International Journal of Consumer Studies
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
8.6
SJR
2.019
CiteScore
13.6
Categories
Applied Psychology
Economics and Econometrics
Marketing
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Areas
Business, Management and Accounting
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Medicine
Psychology
Years of issue
2001-2025
journal names
International Journal of Consumer Studies
INT J CONSUM STUD
Top-3 citing journals

International Journal of Consumer Studies
(5250 citations)

Sustainability
(2639 citations)

Journal of Cleaner Production
(1101 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Helsinki
(35 publications)

University of Pretoria
(35 publications)

Wageningen University and Research Centre
(26 publications)

Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode
(13 publications)

University of Puerto Rico
(8 publications)

University of Reading
(6 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 1369
Q1

Cosimulation-based biomechanics of the human body with hip prosthesis
Di Bona R., Catelani D., Ottaviano E., Gentile D., Testa G.
Q1
Multibody System Dynamics
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Correction to: A new skeletal model for the ankle joint complex
Rodrigues da Silva M., Marques F., Tavares da Silva M., Flores P.
Q1
Multibody System Dynamics
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

A symplectic finite element method in time for periodic response of multibody systems
Wang H., Wang C., Wang G., Pan Y., Mikkola A., Peng H.
Q1
Multibody System Dynamics
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Investigation of the dynamic transmission accuracy of an industrial robot joint RV reducer under variable situations
Xu L., Wu Y.
The dynamic transmission error of the joint RV (rotating vector) reducer is one of the important factors affecting the positioning accuracy of industrial robots. However, the current studies on the transmission accuracy characteristics of RV reducers are based on the equal speed driving condition, which neglects the impact of the transmission error generated by the joint RV reducer on the positioning accuracy when the robot is in the start-stop variable speed phase. This study carries out an in-depth analysis of the dynamic transmission accuracy characteristics of joint RV reducers of industrial robots under variable-speed working conditions. Two typical mathematical models of variable-speed drive laws are constructed, and a multibody dynamic model of the RV reducer that takes into account the geometric errors of typical components is established, aiming to more accurately simulate the operating state of the RV reducer under actual working conditions. To confirm the accuracy of the theoretical RV reducer contact dynamics model, the dynamic transmission error test of the RV reducer under equal-speed conditions is carried out. The results show that the dynamic model can better reflect the actual transmission characteristics of the RV reducer. Thereafter, based on the theoretical model, the effects of different driving laws on the dynamic transmission error of joint RV reducers are analyzed in depth. The results of the study show that the transmission error of the RV reducer under variable speed drive is significantly larger than that under equal speed drive. Moreover, angular acceleration and load inertia are the main factors affecting the transmission error of RV reducers for industrial robot joints.
Q1

Muscle path predictions using a discrete geodesic Euler–Lagrange model in constrained optimisation: comparison with OpenSim and experimental data
Lavaill M., Chen X., Heinrich S., Pivonka P., Leyendecker S.
Abstract
Accurate and robust modelling of muscle paths is crucial for predicting human movement. Traditional methods often rely on simplified straight-line representations and manual specifications of via-points and wrapping surfaces, which may lead to inconsistent and unrealistic muscle paths The discrete geodesic Euler–Lagrange (DGEL) method identifies geodesics with minimal curvature trajectories that adhere closely to anatomical constraints. Embedding DGEL into an optimisation problem with a specific objective function has the potential to identify muscle paths with smooth changes in muscle length over the course of the motion, thereby avoiding abrupt muscle discontinuities. This study aims to investigate the performance of the DGEL method. We developed multibody models with increasing complexity (i.e. a static arm model, a kinematic elbow model and a kinematic shoulder model) and investigated different scenarios, such as muscle attachment modifications, simulation of diverse motions and extreme ranges of motion. We performed a comparative analysis between the geodesic model and the open-source OpenSim framework, with validation against experimental data to assess physiological plausibility. Our findings reveal that the DGEL method overcomes limitations inherent in traditional approaches, including discontinuities and incorrect wrapping surface interactions. For the static arm model, the DGEL-computed muscle length showed a closer match to ground truth compared to OpenSim. In the elbow model, the DGEL method eliminated unphysiological muscle path discontinuities. In the shoulder model, the DGEL method was validated across three different motions against experimental muscle moment arms, achieving great accuracy and superior robustness in handling complex muscle paths. This method effectively addressed common pitfalls in muscle path modelling, such as bone penetrations and erratic trajectories. Future work will further validate the DGEL method across diverse real-world applications and optimise its performance through advanced objective functions. The DGEL approach represents a significant improvement in the accuracy and robustness of muscle path modelling, advancing the field of biomechanics and musculoskeletal modelling.
Q1

