Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
12.9
SJR
3.118
CiteScore
21.3
Categories
Applied Psychology
Business and International Management
Management of Technology and Innovation
Areas
Business, Management and Accounting
Psychology
Years of issue
1970-2025
journal names
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
TECHNOL FORECAST SOC
Top-3 citing journals

Technological Forecasting and Social Change
(32019 citations)

Sustainability
(12856 citations)

Journal of Cleaner Production
(5833 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Utrecht University
(91 publications)

Portland State University
(79 publications)

Delft University of Technology
(78 publications)

Beijing Institute of Technology
(39 publications)

Zhejiang Gongshang University
(39 publications)

Swansea University
(35 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 1369
Q1

Cosimulation-based biomechanics of the human body with hip prosthesis
Di Bona R., Catelani D., Ottaviano E., Gentile D., Testa G.
Q1
Multibody System Dynamics
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Correction to: A new skeletal model for the ankle joint complex
Rodrigues da Silva M., Marques F., Tavares da Silva M., Flores P.
Q1
Multibody System Dynamics
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

A symplectic finite element method in time for periodic response of multibody systems
Wang H., Wang C., Wang G., Pan Y., Mikkola A., Peng H.
Q1
Multibody System Dynamics
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Investigation of the dynamic transmission accuracy of an industrial robot joint RV reducer under variable situations
Xu L., Wu Y.
The dynamic transmission error of the joint RV (rotating vector) reducer is one of the important factors affecting the positioning accuracy of industrial robots. However, the current studies on the transmission accuracy characteristics of RV reducers are based on the equal speed driving condition, which neglects the impact of the transmission error generated by the joint RV reducer on the positioning accuracy when the robot is in the start-stop variable speed phase. This study carries out an in-depth analysis of the dynamic transmission accuracy characteristics of joint RV reducers of industrial robots under variable-speed working conditions. Two typical mathematical models of variable-speed drive laws are constructed, and a multibody dynamic model of the RV reducer that takes into account the geometric errors of typical components is established, aiming to more accurately simulate the operating state of the RV reducer under actual working conditions. To confirm the accuracy of the theoretical RV reducer contact dynamics model, the dynamic transmission error test of the RV reducer under equal-speed conditions is carried out. The results show that the dynamic model can better reflect the actual transmission characteristics of the RV reducer. Thereafter, based on the theoretical model, the effects of different driving laws on the dynamic transmission error of joint RV reducers are analyzed in depth. The results of the study show that the transmission error of the RV reducer under variable speed drive is significantly larger than that under equal speed drive. Moreover, angular acceleration and load inertia are the main factors affecting the transmission error of RV reducers for industrial robot joints.
Q1

Muscle path predictions using a discrete geodesic Euler–Lagrange model in constrained optimisation: comparison with OpenSim and experimental data
Lavaill M., Chen X., Heinrich S., Pivonka P., Leyendecker S.
Abstract
Accurate and robust modelling of muscle paths is crucial for predicting human movement. Traditional methods often rely on simplified straight-line representations and manual specifications of via-points and wrapping surfaces, which may lead to inconsistent and unrealistic muscle paths The discrete geodesic Euler–Lagrange (DGEL) method identifies geodesics with minimal curvature trajectories that adhere closely to anatomical constraints. Embedding DGEL into an optimisation problem with a specific objective function has the potential to identify muscle paths with smooth changes in muscle length over the course of the motion, thereby avoiding abrupt muscle discontinuities. This study aims to investigate the performance of the DGEL method. We developed multibody models with increasing complexity (i.e. a static arm model, a kinematic elbow model and a kinematic shoulder model) and investigated different scenarios, such as muscle attachment modifications, simulation of diverse motions and extreme ranges of motion. We performed a comparative analysis between the geodesic model and the open-source OpenSim framework, with validation against experimental data to assess physiological plausibility. Our findings reveal that the DGEL method overcomes limitations inherent in traditional approaches, including discontinuities and incorrect wrapping surface interactions. For the static arm model, the DGEL-computed muscle length showed a closer match to ground truth compared to OpenSim. In the elbow model, the DGEL method eliminated unphysiological muscle path discontinuities. In the shoulder model, the DGEL method was validated across three different motions against experimental muscle moment arms, achieving great accuracy and superior robustness in handling complex muscle paths. This method effectively addressed common pitfalls in muscle path modelling, such as bone penetrations and erratic trajectories. Future work will further validate the DGEL method across diverse real-world applications and optimise its performance through advanced objective functions. The DGEL approach represents a significant improvement in the accuracy and robustness of muscle path modelling, advancing the field of biomechanics and musculoskeletal modelling.
Q1

