Journal of Aging Studies, volume 31, pages 171-181
From whom do older persons prefer support? The case of rural Thailand
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2014-12-01
Journal:
Journal of Aging Studies
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR: 0.654
CiteScore: 3.2
Impact factor: 1.8
ISSN: 08904065, 1879193X
General Medicine
Health Policy
Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Abstract
This study explores rural elderly preferences for support across a multi-dimensional measure of elderly care needs. Applying a framework developed in the U.S. to Thailand for the first time, five diverse types of support are considered: meal preparation, personal care, transportation, financial support, and emotional support. The emphasis is on preferences for care and not actual care received. The data are from focus group discussions conducted in seven villages in Nang Rong district, northeastern Thailand. Thailand and the study site represent the social and economic conditions faced by many rapidly industrializing places-where there has been a dramatic demographic transition (lowered fertility and substantial out-migration), growing numbers of older persons remaining in rural settings, and limited publically-financed elderly care or market-based elder care available for purchase. For this study, in each village, male and female older persons aged 60 and over participated in the focus group discussions. As part of the discussion, focus group participants were asked to rank their first four preferences by type of support. Male and female older persons' preferences were slightly different for genderized tasks. In addition, social closeness and geographical proximity mattered. Traditional matrilocal residence patterns contributed to the perceptions of the older persons. Neighbors were preferred when kin were not available. Preferences inform strategic choices by older persons given the context of available resources. Understanding preferences and strategic choices among the older persons can help policy makers tailor programs more effectively and efficiently, without jeopardizing elderly well-being.
Found
Found
Top-30
Journals
1
2
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
2 publications, 5.56%
|
|
Australasian Journal on Ageing
2 publications, 5.56%
|
|
Open Public Health Journal
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Journal of Services Marketing
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Inquiry (United States)
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Outlook on Agriculture
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Chronic Illness
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Health Education Journal
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Journal of Transcultural Nursing
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Social Sciences
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Sustainability
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Applied Research in Quality of Life
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Health Research Policy and Systems
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
European Journal of Ageing
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
BMC Geriatrics
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Review of Economics of the Household
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Journal of Aging Studies
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Journal of Rural Studies
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Archives of Psychiatric Nursing
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Asian Social Work and Policy Review
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Nursing and Health Sciences
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Health Science Reports
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
International journal of older people nursing
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Journal of Social Issues
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Journal of Women and Aging
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Contemporary Nurse
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Ageing and Society
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Journal of Aging Research
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
1
2
|
Publishers
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
|
|
Wiley
7 publications, 19.44%
|
|
Springer Nature
6 publications, 16.67%
|
|
SAGE
5 publications, 13.89%
|
|
Elsevier
4 publications, 11.11%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
4 publications, 11.11%
|
|
MDPI
3 publications, 8.33%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
3 publications, 8.33%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Emerald
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
1 publication, 2.78%
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Rittirong J., Prasartkul P., RINDFUSS R. R. From whom do older persons prefer support? The case of rural Thailand // Journal of Aging Studies. 2014. Vol. 31. pp. 171-181.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Rittirong J., Prasartkul P., RINDFUSS R. R. From whom do older persons prefer support? The case of rural Thailand // Journal of Aging Studies. 2014. Vol. 31. pp. 171-181.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.jaging.2014.10.002
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2014.10.002
TI - From whom do older persons prefer support? The case of rural Thailand
T2 - Journal of Aging Studies
AU - Rittirong, Jongjit
AU - Prasartkul, Pramote
AU - RINDFUSS, RONALD R.
PY - 2014
DA - 2014/12/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 171-181
VL - 31
SN - 0890-4065
SN - 1879-193X
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2014_Rittirong,
author = {Jongjit Rittirong and Pramote Prasartkul and RONALD R. RINDFUSS},
title = {From whom do older persons prefer support? The case of rural Thailand},
journal = {Journal of Aging Studies},
year = {2014},
volume = {31},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {dec},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2014.10.002},
pages = {171--181},
doi = {10.1016/j.jaging.2014.10.002}
}