Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q2
Impact factor
4
SJR
0.944
CiteScore
8.3
Categories
Business and International Management
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Areas
Business, Management and Accounting
Years of issue
1970, 1989-2025
journal names
European Business Review
EUR BUS REV
Top-3 citing journals

Sustainability
(1428 citations)

European Business Review
(781 citations)

Frontiers in Psychology
(448 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Deakin University
(20 publications)

University of Ulster
(20 publications)

Linnaeus University
(15 publications)

Niccolò Cusano University
(5 publications)

University of Pretoria
(5 publications)

University of Johannesburg
(4 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 137

Determinants of ICT outsourcing among the locally-owned manufacturers in Malaysia
Yap C.S., Lim Y.M., Jalaludin F.W., Lee T.H.
Purpose
This paper aims to examine the level of information and communication technology (ICT) outsourcing and its determinants in the Malaysian locally owned manufacturing firms. Drawing on the transaction cost theory and the resource-based theory, four determinants – asset specificity, uncertainty, business skills and technical skills – were hypothesized to influence ICT outsourcing.
Design/methodology/approach
Data were collected using a questionnaire survey from 104 manufacturing firms listed on the Directory of Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers. Data were then analyzed using R package partial least squares path modeling.
Findings
The study reveals that slightly over two-thirds (68 per cent) of the surveyed manufacturers either fully or partially outsourced their ICT services. Asset specificity and uncertainty are found to be positively related to the level of ICT outsourcing, which contradict the prediction of the transaction cost theory. On the other hand, business skills and technical skills are not significantly related to the level of ICT outsourcing, which also conflict the resource-based arguments.
Research limitations/implications
The small sample size would not be able to make meaningful conclusion for the population; the small R2 value indicates that other important determinants of ICT outsourcing were not tested in this study, and the transaction cost theory and the resource-based theory do not adequately predict the level of ICT outsourcing in the Malaysian locally owned manufacturers.
Originality/value
The study serves as one of the first studies that tested the determinants of ICT outsourcing using the transaction cost theory and the resource-based theory in locally owned manufacturing firms of a developing country.

An exploratory study on the impact of recruitment process outsourcing on employer branding of an organisation
Gilani H., Jamshed S.
Purpose
This paper aims to focus on “Recruitment Process Outsourcing” (RPO) as a key element of improvement in corporate brand of organisation through using the talent and capabilities of employees. This research explores the linkages and interconnection between the concepts of RPO and its contribution towards the employer branding process. The review of the literature on RPO and employer branding identifies an emergence of conceptual framework based around outsourcing effectiveness and its impact on employer branding.
Design/methodology/approach
Exploratory research was carried out using case study analysis to give clear and deep understanding of the RPO and its impact on employer branding. This was conducted by using the semi-structured interviews with the HR and marketing managers using the qualitative method. The findings propose a conceptual framework which is representative for the organisations engaged in RPO.
Findings
The key findings include talented employees’ role in improving the brand image of any organisation; the development of customers’ perceptions through their attitude and behaviours; the reduction in the HR costs through RPO Services, the responsibility of the organisation taken by RPO which provides the chance for HR professionals and top management to focus on core activities; and the organisational care in selection of the RPO service provider as per their criteria.
Research limitations/implications
This research has been limited to assessing the impact of RPO on the employer branding of manufacturing organisations purely due to access issues. The research clearly establishes a good link between the operationalisation of RPO and its direct influences on an organisation’s employer branding through its outsourced employees. The research clearly highlights the importance of and the vital role played by the outsourced employees and how they need to be nurtured through a strong corporate culture and make them great brand ambassadors.
Practical implications
At the practical level, this study has several managerial implications, as the findings provide a good understanding of the concept of RPO and how it impacts the employer brands of the organisation. The research gives confidence to the HR managers and directors on the importance of outsourced staff members and the need to address the issues concerning the employee branding of an outsourced member of staff. The outcome of the research gives a conceptual model which represents the impact of an outsourced employee on the employer branding process of the organisation. This conceptual model highlights the many different factors that need to be addressed by a HR manager to keep consistency in employee branding of the organisation.
Social implications
The social implications of this research relate to the wellbeing and motivated staff members of an organisation, even though they do not work directly under the brand of the company they serve in. As mentioned in the research findings, the complications of the RPO process usually has drastic and serious impacts on employee attitudes and feelings when it comes to issues like change management, job satisfaction and the sense of belonging to the organisation. By addressing the different factors explored in the conceptual model of this research, an outsourced employee can feel equally motivated and belonging to the organisation they serve in, just as any other permanent member of staff who acts like an ideal brand ambassador for the employer branding of the organisation.
Originality/value
This research is original and adds value to the dynamics of RPO processes by exploring the impact of the process on employer branding of the organisation through its brand ambassadors. This research paves way for further research to be carried out within service organisations where employees play a vital role in being the brand ambassadors of their employer brands.