Dynamic responses of a vibro-impact capsule robot self-propelling in the large intestine via multibody dynamics
Wang Z., Tian J., Liu Y., Neves A., Prasad S.
Abstract
In recent years, colonic capsule endoscopy has become available in clinical practice as an alternative modality to colonoscopy. However, it faces challenges such as prolonged examination time and the absence of clinician navigation. Leveraging their pioneering work in the field of vibro-impact self-propulsion technique for gastrointestinal endoscopy, Zhang et al. (IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 8:1842–1849, 2023) developed a novel, untethered, self-propelled, endoscopic capsule robot, with the aim of providing a new means of examining bowel cancer in real time. To evaluate and optimize the passage of this capsule robot self-propelling in the large intestine, this work adopts multibody dynamics analysis and experimental investigation to study the robot’s dynamics and its interaction with the intestinal environment. Considering the complex anatomy of the large intestine, containing different sections, e.g., cecum, ascending, transverse, descending, and sigmoid colon, and variations of the haustra, e.g., with various radii, lengths, and heights, the robot was driven by the square-wave excitation of an inner mass interacting with the capsule body and tested on a real porcine colon. The robot’s driving parameters, including the excitation frequency, amplitude, and duty cycle, and the dimensions of the haustra are the two main factors influencing the robot’s progression in the intestine. By comparing with the experimental results, the proposed multibody dynamics model developed using MSC Adams can estimate the movement of the capsule robot and the intestinal resistance quantitatively. Extensive numerical and experimental studies suggest an excitation frequency of 60 Hz and a duty cycle of 0.4 as the optimal parameters for driving the robot, and the longer the haustral length is, the faster the robot passes through. These results ensure the validity of the proposed multibody dynamics platform, which can be used by robotic engineers for developing medical robots for intestinal examinations.
Q1

Fluid-conveying pipes in the floating frame of reference formulation
van Voorthuizen K., Abdul Rasheed M.I., Schilder J.
Abstract
This work presents a new formulation for flexible fluid-conveying pipe elements based on the widely used floating frame of reference formulation. The elements can be used as a tool for the analysis of flexible multibody systems that contain fluid-conveying pipes, as it is well known that the movement of the fluid can influence the behavior and stability of such systems. The pipe defines a control volume through which the fluid, which is considered to be a moving mass, axially flows. The velocity of a material point of the fluid is therefore a material derivative of its position, representing the large rigid movement and small elastic deformation of the pipe along with the velocity of the fluid with respect to the pipe. The equations of motion are derived through the principle of virtual work, spatial discretization by finite element interpolation functions, and model reduction. A simplification of the consistent equations of motion is proposed, which avoids the use of inertia shape integrals and reduces the effort required to implement the developed fluid-conveying pipe elements in existing multibody software. The developed elements are validated by simulation of a straight cantilevered pipe and a curved pipe constrained on one end by a hinge. A simulation of a concrete printing system illustrates the straightforward incorporation of the elements in larger multibody systems.
Q1

Dynamic modeling and simulation of the multi-point collision and contact problem of multi-legged robots
Ma X., Zhao S., An Y., Li K., Wang T.
The problem of multi-point collision and contact in multi-legged robots involves complex dynamics with multiple closed loops, variable topology, and numerous contact points, making simulations challenging. Additionally, Zeno behavior—characterized by an infinite number of discrete transitions within a finite time—is likely to occur, reducing computational efficiency and potentially causing simulations to stall. This paper establishes a linear complementary dynamic model to study the collision and contact problem of multi-legged mobile robots. For the uncertainty of multi-point collision and contact, we use sets and transformation matrices to represent the number and position changes of the points that collide or contact with the ground. This paper separately studies the problems of multi-point collision and multi-point continuous contact and considers the coupling effect of collision and continuous contact. A new criterion to determine the state of continuous contact is proposed, and modifications are made to the relevant linear complementary equations to prevent the Zeno behavior. Finally, several numerical examples are provided to verify the effectiveness of the method.
Q1

Vibration isolation performance and non-probabilistic reliability evaluation of multidimensional vibration isolator with interval joint clearance
Gao X., Niu J., He L., Wang Z., Qin Z., Wu H.
For suppressing multidimensional vibration effectively, the multidimensional vibration isolator based on parallel mechanism considering interval joint clearance is proposed. The kinematics and dynamics of the isolator are established respectively. The contact force generated due to interval joint clearance is modeled respectively by the Lankarani–Nikravesh (L-N) model and the modified Coulomb friction force model. Furthermore, the dynamics of the isolator with interval joint clearance are obtained by the first order interval perturbation method. The upper and lower bounds of vibration isolation performance are calculated, which indicates the isolator with interval joint clearance inhibited external vibration in time and frequency domain respectively. The vibration isolation performance is most sensitive in pitch (around $x$ ) direction due to the existence of interval joint clearance. The non-probabilistic reliability model of the isolator is proposed by the shortest distance method, and the non-probabilistic reliability index is investigated in each isolation direction with interval joint clearance. The reliability index of the isolator exhibits a quasi-stable area in horizontal (in $x$ ) and pitch (around $x$ ) directions, which implies the reliability index is not sensitive to joint clearance variation in a certain perturbation range. The proposed vibration isolator with interval joint clearance is fabricated, and the vibration isolation experiment is conducted. The experimental results are generally consistent with the theoretical results, which indicates the correctness of the analysis.
Q1

