischer Informationsdienst
24323 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
23983 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Russian Chemical Bulletin
23116 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Polymer
22870 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Synthesis
22810 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Accounts of Chemical Research
22407 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Carbohydrate Research
22204 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Computational Chemistry
22037 citations, 0.16%
|
|
ChemCatChem
21758 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Synlett
21646 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Polymer Science, Part A: Polymer Chemistry
21189 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry
21105 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Scientific Reports
20984 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Zeitschrift fur Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie
20960 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Nano Letters
20811 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
20712 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Physical Review B
20539 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical
20299 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
20190 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Journal of Quantum Chemistry
19993 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
19623 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Spectrochimica Acta - Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy
19296 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry
18962 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Advanced Energy Materials
18894 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Chemical Physics
18815 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Dyes and Pigments
18675 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Physical Organic Chemistry
18401 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Alloys and Compounds
18335 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Microporous and Mesoporous Materials
18197 citations, 0.14%
|
|
ChemBioChem
18040 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Green Chemistry
17822 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Biopolymers
17778 citations, 0.13%
|
|
ChemPhysChem
17201 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Chemistry
17172 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry
16339 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
|
Citing publishers
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000
3000000
3500000
|
|
Elsevier
3129483 citations, 23.39%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
2957883 citations, 22.11%
|
|
Wiley
2681775 citations, 20.05%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
1514387 citations, 11.32%
|
|
Springer Nature
804056 citations, 6.01%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
221412 citations, 1.66%
|
|
MDPI
178009 citations, 1.33%
|
|
AIP Publishing
162397 citations, 1.21%
|
|
The Chemical Society of Japan
84168 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Oxford University Press
73740 citations, 0.55%
|
|
IOP Publishing
66726 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
61336 citations, 0.46%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
58238 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
45672 citations, 0.34%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
43185 citations, 0.32%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
33048 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
31326 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
27470 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
25965 citations, 0.19%
|
|
SAGE
22796 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
22780 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
21755 citations, 0.16%
|
|
World Scientific
18131 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Beilstein-Institut
16754 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
15689 citations, 0.12%
|
|
The Electrochemical Society
15608 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
15540 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
13751 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Annual Reviews
12247 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
11552 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
11087 citations, 0.08%
|
|
The Society of Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Japan
10319 citations, 0.08%
|
|
The Japan Institute of Heterocyclic Chemistry
10187 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
9845 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
9350 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
8222 citations, 0.06%
|
|
The Royal Society
8121 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
7365 citations, 0.06%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
7048 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Biophysical Society
6877 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
6556 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
6454 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Japan Society of Applied Physics
6245 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry
5040 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry
4537 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
4137 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Portland Press
4083 citations, 0.03%
|
|
King Saud University
3740 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Korean Society of Industrial Engineering Chemistry
3603 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Vacuum Society
3310 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Science in China Press
3310 citations, 0.02%
|
|
3069 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IntechOpen
3064 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Physical Society of Japan
3002 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institute of Organic Chemistry & Biochemistry
2867 citations, 0.02%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
2642 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Electrochemical Society of Japan
2211 citations, 0.02%
|
|
EDP Sciences
2174 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Acta Physica Sinica, Chinese Physical Society and Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
2063 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Polymer Society of Korea
2009 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
1985 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
1956 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
1844 citations, 0.01%
|
|
IOS Press
1807 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Tsinghua University Press
1737 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Copernicus
1726 citations, 0.01%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
1719 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
1656 citations, 0.01%
|
|
OAE Publishing Inc.
1603 citations, 0.01%
|
|
IGI Global
1549 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
1543 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Higher Education Press
1530 citations, 0.01%
|
|
1525 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Society of Coordination Chemistry
1406 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Nonferrous Metals Society of China
1346 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
1241 citations, 0.01%
|
|
China Science Publishing & Media
1200 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Chinese Society of Rare Earths
1004 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Physiological Society
957 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Oil Chemists' Society
957 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Society of Polymer Science, Japan
932 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Hans Publishers
927 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korean Chemical Society
901 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Pharmaceutical Society of Korea
901 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Society of Petroleum Engineers
879 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Microbiology Society
843 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Surface Science Society of Japan
838 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Asian Journal of Chemistry
828 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
826 citations, 0.01%
|
|
ASME International
821 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Institute of Metals
810 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Society of Colour Material
809 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Ceramic Society of Japan
806 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Academy
799 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Astronomical Society
708 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
642 citations, 0%
|
|
The Technical Association of Photopolymers, Japan
639 citations, 0%
|
|
636 citations, 0%
|
|
European Journal of Chemistry
605 citations, 0%
|
|
National Library of Serbia
590 citations, 0%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000
3000000
3500000
|
Publishing organizations
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
|
Northwestern University
2288 publications, 1.09%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
1735 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
1625 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Japan Science and Technology Agency