Dynamic responses of a vibro-impact capsule robot self-propelling in the large intestine via multibody dynamics
Wang Z., Tian J., Liu Y., Neves A., Prasad S.
Abstract
In recent years, colonic capsule endoscopy has become available in clinical practice as an alternative modality to colonoscopy. However, it faces challenges such as prolonged examination time and the absence of clinician navigation. Leveraging their pioneering work in the field of vibro-impact self-propulsion technique for gastrointestinal endoscopy, Zhang et al. (IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 8:1842–1849, 2023) developed a novel, untethered, self-propelled, endoscopic capsule robot, with the aim of providing a new means of examining bowel cancer in real time. To evaluate and optimize the passage of this capsule robot self-propelling in the large intestine, this work adopts multibody dynamics analysis and experimental investigation to study the robot’s dynamics and its interaction with the intestinal environment. Considering the complex anatomy of the large intestine, containing different sections, e.g., cecum, ascending, transverse, descending, and sigmoid colon, and variations of the haustra, e.g., with various radii, lengths, and heights, the robot was driven by the square-wave excitation of an inner mass interacting with the capsule body and tested on a real porcine colon. The robot’s driving parameters, including the excitation frequency, amplitude, and duty cycle, and the dimensions of the haustra are the two main factors influencing the robot’s progression in the intestine. By comparing with the experimental results, the proposed multibody dynamics model developed using MSC Adams can estimate the movement of the capsule robot and the intestinal resistance quantitatively. Extensive numerical and experimental studies suggest an excitation frequency of 60 Hz and a duty cycle of 0.4 as the optimal parameters for driving the robot, and the longer the haustral length is, the faster the robot passes through. These results ensure the validity of the proposed multibody dynamics platform, which can be used by robotic engineers for developing medical robots for intestinal examinations.
Q1

Fluid-conveying pipes in the floating frame of reference formulation
van Voorthuizen K., Abdul Rasheed M.I., Schilder J.
Abstract
This work presents a new formulation for flexible fluid-conveying pipe elements based on the widely used floating frame of reference formulation. The elements can be used as a tool for the analysis of flexible multibody systems that contain fluid-conveying pipes, as it is well known that the movement of the fluid can influence the behavior and stability of such systems. The pipe defines a control volume through which the fluid, which is considered to be a moving mass, axially flows. The velocity of a material point of the fluid is therefore a material derivative of its position, representing the large rigid movement and small elastic deformation of the pipe along with the velocity of the fluid with respect to the pipe. The equations of motion are derived through the principle of virtual work, spatial discretization by finite element interpolation functions, and model reduction. A simplification of the consistent equations of motion is proposed, which avoids the use of inertia shape integrals and reduces the effort required to implement the developed fluid-conveying pipe elements in existing multibody software. The developed elements are validated by simulation of a straight cantilevered pipe and a curved pipe constrained on one end by a hinge. A simulation of a concrete printing system illustrates the straightforward incorporation of the elements in larger multibody systems.
Q1

Dynamic modeling and simulation of the multi-point collision and contact problem of multi-legged robots
Ma X., Zhao S., An Y., Li K., Wang T.
The problem of multi-point collision and contact in multi-legged robots involves complex dynamics with multiple closed loops, variable topology, and numerous contact points, making simulations challenging. Additionally, Zeno behavior—characterized by an infinite number of discrete transitions within a finite time—is likely to occur, reducing computational efficiency and potentially causing simulations to stall. This paper establishes a linear complementary dynamic model to study the collision and contact problem of multi-legged mobile robots. For the uncertainty of multi-point collision and contact, we use sets and transformation matrices to represent the number and position changes of the points that collide or contact with the ground. This paper separately studies the problems of multi-point collision and multi-point continuous contact and considers the coupling effect of collision and continuous contact. A new criterion to determine the state of continuous contact is proposed, and modifications are made to the relevant linear complementary equations to prevent the Zeno behavior. Finally, several numerical examples are provided to verify the effectiveness of the method.
Q1

Vibration isolation performance and non-probabilistic reliability evaluation of multidimensional vibration isolator with interval joint clearance
Gao X., Niu J., He L., Wang Z., Qin Z., Wu H.
For suppressing multidimensional vibration effectively, the multidimensional vibration isolator based on parallel mechanism considering interval joint clearance is proposed. The kinematics and dynamics of the isolator are established respectively. The contact force generated due to interval joint clearance is modeled respectively by the Lankarani–Nikravesh (L-N) model and the modified Coulomb friction force model. Furthermore, the dynamics of the isolator with interval joint clearance are obtained by the first order interval perturbation method. The upper and lower bounds of vibration isolation performance are calculated, which indicates the isolator with interval joint clearance inhibited external vibration in time and frequency domain respectively. The vibration isolation performance is most sensitive in pitch (around $x$ ) direction due to the existence of interval joint clearance. The non-probabilistic reliability model of the isolator is proposed by the shortest distance method, and the non-probabilistic reliability index is investigated in each isolation direction with interval joint clearance. The reliability index of the isolator exhibits a quasi-stable area in horizontal (in $x$ ) and pitch (around $x$ ) directions, which implies the reliability index is not sensitive to joint clearance variation in a certain perturbation range. The proposed vibration isolator with interval joint clearance is fabricated, and the vibration isolation experiment is conducted. The experimental results are generally consistent with the theoretical results, which indicates the correctness of the analysis.
Q1