Using high fidelity discrete element simulation to calibrate an expeditious terramechanics model in a multibody dynamics framework
Zhang Y., Dai J., Hu W., Negrut D.
The wheel–soil interaction has great impact on the dynamics of off-road vehicles in terramechanics applications. The soil contact model (SCM), which anchors an empirical method to characterize the frictional contact between a wheel and soil, has been widely used in off-road vehicle dynamics simulations because it quickly produces adequate results for many terramechanics applications. The SCM approach calls for a set of model parameters that are obtained via a bevameter test. This test is expensive and time consuming to carry out, and in some cases difficult to set up, e.g., in extraterrestrial applications. We propose an approach to address these concerns by conducting the bevameter test in simulation, using a model that captures the physics of the actual experiment with high fidelity. To that end, we model the bevameter test rig as a multibody system, while the dynamics of the soil is captured using a discrete element model (DEM). The multibody dynamics–soil dynamics co-simulation is used to replicate the bevameter test, producing high fidelity ground truth test data that is subsequently used to calibrate the SCM parameters within a Bayesian inference framework. To test the accuracy of the resulting SCM terramechanics, we run single wheel and full rover simulations using both DEM and SCM terrains. The SCM results match well with those produced by the DEM solution, and the simulation time for SCM is two to three orders of magnitude lower than that of DEM. All simulations in this work are performed using Chrono, an open-source, publicly available simulator. The scripts and models used are available in a public repository for reproducibility studies and further research.
Q1

A machine learning approach to simulate flexible body dynamics
Slimak T., Zwölfer A., Todorov B., Rixen D.
Abstract
Flexible body dynamics simulations are powerful tools to realistically analyze vehicles, machines, mechanics, etc. However, the inherently nonlinear governing equations often require tailor-made and computationally expense solution strategies. Employing artificial neural networks for forward dynamics analyses of flexible bodies may be not only useful as a model reduction tool, since evaluating a network is frequently faster compared to solving physics-based models, but also to enhance models with experimental data. In this realm four primary strategies have emerged: (i) Incorporating time as an input to the artificial neural network to predict the desired solution variables at that specific time. (ii) Utilizing an entire time series as input, the network generates the corresponding time series of the desired solution variables in a single pass through the artificial neural network. (iii) Employing an artificial neural network to advance one time step into the future using the states as input. (iv) Leveraging the artificial neural network solely for learning the equations of motion or energetic quantities, e.g., Lagrangian/Hamiltonian, coupled with standard techniques from analytical dynamics and time integration. Approaches (iii) and (iv) can be considered advantageous owing to their inherent physics-informed nature, greater flexibility in adopting varying time steps, and ease of integration with classical simulation techniques. This contribution, therefore, presents a method to predict flexible body dynamics one step at a time using two complimentary artificial neural networks. One network predicts the equations of motion relationship between positions, velocities, and accelerations, while a second network or numerical integrator propagates the system states forwards in time. This work demonstrates the feasibility of the developed approach on the testcase of a flexible beam. Various parameter studies and alternative solutions are presented to highlight the performance of the developed approach. The robustness and ability to extrapolate are also explored to determine the practical viability of this solution. The intention of this single-body work is to enable the future embedding in a multibody context.
Q1

Embedding reference dynamics in model predictive control for trajectory tracking of multi-input multi-output non-minimum phase underactuated multibody systems
Bettega J., Richiedei D., Tamellin I.
This paper proposes a feedback control technique for path and trajectory tracking on multi-input, multi-output nonminimum phase underactuated multibody systems and applies it to a spatial gantry crane moving a double pendulum. The two links forming the double pendulum are connected in series and the desired output of the system is the tip of the second link. This output selection yields to a nonminimum phase system, which is a class of dynamical systems that are particularly challenging from the control design perspective. In this paper, an enhanced formulation of Model Predictive Control is proposed to solve the output trajectory tracking problem by embedding the dynamics of the spatial reference trajectory within the optimization process performed at each time step. The proposed control technique is formulated considering two different scenarios: the case of torque-controlled (i.e., current-controlled) actuators, and the case of position-controlled actuators. The latter is unusual in the field of MPC and is suitable for industrial applications where proprietary controllers are adopted. Numerical validations show negligible contour and tracking errors during the execution of the desired trajectories, with low computational effort.
Q1

Optimising a driving mechanism mechanical design of EXOTIC exoskeleton—a review on upper limb exoskeletons driving systems and a case study
Falkowski P., Mohammadi M., Andreasen Struijk L.N., Rzymkowski C., Pilat Z.
AbstractWhile designing rehabilitation exoskeletons is often realised based on experience and intuition, many processes can be computer-aided. This gives the opportunity to design lighter and more compact constructions. Hence, the devices can be fully wearable and have a wider range of motion. So far, mainly topology optimisation and parametric dimensional optimisations have been used for that. The presented study addresses the problem of automatic selection of the driving systems for exoskeletons. It consists of the literature review of the components used to actuate the joints of such constructions, optimisation algorithm development, and a case study on the EXOTIC exoskeleton. The method includes building a database of motors and gearboxes, computing inverse kinematics of a system to obtain angular trajectories from the task-oriented paths, iteration computing inverse dynamics to compute required torque and the search for the optimal solution according to the defined goal function. This approach enables single joint and multijoint optimisation, with the custom goal function minimising optionally masses, diameters or widths of the selected driving systems. The investigation consists of the 28 simulation trials for EXOTIC exoskeleton to compare results obtained for different aims. Moreover, to visualise the effect, the 1st DOF driving mechanism is redesigned to obtain its minimum width based on the optimisation results. The optimal choice reduced the actuation mechanism mass by 15.3%, while its total dimensions by 17.5%, 8.5% and 26.2%, respectively. The presented approach is easily transferable to any other active exoskeleton and can contribute to designing compact and lightweight constructions. This is particularly important in assistive rehabilitation and can also be used in industrial assistance processes.
Q1

