volume 51 issue 9 pages 2305-2313

Cellular Uptake of Nanoparticles versus Small Molecules: A Matter of Size

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2018-08-29
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR5.433
CiteScore30.7
Impact factor17.7
ISSN00014842, 15204898
General Chemistry
General Medicine
Abstract
The primary function of the cell membrane is to protect cells from their surroundings. This entails a strict regulation on controlling the exchange of matter between the cell and its environment. A key factor when considering potential biological applications of a particular chemical structure has to do with its ability to internalize into cells. Molecules that can readily cross cell membranes are frequently needed in biological research and medicine, since most therapeutic entities are designed to modulate intracellular components. However, the design of molecules that do not penetrate cells is also relevant toward, for example, extracellular contrast agents, which are most widely used in clinical diagnosis. Small molecules have occupied the forefront of biomedical research until recently, but the past few decades have seen an increasing use of larger chemical structures, such as proteins or nanoparticles, leading to unprecedented and often unexpectedly novel research. Great achievements have been made toward understanding the rules that govern cellular uptake, which show that cell internalization of molecules is largely affected by their size. For example, macromolecules such as proteins and nucleic acids are usually unable to internalize cells. Intriguingly, in the case of nanoparticles, larger sizes seem to facilitate internalization via endocytic pathways, through which the particles remain trapped in lysosomes and endosomes. In this Account, we aimed at presenting our personal view of how different chemical structures behave in terms of cell internalization due to their size, ranging from small drugs to large nanoparticles. We first introduce the properties of cell membranes and the main mechanisms involved in cellular uptake. We then discuss the cellular internalization of molecules, distinguishing between those with molecular weights below 1 kDa and biological macromolecules such as proteins and nucleic acids. In the last section, we review the biological behavior of nanoparticles, with a special emphasis on plasmonic nanoparticles, which feature a high potential in the biomedical field. For each group of chemical structures, we discuss the parameters affecting their cellular internalization but also strategies that can be applied to achieve the desired intracellular delivery. Particular attention is paid to approaches that allow conditional regulation of the cell internalization process using external triggers, such as activable cell penetrating peptides, due to the impact that these systems may have in drug delivery and sensing applications. The Account ends with a "Conclusions and Outlook" section, where general lessons and future directions toward further advancements are briefly presented.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Angewandte Chemie - International Edition
9 publications, 2.25%
Angewandte Chemie
9 publications, 2.25%
Nanomaterials
8 publications, 2%
Biomaterials Science
8 publications, 2%
Nanoscale
8 publications, 2%
ACS Nano
7 publications, 1.75%
Small
7 publications, 1.75%
Analytical Chemistry
6 publications, 1.5%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
6 publications, 1.5%
Scientific Reports
6 publications, 1.5%
Carbohydrate Polymers
6 publications, 1.5%
International Journal of Pharmaceutics
6 publications, 1.5%
ACS applied materials & interfaces
6 publications, 1.5%
ACS Applied Bio Materials
6 publications, 1.5%
Pharmaceutics
5 publications, 1.25%
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
5 publications, 1.25%
Journal of Controlled Release
5 publications, 1.25%
Chemical Engineering Journal
5 publications, 1.25%
Advanced Functional Materials
5 publications, 1.25%
Journal of Materials Chemistry B
5 publications, 1.25%
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
4 publications, 1%
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
4 publications, 1%
Chemistry - A European Journal
4 publications, 1%
ACS Biomaterials Science and Engineering
4 publications, 1%
Chemical Society Reviews
3 publications, 0.75%
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
3 publications, 0.75%
Biomaterials
3 publications, 0.75%
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
3 publications, 0.75%
European Polymer Journal
3 publications, 0.75%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Publishers

20
40
60
80
100
120
Elsevier
112 publications, 28%
Wiley
63 publications, 15.75%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
60 publications, 15%
Springer Nature
39 publications, 9.75%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
38 publications, 9.5%
MDPI
32 publications, 8%
Taylor & Francis
12 publications, 3%
Frontiers Media S.A.
6 publications, 1.5%
Oxford University Press
5 publications, 1.25%
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
4 publications, 1%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
3 publications, 0.75%
IOP Publishing
2 publications, 0.5%
American Thoracic Society
1 publication, 0.25%
AIP Publishing
1 publication, 0.25%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 0.25%
King Saud University
1 publication, 0.25%
Social Science Electronic Publishing
1 publication, 0.25%
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
1 publication, 0.25%
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
1 publication, 0.25%
IntechOpen
1 publication, 0.25%
Korean Society of Industrial Engineering Chemistry
1 publication, 0.25%
Research Square Platform LLC
1 publication, 0.25%
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
1 publication, 0.25%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1 publication, 0.25%
Science Alert
1 publication, 0.25%
Mary Ann Liebert
1 publication, 0.25%
Maximum Academic Press
1 publication, 0.25%
20
40
60
80
100
120
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
402
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Mosquera J. et al. Cellular Uptake of Nanoparticles versus Small Molecules: A Matter of Size // Accounts of Chemical Research. 2018. Vol. 51. No. 9. pp. 2305-2313.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Mosquera J., Amores García I., Liz-Marzan L. Cellular Uptake of Nanoparticles versus Small Molecules: A Matter of Size // Accounts of Chemical Research. 2018. Vol. 51. No. 9. pp. 2305-2313.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00292
UR - https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00292
TI - Cellular Uptake of Nanoparticles versus Small Molecules: A Matter of Size
T2 - Accounts of Chemical Research
AU - Mosquera, Jesús
AU - Amores García, Isabel
AU - Liz-Marzan, Luis
PY - 2018
DA - 2018/08/29
PB - American Chemical Society (ACS)
SP - 2305-2313
IS - 9
VL - 51
PMID - 30156826
SN - 0001-4842
SN - 1520-4898
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2018_Mosquera,
author = {Jesús Mosquera and Isabel Amores García and Luis Liz-Marzan},
title = {Cellular Uptake of Nanoparticles versus Small Molecules: A Matter of Size},
journal = {Accounts of Chemical Research},
year = {2018},
volume = {51},
publisher = {American Chemical Society (ACS)},
month = {aug},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00292},
number = {9},
pages = {2305--2313},
doi = {10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00292}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Mosquera, Jesús, et al. “Cellular Uptake of Nanoparticles versus Small Molecules: A Matter of Size.” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 51, no. 9, Aug. 2018, pp. 2305-2313. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00292.