How Certain Are the Reported Ionic Conductivities of Thiophosphate-Based Solid Electrolytes? An Interlaboratory Study
Saneyuki Ohno
1, 2
,
Tim Bernges
1, 2
,
Johannes R Buchheim
3
,
Marc Duchardt
4
,
Anna-Katharina Hatz
5, 6, 7
,
Marvin A Kraft
1, 2
,
Hiram Kwak
8
,
Zhantao Liu
10
,
Nicoló Minafra
1, 2
,
Fumika Tsuji
11
,
Atsushi Sakuda
11
,
Roman Schlem
1, 2
,
Shan Xiong
10
,
Zhenggang Zhang
9
,
Philipp Adelhelm
9
,
Hailong Chen
10
,
Akitoshi Hayashi
11
,
Yoon-Seok Jung
8
,
B. V. Lotsch
5, 6, 7, 12
,
Bernhard Roling
4
,
Wolfgang G. Zeier
1, 2
7
Center for NanoScience, Schellingstrasse 4, 80799 Munich, Germany
|
12
E-conversion, Lichtenbergstrasse 4a, 85748 Garching, Germany
|
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2020-02-28
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 6.799
CiteScore: 29.6
Impact factor: 18.2
ISSN: 23808195
Materials Chemistry
Chemistry (miscellaneous)
Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Fuel Technology
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Abstract
Owing to highly conductive solid ionic conductors, all-solid-state batteries attract significant attention as promising next-generation energy storage devices. A lot of research is invested in the search and optimization of solid electrolytes with higher ionic conductivity. However, a systematic study of an interlaboratory reproducibility of measured ionic conductivities and activation energies is missing, making the comparison of absolute values in literature challenging. In this study, we perform an uncertainty evaluation via a Round Robin approach using different Li-argyrodites exhibiting orders of magnitude different ionic conductivities as reference materials. Identical samples are distributed to different research laboratories and the conductivities and activation barriers are measured by impedance spectroscopy. The results show large ranges of up to 4.5 mScm-1 in the measured total ionic conductivity (1.3 – 5.8 mScm-1 for the highest conducting sample, relative standard deviation 35 – 50% across all samples) and up to 128 meV for the activation barriers (198 – 326 meV, relative standard deviation 5 – 15%, across all samples), presenting the necessity of a more rigorous methodology including further collaborations within the community and multiplicate measurements.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
|
|
Chemistry of Materials
16 publications, 10.74%
|
|
|
Advanced Energy Materials
11 publications, 7.38%
|
|
|
ACS Applied Energy Materials
9 publications, 6.04%
|
|
|
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
9 publications, 6.04%
|
|
|
Journal of Power Sources
5 publications, 3.36%
|
|
|
Inorganic Chemistry
5 publications, 3.36%
|
|
|
ACS applied materials & interfaces
4 publications, 2.68%
|
|
|
Chemical Reviews
3 publications, 2.01%
|
|
|
ACS Materials Letters
3 publications, 2.01%
|
|
|
Batteries
3 publications, 2.01%
|
|
|
Batteries & Supercaps
3 publications, 2.01%
|
|
|
Journal of the American Chemical Society
3 publications, 2.01%
|
|
|
ACS Energy Letters
3 publications, 2.01%
|
|
|
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
3 publications, 2.01%
|
|
|
Nature Energy
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
|
Energy Storage Materials
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
|
Advanced Functional Materials
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
|
ChemSusChem
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
|
Advanced Materials Interfaces
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
|
Advanced Materials
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry C
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
|
Chemical Science
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
|
Science advances
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
|
Annual Review of Materials Research
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
|
Nature Nanotechnology
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
|
Journal of Chemical Physics
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
|
Functional Materials Letters
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
|
Journal of the Electrochemical Society
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
|
Nanomaterials
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
|
Materials
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
Publishers
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
55 publications, 36.91%
|
|
|
Wiley
30 publications, 20.13%
|
|
|
Elsevier
20 publications, 13.42%
|
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
17 publications, 11.41%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
9 publications, 6.04%
|
|
|
MDPI
7 publications, 4.7%
|
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
|
Annual Reviews
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
|
AIP Publishing
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
|
World Scientific
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
|
The Electrochemical Society
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
|
OAE Publishing Inc.
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
149
Total citations:
149
Citations from 2024:
60
(40.27%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Ohno S. et al. How Certain Are the Reported Ionic Conductivities of Thiophosphate-Based Solid Electrolytes? An Interlaboratory Study // ACS Energy Letters. 2020. Vol. 5. No. 3. pp. 910-915.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Ohno S., Bernges T., Buchheim J. R., Duchardt M., Hatz A., Kraft M. A., Kwak H., Santhosha A. L., Liu Z., Minafra N., Tsuji F., Sakuda A., Schlem R., Xiong S., Zhang Z., Adelhelm P., Chen H., Hayashi A., Jung Y., Lotsch B. V., Roling B., Vargas-Barbosa N. M., Zeier W. G. How Certain Are the Reported Ionic Conductivities of Thiophosphate-Based Solid Electrolytes? An Interlaboratory Study // ACS Energy Letters. 2020. Vol. 5. No. 3. pp. 910-915.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02764
UR - https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02764
TI - How Certain Are the Reported Ionic Conductivities of Thiophosphate-Based Solid Electrolytes? An Interlaboratory Study
T2 - ACS Energy Letters
AU - Ohno, Saneyuki
AU - Bernges, Tim
AU - Buchheim, Johannes R
AU - Duchardt, Marc
AU - Hatz, Anna-Katharina
AU - Kraft, Marvin A
AU - Kwak, Hiram
AU - Santhosha, Aggunda L
AU - Liu, Zhantao
AU - Minafra, Nicoló
AU - Tsuji, Fumika
AU - Sakuda, Atsushi
AU - Schlem, Roman
AU - Xiong, Shan
AU - Zhang, Zhenggang
AU - Adelhelm, Philipp
AU - Chen, Hailong
AU - Hayashi, Akitoshi
AU - Jung, Yoon-Seok
AU - Lotsch, B. V.
AU - Roling, Bernhard
AU - Vargas-Barbosa, Nella M.
AU - Zeier, Wolfgang G.
PY - 2020
DA - 2020/02/28
PB - American Chemical Society (ACS)
SP - 910-915
IS - 3
VL - 5
SN - 2380-8195
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2020_Ohno,
author = {Saneyuki Ohno and Tim Bernges and Johannes R Buchheim and Marc Duchardt and Anna-Katharina Hatz and Marvin A Kraft and Hiram Kwak and Aggunda L Santhosha and Zhantao Liu and Nicoló Minafra and Fumika Tsuji and Atsushi Sakuda and Roman Schlem and Shan Xiong and Zhenggang Zhang and Philipp Adelhelm and Hailong Chen and Akitoshi Hayashi and Yoon-Seok Jung and B. V. Lotsch and Bernhard Roling and Nella M. Vargas-Barbosa and Wolfgang G. Zeier},
title = {How Certain Are the Reported Ionic Conductivities of Thiophosphate-Based Solid Electrolytes? An Interlaboratory Study},
journal = {ACS Energy Letters},
year = {2020},
volume = {5},
publisher = {American Chemical Society (ACS)},
month = {feb},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02764},
number = {3},
pages = {910--915},
doi = {10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02764}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Ohno, Saneyuki, et al. “How Certain Are the Reported Ionic Conductivities of Thiophosphate-Based Solid Electrolytes? An Interlaboratory Study.” ACS Energy Letters, vol. 5, no. 3, Feb. 2020, pp. 910-915. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02764.