Open Access
The effect of catalyst layer design on catalyst utilization in PEMFC studied via stochastic reconstruction method
Congfan Zhao
1
,
Shu Yuan
1
,
Xin-Bing Cheng
1
,
Zhifeng Zheng
1
,
Ji-Min Yin
1
,
Shuiyun Shen
1
,
Xiaohui Yan
1
,
Junliang Zhang
1
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2023-07-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 2.000
CiteScore: 16.5
Impact factor: 9.6
ISSN: 26665468
General Energy
Artificial Intelligence
Engineering (miscellaneous)
Abstract
Catalyst utilization is an important determinant of proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance, and increasing the catalyst utilization is one of the most critical approaches to reducing the catalyst loading in PEMFC. 4-phase stochastic reconstruction method based on the variable-resolution Quartet Structure Generation Set (QSGS) algorithm is utilized to elucidate the influence of different parameters of electrode preparation, including the porosity, the dispersion degree of carbon agglomerate, ionomer content, and carbon support size, on the catalyst utilization in the catalyst layer. It was found that there exist optimal values for the porosity, dispersion degree of carbon agglomerate, ionomer content, and carbon support sizes in CLs and any deviations from these optimal values would lead to transport issues of electron, proton and mass within CLs. Taking electron, proton and mass transport into consideration simultaneously, the optimal Pt utilization is 46.55% among 48 cases in this investigation, taken at the carbon support diameter of 40 nm, the porosity of 0.4, the agglomerate spatial density of 25 μm−3 and I/C at 0.7. The selection of porosity, ultrasonic dispersion technique and ionomer content for conventional electrode preparation requires compromises on mass, electron and proton transport, leading to catalyst utilization in CLs hardly exceeding 50%. Therefore, the next generation of catalyst layer design and preparation technology is desired.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
2
3
4
|
|
|
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
4 publications, 9.3%
|
|
|
Journal of Power Sources
3 publications, 6.98%
|
|
|
Energy
3 publications, 6.98%
|
|
|
Advanced Science
3 publications, 6.98%
|
|
|
Advanced Materials Technologies
2 publications, 4.65%
|
|
|
Chemical Engineering Journal
2 publications, 4.65%
|
|
|
Energies
1 publication, 2.33%
|
|
|
Energy Technology
1 publication, 2.33%
|
|
|
ACS Omega
1 publication, 2.33%
|
|
|
ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering
1 publication, 2.33%
|
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
1 publication, 2.33%
|
|
|
RSC Advances
1 publication, 2.33%
|
|
|
Scientific Reports
1 publication, 2.33%
|
|
|
Catalysts
1 publication, 2.33%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Energy Research
1 publication, 2.33%
|
|
|
Energy & Fuels
1 publication, 2.33%
|
|
|
Energy and AI
1 publication, 2.33%
|
|
|
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
1 publication, 2.33%
|
|
|
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
1 publication, 2.33%
|
|
|
Current Opinion in Electrochemistry
1 publication, 2.33%
|
|
|
Applied Energy
1 publication, 2.33%
|
|
|
Energy and Environmental Science
1 publication, 2.33%
|
|
|
Joule
1 publication, 2.33%
|
|
|
Advances in Colloid and Interface Science
1 publication, 2.33%
|
|
|
Electrochemical Energy Reviews
1 publication, 2.33%
|
|
|
ACS Catalysis
1 publication, 2.33%
|
|
|
Applied Thermal Engineering
1 publication, 2.33%
|
|
|
Energy Conversion and Management
1 publication, 2.33%
|
|
|
Energy Conversion and Management: X
1 publication, 2.33%
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
|
Publishers
|
5
10
15
20
25
|
|
|
Elsevier
25 publications, 58.14%
|
|
|
Wiley
6 publications, 13.95%
|
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
4 publications, 9.3%
|
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
3 publications, 6.98%
|
|
|
MDPI
2 publications, 4.65%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
2 publications, 4.65%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 publication, 2.33%
|
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
43
Total citations:
43
Citations from 2024:
35
(81.39%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Zhao C. et al. The effect of catalyst layer design on catalyst utilization in PEMFC studied via stochastic reconstruction method // Energy and AI. 2023. Vol. 13. p. 100245.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Zhao C., Yuan S., Cheng X., Zheng Z., Yin J., Shen S., Yan X., Zhang J. The effect of catalyst layer design on catalyst utilization in PEMFC studied via stochastic reconstruction method // Energy and AI. 2023. Vol. 13. p. 100245.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.egyai.2023.100245
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2023.100245
TI - The effect of catalyst layer design on catalyst utilization in PEMFC studied via stochastic reconstruction method
T2 - Energy and AI
AU - Zhao, Congfan
AU - Yuan, Shu
AU - Cheng, Xin-Bing
AU - Zheng, Zhifeng
AU - Yin, Ji-Min
AU - Shen, Shuiyun
AU - Yan, Xiaohui
AU - Zhang, Junliang
PY - 2023
DA - 2023/07/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 100245
VL - 13
SN - 2666-5468
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2023_Zhao,
author = {Congfan Zhao and Shu Yuan and Xin-Bing Cheng and Zhifeng Zheng and Ji-Min Yin and Shuiyun Shen and Xiaohui Yan and Junliang Zhang},
title = {The effect of catalyst layer design on catalyst utilization in PEMFC studied via stochastic reconstruction method},
journal = {Energy and AI},
year = {2023},
volume = {13},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {jul},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2023.100245},
pages = {100245},
doi = {10.1016/j.egyai.2023.100245}
}
Profiles