1476 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Tokyo
1475 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Kyoto University
1468 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
1374 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Stanford University
1307 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
1302 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Harvard University
1282 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Scripps Research
1240 publications, 0.59%
|
|
California Institute of Technology
1197 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
1098 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
1083 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
1007 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
1001 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Osaka University
986 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Minnesota
979 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
929 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Cornell University
898 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Michigan
883 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Columbia University
854 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
787 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences
770 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Yale University
768 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
755 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
747 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Argonne National Laboratory
737 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Texas A&M University
736 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Utah
730 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Peking University
728 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Cambridge
727 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Science and Technology of China
712 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Princeton University
702 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Chicago
699 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
690 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Oxford
659 publications, 0.31%
|
|
ETH Zurich
647 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Washington
613 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
592 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Toronto
587 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
581 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Purdue University
577 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences
556 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
548 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Tohoku University
548 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Nagoya University
544 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of California, Davis
541 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Ohio State University
533 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Tsinghua University
528 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences
514 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Kyushu University
491 publications, 0.23%
|
|
RIKEN-Institute of Physical and Chemical Research
485 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
468 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
467 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
457 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Brookhaven National Laboratory
452 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Nankai University
449 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Fudan University
446 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Zhejiang University
443 publications, 0.21%
|
|
National University of Singapore
442 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Emory University
440 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Xiamen University
435 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
431 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Iowa State University
428 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Weizmann Institute of Science
427 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
424 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Delaware
423 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Hokkaido University
418 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Manchester
415 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
406 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
404 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Nanjing University
399 publications, 0.19%
|
|
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
395 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Boston College
390 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Colorado State University
380 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Michigan State University
376 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
368 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
368 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Arizona
367 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
355 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Florida
354 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
348 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Southern California
346 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
343 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
338 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research
334 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Imperial College London
329 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Arizona State University
325 publications, 0.15%
|
|
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
321 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
320 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Coal Research
320 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
318 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
318 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
315 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
314 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Seoul National University
313 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Rochester
313 publications, 0.15%
|
|
New York University
311 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Carnegie Mellon University
310 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
611 publications, 4.17%
|
|
Northwestern University
362 publications, 2.47%
|
|
University of Science and Technology of China
354 publications, 2.42%
|
|
Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences
309 publications, 2.11%
|
|
Peking University
304 publications, 2.08%
|
|
Tsinghua University
272 publications, 1.86%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
258 publications, 1.76%
|
|
Nankai University
247 publications, 1.69%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
242 publications, 1.65%
|
|
Zhejiang University
241 publications, 1.65%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
240 publications, 1.64%
|
|
University of Tokyo
216 publications, 1.47%
|
|
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
214 publications, 1.46%
|
|
Xiamen University
212 publications, 1.45%
|
|
Nanjing University
204 publications, 1.39%
|
|
Fudan University
198 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Argonne National Laboratory
192 publications, 1.31%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
190 publications, 1.3%
|
|
University of Cambridge
187 publications, 1.28%
|
|
Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences
184 publications, 1.26%
|
|
Stanford University
181 publications, 1.24%
|
|
University of Oxford
176 publications, 1.2%
|
|
Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences
174 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Kyoto University
169 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Southern University of Science and Technology
166 publications, 1.13%
|
|
ETH Zurich
164 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Tianjin University
163 publications, 1.11%
|
|
Harvard University
162 publications, 1.11%
|
|
California Institute of Technology
157 publications, 1.07%
|
|
University of Chicago
156 publications, 1.06%
|
|
National University of Singapore
155 publications, 1.06%
|
|
Cornell University
149 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
147 publications, 1%
|
|
Princeton University
144 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
140 publications, 0.96%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
139 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
135 publications, 0.92%
|
|
University of Manchester
126 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Yale University
126 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Soochow University (Suzhou)
125 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Scripps Research
125 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
123 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
117 publications, 0.8%
|
|
East China University of Science and Technology
116 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Institute for Basic Science
115 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Zhengzhou University
115 publications, 0.79%
|
|
South China University of Technology
114 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Jilin University
114 publications, 0.78%
|
|
East China Normal University
113 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Michigan
113 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
111 publications, 0.76%
|
|