Tailored gait-pattern generation and verification based on the dynamic analysis of the human musculoskeletal model
Shanmuga Prasad S., Kim Y.
This study presents a novel Forward Dynamic approach that integrates a Genetic Algorithm (GA) to generate and optimize gait patterns with Inverse Dynamics analysis, tailored to individual users in the robot-assisted training platform. The resulting trajectories provide gait-trajectory planning using the developed gait-pattern simulator, enabling medical personnel to select customized tasks and training trajectories for users based on their training goals, subsequently transferring user-specific parameters to the exoskeletal robot for rehabilitation/training. By leveraging biomechanical data as reference (joint torque and force) from the Inverse Dynamic analysis, the method foregoes the necessity for experimental data, directly predicting joint angles and positions. To ensure the validity of the proposed method, we used a combined approach of numerical analysis and comparison with motion-capture data. This evaluation aimed to assess how closely the simulated results resembled real human walking motion for the lower-extremity joints.
Q1

Multi-physics tribo-dynamics simulation of lubricated translational joints in marine engines
Li R., Li G., Meng X., Sun R., Cheng W.
Lubricated translational joints are extensively utilized in power equipment. Due to the presence of clearance, the moving mass exhibits transverse motion within the guide rail in addition to its reciprocating motion. This transverse motion significantly influences the friction, wear, and service life of the friction pair. In this process, multi-physics factors such as fluid lubrication, structural deformation, and frictional heat generation interact with each other, making the tribo-dynamics characteristics very complex. In the current study, a new thermal-fluid-solid coupled method for modeling the tribo-dynamics of translational lubricated joints is presented, and it is applied to the crosshead slider-guide friction pair in marine engines. Research results show that the tribo-dynamics characteristics of the slider predicted by the model is consistent with the experimental ones, the correctness of the model is verified. The frictional heat generation has little effect on the tribo-dynamics characteristics of the crosshead slider under the rated operating conditions. However, the structure deformation induced by the external load intensifies the transverse motion of the crosshead slider. Compared with the model that ignored the deformation, the transverse displacement can be increased by 30%, which indicates that it is necessary to consider the multi-physics coupling effect.
Top-100
Citing journals
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
|
|
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
32019 citations, 10.04%
|
|
Sustainability
12856 citations, 4.03%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
5833 citations, 1.83%
|
|
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
3551 citations, 1.11%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
3054 citations, 0.96%
|
|
Journal of Business Research
2489 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Technovation
2360 citations, 0.74%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
2303 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Futures
2273 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Technology Analysis and Strategic Management
2096 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Management
1819 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Energy Policy
1811 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Resources Policy
1806 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Technology in Society
1799 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
1663 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Energy Economics
1643 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Energies
1635 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Scientometrics
1613 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Heliyon
1596 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Business Strategy and the Environment
1512 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Environment, Development and Sustainability
1470 citations, 0.46%
|
|
PLoS ONE
1418 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Research Policy
1384 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Energy
1346 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Energy Research and Social Science
1341 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Journal of the Knowledge Economy
1335 citations, 0.42%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
1269 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
1212 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
1130 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Foresight
1092 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Frontiers in Environmental Science
1083 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
1061 citations, 0.33%
|
|
European Journal of Innovation Management
968 citations, 0.3%
|
|
IEEE Access
955 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Technology Transfer
868 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Knowledge Management
847 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
837 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
766 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Applied Energy
735 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Expert Systems with Applications
722 citations, 0.23%
|
|
International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management
722 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Computers and Industrial Engineering
718 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Finance Research Letters
717 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Management Decision
711 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Annals of Operations Research
696 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Economic Analysis and Policy
681 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Sustainable Development
668 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
655 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Innovation and Knowledge
645 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Sustainable Cities and Society
635 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Renewable Energy
629 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
625 citations, 0.2%
|
|
R and D Management
606 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Systems
591 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International Journal of Production Economics
588 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
563 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Kybernetes
561 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M
553 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Futures & Foresight Science
552 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Industrial Marketing Management
545 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Cities
543 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja
542 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
520 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Land
515 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Benchmarking
510 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
497 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Review of Economics and Finance
494 citations, 0.15%
|
|
SAGE Open
482 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing
462 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management
460 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Science and Public Policy
453 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Industrial Management and Data Systems
452 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Information Management
437 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Cogent Business and Management
435 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Production Research
434 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Business Process Management Journal
433 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Review of Managerial Science
422 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Telecommunications Policy
421 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Informetrics
419 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Review of Financial Analysis
416 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
415 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal of Innovation Management
411 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Research in International Business and Finance
407 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Applied Economics
403 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Sustainable Production and Consumption
382 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
381 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Scientific Reports
380 citations, 0.12%
|
|
World Patent Information
380 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research
379 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal
370 citations, 0.12%
|
|
European Journal of Futures Research
367 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Ecological Economics
357 citations, 0.11%
|
|
E3S Web of Conferences
354 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
353 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Mathematics
351 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Managerial and Decision Economics
343 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Intellectual Capital