Using high fidelity discrete element simulation to calibrate an expeditious terramechanics model in a multibody dynamics framework
Zhang Y., Dai J., Hu W., Negrut D.
The wheel–soil interaction has great impact on the dynamics of off-road vehicles in terramechanics applications. The soil contact model (SCM), which anchors an empirical method to characterize the frictional contact between a wheel and soil, has been widely used in off-road vehicle dynamics simulations because it quickly produces adequate results for many terramechanics applications. The SCM approach calls for a set of model parameters that are obtained via a bevameter test. This test is expensive and time consuming to carry out, and in some cases difficult to set up, e.g., in extraterrestrial applications. We propose an approach to address these concerns by conducting the bevameter test in simulation, using a model that captures the physics of the actual experiment with high fidelity. To that end, we model the bevameter test rig as a multibody system, while the dynamics of the soil is captured using a discrete element model (DEM). The multibody dynamics–soil dynamics co-simulation is used to replicate the bevameter test, producing high fidelity ground truth test data that is subsequently used to calibrate the SCM parameters within a Bayesian inference framework. To test the accuracy of the resulting SCM terramechanics, we run single wheel and full rover simulations using both DEM and SCM terrains. The SCM results match well with those produced by the DEM solution, and the simulation time for SCM is two to three orders of magnitude lower than that of DEM. All simulations in this work are performed using Chrono, an open-source, publicly available simulator. The scripts and models used are available in a public repository for reproducibility studies and further research.
Q1

A machine learning approach to simulate flexible body dynamics
Slimak T., Zwölfer A., Todorov B., Rixen D.
Abstract
Flexible body dynamics simulations are powerful tools to realistically analyze vehicles, machines, mechanics, etc. However, the inherently nonlinear governing equations often require tailor-made and computationally expense solution strategies. Employing artificial neural networks for forward dynamics analyses of flexible bodies may be not only useful as a model reduction tool, since evaluating a network is frequently faster compared to solving physics-based models, but also to enhance models with experimental data. In this realm four primary strategies have emerged: (i) Incorporating time as an input to the artificial neural network to predict the desired solution variables at that specific time. (ii) Utilizing an entire time series as input, the network generates the corresponding time series of the desired solution variables in a single pass through the artificial neural network. (iii) Employing an artificial neural network to advance one time step into the future using the states as input. (iv) Leveraging the artificial neural network solely for learning the equations of motion or energetic quantities, e.g., Lagrangian/Hamiltonian, coupled with standard techniques from analytical dynamics and time integration. Approaches (iii) and (iv) can be considered advantageous owing to their inherent physics-informed nature, greater flexibility in adopting varying time steps, and ease of integration with classical simulation techniques. This contribution, therefore, presents a method to predict flexible body dynamics one step at a time using two complimentary artificial neural networks. One network predicts the equations of motion relationship between positions, velocities, and accelerations, while a second network or numerical integrator propagates the system states forwards in time. This work demonstrates the feasibility of the developed approach on the testcase of a flexible beam. Various parameter studies and alternative solutions are presented to highlight the performance of the developed approach. The robustness and ability to extrapolate are also explored to determine the practical viability of this solution. The intention of this single-body work is to enable the future embedding in a multibody context.
Q1

Embedding reference dynamics in model predictive control for trajectory tracking of multi-input multi-output non-minimum phase underactuated multibody systems
Bettega J., Richiedei D., Tamellin I.
This paper proposes a feedback control technique for path and trajectory tracking on multi-input, multi-output nonminimum phase underactuated multibody systems and applies it to a spatial gantry crane moving a double pendulum. The two links forming the double pendulum are connected in series and the desired output of the system is the tip of the second link. This output selection yields to a nonminimum phase system, which is a class of dynamical systems that are particularly challenging from the control design perspective. In this paper, an enhanced formulation of Model Predictive Control is proposed to solve the output trajectory tracking problem by embedding the dynamics of the spatial reference trajectory within the optimization process performed at each time step. The proposed control technique is formulated considering two different scenarios: the case of torque-controlled (i.e., current-controlled) actuators, and the case of position-controlled actuators. The latter is unusual in the field of MPC and is suitable for industrial applications where proprietary controllers are adopted. Numerical validations show negligible contour and tracking errors during the execution of the desired trajectories, with low computational effort.
Q1