Local industry technological capability development using outsourcing opportunities
Gewe A.M., Abebe B.B., Azene D.K., Bayu F.G.
Purpose
Technological outsourcing requires possessing the technological capability level by enterprises taking the outsourced activity and further mandates build-up capabilities. Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in developing nations such as Ethiopia are usually equipped with low level of technological capability and could benefit from government-supported or government-initiated outsourcing networks. The current study aims to preliminarily assess performance of outsourcing initiative taken by the Hibret Manufacturing and Machine Building Industry, a subsidiary of a national corporation, in developing technological capability of SMEs in Ethiopia.
Design/methodology/approach
The study used a qualitative research approach through interviews with the parent company officials and owners of SMEs and site visit to these SMEs. Findings are organized in a way to draw lessons to be learned from technological outsourcing examined.
Findings
Technological learning, acquisition of new technologies, market access and process innovation are few capabilities achieved by the involved SMEs. To facilitate and harness these opportunities and further assist in policy ratification, a conceptual framework has been presented and elaborated.
Research limitations/implications
Further investigation into outsourcing procedure and biases are expected to shed further light onto the outsourcing initiative by the parent company. This study drew results from investigation of the SMEs involved. Additional investigation of other SMEs is expected to reveal additional insights.
Originality/value
There is a dearth of literature focusing on exploration of technological outsourcing in low-income developing countries, such as Ethiopia, to build SMEs’ technological capabilities. This research presents insightful contribution to strategic outsourcing to build local technological capability in developing economies.

ISO 37500 – Comparing outsourcing life-cycle models
Babin R., Quayle A.
Purpose
This paper aims to illustrate the value of the outsourcing life cycle, as described in several industry models, including ISO 37500.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors present a comparison of outsourcing life cycles to provide an overview of current practices in the global outsourcing industry.
Findings
Several outsourcing life cycles have been defined by industry associations such as the International Association of Outsourcing Professionals (IAOP) and the National Outsourcing Association (NOA). Academic research has created several outsourcing life cycles, notably the model from the London School of Economics (Cullen and Willcocks, 2005). Finally, commercial models have been defined, for example the Vendor and Sourcing Management model from IDC (2014).
Research limitations/implications
Researchers will find the overview of different life cycles useful in assessing maturity of outsourcing organizations.
Practical implications
Practitioners will find the detailed description of ISO 37500 and the comparative life cycles to be illustrative of different approaches to managing outsourcing transactions. Both buyers and providers will be able to compare their own life cycle to industry standards.
Originality/value
Little or no research has been conducted on how outsourcing life cycles contribute to effective outsourcing. This paper provides a foundation for such research.

Servitization in contract manufacturing – evidence from Polar business cases
Viitamo E., Luoto S., Seppälä T.
Purpose
This paper aims to contribute to the scholarly debate on the origins and nature of industrial servitization. By resorting to contract manufacturing (CM) as an empirical case, it is posited that any product-service solution that a manufacturing firm is capable of delivering on a competitive basis mirrors its goals in value creation and capture, positioning within its value networks and the pool of assets and competences it holds.
Design/methodology/approach
To support this argument, a comparative case study of two CM firms that represent polar cases in the industry was conducted. The primary data were collected through participatory methodology, observations and semi-structured interviews of company representatives. The business experiences of an industry practitioner provided a distinct contribution to the content analysis and modelling.
Findings
It was concluded that servitization becomes endogenous as contract manufacturers aim for higher profitability through the insource of customer activities and hence extend their offering downstream in the supply chain. The findings suggest that the way out of the servitization trap is a shift toward original design and manufacturing business, where high value-adding modules are insourced and integrated into replicable solutions for various types of customers and market segments.
Research limitations/implications
The generalization of the conclusion is constrained by the limited focus on two cases only. More industry and company data are therefore required to further validate this argument. Particularly valuable will be the data on the intermediate business models between the two polar cases.
Originality/value
Building on contested business practices, this paper outlines the logic of competitive strategy in CM on the basis of specific characteristics and implications of the various business concepts. In this case, the principal drivers of servitization are the acquisition of supporting capabilities and insourcing of customer activities. The case study method integrates theory with academic observation and managerial experiences.

Strategic sourcing business models
Vitasek K.
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to describe how seven sourcing models operate along a continuum depending on the complexity of the marketplace and the strategic needs of buyers and suppliers. Studies of business procurement and sourcing practices reveal that collaborative and holistic approaches will increase efficiencies and value in strategic outsourcing relationships.
Design/methodology/approach
The design is based on research and fieldwork from the University of Tennessee and vetted with the Sourcing Industry Group, the Center for Outsourcing Research and Education and the International Association for Contracts and Commercial Management. This work provided the basis and framework for the 2015 book, Strategic Sourcing in the New Economy: Harnessing the Potential of Sourcing Business Models in Modern Procurement.
Findings
Most organizations operate under conventional transaction-based models that are constrained by a formal, legally oriented, risk-averse and liability-based culture. There is growing awareness that transactional-based approaches do not always give each party the intended, or best, results. University of Tennessee research shows how organizations apply alternative output- and outcome-based approaches for complex contracts. That experience demonstrates that alternative Sourcing Business Models are viable approaches to the conventional transactional methods[1]. As senior leaders see positive results from carefully crafted collaborative agreements, momentum grows for both output- and outcome-based approaches.
Practical implications
Education on sourcing business models.
Originality/value
Collaborative outsourcing.