340 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Procedia Computer Science
331 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Enterprise Information Management
328 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Transportation Research, Part D: Transport and Environment
325 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
|
Citing publishers
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
|
|
Elsevier
113433 citations, 35.58%
|
|
Springer Nature
42882 citations, 13.45%
|
|
MDPI
27362 citations, 8.58%
|
|
Emerald
25793 citations, 8.09%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
22365 citations, 7.02%
|
|
Wiley
15834 citations, 4.97%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
12053 citations, 3.78%
|
|
SAGE
7009 citations, 2.2%
|
|
IGI Global
5953 citations, 1.87%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
4526 citations, 1.42%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
2989 citations, 0.94%
|
|
World Scientific
1910 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1807 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Oxford University Press
1701 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
1535 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
1510 citations, 0.47%
|
|
IOP Publishing
1309 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
1208 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
1070 citations, 0.34%
|
|
EDP Sciences
886 citations, 0.28%
|
|
CAIRN
543 citations, 0.17%
|
|
JMIR Publications
526 citations, 0.17%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
509 citations, 0.16%
|
|
SciELO
408 citations, 0.13%
|
|
AIP Publishing
342 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
314 citations, 0.1%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
285 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IOS Press
284 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
270 citations, 0.08%
|
|
IntechOpen
251 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
235 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
229 citations, 0.07%
|
|
F1000 Research
215 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
207 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Copernicus
203 citations, 0.06%
|
|
BMJ
194 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
173 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
171 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
171 citations, 0.05%
|
|
OpenEdition
168 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Academy of Management
162 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
161 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Annual Reviews
158 citations, 0.05%
|
|
AOSIS
154 citations, 0.05%
|
|
IWA Publishing
132 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
128 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
123 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Inderscience Publishers
122 citations, 0.04%
|
|
ASME International
121 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
116 citations, 0.04%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
116 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
113 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
107 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
104 citations, 0.03%
|
|
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
96 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
90 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administracao de Empresas de Sao Paulo
82 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Editora Edgard Blucher, Ltda.
80 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Royal Society
79 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Hans Publishers
79 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universidade Federal de São Carlos
78 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
69 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Thomas Telford
67 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
66 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mackenzie Presbyterian University
66 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Associacao Brasileira de Engenharia de Producao - ABEPRO
65 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Brazilian Administration Review
63 citations, 0.02%
|
|
National Biological Information Infrastructure
62 citations, 0.02%
|
|
SAE International
62 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Marketing Association
60 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Brill
59 citations, 0.02%
|
|
PeerJ
59 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
58 citations, 0.02%
|
|
MIT Press
54 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
54 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Intellect
54 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Publishing House Helvetica (Publications)
53 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Borsa Istanbul Anonim Sirketi
51 citations, 0.02%
|
|
NP Voprosy Ekonomiki
51 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
50 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
49 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Publishing House Finance and Credit
48 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Tech Science Press
46 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
44 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
42 citations, 0.01%
|
|
European Academy of Management and Business Economics
42 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Editura Economica
42 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
42 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Pluto Journals
40 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Geophysical Union
39 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Cognizant, LLC
39 citations, 0.01%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
38 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Meteorological Society
38 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Escola Brasileira de Administracao Publica da Fundacao Getulio Vargas
38 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Science Alert
38 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Alexandria University
36 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Academic Journals
35 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Vilnius University Press
32 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Society of Petroleum Engineers
31 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Publishing House Science
31 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
|
Utrecht University
91 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Portland State University
79 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
78 publications, 0.85%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
75 publications, 0.82%
|
|
University of Manchester
63 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Beijing Institute of Technology
60 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
59 publications, 0.64%
|
|
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
59 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Tsinghua University
56 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
52 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Sussex
51 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Twente
50 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Turin
50 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Seoul National University
50 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Cambridge
49 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Valencia
45 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Lisbon
44 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Turku
43 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Yonsei University
43 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Newcastle University
43 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
42 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Zhejiang Gongshang University
41 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Tokyo
41 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research
40 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Swansea University
40 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Coventry University
39 publications, 0.43%
|
|
ETH Zurich
36 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Milan
36 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
36 publications, 0.39%
|
|
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
36 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
35 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Anhui University of Finance and Economics
35 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Lebanese American University
34 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Aarhus University
33 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Aalto University
32 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Brunel University London
32 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Oxford
32 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
32 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology
31 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
31 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Sungkyunkwan University
31 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Valencia
31 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Stanford University
30 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information
30 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
30 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Tongji University
29 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