Optimising a driving mechanism mechanical design of EXOTIC exoskeleton—a review on upper limb exoskeletons driving systems and a case study
Falkowski P., Mohammadi M., Andreasen Struijk L.N., Rzymkowski C., Pilat Z.
AbstractWhile designing rehabilitation exoskeletons is often realised based on experience and intuition, many processes can be computer-aided. This gives the opportunity to design lighter and more compact constructions. Hence, the devices can be fully wearable and have a wider range of motion. So far, mainly topology optimisation and parametric dimensional optimisations have been used for that. The presented study addresses the problem of automatic selection of the driving systems for exoskeletons. It consists of the literature review of the components used to actuate the joints of such constructions, optimisation algorithm development, and a case study on the EXOTIC exoskeleton. The method includes building a database of motors and gearboxes, computing inverse kinematics of a system to obtain angular trajectories from the task-oriented paths, iteration computing inverse dynamics to compute required torque and the search for the optimal solution according to the defined goal function. This approach enables single joint and multijoint optimisation, with the custom goal function minimising optionally masses, diameters or widths of the selected driving systems. The investigation consists of the 28 simulation trials for EXOTIC exoskeleton to compare results obtained for different aims. Moreover, to visualise the effect, the 1st DOF driving mechanism is redesigned to obtain its minimum width based on the optimisation results. The optimal choice reduced the actuation mechanism mass by 15.3%, while its total dimensions by 17.5%, 8.5% and 26.2%, respectively. The presented approach is easily transferable to any other active exoskeleton and can contribute to designing compact and lightweight constructions. This is particularly important in assistive rehabilitation and can also be used in industrial assistance processes.
Q1

Tailored gait-pattern generation and verification based on the dynamic analysis of the human musculoskeletal model
Shanmuga Prasad S., Kim Y.
This study presents a novel Forward Dynamic approach that integrates a Genetic Algorithm (GA) to generate and optimize gait patterns with Inverse Dynamics analysis, tailored to individual users in the robot-assisted training platform. The resulting trajectories provide gait-trajectory planning using the developed gait-pattern simulator, enabling medical personnel to select customized tasks and training trajectories for users based on their training goals, subsequently transferring user-specific parameters to the exoskeletal robot for rehabilitation/training. By leveraging biomechanical data as reference (joint torque and force) from the Inverse Dynamic analysis, the method foregoes the necessity for experimental data, directly predicting joint angles and positions. To ensure the validity of the proposed method, we used a combined approach of numerical analysis and comparison with motion-capture data. This evaluation aimed to assess how closely the simulated results resembled real human walking motion for the lower-extremity joints.
Q1

