volume 48 issue 12 pages 2371-2385

Lead Finder: An Approach To Improve Accuracy of Protein−Ligand Docking, Binding Energy Estimation, and Virtual Screening

Oleg V Stroganov 1
Fedor Novikov 1
Val Kulkov 1
Ghermes G Chilov 1
1
 
MolTech Ltd., Leninskie gory, 1/75A, Moscow 119992, Russian Federation, and BioMolTech Corp., 226 York Mills Road, Toronto, Ontario M2L 1L1, Canada
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2008-11-13
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR1.467
CiteScore9.8
Impact factor5.3
ISSN15499596, 1549960X
PubMed ID:  19007114
General Chemistry
Computer Science Applications
General Chemical Engineering
Library and Information Sciences
Abstract
An innovative molecular docking algorithm and three specialized high accuracy scoring functions are introduced in the Lead Finder docking software. Lead Finder's algorithm for ligand docking combines the classical genetic algorithm with various local optimization procedures and resourceful exploitation of the knowledge generated during docking process. Lead Finder's scoring functions are based on a molecular mechanics functional which explicitly accounts for different types of energy contributions scaled with empiric coefficients to produce three scoring functions tailored for (a) accurate binding energy predictions; (b) correct energy-ranking of docked ligand poses; and (c) correct rank-ordering of active and inactive compounds in virtual screening experiments. The predicted values of the free energy of protein-ligand binding were benchmarked against a set of experimentally measured binding energies for 330 diverse protein-ligand complexes yielding rmsd of 1.50 kcal/mol. The accuracy of ligand docking was assessed on a set of 407 structures, which included almost all published test sets of the following programs: FlexX, Glide SP, Glide XP, Gold, LigandFit, MolDock, and Surflex. rmsd of 2 A or less was observed for 80-96% of the structures in the test sets (80.0% on the Glide XP and FlexX test sets, 96.0% on the Surflex and MolDock test sets). The ability of Lead Finder to distinguish between active and inactive compounds during virtual screening experiments was benchmarked against 34 therapeutically relevant protein targets. Impressive enrichment factors were obtained for almost all of the targets with the average area under receiver operator curve being equal to 0.92.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Mendeleev Communications
13 publications, 6.77%
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
8 publications, 4.17%
Biochemistry (Moscow)
8 publications, 4.17%
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
8 publications, 4.17%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
6 publications, 3.13%
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
5 publications, 2.6%
Molecules
4 publications, 2.08%
Journal of Molecular Modeling
3 publications, 1.56%
Scientific Reports
3 publications, 1.56%
Bioorganic Chemistry
3 publications, 1.56%
Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy
3 publications, 1.56%
ChemistrySelect
3 publications, 1.56%
FEBS Journal
3 publications, 1.56%
Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery
3 publications, 1.56%
Cancers
2 publications, 1.04%
Nutrients
2 publications, 1.04%
Food Chemistry
2 publications, 1.04%
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
2 publications, 1.04%
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
2 publications, 1.04%
Journal of Molecular Structure
2 publications, 1.04%
Computers in Biology and Medicine
2 publications, 1.04%
Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry
2 publications, 1.04%
ChemMedChem
2 publications, 1.04%
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
2 publications, 1.04%
Crystallography Reports
2 publications, 1.04%
Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry
2 publications, 1.04%
Antioxidants
2 publications, 1.04%
Journal of Experimental Botany
2 publications, 1.04%
Pharmaceuticals
1 publication, 0.52%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Elsevier
40 publications, 20.83%
Springer Nature
26 publications, 13.54%
MDPI
23 publications, 11.98%
Wiley
18 publications, 9.38%
Pleiades Publishing
15 publications, 7.81%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
14 publications, 7.29%
Taylor & Francis
14 publications, 7.29%
OOO Zhurnal "Mendeleevskie Soobshcheniya"
13 publications, 6.77%
Oxford University Press
4 publications, 2.08%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
4 publications, 2.08%
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
3 publications, 1.56%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
2 publications, 1.04%
World Scientific
1 publication, 0.52%
King Saud University
1 publication, 0.52%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 0.52%
The Japan Institute of Heterocyclic Chemistry
1 publication, 0.52%
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 0.52%
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
1 publication, 0.52%
Hindawi Limited
1 publication, 0.52%
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
1 publication, 0.52%
Acta Naturae Ltd
1 publication, 0.52%
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
1 publication, 0.52%
Institute of Biochemistry
1 publication, 0.52%
Oriental Scientific Publishing Company
1 publication, 0.52%
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
192
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Stroganov O. V. et al. Lead Finder: An Approach To Improve Accuracy of Protein−Ligand Docking, Binding Energy Estimation, and Virtual Screening // Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 2008. Vol. 48. No. 12. pp. 2371-2385.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Stroganov O. V., Novikov F., Stroylov V., Kulkov V., Chilov G. G. Lead Finder: An Approach To Improve Accuracy of Protein−Ligand Docking, Binding Energy Estimation, and Virtual Screening // Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 2008. Vol. 48. No. 12. pp. 2371-2385.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1021/ci800166p
UR - https://doi.org/10.1021/ci800166p
TI - Lead Finder: An Approach To Improve Accuracy of Protein−Ligand Docking, Binding Energy Estimation, and Virtual Screening
T2 - Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
AU - Stroganov, Oleg V
AU - Novikov, Fedor
AU - Stroylov, Victor
AU - Kulkov, Val
AU - Chilov, Ghermes G
PY - 2008
DA - 2008/11/13
PB - American Chemical Society (ACS)
SP - 2371-2385
IS - 12
VL - 48
PMID - 19007114
SN - 1549-9596
SN - 1549-960X
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2008_Stroganov,
author = {Oleg V Stroganov and Fedor Novikov and Victor Stroylov and Val Kulkov and Ghermes G Chilov},
title = {Lead Finder: An Approach To Improve Accuracy of Protein−Ligand Docking, Binding Energy Estimation, and Virtual Screening},
journal = {Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling},
year = {2008},
volume = {48},
publisher = {American Chemical Society (ACS)},
month = {nov},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/ci800166p},
number = {12},
pages = {2371--2385},
doi = {10.1021/ci800166p}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Stroganov, Oleg V., et al. “Lead Finder: An Approach To Improve Accuracy of Protein−Ligand Docking, Binding Energy Estimation, and Virtual Screening.” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol. 48, no. 12, Nov. 2008, pp. 2371-2385. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci800166p.