volume 164-165 pages 1218-1225

Comparison between finite element method and analytical methods for studying wire drawing processes

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2005-05-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR1.885
CiteScore14.3
Impact factor7.5
ISSN09240136, 18734774
Metals and Alloys
Ceramics and Composites
Computer Science Applications
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Modeling and Simulation
Abstract
Wire drawing is one of the most commonly used processes for obtaining wire used in mechanical applications such as: rivets, screws, welding wires, etc. In this work, several analytical methods have been employed in order to obtain the forces, energies, stresses and strains that are involved in the process. A comparative study between analytical methods and FEM results is presented, considering hardening strain materials. The material selected to carry out those analyses was an aluminium alloy AA-5083, whose flow stress was determined by an appropriate tension test. The geometric property of axisymmetry has been used in order to reduce the computational cost in the finite element simulations, and to simplify the equations for the rest of the methods introduced. The energies involved in wire drawing processes are also determined. Moreover, energies involved in the process are studied for both strain hardening and non-strain hardening materials.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
5 publications, 9.62%
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
4 publications, 7.69%
Metals
3 publications, 5.77%
Materials & Design (1980-2015)
3 publications, 5.77%
Processes
2 publications, 3.85%
International Journal of Material Forming
2 publications, 3.85%
Applied Mathematical Modelling
2 publications, 3.85%
Journal of Materials Processing Technology
2 publications, 3.85%
Journal of the Japan Society for Technology of Plasticity
2 publications, 3.85%
Mechanics and Industry
1 publication, 1.92%
International Journal of Modern Physics C
1 publication, 1.92%
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture
1 publication, 1.92%
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
1 publication, 1.92%
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science
1 publication, 1.92%
Meccanica
1 publication, 1.92%
Journal of Computer-Aided Materials Design
1 publication, 1.92%
Transactions of Tianjin University
1 publication, 1.92%
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering
1 publication, 1.92%
Materials Research Express
1 publication, 1.92%
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
1 publication, 1.92%
Materials Science & Engineering A: Structural Materials: Properties, Microstructure and Processing
1 publication, 1.92%
Engineering Failure Analysis
1 publication, 1.92%
Procedia Manufacturing
1 publication, 1.92%
Finite Elements in Analysis and Design
1 publication, 1.92%
Procedia CIRP
1 publication, 1.92%
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
1 publication, 1.92%
International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture
1 publication, 1.92%
Materials and Manufacturing Processes
1 publication, 1.92%
Advanced Materials Research
1 publication, 1.92%
Key Engineering Materials
1 publication, 1.92%
1
2
3
4
5

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Springer Nature
17 publications, 32.69%
Elsevier
15 publications, 28.85%
MDPI
6 publications, 11.54%
Trans Tech Publications
3 publications, 5.77%
IOP Publishing
2 publications, 3.85%
Taylor & Francis
2 publications, 3.85%
The Japan Society for Technology and Plasticity
2 publications, 3.85%
EDP Sciences
1 publication, 1.92%
World Scientific
1 publication, 1.92%
SAGE
1 publication, 1.92%
BSTU named after V.G. Shukhov
1 publication, 1.92%
Editora Edgard Blucher, Ltda.
1 publication, 1.92%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
52
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Luis C., León J., Luri R. Comparison between finite element method and analytical methods for studying wire drawing processes // Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2005. Vol. 164-165. pp. 1218-1225.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Luis C., León J., Luri R. Comparison between finite element method and analytical methods for studying wire drawing processes // Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2005. Vol. 164-165. pp. 1218-1225.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.138
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.138
TI - Comparison between finite element method and analytical methods for studying wire drawing processes
T2 - Journal of Materials Processing Technology
AU - Luis, C.J.
AU - León, J.A.
AU - Luri, R.
PY - 2005
DA - 2005/05/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 1218-1225
VL - 164-165
SN - 0924-0136
SN - 1873-4774
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2005_Luis,
author = {C.J. Luis and J.A. León and R. Luri},
title = {Comparison between finite element method and analytical methods for studying wire drawing processes},
journal = {Journal of Materials Processing Technology},
year = {2005},
volume = {164-165},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {may},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.138},
pages = {1218--1225},
doi = {10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.138}
}