Multi-physics tribo-dynamics simulation of lubricated translational joints in marine engines
Li R., Li G., Meng X., Sun R., Cheng W.
Lubricated translational joints are extensively utilized in power equipment. Due to the presence of clearance, the moving mass exhibits transverse motion within the guide rail in addition to its reciprocating motion. This transverse motion significantly influences the friction, wear, and service life of the friction pair. In this process, multi-physics factors such as fluid lubrication, structural deformation, and frictional heat generation interact with each other, making the tribo-dynamics characteristics very complex. In the current study, a new thermal-fluid-solid coupled method for modeling the tribo-dynamics of translational lubricated joints is presented, and it is applied to the crosshead slider-guide friction pair in marine engines. Research results show that the tribo-dynamics characteristics of the slider predicted by the model is consistent with the experimental ones, the correctness of the model is verified. The frictional heat generation has little effect on the tribo-dynamics characteristics of the crosshead slider under the rated operating conditions. However, the structure deformation induced by the external load intensifies the transverse motion of the crosshead slider. Compared with the model that ignored the deformation, the transverse displacement can be increased by 30%, which indicates that it is necessary to consider the multi-physics coupling effect.
Top-100
Citing journals
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
|
|
International Journal of Consumer Studies
5250 citations, 9.69%
|
|
Sustainability
2639 citations, 4.87%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
1101 citations, 2.03%
|
|
British Food Journal
1007 citations, 1.86%
|
|
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
836 citations, 1.54%
|
|
Journal of Business Research
658 citations, 1.21%
|
|
Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management
521 citations, 0.96%
|
|
Journal of Consumer Behaviour
482 citations, 0.89%
|
|
Food Quality and Preference
480 citations, 0.89%
|
|
Appetite
453 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
388 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Foods
381 citations, 0.7%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
366 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Psychology and Marketing
326 citations, 0.6%
|
|
International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management
323 citations, 0.6%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
319 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics
303 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Journal of Consumer Marketing
274 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Advances in Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, and E-Services
272 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Journal of Business Ethics
258 citations, 0.48%
|
|
International Journal of Bank Marketing
257 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Journal of Consumer Affairs
251 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Young Consumers
240 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Sustainable Production and Consumption
240 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Business Strategy and the Environment
220 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Journal of Marketing Management
201 citations, 0.37%
|
|
European Journal of Marketing
199 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of Food Products Marketing
193 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Nutrients
190 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journal of International Consumer Marketing
188 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Marketing Intelligence and Planning
188 citations, 0.35%
|
|
PLoS ONE
188 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Cogent Business and Management
187 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journal of Product and Brand Management
179 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
177 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Heliyon
163 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Islamic Marketing
159 citations, 0.29%
|
|
International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education
149 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Global Fashion Marketing
144 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Environment, Development and Sustainability
142 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Food Control
140 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Family and Economic Issues
139 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
134 citations, 0.25%
|
|
SAGE Open
130 citations, 0.24%
|
|
European Management Journal
124 citations, 0.23%
|
|
International Journal of Hospitality Management
122 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing
120 citations, 0.22%
|
|
International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research
118 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Consumer Policy
117 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Food Policy
115 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Energy Research and Social Science
103 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Macromarketing
102 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Agriculture and Human Values
100 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
98 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
95 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Foodservice Business Research
95 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption
95 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning
92 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Social Responsibility Journal
92 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Computers in Human Behavior
91 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Energy Policy
90 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Energies
90 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Meat Science
83 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Current Psychology
81 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Energy Efficiency
80 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Services Marketing
80 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Financial Services Marketing
80 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Public Health Nutrition
80 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Sustainable Development
80 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Food Research International
80 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Journal of Emerging Markets
77 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Strategic Marketing
76 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Ecological Economics
74 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management
74 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Agriculture (Switzerland)
72 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Consumer Culture
70 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research
70 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal
70 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Tenside, Surfactants, Detergents
69 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
69 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice
67 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Brand Management
67 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Sustainable Tourism
67 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Marketing Communications
67 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition)
67 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Global Marketing
66 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
66 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Management Review Quarterly
65 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Promotion Management
65 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing
64 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing
64 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Agribusiness
62 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Health Expectations
62 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing
61 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Qualitative Market Research
61 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal
61 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Recherche et Applications en Marketing
61 citations, 0.11%
|
|
BMC Public Health
61 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Tourism Management
61 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Waste Management
60 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
|
Citing publishers
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
|
|
Elsevier
9964 citations, 18.4%
|
|
Wiley
8843 citations, 16.33%
|
|
Emerald
7584 citations, 14%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
5945 citations, 10.98%
|
|
Springer Nature
5299 citations, 9.78%
|
|
MDPI
4832 citations, 8.92%
|
|
SAGE
2266 citations, 4.18%
|
|
IGI Global
1163 citations, 2.15%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
868 citations, 1.6%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
361 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
355 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
323 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
297 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Oxford University Press
273 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
234 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
122 citations, 0.23%
|
|
CAIRN
118 citations, 0.22%
|
|
IOP Publishing
113 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
101 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Springer Publishing Company
92 citations, 0.17%
|
|
EDP Sciences
86 citations, 0.16%
|
|
SciELO
80 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Intellect
