Nucleus-Independent Chemical Shifts:  A Simple and Efficient Aromaticity Probe

The ability to sustain a diatropic ring current is the defining characteristic of aromatic species.1-7 Cyclic electron delocalization results in enhanced stability, bond length equalization, and special magnetic as well as chemical and physical properties.1 In contrast, antiaromatic compounds sustain paratropic ring currents3 despite their localized, destabilized structures.1-7 We have demonstrated the direct, quantitative relationships among energetic, geometrical, and magnetic criteria of aromaticity in a wide-ranging set of aromatic/antiaromatic fivemembered rings.5a While the diamagnetic susceptibility exaltation (Λ) is uniquely associated with aromaticity, it is highly dependent on the ring size (area2) and requires suitable calibration standards.6 Aromatic stabilization energies (ASEs) of strained and more complicated systems are difficult to evaluate. CC bond length variations in polybenzenoid hydrocarbons can be just as large as those in linear conjugated polyenes.2 The abnormal proton chemical shifts of aromatic molecules are the most commonly employed indicators of ring current effects.1 However, the ca. 2-4 ppm displacements of external protons to lower magnetic fields are relatively modest (e.g., δH ) 7.3 for benzene vs 5.6 for dC-H in cyclohexene). In contrast, the upfield chemical shifts of protons located inside aromatic rings are more unusual. The six inner hydrogens of [18]annulene, for example, resonate at -3.0 ppm vs δ ) 9.28 for the outer protons. This relationship is inverted dramatically in the antiaromatic [18]annulene dianion, C18H18, where δ ) 20.8 and 29.5 (in) vs. -1.1 (out).8 Similar demonstrations of paratropic ring currents in antiaromatic compounds are well documented.3,8,9 Chemical shifts of encapsulated 3He atoms are now employed as experimental and computed measures of aromaticity in fullerenes and fullerene derivatives.10 While the rings of most aromatic systems are too small to accommodate atoms internally, the chemical shifts of hydrogens in bridging positions have long been used as aromaticity and antiaromaticity probes.9 δLi+ can be employed similarly, with the advantage that Li+ complexes with individual rings in polycyclic systems can be computed.4,11 We now propose the use of absolute magnetic shieldings, computed at ring centers (nonweighted mean of the heavy atom coordinates) with available quantum mechanics programs,12 as a new aromaticity/antiaromaticity criterion. To correspond to the familiar NMR chemical shift convention, the signs of the computed values are reversed: Negative “nucleus-independent chemical shifts” (NICSs) denote aromaticity; positive NICSs, antiaromaticity (see Table 1 for selected results). Figure 1, a plot of NICSs vs the ASEs for our set of five-membered ring heterocycles,5a provides calibration. The equally good correlations with magnetic susceptibility exaltations and with structural variations establish NICS as an effective aromaticity criterion. Unlike Λ,6 NICS values for [n]annulenes (Table 1) show only a modest dependence on ring size. The 10 π electron systems give significantly higher values than those with 6 π electrons. The antiaromatic 4n π electron compounds, cyclobutadiene (27.6), pentalene (18.1), heptalene (22.7), and planar D4h cyclooctatetraene (30.1), all show highly positive NICSs. Like the Li+-complex probe,4 the NICS evaluates the aromaticity and antiaromaticity contributions of individual rings in polycyclic systems. Scheme 1 (HF/6-31+G*, data from Table 1) shows NICSs for selected examples. The benzenoid aromatic NICSs provide evidence both for localized and “perimeter” models. The naphthalene (1) NICS (-9.9) resembles that of benzene (-9.7), as do the NICSs for the outer rings of phenanthrene (2) (-10.2) and triphenylene (3); the aromaticity of the central rings of the latter two are reduced. The NICS of the central ring of anthracene (4) (-13.3) exceeds the benzene value in contrast to the outer ring NICS (-8.2). Remarkably, the NICS (-7.0) for the seven-membered ring of azulene (5) is very close to that of the tropylium ion (-7.6 ppm), whereas the azulene five-membered ring NICS (-19.7) is even larger in magnitude than that of the cyclopentadienyl anion (-14.3). The four-membered rings in benzocyclobutadiene (6) (NICS ) 22.5) and in biphenylene (7) (19.0) are antiaromatic, but less so than cyclobutadiene itself (27.6). The six-membered rings in these polycycles are still aromatic, but their NICSs (-2.5 (1) (a) Minkin, V. I.; Glukhovtsev, M. N.; Simkin, B. Y. Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity; Wiley: New York, 1994. (b) Garratt, P. J. Aromaticity; Wiley: New York, 1986. (c) Eluidge, J. A.; Jackman, L. M. J. Chem. Soc. 1961, 859. (2) Schleyer, P. v. R.; Jiao, H. Pure Appl. Chem. 1996, 28, 209. (3) Pople, J. A.; Untch, K. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 4811. (4) Jiao, H; Schleyer, P. v. R. AIP Conference Proceedings 330, E.C.C.C.1, Computational Chemistry; Bernardi, F., Rivail, J.-L., Eds.; American Institute of Physics: Woodbury, New York, 1995; p 107. (5) (a) Schleyer, P. v. R.; Freeman, P.; Jiao, H.; Goldfuss, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 337. (b) Jiao, H.; Schleyer, P. v. R. Unpublished IGLO results. (c) Kutzelnigg, W.; Fleischer, U.; Schindler, M. In NMR: Basic Princ. Prog.; Springer: Berlin, 1990; Vol. 23, p 165. (6) Dauben, H. J., Jr.; Wilson, J. D.; Laity, J. L. In Non-Benzenoid Aromatics; Synder, J., Ed.; Academic Press, 1971; Vol. 2, and references cited. The partitioning of ring current or ring current susceptabilitites among various rings in polycyclic syestems were considered earlier, e.g., by Aihara (Aihara, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 207, 298 and refs cited) and by Mallion (Haigh, C. W.; Mallion, J. Chem. Phys. 1982, 76, 1982). (7) Fleischer, U.; Kutzelnigg, W.; Lazzeretti, P.; Mühlenkamp, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 5298. (8) Sondheimer, F. Acc. Chem. Res. 1972, 5, 81. (9) (a) Hunandi, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 6889. (b) Pascal, R. A., Jr.; Winans, C. G.; Van Engen, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 3007. (10) (a) Bühl, M.; Thiel, W.; Jiao, H.; Schleyer, P. v. R.; Saunders, M.; Anet, F. A. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 7429 and references cited. (b) Bühl, M.; van Wüllen, C. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 247, 63. The authors have shown that the negative absolute shielding in the center of C60 is nearly the same as δ3He, computed at the same level. (11) Paquette, L. A.; Bauer, W.; Sivik, M. R.; Bühl, M.; Feigel, M.; Schleyer, P. v. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 8776. (12) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B. G.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Keith, T. A.; Petersson, G. A.; Montgomery, J. A.; Raghavachari, K.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Zakrewski, V. G.; Ortiz, J. V.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Peng, C. Y.; Ayala, P. Y.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Replogle, E. S.; Gomperts, R.; Stewart, J. P.; Head-Gordon, M.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 94, ReVision B.2; Gaussian Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1995. Figure 1. Plot of NICSs (ppm) vs the aromatic stabilization energies (ASEs, kcal/mol)5a for a set of five-membered ring heterocycles, C4H4X (X ) as shown) (cc ) 0.966). 6317 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 6317