HR outsourcing trends in Malaysia: the undetected tiger
Sim S.C., Avvari V. M., Kaliannan M.
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to provide deeper and broader insights into human resource outsourcing (HRO) trends and practices specific to the Malaysian context.Design/methodology/approachData were collected from HR managers through a questionnaire-based survey, using convenient sampling with random selection.FindingsHRO practices were found to have evolved into second-generation outsourcing, with considerable potential to grow further in the future. Firm size and sector had little or no effect on the degree of HRO. Both cost benefits and resourced-based benefits were key drivers of HRO decisions, with a majority of the firms reporting having achieved these benefits equally and positively. Most of the functions outsourced were traditional-transactional HR functions. Slightly more than half of the HRO decisions were made by top management without the involvement of HR managers. More than half of the firms surveyed intended to do more outsourcing in the near future (i.e. within the next two to five years), including firms that had previously experienced HRO failure.Research limitations/implicationsWhile convenience sampling limits the generalisability of the findings, it is suitable for a study like this, especially as there is no pre-established list of firms outsourcing HR available in Malaysia. The study did not cover trends in either HR shared services or insourcing – either of which could potentially affect future HRO trends in the future. The findings also serve as a warning to future HRO researchers about the importance of contextual knowledge to strengthen the validity of their findings.Practical implicationsThe findings provide both practitioners and service providers with insights into HRO practices and trends in Malaysia, which are comprehensively discussed in the paper.Originality/valueThis paper presents a broad, yet up-to-date, overview of HRO practices and trends specific to the Malaysian context. It covers aspects and details of HRO not explored or explicitly discussed before.

Strategic manoeuvers in outsourcing arrangements
Plugge A., Borman M., Janssen M.
Purpose
Adaptation is often seen as a key competitive advantage for outsourcing vendors. Outsourcing research has often assumed that vendor capabilities are static. However, as a result of uncertainties and/or changes in the client environment, vendors need to be able to adapt their outsourcing capabilities. The aim of our research is to compare two contrasting outsourcing approaches and illustrate how an adaptive approach may deliver better results for clients in the long term.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper uses a combination of literature and case study research. A retrospective case study approach was adopted, using interviews, observations and analysis of reports. Two case studies utilizing contrasting clients approaches were investigated and compared. In one of the case studies, the client reorganized activities first and then outsourced them, while in the other, the client did the reverse – outsourced first and then reorganized.
Findings
The findings indicate that reorganizing first and outsourcing afterwards contributes to a more controlled implementation, which results in a more defined and stable set of vendor outsourcing capabilities that contributed to short-term success. In contrast, outsourcing first and reorganizing later demonstrates a less controlled redesign of the client’s organizational structure, which requires a malleable set of outsourcing capabilities to accommodate future change. The latter strategic manoeuver results in an extended adaptation period, as some capabilities need to be developed over time. However, it may improve success over time as subsequent changes in the client environment can be catered for in a better way.
Research limitations/implications
Only two explorative case studies were performed, limiting confidence in the degree of generalization of the results. We plea for more research on the effect of context dependency as various contingencies may impact the adaptation of outsourcing capabilities; for example, the volatility of the client’s market or the stability of the technology concerned.
Practical implications
When a client applies a proactive manoeuver, reorganizing first and then applying outsourcing, the number of adaptive capabilities required of the outsourcing vendor is reduced, limiting the risk for the client in the short term. In the longer term, however, subsequent change requirements may be less well-accommodated.
Originality/value
Strategic manoeuvers within an outsourcing context have received limited attention in research. As far as we know, this is the first empirical research that investigates the benefits of vendors having adaptive capability.

Implementing environmental sustainability in logistics operations: a case study
Jørsfeldt L.M., Hvolby H., Nguyen V.T.
Purpose
The purpose of the study is to develop an in-depth understanding of how supplier–buyer relationships, particularly in operational coordination, are affected when a company introduces an environmental sustainability target (CO2 emissions reduction) into its supply chain operations. The investigation focuses on the joint activities of the logistics function of the company (buyer) and the third-party logistics providers (3PLs) (suppliers).
Design/methodology/approach
This single-case study takes the perspective of a sustainability-conscious Danish company that outsources logistics services to 3PLs but maintains internal logistics as a boundary function. The value offering point/order penetration point (VOP/OPP) methodology is used.
Findings
The results showed that the introduction of sustainability led to the emergence of multiple decoupling points in both the demand and the supply chains. The logistics function therefore began to play the role of “integrator” across both the functions in the company and the organizations in the supply chain. The findings indicate the need to develop clear cross-functional and inter-organizational coordination mechanisms.
Research limitations/implications
This is a single-case study in a Danish context.
Practical implications
The study provides rich insights into managing the implementation of sustainability in supply chain operations, and it exemplifies how the VOP/OPP tool can be applied by 3PLs to develop sustainable offerings.
Originality/value
The current research on sustainable supply chain management takes into account the entire supply chain. In contrast, this study focuses on the logistics function. The VOP/OPP concept is used to capture the processes used in actual practice, and both the buyer and the supplier are considered potential co-producers of value.