69 citations, 0.13%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
65 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Marketing Association
58 citations, 0.11%
|
|
JMIR Publications
58 citations, 0.11%
|
|
World Scientific
53 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
53 citations, 0.1%
|
|
N T C Publications Ltd.
49 citations, 0.09%
|
|
F1000 Research
46 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
46 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Cognizant, LLC
45 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Science Alert
41 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
39 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Annual Reviews
39 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
39 citations, 0.07%
|
|
IntechOpen
39 citations, 0.07%
|
|
International Association for Food Protection
37 citations, 0.07%
|
|
BMJ
37 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
36 citations, 0.07%
|
|
AOSIS
36 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
34 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
32 citations, 0.06%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
31 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Bristol University Press
30 citations, 0.06%
|
|
AIP Publishing
29 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
26 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciencia e Tecnologia de Alimentos
26 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
25 citations, 0.05%
|
|
International Food and Agribusiness Management Association
25 citations, 0.05%
|
|
OpenEdition
25 citations, 0.05%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
23 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
23 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society for Horticultural Science
21 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Wageningen Academic Publishers
21 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Korean Society for Clothing Industry
20 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Franco Angeli
20 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Brill
19 citations, 0.04%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
19 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IOS Press
18 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles
18 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
17 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administracao de Empresas de Sao Paulo
17 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
17 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
17 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Hans Publishers
17 citations, 0.03%
|
|
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
16 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
15 citations, 0.03%
|
|
International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS)
15 citations, 0.03%
|
|
National Biological Information Infrastructure
15 citations, 0.03%
|
|
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR)
15 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Human Kinetics
14 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems
14 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korea Distribution Science Association (KODISA)
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Editura Economica
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Gyandhara International Academic Publications
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academic Journals
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
11 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Editura ASE Bucuresti
11 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Technical University Liberec
11 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universities Federation for Animal Welfare
11 citations, 0.02%
|
|
China Science Publishing & Media
11 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
11 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
10 citations, 0.02%
|
|
10 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IWA Publishing
10 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
10 citations, 0.02%
|
|
PERSEE Program
10 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
10 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
10 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Dietitians of Canada
9 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society for Nutrition
9 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Vilnius University Press
9 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
9 citations, 0.02%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
9 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
|
University of Helsinki
35 publications, 1.7%
|
|
University of Pretoria
35 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
26 publications, 1.26%
|
|
Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University of Bonn
22 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Griffith University
20 publications, 0.97%
|
|
North-West University
18 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
17 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Virginia Tech
17 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Uppsala University
16 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
16 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Iowa State University
16 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
16 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Texas State University
16 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Ohio State University
15 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Rhode Island
15 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Deakin University
14 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode
13 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Umeå University
13 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Florida State University
13 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Aalto University
12 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Aarhus University
12 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Tampere University
11 publications, 0.53%
|
|
University of Otago
11 publications, 0.53%
|
|
University of Queensland
11 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Seoul National University
11 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Newcastle University
11 publications, 0.53%
|
|
University of Minnesota
11 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Cardiff University
11 publications, 0.53%
|
|
University of Reading
11 publications, 0.53%
|
|
University of Ulster
11 publications, 0.53%
|
|
University of Zaragoza
10 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Alabama
10 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Lund University
9 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
9 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Liverpool John Moores University
9 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Swinburne University of Technology
9 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of South Africa
9 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Corvinus University of Budapest
9 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Ghana
9 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Puerto Rico
9 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Université Laval
9 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Alberta
9 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Valencia
9 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
8 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Copenhagen Business School
8 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Birmingham
8 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Glasgow Caledonian University
8 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Curtin University
8 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Auburn University
8 publications, 0.39%
|
|
North Carolina State University
8 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Southern Illinois University Carbondale
8 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Kentucky
8 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Ghent University
7 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
7 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Kristianstad University
7 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Renmin University of China
7 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Vaasa
7 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Manchester
7 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
7 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Monash University
7 publications, 0.34%
|
|
La Trobe University
7 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Sungkyunkwan University
7 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Cardiff Metropolitan University
7 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Ljubljana
7 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of North Texas
7 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Utah State University
7 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Tennessee
7 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Surrey
7 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Salford
7 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Delhi
6 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
6 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University Putra Malaysia
6 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Turku
6 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Nottingham
6 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
6 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Macquarie University
6 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Tasmania
6 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
6 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Harokopio University of Athens
6 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Purdue University
6 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Tecnológico de Monterrey