ShanghaiTech University
111 publications, 0.76%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
110 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
109 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
109 publications, 0.74%
|
|
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
107 publications, 0.73%
|
|
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
106 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of New South Wales
106 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
106 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
103 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Wuhan University
102 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
102 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Shandong University
102 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter, Chinese Academy of Sciences
99 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Hokkaido University
99 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Toronto
99 publications, 0.68%
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
97 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Coal Research
97 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Texas A&M University
97 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Sichuan University
96 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Columbia University
96 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
95 publications, 0.65%
|
|
RIKEN-Institute of Physical and Chemical Research
95 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Brookhaven National Laboratory
94 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Osaka University
94 publications, 0.64%
|
|
University of Utah
92 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Japan Science and Technology Agency
91 publications, 0.62%
|
|
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
87 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Nagoya University
87 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
86 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
86 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
85 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Imperial College London
84 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Hunan University
84 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Beijing Normal University
83 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
83 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Minnesota
83 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
79 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Münster
79 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Westlake University
78 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies
78 publications, 0.53%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
77 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Uppsala University
76 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
75 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Southern California
75 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of California, Davis
75 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology
74 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Weizmann Institute of Science
73 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Yonsei University
73 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Shenzhen University
72 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
Publishing countries
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
|
|
USA
|
USA, 45749, 21.74%
USA
45749 publications, 21.74%
|
China
|
China, 11249, 5.35%
China
11249 publications, 5.35%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 8228, 3.91%
Japan
8228 publications, 3.91%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 6218, 2.95%
Germany
6218 publications, 2.95%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 4779, 2.27%
United Kingdom
4779 publications, 2.27%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 3203, 1.52%
Canada
3203 publications, 1.52%
|
France
|
France, 3068, 1.46%
France
3068 publications, 1.46%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 2062, 0.98%
Spain
2062 publications, 0.98%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1910, 0.91%
Republic of Korea
1910 publications, 0.91%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1866, 0.89%
Switzerland
1866 publications, 0.89%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 1727, 0.82%
Italy
1727 publications, 0.82%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 1403, 0.67%
Netherlands
1403 publications, 0.67%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 1220, 0.58%
Australia
1220 publications, 0.58%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1064, 0.51%
Israel
1064 publications, 0.51%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1035, 0.49%
Sweden
1035 publications, 0.49%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 888, 0.42%
Singapore
888 publications, 0.42%
|
India
|
India, 774, 0.37%
India
774 publications, 0.37%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 581, 0.28%
Denmark
581 publications, 0.28%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 547, 0.26%
Belgium
547 publications, 0.26%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 423, 0.2%
Saudi Arabia
423 publications, 0.2%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 369, 0.18%
Russia
369 publications, 0.18%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 344, 0.16%
Poland
344 publications, 0.16%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 317, 0.15%
Austria
317 publications, 0.15%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 290, 0.14%
Mexico
290 publications, 0.14%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 262, 0.12%
Czech Republic
262 publications, 0.12%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 246, 0.12%
Finland
246 publications, 0.12%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 204, 0.1%
Hungary
204 publications, 0.1%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 188, 0.09%
Ireland
188 publications, 0.09%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 171, 0.08%
Portugal
171 publications, 0.08%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 145, 0.07%
New Zealand
145 publications, 0.07%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 139, 0.07%
Greece
139 publications, 0.07%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 136, 0.06%
Brazil
136 publications, 0.06%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 128, 0.06%
Norway
128 publications, 0.06%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 112, 0.05%
Argentina
112 publications, 0.05%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 66, 0.03%
Slovenia
66 publications, 0.03%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 66, 0.03%
Turkey
66 publications, 0.03%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 63, 0.03%
South Africa
63 publications, 0.03%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 58, 0.03%
Egypt
58 publications, 0.03%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 41, 0.02%
Bulgaria
41 publications, 0.02%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 41, 0.02%
Croatia
41 publications, 0.02%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 37, 0.02%
Iraq
37 publications, 0.02%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 37, 0.02%
UAE
37 publications, 0.02%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 37, 0.02%
Puerto Rico
37 publications, 0.02%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 36, 0.02%
Ukraine
36 publications, 0.02%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 35, 0.02%
Qatar
35 publications, 0.02%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 34, 0.02%
Iran
34 publications, 0.02%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 33, 0.02%
Slovakia
33 publications, 0.02%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 33, 0.02%
Thailand
33 publications, 0.02%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 24, 0.01%
Romania
24 publications, 0.01%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 23, 0.01%
Costa Rica
23 publications, 0.01%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 23, 0.01%
Chile
23 publications, 0.01%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 19, 0.01%
Estonia
19 publications, 0.01%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 19, 0.01%
Lithuania
19 publications, 0.01%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 16, 0.01%
Vietnam
16 publications, 0.01%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 16, 0.01%
Georgia
16 publications, 0.01%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 15, 0.01%
Philippines
15 publications, 0.01%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 14, 0.01%
Venezuela
14 publications, 0.01%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 14, 0.01%
Malaysia
14 publications, 0.01%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 12, 0.01%
Cyprus
12 publications, 0.01%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 12, 0.01%
Lebanon
12 publications, 0.01%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 12, 0.01%
Serbia
12 publications, 0.01%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 11, 0.01%
Iceland
11 publications, 0.01%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 11, 0.01%
Luxembourg
11 publications, 0.01%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 11, 0.01%
Morocco
11 publications, 0.01%
|
Moldova
|
Moldova, 11, 0.01%
Moldova
11 publications, 0.01%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 10, 0%
Belarus
10 publications, 0%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 10, 0%
Pakistan