Analysis and management of risks associated with outsourcing in China
El Fadil J., St-Pierre J.
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to analyse the risks associated with outsourcing production to emerging countries with lower labour costs, namely China, and study actions and plans used to reduce the influence of factors/drivers that induce these risks.
Design/methodology/approach
This research uses a multiple case-study methodology, involving seven Canadian manufacturing firms that have chosen an outsourcing strategy in China. It is based on a particular approach of classifying factors/drivers that may generate risks related to this strategy and on interviews with two managers per firm to reduce personal bias.
Findings
In each of the seven cases studied, outsourcing was chosen to take advantage of lower labour costs in China, but in reality, costs were higher than expected due to unforeseen factors inherent to the risks involved. This study reveals that risks generated by factors/drivers such as lack of experience, reduced control over foreign operations and cultural differences are of major concern for managers outsourcing part of their production to China. However, according to some executives that were interviewed, certain actions can be taken by firms to overcome the negative influence of these factors/drivers. Furthermore, some risks may have multiple causes or be induced by other risks.
Research limitations/implications
The sample of this study was composed of firms from different industrial sectors, and the authors were therefore unable to analyse sector-specific risks. As the industrial sector has an impact on the technical complexity of the products and their components, it would be appropriate to reconduct our research using samples drawn from similar sectors.
Practical implications
These findings can help guide the decisions of managers wishing to outsource some of their activities to China and other emerging countries. They will contribute to the success of outsourcing strategies to these countries, as they reveal the risks associated with these strategies and the ways to deal with factors/drivers that can induce them. For example, building long-term relationships with Chinese partners based on collaboration, trust and mutual benefit as well as conducting a rigorous prospecting phase and taking time to select the right subcontractor can have a major impact on reducing risks.
Originality/value
The main contribution of this work is the analysis of risks associated with outsourcing to China, based on a categorisation of factors/drivers that can generate these risks, and the study of how firms manage these factors/drivers and control their negative effects. The nature of the practices and actions used to manage important risks depends on the characteristics of the companies, their size, resources and the products they outsource.

A modified ANP and fuzzy inference system based approach for risk assessment of in-house and third party e-procurement systems
Ramkumar M.
Purpose
The increasing complexity and dynamism of new technology implemented or to implement have imposed substantial uncertainties and subjectivities in the risk assessment process. This paper aims to present a risk assessment methodology for e-procurement implementation based on modified analytic network process (ANP) coupled with fuzzy inference systems.
Design/methodology/approach
ANP is modified in such a way that the experts can provide necessary data precise numerical value, a range of numerical values, a linguistic term or a fuzzy number. The proposed methodology incorporates knowledge and judgements obtained from experts to carry out identification of risk factors and to assess the risk magnitude of the identified risk factors based on factor index, risk likelihood and risk severity.
Findings
Risk magnitude of third party systems are found to be minor with a belief of 100 per cent, and for in-house systems, the risk is found to be between minor with a belief of 30 per cent and major of 70 per cent. The results indicate that by using the proposed methodology, the technological risk assessment of new technology can be done effectively and efficiently.
Research limitations/implications
Using the results of this study, the practitioners can better know the pros and cons of implementing both in-house and third party e-procurement systems.
Originality/value
The modified ANP is used mainly to structure and prioritize the diverse risk factors. Finally, an illustrative example on technological risk assessment of both in-house and third party e-procurement systems is used to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed methodology in real life situations.

Outsourcing in the Persian Gulf petroleum supply chain
Modarress B., Ansari A., Thies E.
Purpose
– The purpose of this study is to identify the challenges, the benefits, the risks and the motives of petroleum companies in the Persian Gulf toward outsourcing strategy. While the petroleum companies are faced with massive costs of operation that stem from the aging infrastructure, human capital deficit, inefficient fragmented business processes and lack of access to new technologies, outsourcing strategy toward cost savings and the overt and covert resistance of management and employees are significant barriers for creation of continuous process.
Design/methodology/approach
– Based on the review of existing literature, the industry
'
s archives and in-depth personal interviews with senior executives of the national oil and gas companies in five Gulf countries and seven global outsourcing companies and 87 survey responses, this study develops a methodological framework which substantiates or refutes the hypotheses based on the objectives: industry challenges are the driving forces behind outsourcing strategy; the potential risks of cost savings of outsourcing outweigh the consequential loss in control over the product or service, companies
'
safety and security of the region.
Findings
– The findings indicate that the oil and gas exporters have mixed but broad positive view of outsourcing strategy. While outsourcing could provide savings across the entire supply chain, it also generates a distracting resistance due to the fear of unknown in a complex range of culture, infrastructures and sequential processes that requires resiliency for continuity of operations.
Originality/value
– This study is the first of its kind in the Persian Gulf oil and gas industry investigating the implementation of outsourcing strategy. The result of this investigation reveals the compromise between the potential benefits in cost reduction and the security of petroleum supply. This study contributes to all who are in the industry or who are involved with it to share a clear assessment of the future.

