Human Resource Management Review, volume 32, issue 1, pages 100589

Employee engagement: Do practitioners care what academics have to say – And should they?

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2022-03-01
scimago Q1
SJR3.302
CiteScore20.2
Impact factor8.2
ISSN10534822, 18737889
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Applied Psychology
Abstract
Securing high levels of employee engagement has become a dominant concern for HR practitioners globally, and a lucrative survey and consultancy industry has grown up around the topic. Despite significant parallel interest within the scholarly community, it is questionable whether research published in peer-reviewed journals has had any impact on the practice of engagement. The divergent perspectives of academics and practitioners on engagement are explored within the wider context of evidence-based management and the ‘rigor – relevance’ debate, alongside consideration of the risks of presupposing a simplified binary divide between the two communities. Some suggestions for strategies aimed at creating a stronger connection between the interests of practitioners and those of academics are proposed, whilst bearing in mind academia's broader and more critical remit.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
1
2

Publishers

1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?