29 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
29 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Sheffield
29 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Exeter
29 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Copenhagen Business School
28 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Technical University of Berlin
28 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Leeds
28 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Kyung Hee University
27 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Tehran
26 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
26 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Aston University
26 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Qingdao University
26 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
26 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Reading
26 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Lulea University of Technology
25 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Parthenope University of Naples
25 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
25 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Bologna
25 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Vaasa
25 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Yuan Ze University
25 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Hunan University
25 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Essex
25 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Zhejiang University
24 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
24 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Shenzhen University
24 publications, 0.26%
|
|
American University of Beirut
24 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Chaoyang University of Technology
24 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Agder
24 publications, 0.26%
|
|
North-West University
24 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Korea University
24 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Beira Interior
24 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Jilin University
23 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Jinan University
23 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Imperial College London
23 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong–Liverpool University
23 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Nottingham
23 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Salento
23 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Universidad de Alcalá
23 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
23 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Beijing Normal University
22 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
22 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology
22 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
22 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Southern California
22 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Loughborough University
22 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Southampton
22 publications, 0.24%
|
|
National Tsing Hua University
22 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Birmingham
22 publications, 0.24%
|
|
National Chung Hsing University
22 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Seville
22 publications, 0.24%
|
|
WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management
22 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
22 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Chalmers University of Technology
21 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Nanjing University of Finance and Economics
21 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
|
Beijing Institute of Technology
39 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Zhejiang Gongshang University
39 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Swansea University
35 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of Turin
33 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Lebanese American University
31 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Valencia
30 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Anhui University of Finance and Economics
29 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Tsinghua University
27 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
26 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Valencia
26 publications, 0.72%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
25 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Qingdao University
25 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Coventry University
25 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
24 publications, 0.66%
|
|
North-West University
24 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Agder
23 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Reading
23 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Shenzhen University
22 publications, 0.61%
|
|
American University of Beirut
22 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Tongji University
21 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Lisbon
21 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Parthenope University of Naples
21 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Vaasa
21 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Essex
21 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Nanjing University of Finance and Economics
20 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Turku
20 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Sheffield
20 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Universidad de Alcalá
20 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Bradford
20 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Lulea University of Technology
19 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Copenhagen Business School
19 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Southampton
19 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Exeter
19 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Portland State University
19 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Zhejiang University
18 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Bologna
18 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Aston University
18 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Cambridge
18 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
18 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Jiangsu University
18 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
18 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Chaoyang University of Technology
18 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
17 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Sichuan University
17 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Wuhan University
17 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Brunel University London
17 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Aarhus University
17 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Loughborough University
17 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Stavanger
17 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Newcastle University
17 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Hunan University
17 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Utrecht University
17 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Sussex
17 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
16 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
16 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Hanken School of Economics
16 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Salento
16 publications, 0.44%
|
|
WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management
16 publications, 0.44%
|
|
O. P. Jindal Global University
15 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Sunway University
15 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
15 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong–Liverpool University
15 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Johannes Kepler University of Linz
15 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
15 publications, 0.41%
|
|
De Montfort University
15 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Tehran
14 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Symbiosis International University
14 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Peking University
14 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Jilin University
14 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Södertörn University
14 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Nankai University
14 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Milan
14 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of International Business and Economics
14 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Manchester
14 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Birmingham
14 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Nicosia
14 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
14 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Newcastle Australia
14 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics
14 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Stuttgart
14 publications, 0.39%
|
|
King Abdulaziz University
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Fudan University
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Twente
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
ETH Zurich
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Liverpool
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Nottingham
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
