Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, volume 77, pages 13-24

Principles and procedures for implementation of ICH M7 recommended (Q)SAR analyses

Alexander Amberg 1
Lisa D. Beilke 2
Joel Bercu 3
Dave Bower 4
Alessandro Brigo 5
Kevin P. Cross 4
Laura Custer 6, 7
Krista Dobo 8
Eric Dowdy 3
Kevin A Ford 9, 10
Susanne Glowienke 11
Jacky Van Gompel 12
James S Harvey 13
Catrin Hasselgren 4
Masamitsu Honma 14
Robert A Jolly 15
Raymond Kemper 16
Michelle Kenyon 8
Naomi Kruhlak 17
Penny Leavitt 6, 7
Scott Miller 4
Wolfgang Muster 5
John Nicolette 18
Andreja Plaper 19
Mark Powley 17
Donald P Quigley 4
M.Vijayaraj Reddy 20
Hans Peter Spirkl 1
L. Stavitskaya 17
Andrew Teasdale 21
Sandy Weiner 22
Dennie S Welch 18
Angela White 13
Jörg D Wichard 23
Glenn J. Myatt 4
Show full list: 35 authors
1
 
Sanofi-aventis Deutschland GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany.
2
 
Toxicology Solutions, San Diego, CA, USA.
3
 
Gilead, Foster City, CA, USA.
4
 
Leadscope, Columbus, OH, USA.
5
 
Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland.
6
 
Bristol-Myers Squibb
7
 
New Brunswick NJ USA
8
 
Pfizer Groton CT USA
9
 
Genentech
10
 
South San Francisco USA
11
 
Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research,Basel,Switzerland
12
 
Janssen, Beerse, Belgium
15
 
Eli-Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
16
 
Vertex, Boston, MA, USA.
18
 
AbbVie, Inc North Chicago IL USA
19
 
KRKA, Novo Mesto, Slovenia.
20
 
Merck Research Laboratories West Point PA USA
22
 
Janssen, Spring House, PA, USA
23
 
Bayer Healthcare, Berlin, Germany.
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2016-06-01
scimago Q2
SJR0.778
CiteScore6.7
Impact factor3
ISSN02732300, 10960295
General Medicine
Toxicology
Abstract
The ICH M7 guideline describes a consistent approach to identify, categorize, and control DNA reactive, mutagenic, impurities in pharmaceutical products to limit the potential carcinogenic risk related to such impurities. This paper outlines a series of principles and procedures to consider when generating (Q)SAR assessments aligned with the ICH M7 guideline to be included in a regulatory submission. In the absence of adequate experimental data, the results from two complementary (Q)SAR methodologies may be combined to support an initial hazard classification. This may be followed by an assessment of additional information that serves as the basis for an expert review to support or refute the predictions. This paper elucidates scenarios where additional expert knowledge may be beneficial, what such an expert review may contain, and how the results and accompanying considerations may be documented. Furthermore, the use of these principles and procedures to yield a consistent and robust (Q)SAR-based argument to support impurity qualification for regulatory purposes is described in this manuscript.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex
Found error?