volume 45 issue 3 pages 647-665

How predictable is technological progress?

J. Doyne Farmer 1, 2
François Lafond 3, 4
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2016-04-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR3.443
CiteScore15.0
Impact factor8.0
ISSN00487333, 18737625
Management of Technology and Innovation
Strategy and Management
Management Science and Operations Research
Abstract
Recently it has become clear that many technologies follow a generalized version of Moore's law, i.e. costs tend to drop exponentially, at different rates that depend on the technology. Here we formulate Moore's law as a correlated geometric random walk with drift, and apply it to historical data on 53 technologies. We derive a closed form expression approximating the distribution of forecast errors as a function of time. Based on hind-casting experiments we show that this works well, making it possible to collapse the forecast errors for many different technologies at different time horizons onto the same universal distribution. This is valuable because it allows us to make forecasts for any given technology with a clear understanding of the quality of the forecasts. As a practical demonstration we make distributional forecasts at different time horizons for solar photovoltaic modules, and show how our method can be used to estimate the probability that a given technology will outperform another technology at a given point in the future.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
7 publications, 3.7%
SSRN Electronic Journal
6 publications, 3.17%
Energies
5 publications, 2.65%
Nature Energy
5 publications, 2.65%
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
5 publications, 2.65%
Applied Energy
4 publications, 2.12%
Joule
4 publications, 2.12%
Energy Policy
4 publications, 2.12%
Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions Of the ASME
3 publications, 1.59%
Journal of Evolutionary Economics
3 publications, 1.59%
Nature Communications
3 publications, 1.59%
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
3 publications, 1.59%
PLoS ONE
3 publications, 1.59%
Research Policy
3 publications, 1.59%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
3 publications, 1.59%
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
2 publications, 1.06%
Renewable Energy
2 publications, 1.06%
Global Environmental Change
2 publications, 1.06%
Journal of Cleaner Production
2 publications, 1.06%
Futures
2 publications, 1.06%
Energy Economics
2 publications, 1.06%
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
2 publications, 1.06%
Science
2 publications, 1.06%
Nature Reviews Materials
2 publications, 1.06%
Oxford Review of Economic Policy
2 publications, 1.06%
ACS Omega
1 publication, 0.53%
Environmental Science & Technology
1 publication, 0.53%
Applied Physics Letters
1 publication, 0.53%
ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
1 publication, 0.53%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Publishers

10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Elsevier
70 publications, 37.04%
Springer Nature
31 publications, 16.4%
MDPI
9 publications, 4.76%
Wiley
9 publications, 4.76%
Social Science Electronic Publishing
6 publications, 3.17%
Taylor & Francis
6 publications, 3.17%
ASME International
5 publications, 2.65%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
4 publications, 2.12%
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
4 publications, 2.12%
Oxford University Press
4 publications, 2.12%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
3 publications, 1.59%
AIP Publishing
3 publications, 1.59%
Frontiers Media S.A.
3 publications, 1.59%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
3 publications, 1.59%
Cambridge University Press
3 publications, 1.59%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
3 publications, 1.59%
IOP Publishing
3 publications, 1.59%
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
2 publications, 1.06%
Emerald
2 publications, 1.06%
The Royal Society
2 publications, 1.06%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
2 publications, 1.06%
SAGE
2 publications, 1.06%
IWA Publishing
1 publication, 0.53%
Mary Ann Liebert
1 publication, 0.53%
MIT Press
1 publication, 0.53%
World Scientific
1 publication, 0.53%
N T C Publications Ltd.
1 publication, 0.53%
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
1 publication, 0.53%
Annual Reviews
1 publication, 0.53%
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
190
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Farmer J. D. et al. How predictable is technological progress? // Research Policy. 2016. Vol. 45. No. 3. pp. 647-665.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Farmer J. D., Lafond F. How predictable is technological progress? // Research Policy. 2016. Vol. 45. No. 3. pp. 647-665.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.001
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.001
TI - How predictable is technological progress?
T2 - Research Policy
AU - Farmer, J. Doyne
AU - Lafond, François
PY - 2016
DA - 2016/04/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 647-665
IS - 3
VL - 45
SN - 0048-7333
SN - 1873-7625
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2016_Farmer,
author = {J. Doyne Farmer and François Lafond},
title = {How predictable is technological progress?},
journal = {Research Policy},
year = {2016},
volume = {45},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {apr},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.001},
number = {3},
pages = {647--665},
doi = {10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.001}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Farmer, J. Doyne, et al. “How predictable is technological progress?.” Research Policy, vol. 45, no. 3, Apr. 2016, pp. 647-665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.001.