National University of Singapore
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Southwest Jiaotong University
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Asia University
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Seoul National University
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Nottingham Ningbo China
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Santiago de Compostela
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Castilla-La Mancha
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Portsmouth
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Karachi
12 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
Publishing countries
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
|
|
USA
|
USA, 1439, 15.68%
USA
1439 publications, 15.68%
|
China
|
China, 1435, 15.64%
China
1435 publications, 15.64%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 1052, 11.46%
United Kingdom
1052 publications, 11.46%
|
France
|
France, 505, 5.5%
France
505 publications, 5.5%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 501, 5.46%
Italy
501 publications, 5.46%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 445, 4.85%
Netherlands
445 publications, 4.85%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 430, 4.69%
Spain
430 publications, 4.69%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 422, 4.6%
Germany
422 publications, 4.6%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 379, 4.13%
Republic of Korea
379 publications, 4.13%
|
India
|
India, 310, 3.38%
India
310 publications, 3.38%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 258, 2.81%
Australia
258 publications, 2.81%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 204, 2.22%
Finland
204 publications, 2.22%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 162, 1.77%
Canada
162 publications, 1.77%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 161, 1.75%
Japan
161 publications, 1.75%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 146, 1.59%
Austria
146 publications, 1.59%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 143, 1.56%
Sweden
143 publications, 1.56%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 140, 1.53%
Denmark
140 publications, 1.53%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 137, 1.49%
Portugal
137 publications, 1.49%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 128, 1.39%
Brazil
128 publications, 1.39%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 122, 1.33%
Russia
122 publications, 1.33%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 112, 1.22%
Turkey
112 publications, 1.22%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 112, 1.22%
Switzerland
112 publications, 1.22%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 108, 1.18%
Norway
108 publications, 1.18%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 79, 0.86%
Malaysia
79 publications, 0.86%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 74, 0.81%
Iran
74 publications, 0.81%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 74, 0.81%
Pakistan
74 publications, 0.81%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 71, 0.77%
South Africa
71 publications, 0.77%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 69, 0.75%
Poland
69 publications, 0.75%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 68, 0.74%
Belgium
68 publications, 0.74%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 65, 0.71%
UAE
65 publications, 0.71%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 55, 0.6%
Greece
55 publications, 0.6%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 50, 0.54%
Singapore
50 publications, 0.54%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 47, 0.51%
Israel
47 publications, 0.51%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 47, 0.51%
Saudi Arabia
47 publications, 0.51%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 41, 0.45%
Vietnam
41 publications, 0.45%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 39, 0.43%
New Zealand
39 publications, 0.43%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 38, 0.41%
Thailand
38 publications, 0.41%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 36, 0.39%
Lebanon
36 publications, 0.39%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 35, 0.38%
Croatia
35 publications, 0.38%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 33, 0.36%
Ireland
33 publications, 0.36%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 33, 0.36%
Czech Republic
33 publications, 0.36%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 32, 0.35%
Romania
32 publications, 0.35%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 31, 0.34%
Cyprus
31 publications, 0.34%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 29, 0.32%
Lithuania
29 publications, 0.32%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 28, 0.31%
Ghana
28 publications, 0.31%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 27, 0.29%
Bangladesh
27 publications, 0.29%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 26, 0.28%
Mexico
26 publications, 0.28%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 25, 0.27%
Tunisia
25 publications, 0.27%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 25, 0.27%
Chile
25 publications, 0.27%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 21, 0.23%
Morocco
21 publications, 0.23%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 21, 0.23%
Nigeria
21 publications, 0.23%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 16, 0.17%
Hungary
16 publications, 0.17%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 16, 0.17%
Qatar
16 publications, 0.17%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 15, 0.16%
Ukraine
15 publications, 0.16%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 14, 0.15%
Egypt
14 publications, 0.15%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 14, 0.15%
Iraq
14 publications, 0.15%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 14, 0.15%
Colombia
14 publications, 0.15%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 14, 0.15%
Slovenia
14 publications, 0.15%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 12, 0.13%
Indonesia
12 publications, 0.13%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 12, 0.13%
Serbia
12 publications, 0.13%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 9, 0.1%
Ecuador
9 publications, 0.1%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 8, 0.09%
Estonia
8 publications, 0.09%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 8, 0.09%
Jordan
8 publications, 0.09%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 8, 0.09%
Kenya
8 publications, 0.09%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 8, 0.09%
Oman
8 publications, 0.09%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 8, 0.09%
Philippines
8 publications, 0.09%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 7, 0.08%
Argentina
7 publications, 0.08%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 7, 0.08%
Luxembourg
7 publications, 0.08%
|
USSR
|
USSR, 7, 0.08%
USSR
7 publications, 0.08%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 6, 0.07%
Kuwait
6 publications, 0.07%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 6, 0.07%
North Macedonia
6 publications, 0.07%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 6, 0.07%
Slovakia
6 publications, 0.07%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 5, 0.05%
Cameroon
5 publications, 0.05%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 5, 0.05%
Malawi
5 publications, 0.05%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 4, 0.04%
Algeria
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Bolivia
|
Bolivia, 4, 0.04%
Bolivia
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 4, 0.04%
Zimbabwe
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 4, 0.04%
Iceland
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Liechtenstein
|
Liechtenstein, 4, 0.04%
Liechtenstein
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 4, 0.04%
Peru
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 4, 0.04%
Tanzania
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Fiji
|
Fiji, 4, 0.04%
Fiji
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 4, 0.04%
Ethiopia
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 3, 0.03%
Azerbaijan
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Mozambique
|
Mozambique, 3, 0.03%
Mozambique
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
Trinidad and Tobago, 3, 0.03%
Trinidad and Tobago
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 3, 0.03%
Uzbekistan
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 2, 0.02%
Armenia
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 2, 0.02%
Bahrain
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2, 0.02%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 2, 0.02%
Costa Rica
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Mali
|
Mali, 2, 0.02%
Mali
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 2, 0.02%
Malta
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 2, 0.02%
Uganda
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 2, 0.02%
Uruguay
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Jamaica
|
Jamaica, 2, 0.02%
Jamaica
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 1, 0.01%
Belarus
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Albania
|
Albania, 1, 0.01%
Albania
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 1, 0.01%
Botswana
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Cape Verde
|
Cape Verde, 1, 0.01%
Cape Verde
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
|
China
|
China, 958, 26.42%
China
958 publications, 26.42%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 545, 15.03%
United Kingdom
545 publications, 15.03%
|
USA
|
USA, 328, 9.05%
USA
328 publications, 9.05%
