volume 42 issue 4 pages 701-719

Dimensions of Financial Autonomy in Low-/Moderate-Income Couples from a Gender Perspective and Implications for Welfare Reform

Fran Bennett 1
Sirin Sung 2
1
 
Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Barnett House, 32 Wellington Square, Oxford OX1 2ER email: fran.bennett@spi.ox.ac.uk
2
 
Department of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work, Queens University Belfast, 6 College Park, Belfast BT7 1LP email: s.sung@qub.ac.uk
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2013-07-11
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR1.025
CiteScore5.1
Impact factor2.6
ISSN00472794, 14697823
Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Public Administration
Abstract

The ‘unitary household’ lives on in policymakers’ assumptions about couples sharing their finances. Yet financial autonomy is seen as a key issue in gender relations, particularly for women. This article draws on evidence from semi-structured individual interviews with men and women in thirty low-/moderate-income couples in Britain. The interviews explored whether financial autonomy had any meaning to these individuals; and, if so, to what extent this was gendered in the sense of there being differences in men's and women's understanding of it. We develop a framework for the investigation of financial autonomy, involving several dimensions: achieving economic independence, having privacy in one's financial affairs and exercising agency in relation to household and/or personal spending. We argue that financial autonomy is a relevant issue for low-/moderate-income couples, and that women are more conscious of tensions between financial togetherness and autonomy due to their greater responsibility for managing togetherness and lower likelihood of achieving financial independence. Policymakers should therefore not discount the aspirations of women in particular for financial autonomy, even in low-/moderate-income couples where there remain significant obstacles to achieving this. Yet plans for welfare reform that rely on means testing and ignore intra-household dynamics in relation to family finances threaten to exacerbate these obstacles and reinforce a unitary family model.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
Journal of Islamic Marketing
3 publications, 10%
International Journal of Bank Marketing
2 publications, 6.67%
Critical Social Policy
2 publications, 6.67%
International Social Security Review
2 publications, 6.67%
Social Policy and Society
2 publications, 6.67%
Social Politics
2 publications, 6.67%
Maternal and Child Health Journal
1 publication, 3.33%
Journal of Family and Economic Issues
1 publication, 3.33%
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
1 publication, 3.33%
Heliyon
1 publication, 3.33%
Energy Research and Social Science
1 publication, 3.33%
SSRN Electronic Journal
1 publication, 3.33%
Journal of Marriage and Family
1 publication, 3.33%
Canadian Review of Sociology
1 publication, 3.33%
Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research
1 publication, 3.33%
British Journal of Educational Studies
1 publication, 3.33%
Journal of Business Ethics
1 publication, 3.33%
Journal of Poverty and Social Justice
1 publication, 3.33%
Canadian Studies in Population
1 publication, 3.33%
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
1 publication, 3.33%
International Journal of Consumer Studies
1 publication, 3.33%
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
1 publication, 3.33%
1
2
3

Publishers

1
2
3
4
5
Emerald
5 publications, 16.67%
Springer Nature
5 publications, 16.67%
Wiley
5 publications, 16.67%
Elsevier
3 publications, 10%
SAGE
2 publications, 6.67%
Taylor & Francis
2 publications, 6.67%
Cambridge University Press
2 publications, 6.67%
Oxford University Press
2 publications, 6.67%
Social Science Electronic Publishing
1 publication, 3.33%
Bristol University Press
1 publication, 3.33%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
1 publication, 3.33%
1
2
3
4
5
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
30
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Bennett F., Sung S. Dimensions of Financial Autonomy in Low-/Moderate-Income Couples from a Gender Perspective and Implications for Welfare Reform // Journal of Social Policy. 2013. Vol. 42. No. 4. pp. 701-719.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Bennett F., Sung S. Dimensions of Financial Autonomy in Low-/Moderate-Income Couples from a Gender Perspective and Implications for Welfare Reform // Journal of Social Policy. 2013. Vol. 42. No. 4. pp. 701-719.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1017/s0047279413000330
UR - https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279413000330
TI - Dimensions of Financial Autonomy in Low-/Moderate-Income Couples from a Gender Perspective and Implications for Welfare Reform
T2 - Journal of Social Policy
AU - Bennett, Fran
AU - Sung, Sirin
PY - 2013
DA - 2013/07/11
PB - Cambridge University Press
SP - 701-719
IS - 4
VL - 42
SN - 0047-2794
SN - 1469-7823
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2013_Bennett,
author = {Fran Bennett and Sirin Sung},
title = {Dimensions of Financial Autonomy in Low-/Moderate-Income Couples from a Gender Perspective and Implications for Welfare Reform},
journal = {Journal of Social Policy},
year = {2013},
volume = {42},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
month = {jul},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279413000330},
number = {4},
pages = {701--719},
doi = {10.1017/s0047279413000330}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Bennett, Fran, and Sirin Sung. “Dimensions of Financial Autonomy in Low-/Moderate-Income Couples from a Gender Perspective and Implications for Welfare Reform.” Journal of Social Policy, vol. 42, no. 4, Jul. 2013, pp. 701-719. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279413000330.