IT outsourcing management in Poland – trends and performance
Sobinska M., Willcocks L.
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to find how mature the Polish commercial production companies are in their information technology (IT) sourcing practices, what they do, the practices that are successful, the challenges experienced and the outcomes.The paper presents and critically evaluates the results of a study of IT outsourcing management processes in selected industrial enterprises operating in Poland. Dynamic business contexts, globalisation and advances in IT make the development of IT sourcing models challenging in both theory and practice. This paper examines the principles and practice of sourcing IT and business processes in Poland, a country much under-represented in the literature. Little research has been conducted on the strategic rationale behind IT sourcing decisions, the resulting challenges and the potential or actual consequences of such decisions. This paper addresses these gaps in the understanding of IT sourcing processes by way of examining the types of sourcing models and solutions among manufacturing companies operating in Poland, and by identifying the most problematic and critical factors in effective IT sourcing collaborations. The outcomes are assessed against findings from the broader empirical outsourcing literature, and lessons are drawn for Polish client firms and those in similar economies.
Design/methodology/approach
– A survey methodology of a limited number of organisations in Poland was used. The study was designed to address the process of managing IT sourcing relations in production companies operating in Poland. The main objective of the study was to formulate working hypotheses to be used in further research on the sourcing models used in the IT sphere. Additionally, the study was designed to provide information on: the potential respondent reactions to the research problem, the understanding of the notions and terms used in the survey questionnaire and the evaluation of the research instrument itself.
Findings
– Organisations (and their employees) are generally well aware of their IT needs, and that they select quite well providers that suit their particular requirements. In their selection processes, organisations carefully consider not only the providers’ experience and the range of services on offer but also their flexibility in response to the client’s demands, the location and the trust formed in the course of previous cooperation. Communication between the parties typically takes the form of telephone conversations and e-mails. The majority of respondents reported more than one type of problems faced in the course of outsourcing. Problems concentrated in the areas of communication (52 per cent) and organisation (48 per cent), followed by difficulties in enforcing the terms of the contract.
Research limitations/implications
– It is a selective sample, focuses only on production companies and does not look at the offshore outsourcing market that has grown up in Poland, but rather what domestic polish organisations do in their sourcing practices.
Practical implications
– The organisations still struggle with the organisation and management of relations with their external service providers while getting reasonable results. They have much to learn from the published literature on managing the outsourcing life cycle.
Social implications
– There is a need for better inter-organisational cooperation.
Originality/value
– Poland is very underrepresented in the outsourcing literature – there are no examples of surveys like this in the English literature.

Open innovation: an analysis of twelve years of research
Hossain M., Anees-ur-Rehman M.
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to explore patterns and developments in the open innovation literature.
Design/methodology/approach
– A bibliometric analysis was performed by classifying 411 articles in a range of key attributes.
Findings
– Europe (61 per cent) as a region of data source was higher than all other regions together. As a unit of analysis, firm level (65 per cent) was more than all other levels together. Qualitative studies were mostly case-based, and quantitative studies were largely based on survey and panel data. Regression was a widely used analytical technique.
Originality/value
– The authors identified avenues to address overlooked research topics, increase cross-continental collaboration, diversity of research methods beyond case study and survey, etc. Based on findings, the authors outlined some future research directions.