|
France
|
France, 320, 8.83%
France
320 publications, 8.83%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 255, 7.03%
Italy
255 publications, 7.03%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 250, 6.89%
Spain
250 publications, 6.89%
|
India
|
India, 235, 6.48%
India
235 publications, 6.48%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 179, 4.94%
Germany
179 publications, 4.94%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 135, 3.72%
Australia
135 publications, 3.72%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 123, 3.39%
Republic of Korea
123 publications, 3.39%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 116, 3.2%
Netherlands
116 publications, 3.2%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 98, 2.7%
Finland
98 publications, 2.7%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 77, 2.12%
Norway
77 publications, 2.12%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 75, 2.07%
Turkey
75 publications, 2.07%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 72, 1.99%
Denmark
72 publications, 1.99%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 72, 1.99%
Sweden
72 publications, 1.99%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 71, 1.96%
Pakistan
71 publications, 1.96%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 70, 1.93%
Canada
70 publications, 1.93%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 69, 1.9%
Brazil
69 publications, 1.9%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 59, 1.63%
Portugal
59 publications, 1.63%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 59, 1.63%
Malaysia
59 publications, 1.63%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 52, 1.43%
Russia
52 publications, 1.43%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 49, 1.35%
Poland
49 publications, 1.35%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 49, 1.35%
South Africa
49 publications, 1.35%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 47, 1.3%
UAE
47 publications, 1.3%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 41, 1.13%
Austria
41 publications, 1.13%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 41, 1.13%
Saudi Arabia
41 publications, 1.13%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 39, 1.08%
Japan
39 publications, 1.08%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 38, 1.05%
Vietnam
38 publications, 1.05%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 38, 1.05%
Switzerland
38 publications, 1.05%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 36, 0.99%
Iran
36 publications, 0.99%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 33, 0.91%
Lebanon
33 publications, 0.91%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 31, 0.85%
Croatia
31 publications, 0.85%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 28, 0.77%
Singapore
28 publications, 0.77%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 28, 0.77%
Czech Republic
28 publications, 0.77%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 26, 0.72%
Belgium
26 publications, 0.72%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 26, 0.72%
Ireland
26 publications, 0.72%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 25, 0.69%
Bangladesh
25 publications, 0.69%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 24, 0.66%
Cyprus
24 publications, 0.66%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 21, 0.58%
Ghana
21 publications, 0.58%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 21, 0.58%
Greece
21 publications, 0.58%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 21, 0.58%
Morocco
21 publications, 0.58%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 21, 0.58%
Romania
21 publications, 0.58%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 21, 0.58%
Tunisia
21 publications, 0.58%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 19, 0.52%
New Zealand
19 publications, 0.52%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 17, 0.47%
Lithuania
17 publications, 0.47%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 16, 0.44%
Qatar
16 publications, 0.44%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 16, 0.44%
Chile
16 publications, 0.44%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 15, 0.41%
Nigeria
15 publications, 0.41%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 11, 0.3%
Thailand
11 publications, 0.3%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 10, 0.28%
Ukraine
10 publications, 0.28%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 10, 0.28%
Indonesia
10 publications, 0.28%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 10, 0.28%
Mexico
10 publications, 0.28%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 9, 0.25%
Hungary
9 publications, 0.25%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 9, 0.25%
Egypt
9 publications, 0.25%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 8, 0.22%
Colombia
8 publications, 0.22%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 8, 0.22%
Slovenia
8 publications, 0.22%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 7, 0.19%
Serbia
7 publications, 0.19%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 7, 0.19%
Ecuador
7 publications, 0.19%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 6, 0.17%
Jordan
6 publications, 0.17%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 6, 0.17%
Kuwait
6 publications, 0.17%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 6, 0.17%
Oman
6 publications, 0.17%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 5, 0.14%
Estonia
5 publications, 0.14%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 5, 0.14%
Argentina
5 publications, 0.14%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 5, 0.14%
Cameroon
5 publications, 0.14%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 5, 0.14%
North Macedonia
5 publications, 0.14%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 4, 0.11%
Algeria
4 publications, 0.11%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 4, 0.11%
Kenya
4 publications, 0.11%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 4, 0.11%
Slovakia
4 publications, 0.11%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 4, 0.11%
Philippines
4 publications, 0.11%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 3, 0.08%
Azerbaijan
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 3, 0.08%
Israel
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 3, 0.08%
Iraq
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 3, 0.08%
Tanzania
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 3, 0.08%
Uzbekistan
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Fiji
|
Fiji, 3, 0.08%
Fiji
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Bolivia
|
Bolivia, 2, 0.06%
Bolivia
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2, 0.06%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 2, 0.06%
Zimbabwe
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Liechtenstein
|
Liechtenstein, 2, 0.06%
Liechtenstein
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 2, 0.06%
Malawi
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Mali
|
Mali, 2, 0.06%
Mali
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 2, 0.06%
Uruguay
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 1, 0.03%
Belarus
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 1, 0.03%
Armenia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 1, 0.03%
Bahrain
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 1, 0.03%
Botswana
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.03%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Kiribati
|
Kiribati, 1, 0.03%
Kiribati
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 1, 0.03%
Costa Rica
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Libya
|
Libya, 1, 0.03%
Libya
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.03%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Mauritius
|
Mauritius, 1, 0.03%
Mauritius
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 1, 0.03%
Malta
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Mozambique
|
Mozambique, 1, 0.03%
Mozambique
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Moldova
|
Moldova, 1, 0.03%
Moldova
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Monaco
|
Monaco, 1, 0.03%
Monaco
1 publication, 0.03%
|
New Caledonia
|
New Caledonia, 1, 0.03%
New Caledonia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.03%
Peru
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Somalia
|
Somalia, 1, 0.03%
Somalia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
4 profile journal articles
Fernandes Cristina
127 publications,
4 639 citations
h-index: 34
2 profile journal articles
Emrouznejad Ali

University of Surrey
235 publications,
8 566 citations
h-index: 50
2 profile journal articles
Kostakos Vassilis

University of Melbourne
272 publications,
5 949 citations
h-index: 39
2 profile journal articles
Sheng Jichuan
🥼 🤝
65 publications,
1 446 citations
h-index: 19
1 profile journal article
Correia Marisol
42 publications,
507 citations
h-index: 12
1 profile journal article
Aloulou Wassim
🤝
50 publications,
476 citations
h-index: 12
1 profile journal article
TENG WANG

University of Kentucky
16 publications,
238 citations
h-index: 4
1 profile journal article
Turel Ofir

University of Melbourne
232 publications,
8 071 citations
h-index: 46
1 profile journal article
Proskuryakova Liliana

National Research University Higher School of Economics
36 publications,
647 citations
h-index: 12
1 profile journal article
Kwame George
17 publications,
163 citations
h-index: 5
1 profile journal article
Nefedova Alena
11 publications,
73 citations
h-index: 5
1 profile journal article
Vasa Laszlo
123 publications,
813 citations
h-index: 16
1 profile journal article
Pedro Manuel
43 publications,
306 citations
h-index: 11