6 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Porto
6 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Sheffield
6 publications, 0.29%
|
|
York University
6 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
6 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Delaware
6 publications, 0.29%
|
|
London Metropolitan University
6 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Ankara University
5 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Aligarh Muslim University
5 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Lucknow
5 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Rohtak
5 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
5 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Jilin University
5 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Malaya
5 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Parthenope University of Naples
5 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Western Sydney University
5 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Eastern Finland
5 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Dundee
5 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Auckland University of Technology
5 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Stellenbosch University
5 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode
13 publications, 2.41%
|
|
University of Puerto Rico
8 publications, 1.48%
|
|
University of Reading
6 publications, 1.11%
|
|
Aligarh Muslim University
5 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
5 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
5 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Griffith University
5 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of Kentucky
5 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Texas State University
5 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of Delhi
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Symbiosis International University
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Hamirpur
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Calcutta
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Lucknow
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Renmin University of China
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Auckland University of Technology
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Curtin University
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Macquarie University
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
La Trobe University
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Seoul National University
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Sungkyunkwan University
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of Minnesota
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Poznań University of Economics and Business
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of Valencia
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of Rhode Island
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of North Texas
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of Alabama
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Hacettepe University
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Hyderabad
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Indore
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Rohtak
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Jilin University
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
O. P. Jindal Global University
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Malaya
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University Putra Malaysia
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Tampere University
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Western Sydney University
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Shenzhen University
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
American University of Beirut
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Tianjin University
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Lebanese American University
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Guizhou University of Finance and Economics
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Otago
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Monash University
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Deakin University
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Swinburne University of Technology
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Newcastle University
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Macau
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Purdue University
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Tecnológico de Monterrey
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Porto
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Sheffield
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Warsaw
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
York University
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Florida
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Xavier University
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
International University of Rabat
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Tehran
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Istanbul University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Yildiz Technical University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Savitribai Phule Pune University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Cochin University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Istanbul Medeniyet University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Shri Vile Parle Kelavani Mandal's Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Banasthali Vidyapith
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Christ University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Ranchi
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Nagpur
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Tsinghua University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Central University of Haryana
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Integral University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Harbin Engineering University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Istanbul Arel University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Ghent University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
National University of Malaysia
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Helsinki
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
UCSI University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Jordan
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Aalto University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Central University of Finance and Economics
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Basel
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Milan
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Turku
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Shanghai University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Vaasa
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Aarhus University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
National University of Singapore
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
|
|
USA
|
USA, 437, 21.19%
USA
437 publications, 21.19%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 260, 12.61%
United Kingdom
260 publications, 12.61%
|
India
|
India, 130, 6.3%
India
130 publications, 6.3%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 123, 5.97%
Australia
123 publications, 5.97%
|
China
|
China, 115, 5.58%
China
115 publications, 5.58%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 98, 4.75%
Canada
98 publications, 4.75%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 89, 4.32%
Finland
89 publications, 4.32%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 80, 3.88%
Germany
80 publications, 3.88%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 72, 3.49%
South Africa
72 publications, 3.49%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 67, 3.25%
Sweden
67 publications, 3.25%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 65, 3.15%
Spain
65 publications, 3.15%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 65, 3.15%
Republic of Korea
65 publications, 3.15%
|
France
|
France, 48, 2.33%
France
48 publications, 2.33%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 42, 2.04%
Italy
42 publications, 2.04%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 40, 1.94%
Turkey
40 publications, 1.94%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 38, 1.84%
Brazil
38 publications, 1.84%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 36, 1.75%
Denmark
36 publications, 1.75%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 36, 1.75%
Netherlands
36 publications, 1.75%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 34, 1.65%
Malaysia
34 publications, 1.65%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 32, 1.55%
Poland
32 publications, 1.55%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 29, 1.41%
Portugal
29 publications, 1.41%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 28, 1.36%
New Zealand
28 publications, 1.36%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 25, 1.21%
Norway
25 publications, 1.21%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 16, 0.78%
Japan
16 publications, 0.78%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 14, 0.68%
Belgium
14 publications, 0.68%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 14, 0.68%
Ghana
14 publications, 0.68%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 13, 0.63%
Hungary
13 publications, 0.63%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 13, 0.63%
Ireland
13 publications, 0.63%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 12, 0.58%
Greece
12 publications, 0.58%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 11, 0.53%
Indonesia
