Chemical Reviews, volume 122, issue 12, pages 11085-11130

Modeling Operando Electrochemical CO2 Reduction

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2022-04-27
Journal: Chemical Reviews
Quartile SCImago
Q1
Quartile WOS
Q1
Impact factor62.1
ISSN00092665, 15206890
General Chemistry
Abstract
Since the seminal works on the application of density functional theory and the computational hydrogen electrode to electrochemical CO2 reduction (eCO2R) and hydrogen evolution (HER), the modeling of both reactions has quickly evolved for the last two decades. Formulation of thermodynamic and kinetic linear scaling relationships for key intermediates on crystalline materials have led to the definition of activity volcano plots, overpotential diagrams, and full exploitation of these theoretical outcomes at laboratory scale. However, recent studies hint at the role of morphological changes and short-lived intermediates in ruling the catalytic performance under operating conditions, further raising the bar for the modeling of electrocatalytic systems. Here, we highlight some novel methodological approaches employed to address eCO2R and HER reactions. Moving from the atomic scale to the bulk electrolyte, we first show how ab initio and machine learning methodologies can partially reproduce surface reconstruction under operation, thus identifying active sites and reaction mechanisms if coupled with microkinetic modeling. Later, we introduce the potential of density functional theory and machine learning to interpret data from Operando spectroelectrochemical techniques, such as Raman spectroscopy and extended X-ray absorption fine structure characterization. Next, we review the role of electrolyte and mass transport effects. Finally, we suggest further challenges for computational modeling in the near future as well as our perspective on the directions to follow.

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
Journal of Physical Chemistry C
4 publications, 4.65%
Journal of the American Chemical Society
3 publications, 3.49%
EES Catalysis
3 publications, 3.49%
ACS Catalysis
3 publications, 3.49%
Nature Catalysis
3 publications, 3.49%
Journal of Chemical Physics
2 publications, 2.33%
Materials Reports Energy
2 publications, 2.33%
Nature Communications
2 publications, 2.33%
Advanced Functional Materials
2 publications, 2.33%
Chemical Society Reviews
2 publications, 2.33%
Nanoscale
2 publications, 2.33%
Angewandte Chemie
2 publications, 2.33%
Angewandte Chemie - International Edition
2 publications, 2.33%
Chemical Engineering Journal
2 publications, 2.33%
Rare Metals
2 publications, 2.33%
Electrochimica Acta
2 publications, 2.33%
Science China Chemistry
1 publication, 1.16%
Coordination Chemistry Reviews
1 publication, 1.16%
Chemical Engineering Science
1 publication, 1.16%
Inorganica Chimica Acta
1 publication, 1.16%
Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
1 publication, 1.16%
Nano Research
1 publication, 1.16%
Digital Discovery
1 publication, 1.16%
ChemSusChem
1 publication, 1.16%
New Journal of Chemistry
1 publication, 1.16%
Small Structures
1 publication, 1.16%
Catalysis Today
1 publication, 1.16%
Surface Science
1 publication, 1.16%
Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
1 publication, 1.16%
Catalysts
1 publication, 1.16%
1
2
3
4

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
30
Elsevier
26 publications, 30.23%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
16 publications, 18.6%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
14 publications, 16.28%
Wiley
12 publications, 13.95%
Springer Nature
11 publications, 12.79%
AIP Publishing
2 publications, 2.33%
MDPI
2 publications, 2.33%
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
1 publication, 1.16%
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 1.16%
OAE Publishing Inc.
1 publication, 1.16%
5
10
15
20
25
30
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Dattila F. et al. Modeling Operando Electrochemical CO2 Reduction // Chemical Reviews. 2022. Vol. 122. No. 12. pp. 11085-11130.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Dattila F., Seemakurthi R. R., Zhou Y., Esparza Lopez N. Modeling Operando Electrochemical CO2 Reduction // Chemical Reviews. 2022. Vol. 122. No. 12. pp. 11085-11130.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00690
UR - https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00690
TI - Modeling Operando Electrochemical CO2 Reduction
T2 - Chemical Reviews
AU - Seemakurthi, Ranga Rohit
AU - Dattila, Federico
AU - Zhou, Yecheng
AU - Esparza Lopez, Nuria
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/04/27
PB - American Chemical Society (ACS)
SP - 11085-11130
IS - 12
VL - 122
SN - 0009-2665
SN - 1520-6890
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex Copy
@article{2022_Dattila,
author = {Ranga Rohit Seemakurthi and Federico Dattila and Yecheng Zhou and Nuria Esparza Lopez},
title = {Modeling Operando Electrochemical CO2 Reduction},
journal = {Chemical Reviews},
year = {2022},
volume = {122},
publisher = {American Chemical Society (ACS)},
month = {apr},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00690},
number = {12},
pages = {11085--11130},
doi = {10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00690}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Dattila, Federico, et al. “Modeling Operando Electrochemical CO2 Reduction.” Chemical Reviews, vol. 122, no. 12, Apr. 2022, pp. 11085-11130. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00690.
Found error?