Governance structure in IT outsourcing: a network perspective
Lin T., Hekkala R.
Purpose– The governance of information technology outsourcing (ITO) has been identified as an essential determinant for ITO success. Prior studies have shed light on effective governance structures in different organizational contexts. This study aims to advance this prior knowledge by exploring how interpersonal networks, as an important aspect of such context, reflect and influence ITO governance.Design/methodology/approach– A single case study was conducted from a vendor’s perspective in an ITO dyad. Social network analysis was leveraged to reveal the interpersonal networks, with whole-network analysis on 24 team members in an ITO vendor company. In addition, open-ended interviews with six selected team members were utilized to identify the perceived governance structure.Findings– The findings of this study suggest certain features of interpersonal networks, i.e. network density and cross-network comparison, can reflect governance structure in multiple aspects. Meanwhile, the authors also argue that interpersonal networks can influence the form of governance structure.Research limitations/implications– As a single case study, the context of the research site cannot be ignored in the inference of findings. To increase the confidence for further generalization, future empirical studies are needed especially in contrasting sites, such as ITO relations based on network governance.Originality/value– This study associates intra-organizational characteristics of the vendor to the inter-organizational governance structure of the ITO relationship. It also provides an innovative methodology for both researchers and practitioners to assess ITO governance structure.
Top-100
Citing journals
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
|
|
Sustainability
1428 citations, 4.13%
|
|
European Business Review
781 citations, 2.26%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
448 citations, 1.29%
|
|
Journal of Business Research
413 citations, 1.19%
|
|
Cogent Business and Management
404 citations, 1.17%
|
|
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
309 citations, 0.89%
|
|
Heliyon
302 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
291 citations, 0.84%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
265 citations, 0.77%
|
|
SAGE Open
238 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
178 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Business Strategy and the Environment
175 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing
167 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Management Decision
157 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Industrial Marketing Management
147 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Journal of Islamic Marketing
141 citations, 0.41%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
140 citations, 0.4%
|
|
PLoS ONE
140 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Benchmarking
133 citations, 0.38%
|
|
International Business Review
130 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Kybernetes
129 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Current Psychology
118 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Business Process Management Journal
116 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Knowledge Management
114 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
114 citations, 0.33%
|
|
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
113 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
113 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
109 citations, 0.31%
|
|
International Journal of Hospitality Management
108 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics
108 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Education and Information Technologies
101 citations, 0.29%
|
|
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
93 citations, 0.27%
|
|
British Food Journal
93 citations, 0.27%
|
|
International Marketing Review
89 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Marketing Intelligence and Planning
87 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Social Responsibility Journal
86 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Contributions to Management Science
84 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
83 citations, 0.24%
|
|
International Journal of Emerging Markets
82 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Business Ethics
80 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Behavioral Sciences
80 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Corporate Governance (Bingley)
79 citations, 0.23%
|
|
European Journal of Marketing
75 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights
74 citations, 0.21%
|
|
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
73 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Handbook of Research on Global Business Opportunities
72 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Administrative Sciences
71 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
68 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development
62 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of International Entrepreneurship
62 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Advances in Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, and E-Services
61 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Marketing Management
60 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Technology in Society
58 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Journal of Bank Marketing
55 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management
54 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Supply Chain Management
53 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Problems and Perspectives in Management
51 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of East-West Business
50 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Thunderbird International Business Review
50 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Operations and Production Management
48 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Service Management
48 citations, 0.14%
|
|
TQM Journal
47 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Product and Brand Management
45 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal
43 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Outsourcing Management for Supply Chain Operations and Logistics Service
42 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Service Theory and Practice
41 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Services Marketing
41 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of World Business
41 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research
41 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Advances in Human Resources Management and Organizational Development
41 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management
40 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Service Business
40 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Baltic Journal of Management
40 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
40 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
39 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Brand Management
39 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of International Management
39 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management
39 citations, 0.11%
|
|
International Journal of Organizational Analysis
39 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Corporate Ownership and Control
39 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Marketing Theory
38 citations, 0.11%
|
|
European Management Journal
38 citations, 0.11%
|
|
International Journal of Logistics Management
38 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of the Knowledge Economy
38 citations, 0.11%
|
|
International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences
38 citations, 0.11%
|
|
International Journal of Human Resource Management
38 citations, 0.11%
|
|
IEEE Access
38 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Service Industries Journal
37 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management
36 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Management Development
36 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Industrial Management and Data Systems
36 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Strategic Marketing
35 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Small Business Management
35 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Management Research Review
35 citations, 0.1%
|
|
EuroMed Journal of Business
35 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Management of Environmental Quality
34 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Review of International Business and Strategy
34 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Total Quality Management and Business Excellence
32 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Intellectual Capital
31 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Global Business Review
31 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
|
Citing publishers
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
|
|
Emerald
9332 citations, 26.96%
|
|
Elsevier
4930 citations, 14.24%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
3892 citations, 11.24%
|
|
Springer Nature
3730 citations, 10.77%
|
|
MDPI
2659 citations, 7.68%
|
|
Wiley
1572 citations, 4.54%
|
|
SAGE
1430 citations, 4.13%
|
|
IGI Global
975 citations, 2.82%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
744 citations, 2.15%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
643 citations, 1.86%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
299 citations, 0.86%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
199 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
162 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
146 citations, 0.42%
|
|
World Scientific
134 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
118 citations, 0.34%
|
|
AOSIS
117 citations, 0.34%
|
|
EDP Sciences
98 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
92 citations, 0.27%
|
|
SciELO
85 citations, 0.25%
|
|
IOP Publishing
74 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
73 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
72 citations, 0.21%
|
|
AIP Publishing
61 citations, 0.18%
|
|
JMIR Publications
60 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
59 citations, 0.17%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
58 citations, 0.17%
|
|
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
56 citations, 0.16%
|
|
CAIRN
45 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
39 citations, 0.11%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
39 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Cognizant, LLC
36 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
31 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
27 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Oxford University Press
24 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
21 citations, 0.06%
|
|
IntechOpen
21 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Academy of Management
19 citations, 0.05%
|
|
F1000 Research
18 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
18 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Gyandhara International Academic Publications
16 citations, 0.05%
|
|
IOS Press
15 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Marketing Association
14 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
14 citations, 0.04%
|
|
N T C Publications Ltd.
13 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Science Alert
12 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Inderscience Publishers
12 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
10 citations, 0.03%
|
|
International Management Development Association
10 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society for Quality
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Editura Economica
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Mackenzie Presbyterian University
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Association of Professional Managers in South Africa
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Brazilian Administration Review
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society of Transportation and Logistics
8 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administracao de Empresas de Sao Paulo
8 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
8 citations, 0.02%
|
|
OpenEdition
8 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Intellect
