Radiocarbon, volume 62, issue 4, pages 725-757

The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curve (0–55 cal kBP)

Paula J. Reimer 1
William E N Austin 2, 3
Edouard Bard 4
A. Bayliss 5
Paul G. Blackwell 6
Christopher Bronk Ramsey 7
M. Butzin 8
Hai Cheng 9, 10
R. Lawrence Edwards 10, 11
Michael FRIEDRICH 12
Pieter M Grootes 13
Thomas P. Guilderson 14, 15
Irka Hajdas 16
Timothy J. Heaton 6
Alan Hogg 17
Konrad A. Hughen 18
Bernd Kromer 19
Sturt Manning 20
R. Muscheler 21
Jonathan M. Palmer 22
C. Pearson 23
Johannes van der Plicht 24
Ron W Reimer 1
David A. Richards 25
Marian Scott 26
John R. Southon 27
CHRIS S. M. TURNEY 22
L. Wacker 16
F. Adolphi 28
Ulf Büntgen 29, 30, 31, 32
Manuela Capano 4
Simon M Fahrni 27, 33
Alexandra Fogtmann Schulz 34
Ronny Friedrich 35
Sabrina Kudsk 34
Fusa Miyake 36
Jesper Olsen 37
Frederick Reinig 30
Minoru Sakamoto 38
Adam Sookdeo 16, 22
Sahra Talamo 39
Show full list: 42 authors
3
 
Scottish Association for Marine Science, Scottish Marine Institute, Oban, PA37 1QA, UK
5
 
Historic England, 25 Dowgate Hill, London, EC4R 2YAUK
31
 
Global Change Research Centre (CzechGlobe), 603 00Brno, Czech Republic
33
 
Ionplus AG, 8953Dietikon, Switzerland
35
 
Curt-Engelhorn-Centre Archaeometry, Mannheim, Germany
38
 
National Museum of Japanese History, Sakura, Japan
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2020-08-12
Journal: Radiocarbon
scimago Q1
SJR4.956
CiteScore16.2
Impact factor2
ISSN00338222, 19455755
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Archeology
Abstract
ABSTRACT Radiocarbon (14C) ages cannot provide absolutely dated chronologies for archaeological or paleoenvironmental studies directly but must be converted to calendar age equivalents using a calibration curve compensating for fluctuations in atmospheric 14C concentration. Although calibration curves are constructed from independently dated archives, they invariably require revision as new data become available and our understanding of the Earth system improves. In this volume the international 14C calibration curves for both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, as well as for the ocean surface layer, have been updated to include a wealth of new data and extended to 55,000 cal BP. Based on tree rings, IntCal20 now extends as a fully atmospheric record to ca. 13,900 cal BP. For the older part of the timescale, IntCal20 comprises statistically integrated evidence from floating tree-ring chronologies, lacustrine and marine sediments, speleothems, and corals. We utilized improved evaluation of the timescales and location variable 14C offsets from the atmosphere (reservoir age, dead carbon fraction) for each dataset. New statistical methods have refined the structure of the calibration curves while maintaining a robust treatment of uncertainties in the 14C ages, the calendar ages and other corrections. The inclusion of modeled marine reservoir ages derived from a three-dimensional ocean circulation model has allowed us to apply more appropriate reservoir corrections to the marine 14C data rather than the previous use of constant regional offsets from the atmosphere. Here we provide an overview of the new and revised datasets and the associated methods used for the construction of the IntCal20 curve and explore potential regional offsets for tree-ring data. We discuss the main differences with respect to the previous calibration curve, IntCal13, and some of the implications for archaeology and geosciences ranging from the recent past to the time of the extinction of the Neanderthals.

Top-30

Journals

50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450

Publishers

200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?