volume 25 issue 1 pages 51-65

“Us vs. them” or “us over them”? On the roles of similarity and status in M&As

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2016-02-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR2.104
CiteScore11.6
Impact factor6.1
ISSN09695931, 15984869, 27138291
Finance
Business and International Management
Marketing
Abstract
This paper complements existing research on the role of cultural similarity in cross-border M&As by examining their effects in conjunction with relative status positions of merging entities. Two experimental studies with senior managers were conducted and reported. Whereas status breeds competence-based trust between acquirer and acquired unit, similarity is conducive to benevolence-based trust. Furthermore, higher status position of acquirer is shown to have significant effect on acquired unit members’ social preferences toward the former (Study1). Lastly, similarity and status are found to have distinct and joint effects on knowledge transfer in M&As, which designate an interesting tradeoff between acquired unit members’ perceptions of the credibility of the acquirer and the usefulness of the advice it provides (Study 2). Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
Management Decision
3 publications, 12%
International Business Review
2 publications, 8%
European Management Journal
2 publications, 8%
International Journal of Management Reviews
2 publications, 8%
Springer Texts in Business and Economics
2 publications, 8%
Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing
1 publication, 4%
European Business Review
1 publication, 4%
International Journal of Emerging Markets
1 publication, 4%
Energies
1 publication, 4%
SN Business & Economics
1 publication, 4%
Human Resource Management Review
1 publication, 4%
Thunderbird International Business Review
1 publication, 4%
JMM International Journal on Media Management
1 publication, 4%
Journal of International Business Studies
1 publication, 4%
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
1 publication, 4%
Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions
1 publication, 4%
Scandinavian Journal of Management
1 publication, 4%
Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing
1 publication, 4%
Journal of Knowledge Management
1 publication, 4%
1
2
3

Publishers

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Emerald
9 publications, 36%
Elsevier
6 publications, 24%
Springer Nature
4 publications, 16%
Wiley
3 publications, 12%
MDPI
1 publication, 4%
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 4%
SAGE
1 publication, 4%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
25
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Yildiz H. E. “Us vs. them” or “us over them”? On the roles of similarity and status in M&As // International Business Review. 2016. Vol. 25. No. 1. pp. 51-65.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Yildiz H. E. “Us vs. them” or “us over them”? On the roles of similarity and status in M&As // International Business Review. 2016. Vol. 25. No. 1. pp. 51-65.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.05.002
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.05.002
TI - “Us vs. them” or “us over them”? On the roles of similarity and status in M&As
T2 - International Business Review
AU - Yildiz, Harun Emre
PY - 2016
DA - 2016/02/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 51-65
IS - 1
VL - 25
SN - 0969-5931
SN - 1598-4869
SN - 2713-8291
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2016_Yildiz,
author = {Harun Emre Yildiz},
title = {“Us vs. them” or “us over them”? On the roles of similarity and status in M&As},
journal = {International Business Review},
year = {2016},
volume = {25},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {feb},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.05.002},
number = {1},
pages = {51--65},
doi = {10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.05.002}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Yildiz, Harun Emre. ““Us vs. them” or “us over them”? On the roles of similarity and status in M&As.” International Business Review, vol. 25, no. 1, Feb. 2016, pp. 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.05.002.