10 publications, 0%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 9, 0%
North Macedonia
9 publications, 0%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 8, 0%
Latvia
8 publications, 0%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 6, 0%
Kenya
6 publications, 0%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 6, 0%
Tunisia
6 publications, 0%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 4, 0%
Kazakhstan
4 publications, 0%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 4, 0%
Indonesia
4 publications, 0%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 4, 0%
Jordan
4 publications, 0%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 4, 0%
Colombia
4 publications, 0%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 4, 0%
Cuba
4 publications, 0%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 4, 0%
Uruguay
4 publications, 0%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 4, 0%
Ecuador
4 publications, 0%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 3, 0%
Panama
3 publications, 0%
|
Yugoslavia
|
Yugoslavia, 3, 0%
Yugoslavia
3 publications, 0%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 2, 0%
Algeria
2 publications, 0%
|
New Caledonia
|
New Caledonia, 2, 0%
New Caledonia
2 publications, 0%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 2, 0%
Peru
2 publications, 0%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 2, 0%
Uzbekistan
2 publications, 0%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 2, 0%
Sri Lanka
2 publications, 0%
|
Jamaica
|
Jamaica, 2, 0%
Jamaica
2 publications, 0%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 1, 0%
Armenia
1 publication, 0%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0%
|
Barbados
|
Barbados, 1, 0%
Barbados
1 publication, 0%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 1, 0%
Botswana
1 publication, 0%
|
Hong Kong
|
Hong Kong, 1, 0%
Hong Kong
1 publication, 0%
|
Guam
|
Guam, 1, 0%
Guam
1 publication, 0%
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1, 0%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
1 publication, 0%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0%
|
Liechtenstein
|
Liechtenstein, 1, 0%
Liechtenstein
1 publication, 0%
|
Monaco
|
Monaco, 1, 0%
Monaco
1 publication, 0%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 1, 0%
Mongolia
1 publication, 0%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0%
Oman
1 publication, 0%
|
Palestine
|
Palestine, 1, 0%
Palestine
1 publication, 0%
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
|
|
USA
|
USA, 5570, 38.03%
USA
5570 publications, 38.03%
|
China
|
China, 5160, 35.23%
China
5160 publications, 35.23%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 1387, 9.47%
Germany
1387 publications, 9.47%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 1045, 7.13%
Japan
1045 publications, 7.13%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 1035, 7.07%
United Kingdom
1035 publications, 7.07%
|
France
|
France, 535, 3.65%
France
535 publications, 3.65%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 492, 3.36%
Republic of Korea
492 publications, 3.36%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 471, 3.22%
Spain
471 publications, 3.22%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 438, 2.99%
Switzerland
438 publications, 2.99%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 411, 2.81%
Canada
411 publications, 2.81%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 365, 2.49%
Australia
365 publications, 2.49%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 312, 2.13%
Singapore
312 publications, 2.13%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 294, 2.01%
Netherlands
294 publications, 2.01%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 271, 1.85%
Italy
271 publications, 1.85%
|
India
|
India, 250, 1.71%
India
250 publications, 1.71%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 249, 1.7%
Sweden
249 publications, 1.7%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 198, 1.35%
Israel
198 publications, 1.35%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 132, 0.9%
Saudi Arabia
132 publications, 0.9%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 129, 0.88%
Belgium
129 publications, 0.88%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 117, 0.8%
Denmark
117 publications, 0.8%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 93, 0.63%
Austria
93 publications, 0.63%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 89, 0.61%
Poland
89 publications, 0.61%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 74, 0.51%
Czech Republic
74 publications, 0.51%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 71, 0.48%
Russia
71 publications, 0.48%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 58, 0.4%
Finland
58 publications, 0.4%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 52, 0.35%
Portugal
52 publications, 0.35%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 44, 0.3%
Ireland
44 publications, 0.3%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 29, 0.2%
Brazil
29 publications, 0.2%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 27, 0.18%
New Zealand
27 publications, 0.18%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 26, 0.18%
Greece
26 publications, 0.18%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 26, 0.18%
Norway
26 publications, 0.18%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 22, 0.15%
Slovenia
22 publications, 0.15%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 20, 0.14%
Hungary
20 publications, 0.14%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 19, 0.13%
Thailand
19 publications, 0.13%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 18, 0.12%
Egypt
18 publications, 0.12%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 16, 0.11%
Argentina
16 publications, 0.11%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 16, 0.11%
South Africa
16 publications, 0.11%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 15, 0.1%
Turkey
15 publications, 0.1%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 13, 0.09%
Mexico
13 publications, 0.09%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 13, 0.09%
UAE
13 publications, 0.09%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 11, 0.08%
Bulgaria
11 publications, 0.08%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 10, 0.07%
Qatar
10 publications, 0.07%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 9, 0.06%
Iran
9 publications, 0.06%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 9, 0.06%
Romania
9 publications, 0.06%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 9, 0.06%
Slovakia
9 publications, 0.06%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 7, 0.05%
Ukraine
7 publications, 0.05%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 7, 0.05%
Lithuania
7 publications, 0.05%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 7, 0.05%
Croatia
7 publications, 0.05%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 6, 0.04%
Iceland
6 publications, 0.04%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 6, 0.04%
Lebanon
6 publications, 0.04%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 6, 0.04%
Morocco
6 publications, 0.04%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 6, 0.04%
Chile
6 publications, 0.04%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 5, 0.03%
North Macedonia
5 publications, 0.03%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 4, 0.03%
Estonia
4 publications, 0.03%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 4, 0.03%
Vietnam
4 publications, 0.03%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 4, 0.03%
Malaysia
4 publications, 0.03%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 3, 0.02%
Cyprus
3 publications, 0.02%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 3, 0.02%
Luxembourg
3 publications, 0.02%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 3, 0.02%
Panama
3 publications, 0.02%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 3, 0.02%
Serbia
3 publications, 0.02%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 2, 0.01%
Venezuela
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 2, 0.01%
Indonesia
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 2, 0.01%
Iraq
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 2, 0.01%
Colombia
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 2, 0.01%
Latvia
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 2, 0.01%
Pakistan
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 2, 0.01%
Ecuador
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.01%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Hong Kong
|
Hong Kong, 1, 0.01%
Hong Kong
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.01%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 1, 0.01%
Kenya
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1, 0.01%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 1, 0.01%
Costa Rica
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.01%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Monaco
|
Monaco, 1, 0.01%
Monaco
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 1, 0.01%
Mongolia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.01%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 1, 0.01%
Puerto Rico
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 1, 0.01%
Uzbekistan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.01%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.01%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.01%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Jamaica
|
Jamaica, 1, 0.01%
Jamaica
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Show all (53 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
|
43 profile journal articles
Alabugin Igor

