Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, volume 77, pages 13-24
Principles and procedures for implementation of ICH M7 recommended (Q)SAR analyses
Alexander Amberg
1
,
Lisa D. Beilke
2
,
Joel Bercu
3
,
Dave Bower
4
,
Alessandro Brigo
5
,
Kevin P. Cross
4
,
Laura Custer
6, 7
,
Krista Dobo
8
,
Eric Dowdy
3
,
Kevin A Ford
9, 10
,
Susanne Glowienke
11
,
Jacky Van Gompel
12
,
James S Harvey
13
,
Catrin Hasselgren
4
,
Masamitsu Honma
14
,
Robert A Jolly
15
,
Raymond Kemper
16
,
Michelle Kenyon
8
,
Naomi Kruhlak
17
,
Penny Leavitt
6, 7
,
Scott Miller
4
,
Wolfgang Muster
5
,
John Nicolette
18
,
Andreja Plaper
19
,
Mark Powley
17
,
Donald P Quigley
4
,
M.Vijayaraj Reddy
20
,
Hans Peter Spirkl
1
,
L. Stavitskaya
17
,
Andrew Teasdale
21
,
Sandy Weiner
22
,
Dennie S Welch
18
,
Angela White
13
,
Jörg D Wichard
23
,
Glenn J. Myatt
4
1
Sanofi-aventis Deutschland GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany.
|
2
Toxicology Solutions, San Diego, CA, USA.
|
3
Gilead, Foster City, CA, USA.
|
4
Leadscope, Columbus, OH, USA.
|
5
Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland.
|
6
Bristol-Myers Squibb
7
New Brunswick NJ USA
|
8
Pfizer Groton CT USA
|
9
Genentech
10
South San Francisco USA
|
11
Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research,Basel,Switzerland
|
12
Janssen, Beerse, Belgium
|
15
Eli-Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
|
16
Vertex, Boston, MA, USA.
|
18
AbbVie, Inc North Chicago IL USA
|
19
KRKA, Novo Mesto, Slovenia.
|
20
Merck Research Laboratories West Point PA USA
|
22
Janssen, Spring House, PA, USA
|
23
Bayer Healthcare, Berlin, Germany.
|
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2016-06-01
scimago Q2
SJR: 0.778
CiteScore: 6.7
Impact factor: 3
ISSN: 02732300, 10960295
General Medicine
Toxicology
Abstract
The ICH M7 guideline describes a consistent approach to identify, categorize, and control DNA reactive, mutagenic, impurities in pharmaceutical products to limit the potential carcinogenic risk related to such impurities. This paper outlines a series of principles and procedures to consider when generating (Q)SAR assessments aligned with the ICH M7 guideline to be included in a regulatory submission. In the absence of adequate experimental data, the results from two complementary (Q)SAR methodologies may be combined to support an initial hazard classification. This may be followed by an assessment of additional information that serves as the basis for an expert review to support or refute the predictions. This paper elucidates scenarios where additional expert knowledge may be beneficial, what such an expert review may contain, and how the results and accompanying considerations may be documented. Furthermore, the use of these principles and procedures to yield a consistent and robust (Q)SAR-based argument to support impurity qualification for regulatory purposes is described in this manuscript.
Found
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.