volume 46 issue 4 pages 799-819

Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: A patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies

Valeria Costantini 1
Francesco Crespi 1, 2
Alessandro Palma 3, 4
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2017-05-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR3.443
CiteScore15.0
Impact factor8.0
ISSN00487333, 18737625
Management of Technology and Innovation
Strategy and Management
Management Science and Operations Research
Abstract
This paper provides an empirical investigation of the role played by selected characteristics of the policy mix in inducing innovation in energy efficiency technologies. An original dataset covering 23 OECD countries over the period 1990–2010 combines the full set of policies in the energy efficiency domain for the residential sector with data on patents applied over the same period in this specific technological sector. The econometric results suggest that when the policy mix is characterised by a more balanced use in demand-pull and technology-push instruments, its positive effects on eco-innovation tend to be greater. Moreover, a more comprehensive policy mix is shown to be able to enhance innovation activities for the generation of new energy efficient technologies. However, the simple addition of an indiscriminate number of simultaneous policy instruments may reduce policy mix effectiveness. Finally, the empirical findings confirm previous evidence on the importance of policy spillover effects, and suggest that policy similarity between countries may represent an important aspect to be accounted for in policy mix design.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

5
10
15
20
25
Sustainability
23 publications, 6.99%
Journal of Cleaner Production
15 publications, 4.56%
Research Policy
14 publications, 4.26%
Energy Policy
14 publications, 4.26%
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
12 publications, 3.65%
Energy Economics
12 publications, 3.65%
Business Strategy and the Environment
9 publications, 2.74%
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
8 publications, 2.43%
Technovation
8 publications, 2.43%
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
7 publications, 2.13%
Energy Research and Social Science
7 publications, 2.13%
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
6 publications, 1.82%
SSRN Electronic Journal
6 publications, 1.82%
Economics of Innovation and New Technology
5 publications, 1.52%
Energies
4 publications, 1.22%
Ecological Economics
4 publications, 1.22%
Journal of Environmental Management
4 publications, 1.22%
Structural Change and Economic Dynamics
4 publications, 1.22%
Technology Analysis and Strategic Management
4 publications, 1.22%
Environment, Development and Sustainability
4 publications, 1.22%
Frontiers in Public Health
3 publications, 0.91%
International Review of Economics and Finance
3 publications, 0.91%
Environmental Science and Policy
3 publications, 0.91%
Sustainable Development
3 publications, 0.91%
Industry and Innovation
3 publications, 0.91%
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
3 publications, 0.91%
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
3 publications, 0.91%
Kybernetes
2 publications, 0.61%
Energy and Environment
2 publications, 0.61%
5
10
15
20
25

Publishers

20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Elsevier
146 publications, 44.38%
Springer Nature
40 publications, 12.16%
MDPI
38 publications, 11.55%
Taylor & Francis
31 publications, 9.42%
Wiley
20 publications, 6.08%
Frontiers Media S.A.
9 publications, 2.74%
Emerald
8 publications, 2.43%
SAGE
6 publications, 1.82%
Social Science Electronic Publishing
6 publications, 1.82%
Hindawi Limited
4 publications, 1.22%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
3 publications, 0.91%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
3 publications, 0.91%
Annual Reviews
2 publications, 0.61%
IGI Global
2 publications, 0.61%
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
1 publication, 0.3%
EDP Sciences
1 publication, 0.3%
IOP Publishing
1 publication, 0.3%
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 0.3%
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 0.3%
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
1 publication, 0.3%
PERSEE Program
1 publication, 0.3%
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
1 publication, 0.3%
Hans Publishers
1 publication, 0.3%
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
1 publication, 0.3%
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
329
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Costantini V. et al. Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: A patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies // Research Policy. 2017. Vol. 46. No. 4. pp. 799-819.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Costantini V., Crespi F., Palma A. Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: A patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies // Research Policy. 2017. Vol. 46. No. 4. pp. 799-819.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.004
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.004
TI - Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: A patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies
T2 - Research Policy
AU - Costantini, Valeria
AU - Crespi, Francesco
AU - Palma, Alessandro
PY - 2017
DA - 2017/05/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 799-819
IS - 4
VL - 46
SN - 0048-7333
SN - 1873-7625
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2017_Costantini,
author = {Valeria Costantini and Francesco Crespi and Alessandro Palma},
title = {Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: A patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies},
journal = {Research Policy},
year = {2017},
volume = {46},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {may},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.004},
number = {4},
pages = {799--819},
doi = {10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.004}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Costantini, Valeria, et al. “Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: A patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies.” Research Policy, vol. 46, no. 4, May. 2017, pp. 799-819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.004.