Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): What we know and what is left to attain Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence
Sajid Ali
1
,
Tamer Abuhmed
2
,
Shaker El Sappagh
2, 3, 4
,
Khan Muhammad
5
,
Jose M. Alonso-Moral
6
,
Roberto Confalonieri
7
,
Riccardo Guidotti
8
,
Javier Del Ser
9, 10
,
Natalia Díaz-Rodríguez
11
,
Francisco Herrera
11
3
Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Galala University, Suez 435611, Egypt
|
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2023-11-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 4.128
CiteScore: 24.1
Impact factor: 15.5
ISSN: 15662535, 18726305
Hardware and Architecture
Information Systems
Software
Signal Processing
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is currently being utilized in a wide range of sophisticated applications, but the outcomes of many AI models are challenging to comprehend and trust due to their black-box nature. Usually, it is essential to understand the reasoning behind an AI model’s decision-making. Thus, the need for eXplainable AI (XAI) methods for improving trust in AI models has arisen. XAI has become a popular research subject within the AI field in recent years. Existing survey papers have tackled the concepts of XAI, its general terms, and post-hoc explainability methods but there have not been any reviews that have looked at the assessment methods, available tools, XAI datasets, and other related aspects. Therefore, in this comprehensive study, we provide readers with an overview of the current research and trends in this rapidly emerging area with a case study example. The study starts by explaining the background of XAI, common definitions, and summarizing recently proposed techniques in XAI for supervised machine learning. The review divides XAI techniques into four axes using a hierarchical categorization system: (i) data explainability, (ii) model explainability, (iii) post-hoc explainability, and (iv) assessment of explanations. We also introduce available evaluation metrics as well as open-source packages and datasets with future research directions. Then, the significance of explainability in terms of legal demands, user viewpoints, and application orientation is outlined, termed as XAI concerns. This paper advocates for tailoring explanation content to specific user types. An examination of XAI techniques and evaluation was conducted by looking at 410 critical articles, published between January 2016 and October 2022, in reputed journals and using a wide range of research databases as a source of information. The article is aimed at XAI researchers who are interested in making their AI models more trustworthy, as well as towards researchers from other disciplines who are looking for effective XAI methods to complete tasks with confidence while communicating meaning from data.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
29 publications, 3.01%
|
|
|
IEEE Access
25 publications, 2.6%
|
|
|
Information Fusion
18 publications, 1.87%
|
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
18 publications, 1.87%
|
|
|
Communications in Computer and Information Science
16 publications, 1.66%
|
|
|
Electronics (Switzerland)
12 publications, 1.25%
|
|
|
Scientific Reports
11 publications, 1.14%
|
|
|
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
10 publications, 1.04%
|
|
|
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
10 publications, 1.04%
|
|
|
Computers in Biology and Medicine
9 publications, 0.94%
|
|
|
Expert Systems with Applications
8 publications, 0.83%
|
|
|
Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics
7 publications, 0.73%
|
|
|
ACM Computing Surveys
7 publications, 0.73%
|
|
|
Artificial Intelligence Review
7 publications, 0.73%
|
|
|
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
6 publications, 0.62%
|
|
|
Big Data and Cognitive Computing
6 publications, 0.62%
|
|
|
Mathematics
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
|
Neural Computing and Applications
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
|
Cognitive Computation
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
|
Neurocomputing
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
|
Computers and Industrial Engineering
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
|
Energies
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
|
Information (Switzerland)
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
|
Results in Engineering
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
|
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
4 publications, 0.42%
|
|
|
Journal of Medical Internet Research
4 publications, 0.42%
|
|
|
Neural Networks
4 publications, 0.42%
|
|
|
Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction
4 publications, 0.42%
|
|
|
Multimedia Tools and Applications
4 publications, 0.42%
|
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
Publishers
|
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
|
Elsevier
249 publications, 25.88%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
221 publications, 22.97%
|
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
159 publications, 16.53%
|
|
|
MDPI
100 publications, 10.4%
|
|
|
Wiley
43 publications, 4.47%
|
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
38 publications, 3.95%
|
|
|
IGI Global
23 publications, 2.39%
|
|
|
SAGE
16 publications, 1.66%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
15 publications, 1.56%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
14 publications, 1.46%
|
|
|
JMIR Publications
8 publications, 0.83%
|
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
8 publications, 0.83%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
8 publications, 0.83%
|
|
|
Emerald
7 publications, 0.73%
|
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
4 publications, 0.42%
|
|
|
IOP Publishing
4 publications, 0.42%
|
|
|
American Geophysical Union
2 publications, 0.21%
|
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
2 publications, 0.21%
|
|
|
AME Publishing Company
2 publications, 0.21%
|
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
2 publications, 0.21%
|
|
|
Alexandria University
1 publication, 0.1%
|
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
1 publication, 0.1%
|
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1 publication, 0.1%
|
|
|
IntechOpen
1 publication, 0.1%
|
|
|
Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego
1 publication, 0.1%
|
|
|
FSFEI HE Don State Technical University
1 publication, 0.1%
|
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
1 publication, 0.1%
|
|
|
50
100
150
200
250
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
969
Total citations:
969
Citations from 2024:
891
(92.62%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Ali S. et al. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): What we know and what is left to attain Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence // Information Fusion. 2023. Vol. 99. p. 101805.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Ali S., Abuhmed T., El Sappagh S., Muhammad K., Alonso-Moral J. M., Confalonieri R., Guidotti R., Ser J. D., Díaz-Rodríguez N., Herrera F. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): What we know and what is left to attain Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence // Information Fusion. 2023. Vol. 99. p. 101805.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805
TI - Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): What we know and what is left to attain Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence
T2 - Information Fusion
AU - Ali, Sajid
AU - Abuhmed, Tamer
AU - El Sappagh, Shaker
AU - Muhammad, Khan
AU - Alonso-Moral, Jose M.
AU - Confalonieri, Roberto
AU - Guidotti, Riccardo
AU - Ser, Javier Del
AU - Díaz-Rodríguez, Natalia
AU - Herrera, Francisco
PY - 2023
DA - 2023/11/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 101805
VL - 99
SN - 1566-2535
SN - 1872-6305
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2023_Ali,
author = {Sajid Ali and Tamer Abuhmed and Shaker El Sappagh and Khan Muhammad and Jose M. Alonso-Moral and Roberto Confalonieri and Riccardo Guidotti and Javier Del Ser and Natalia Díaz-Rodríguez and Francisco Herrera},
title = {Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): What we know and what is left to attain Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence},
journal = {Information Fusion},
year = {2023},
volume = {99},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {nov},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805},
pages = {101805},
doi = {10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805}
}