8 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universidade Federal de São Carlos
8 citations, 0.02%
|
|
European Academy of Management and Business Economics
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academic Journals
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japan Marketing Academy
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Accounting Association
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
University of Warsaw
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Vilnius University Press
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Fakulteta za Organizacijske Vede, Univerza v Mariboru
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Hans Publishers
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Publishing House Helvetica (Publications)
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korea Distribution Science Association (KODISA)
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Lavoisier
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Wageningen Academic Publishers
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Bundesvereinigung Logistik (BVL)
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Japan Society of Polymer Processing
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
AMO Publisher
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Prague University of Economics and Business
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Brill
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Index Copernicus
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
International Food and Agribusiness Management Association
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Oxford Brookes University
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Borsa Istanbul Anonim Sirketi
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Sumy State University
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
DMSP Research Center, Paris-Dauphine University
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
BMJ
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Thomas Telford
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
EJournal Publishing
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
CSRC Publishing, Center for Sustainability Research and Consultancy
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
|
|
Deakin University
20 publications, 1.19%
|
|
University of Ulster
20 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Linnaeus University
15 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of Huddersfield
13 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Manchester Metropolitan University
11 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Halmstad University
10 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
8 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Windsor
8 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
7 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Monash University
7 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Sheffield Hallam University
7 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology
6 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Pretoria
6 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
6 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Aalto University
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Vaasa
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Hanken School of Economics
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
National Chung Hsing University
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Niccolò Cusano University
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Griffith University
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Wollongong
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Queen's University Belfast
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Leeds
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Valencia
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Murcia
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
De Montfort University
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Cranfield University
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Texas at San Antonio
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Surrey
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Hull
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Bradford
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Heriot-Watt University
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of New South Wales
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Warwick
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Liverpool John Moores University
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Birmingham
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Auckland
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Curtin University
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Robert Gordon University
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Swansea University
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Tecnológico de Monterrey
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Vigo
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Texas A&M University
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Quinnipiac University
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
International University of Rabat
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
United Arab Emirates University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Sharjah
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Istanbul University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Uppsala University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Parthenope University of Naples
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Petra University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Turin
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Brunel University London
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Waikato
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Newcastle Australia
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Victoria University (Australia)
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Cape Town
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of South Africa
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Illinois State University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Ghana
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Patras
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Athens University of Economics and Business
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Coimbra
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Anglia Ruskin University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Coventry University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Stirling
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Université de Lille
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Salford
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Iran University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
American University of Sharjah
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
National University of Sciences & Technology
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Yeditepe University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Lucknow
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Dumlupinar University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Jammu
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Mumbai
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Beykent University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Sinop University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Ghent University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Chalmers University of Technology
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Sunway University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Borås
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
American University of Beirut
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Aalborg University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Aston University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Oxford Brookes University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Palermo
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Nottingham Trent University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Loughborough University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Yuan Ze University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Otago
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Victoria University of Wellington
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
|
|
Niccolò Cusano University
5 publications, 2.08%
|
|
University of Pretoria
5 publications, 2.08%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
4 publications, 1.67%
|
|
International University of Rabat
4 publications, 1.67%
|
|
Tecnológico de Monterrey
3 publications, 1.25%
|
|
National University of Sciences & Technology
2 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Jammu
2 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Sinop University
2 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Aalborg University
2 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Liverpool John Moores University
2 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Palermo
2 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Prince of Songkla University
2 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Groningen
2 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Beira Interior
2 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Valencia
2 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Florida International University
2 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Suez Canal University
2 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Prince Sultan University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Sharif University of Technology
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
United Arab Emirates University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Sharjah
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Zayed University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Delhi
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Abu Dhabi University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Canadian University of Dubai
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Government College University, Faisalabad
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Management and Technology
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of the Punjab
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Iqra University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Bahria University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
The Islamia University of Bahawalpur
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Lahore
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Gebze Technical University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Urmia University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Kocaeli University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Lucknow
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Dumlupinar University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Ranchi
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Bodh Gaya
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Mumbai
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
American University of Cyprus
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Near East University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Balikesir University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Ordu University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Bandirma Onyedi Eylul University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Istanbul Commerce University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University Putra Malaysia
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Taylor's University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Sunway University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Linnaeus University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Borås
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Mälardalen University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Parthenope University of Naples
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Petra University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Jadara University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Shenzhen University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Sohar University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Université Catholique de Louvain