11 publications, 0.53%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 9, 0.44%
Pakistan
9 publications, 0.44%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 9, 0.44%
Switzerland
9 publications, 0.44%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 8, 0.39%
Russia
8 publications, 0.39%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 8, 0.39%
Bangladesh
8 publications, 0.39%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 8, 0.39%
Colombia
8 publications, 0.39%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 8, 0.39%
Slovenia
8 publications, 0.39%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 7, 0.34%
Austria
7 publications, 0.34%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 7, 0.34%
Mexico
7 publications, 0.34%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 6, 0.29%
Nigeria
6 publications, 0.29%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 6, 0.29%
UAE
6 publications, 0.29%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 6, 0.29%
Saudi Arabia
6 publications, 0.29%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 6, 0.29%
Croatia
6 publications, 0.29%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 5, 0.24%
Botswana
5 publications, 0.24%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 5, 0.24%
Lebanon
5 publications, 0.24%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 5, 0.24%
Singapore
5 publications, 0.24%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 5, 0.24%
Thailand
5 publications, 0.24%
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
Trinidad and Tobago, 5, 0.24%
Trinidad and Tobago
5 publications, 0.24%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 5, 0.24%
Czech Republic
5 publications, 0.24%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 5, 0.24%
Chile
5 publications, 0.24%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 4, 0.19%
Estonia
4 publications, 0.19%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 4, 0.19%
Bulgaria
4 publications, 0.19%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 4, 0.19%
Vietnam
4 publications, 0.19%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 4, 0.19%
Iran
4 publications, 0.19%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 4, 0.19%
Kuwait
4 publications, 0.19%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 4, 0.19%
Malawi
4 publications, 0.19%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 4, 0.19%
Morocco
4 publications, 0.19%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 4, 0.19%
Sri Lanka
4 publications, 0.19%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 3, 0.15%
Egypt
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 3, 0.15%
Jordan
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 3, 0.15%
Peru
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 3, 0.15%
Romania
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 3, 0.15%
Serbia
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 3, 0.15%
Tunisia
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Haiti
|
Haiti, 2, 0.1%
Haiti
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 2, 0.1%
Israel
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 2, 0.1%
Qatar
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 2, 0.1%
Cyprus
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 2, 0.1%
Philippines
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Eswatini
|
Eswatini, 2, 0.1%
Eswatini
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0.05%
Algeria
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 1, 0.05%
Benin
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 1, 0.05%
Brunei
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 1, 0.05%
Zimbabwe
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.05%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 1, 0.05%
Costa Rica
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 0.05%
Latvia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.05%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.05%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Mauritius
|
Mauritius, 1, 0.05%
Mauritius
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 1, 0.05%
Malta
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0.05%
Oman
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 1, 0.05%
Puerto Rico
1 publication, 0.05%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 1, 0.05%
North Macedonia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 0.05%
Tanzania
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Fiji
|
Fiji, 1, 0.05%
Fiji
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 1, 0.05%
Ecuador
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Jamaica
|
Jamaica, 1, 0.05%
Jamaica
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Show all (57 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|
|
USA
|
USA, 123, 22.82%
USA
123 publications, 22.82%
|
India
|
India, 111, 20.59%
India
111 publications, 20.59%
|
China
|
China, 68, 12.62%
China
68 publications, 12.62%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 42, 7.79%
Australia
42 publications, 7.79%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 40, 7.42%
United Kingdom
40 publications, 7.42%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 23, 4.27%
Spain
23 publications, 4.27%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 22, 4.08%
Canada
22 publications, 4.08%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 21, 3.9%
Republic of Korea
21 publications, 3.9%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 20, 3.71%
Poland
20 publications, 3.71%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 19, 3.53%
Germany
19 publications, 3.53%
|
France
|
France, 18, 3.34%
France
18 publications, 3.34%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 16, 2.97%
Turkey
16 publications, 2.97%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 15, 2.78%
Portugal
15 publications, 2.78%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 14, 2.6%
Malaysia
14 publications, 2.6%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 14, 2.6%
Finland
14 publications, 2.6%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 12, 2.23%
Brazil
12 publications, 2.23%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 12, 2.23%
Italy
12 publications, 2.23%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 8, 1.48%
New Zealand
8 publications, 1.48%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 8, 1.48%
Sweden
8 publications, 1.48%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 7, 1.3%
Denmark
7 publications, 1.3%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 7, 1.3%
Pakistan
7 publications, 1.3%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 6, 1.11%
South Africa
6 publications, 1.11%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 5, 0.93%
Indonesia
5 publications, 0.93%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 5, 0.93%
Colombia
5 publications, 0.93%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 4, 0.74%
Bangladesh
4 publications, 0.74%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 4, 0.74%
Belgium
4 publications, 0.74%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 4, 0.74%
Hungary
4 publications, 0.74%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 4, 0.74%
Lebanon
4 publications, 0.74%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 4, 0.74%
Mexico
4 publications, 0.74%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 4, 0.74%
UAE
4 publications, 0.74%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 4, 0.74%
Singapore
4 publications, 0.74%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 4, 0.74%
Croatia
4 publications, 0.74%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 3, 0.56%
Russia
3 publications, 0.56%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 3, 0.56%
Iran
3 publications, 0.56%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 3, 0.56%
Morocco
3 publications, 0.56%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 3, 0.56%
Norway
3 publications, 0.56%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 3, 0.56%
Slovenia
3 publications, 0.56%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 3, 0.56%
Czech Republic
3 publications, 0.56%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 0.37%
Austria
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 2, 0.37%
Vietnam
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 2, 0.37%
Jordan
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.37%
Ireland
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 2, 0.37%
Cyprus
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 2, 0.37%
Kuwait
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 2, 0.37%
Netherlands
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.37%
Romania
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 2, 0.37%
Saudi Arabia
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.37%
Chile
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 2, 0.37%
Switzerland
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 2, 0.37%
Japan
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0.19%
Algeria
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 1, 0.19%
Brunei
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.19%
Greece
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.19%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.19%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.19%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0.19%
Oman
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.19%
Peru
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 1, 0.19%
Puerto Rico
1 publication, 0.19%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 1, 0.19%
North Macedonia
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.19%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.19%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Fiji
|
Fiji, 1, 0.19%
Fiji
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Jamaica
|
Jamaica, 1, 0.19%
Jamaica
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Show all (34 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|
1 profile journal article
Moreira António
227 publications,
2 432 citations
h-index: 26