Florida State University

A.E. Arbuzov Institute of Organic and Physical Chemistry of the Kazan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
236 publications,
10 084 citations
h-index: 59
34 profile journal articles
Barone Vincenzo

Scuola Normale Superiore
955 publications,
90 755 citations
h-index: 101
15 profile journal articles
Abakumov Artem
PhD in Chemistry

Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
439 publications,
14 408 citations
h-index: 56
15 profile journal articles
Vocadlo David

Simon Fraser University
206 publications,
13 602 citations
h-index: 59
13 profile journal articles
Mehta Goverdhan

University of Hyderabad
489 publications,
10 367 citations
h-index: 44
11 profile journal articles
Beldjoudi Yassine
🥼
PhD in Chemistry, Associate Professor

University of Nizwa

Northwestern University
60 publications,
1 165 citations
h-index: 18
8 profile journal articles
Ananikov Valentine

N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
419 publications,
18 974 citations
h-index: 71
8 profile journal articles
Chan Warren

University of Toronto
223 publications,
57 865 citations
h-index: 84
8 profile journal articles
Gajan David
63 publications,
2 149 citations
h-index: 25
7 profile journal articles
Kuz'mina Lyudmila
DSc in Chemistry

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
376 publications,
5 137 citations
h-index: 36
7 profile journal articles
Gozin Michael
🥼
122 publications,
4 957 citations
h-index: 38
7 profile journal articles
Tolstoy Peter
DSc in Chemistry, Professor

Saint Petersburg State University
166 publications,
3 622 citations
h-index: 37