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Turin
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Holy Spirit University of Kaslik
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Saint Joseph University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Manchester
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Loughborough University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Birmingham
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Stavanger
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Foggia
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Waikato
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Charles Sturt University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Notre Dame Australia
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of KwaZulu-Natal
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
North-West University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Durban University of Technology
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Gadjah Mada University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Telkom University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Kwangwoon University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Ghana
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Cape Coast
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Tirana
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Botho University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Austral University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Western Illinois University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
McGill University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Seville
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Hamburg University of Technology
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Puerto Rico
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Innsbruck
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–La Crosse
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Porto
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Université Paris-Est Créteil
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Poznań University of Economics and Business
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 253, 15.01%
United Kingdom
253 publications, 15.01%
|
USA
|
USA, 132, 7.83%
USA
132 publications, 7.83%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 61, 3.62%
Australia
61 publications, 3.62%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 41, 2.43%
Sweden
41 publications, 2.43%
|
France
|
France, 35, 2.08%
France
35 publications, 2.08%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 34, 2.02%
Spain
34 publications, 2.02%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 32, 1.9%
Norway
32 publications, 1.9%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 29, 1.72%
Finland
29 publications, 1.72%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 28, 1.66%
South Africa
28 publications, 1.66%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 25, 1.48%
Brazil
25 publications, 1.48%
|
India
|
India, 21, 1.25%
India
21 publications, 1.25%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 20, 1.19%
Greece
20 publications, 1.19%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 20, 1.19%
Turkey
20 publications, 1.19%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 19, 1.13%
Italy
19 publications, 1.13%
|
China
|
China, 16, 0.95%
China
16 publications, 0.95%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 16, 0.95%
Canada
16 publications, 0.95%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 14, 0.83%
New Zealand
14 publications, 0.83%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 13, 0.77%
Portugal
13 publications, 0.77%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 12, 0.71%
Germany
12 publications, 0.71%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 12, 0.71%
UAE
12 publications, 0.71%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 10, 0.59%
Netherlands
10 publications, 0.59%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 9, 0.53%
Pakistan
9 publications, 0.53%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 8, 0.47%
Denmark
8 publications, 0.47%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 8, 0.47%
Iran
8 publications, 0.47%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 8, 0.47%
Colombia
8 publications, 0.47%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 6, 0.36%
Ghana
6 publications, 0.36%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 6, 0.36%
Lebanon
6 publications, 0.36%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 6, 0.36%
Mexico
6 publications, 0.36%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 5, 0.3%
Belgium
5 publications, 0.3%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 5, 0.3%
Egypt
5 publications, 0.3%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 5, 0.3%
Jordan
5 publications, 0.3%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 5, 0.3%
Cyprus
5 publications, 0.3%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 5, 0.3%
Malaysia
5 publications, 0.3%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 4, 0.24%
Russia
4 publications, 0.24%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 4, 0.24%
Ireland
4 publications, 0.24%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 4, 0.24%
Tunisia
4 publications, 0.24%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 3, 0.18%
Poland
3 publications, 0.18%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 3, 0.18%
Saudi Arabia
3 publications, 0.18%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 3, 0.18%
Thailand
3 publications, 0.18%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 3, 0.18%
Switzerland
3 publications, 0.18%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 0.12%
Austria
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 2, 0.12%
Bangladesh
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 2, 0.12%
Bulgaria
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 2, 0.12%
Vietnam
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 2, 0.12%
Israel
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Mauritius
|
Mauritius, 2, 0.12%
Mauritius
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 2, 0.12%
Oman
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 2, 0.12%
Peru
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 2, 0.12%
Puerto Rico
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 2, 0.12%
Republic of Korea
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.12%
Romania
2 publications, 0.12%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 2, 0.12%
North Macedonia
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 2, 0.12%
Singapore
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.12%
Chile
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 2, 0.12%
Japan
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Albania
|
Albania, 1, 0.06%
Albania
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0.06%
Algeria
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.06%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1, 0.06%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 1, 0.06%
Botswana
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.06%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.06%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.06%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.06%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.06%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.06%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Namibia
|
Namibia, 1, 0.06%
Namibia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.06%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Show all (38 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
|
France
|
France, 14, 5.83%
France
14 publications, 5.83%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 12, 5%
South Africa
12 publications, 5%
|
India
|
India, 11, 4.58%
India
11 publications, 4.58%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 10, 4.17%
Italy
10 publications, 4.17%
|
USA
|
USA, 8, 3.33%
USA
8 publications, 3.33%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 8, 3.33%
Brazil
8 publications, 3.33%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 7, 2.92%
United Kingdom
7 publications, 2.92%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 7, 2.92%
Pakistan
7 publications, 2.92%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 6, 2.5%
Portugal
6 publications, 2.5%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 6, 2.5%
Spain
6 publications, 2.5%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 6, 2.5%
UAE
6 publications, 2.5%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 5, 2.08%
Colombia
5 publications, 2.08%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 5, 2.08%
Mexico
5 publications, 2.08%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 5, 2.08%
Turkey
5 publications, 2.08%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 4, 1.67%
Lebanon
4 publications, 1.67%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 4, 1.67%
Norway
4 publications, 1.67%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 3, 1.25%
Australia
3 publications, 1.25%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 3, 1.25%
Ghana
3 publications, 1.25%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 3, 1.25%
Egypt
3 publications, 1.25%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 3, 1.25%
Jordan
3 publications, 1.25%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 3, 1.25%
Malaysia
3 publications, 1.25%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 3, 1.25%
Poland
3 publications, 1.25%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 3, 1.25%
Tunisia
3 publications, 1.25%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 3, 1.25%
Sweden
3 publications, 1.25%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 2, 0.83%
Bangladesh
2 publications, 0.83%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 2, 0.83%
Vietnam
2 publications, 0.83%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.83%
Denmark
2 publications, 0.83%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 2, 0.83%
Iran
2 publications, 0.83%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 2, 0.83%
Cyprus
2 publications, 0.83%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 2, 0.83%
Netherlands
2 publications, 0.83%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 2, 0.83%
Puerto Rico
2 publications, 0.83%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 2, 0.83%
Republic of Korea
2 publications, 0.83%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.83%
Romania
2 publications, 0.83%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 2, 0.83%
Thailand
2 publications, 0.83%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 1, 0.42%
Germany
1 publication, 0.42%
|
China
|
China, 1, 0.42%
China
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 0.42%
Austria
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Albania
|
Albania, 1, 0.42%
Albania
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.42%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.42%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 1, 0.42%
Botswana
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.42%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.42%
Greece
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.42%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.42%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 1, 0.42%
Canada
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.42%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Namibia
|
Namibia, 1, 0.42%
Namibia
1 publication, 0.42%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 1, 0.42%
New Zealand
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0.42%
Oman
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.42%
Peru
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.42%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.42%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 1, 0.42%
North Macedonia
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.42%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.42%
Finland
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.42%
Chile
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Show all (26 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
2 profile journal articles
De Justo
49 publications,
359 citations
h-index: 12
1 profile journal article
Fernandes Cristina
127 publications,
4 639 citations
h-index: 34