Open Access
Open access
Journal of Cleaner Production, volume 236, pages 117666

Energy technological progress, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from China

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2019-11-01
scimago Q1
SJR2.058
CiteScore20.4
Impact factor9.7
ISSN09596526, 18791786
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
General Environmental Science
Building and Construction
Strategy and Management
Abstract
Technical progress is usually considered to be an important way to effectively reduce carbon emissions. However, the advancement of energy technology may cause rebound effect which may lessen the emission reduction effect of technical progress. This suggests that the real impact of energy technological progress is worthy of further study. By taking the rebound effect into consideration, this study estimates the real effect of energy technological progress and energy consumption on carbon emissions in China, based on an interaction model, and using data from China's 30 provinces for the period 2005–2016. Key results include the following: (1) An inverted U-shaped relationship between energy technological progress and carbon emissions is detected. (2) Across technical progress, energy consumption has an inverted U-shaped effect on carbon emissions. (3) Turning points are found in both the direct effect and the technical effect of China's energy technological progress. This indicates that they initially increase carbon emissions, and then reduce them, although the rebound effect continues to have a positive impact on the increase of carbon emissions. (4) The largest differences between regions with different energy technology levels appear in the direct effect and the technical effect of energy technological progress on CO2 emissions, and there is almost no difference in rebound effect. Some relevant policy recommendations are proposed, based on the above findings.

Top-30

Journals

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
5
10
15
20
25
30
35

Publishers

10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex
Found error?