Geometry Mismatch and Reticular Chemistry: Strategies To Assemble Metal–Organic Frameworks with Non-default Topologies
Vincent Guillerm
1
,
Daniel Maspoch
1, 2
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2019-09-27
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 5.554
CiteScore: 22.5
Impact factor: 15.6
ISSN: 00027863, 15205126
PubMed ID:
31560855
General Chemistry
Catalysis
Biochemistry
Colloid and Surface Chemistry
Abstract
The past 20 years have witnessed tremendous advances in the field of porous materials, including the development of novel metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) that show great potential for practical applications aimed at addressing global environmental and industrial challenges. A critical tool enabling this progress has been reticular chemistry, through which researchers can design materials that exhibit highly regular (i.e. edge-transitive) topologies, based on the assembly of geometrically-matched building blocks into specific nets. However, innovation sometimes demands that researchers steer away from default topologies to instead pursue unusual geometries. In this perspective, we cover this aspect and introduce the concept of geometry mismatch, in which seemingly incompatible building blocks are combined to generate non-default structures. We describe diverse MOF assemblies built through geometry mismatch generated by use of ligand bend-angles, twisted functional groups, zigzag ligands and other elements, focusing on carboxylate-based MOFs combined with common inorganic clusters. We aim to provide a fresh perspective on rational design of MOFs and to help readers understand the countless options now available to achieve greater structural complexity in MOFs.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
|
|
|
Journal of the American Chemical Society
19 publications, 14.29%
|
|
|
Angewandte Chemie - International Edition
9 publications, 6.77%
|
|
|
Angewandte Chemie
9 publications, 6.77%
|
|
|
Dalton Transactions
8 publications, 6.02%
|
|
|
CrystEngComm
7 publications, 5.26%
|
|
|
Inorganic Chemistry
6 publications, 4.51%
|
|
|
Advanced Materials
4 publications, 3.01%
|
|
|
Coordination Chemistry Reviews
4 publications, 3.01%
|
|
|
Chemical Communications
3 publications, 2.26%
|
|
|
Chem
3 publications, 2.26%
|
|
|
Chemical Engineering Journal
3 publications, 2.26%
|
|
|
ACS applied materials & interfaces
3 publications, 2.26%
|
|
|
Chemical Science
3 publications, 2.26%
|
|
|
Nano Research
2 publications, 1.5%
|
|
|
Polyhedron
2 publications, 1.5%
|
|
|
ACS Materials Letters
2 publications, 1.5%
|
|
|
Accounts of Chemical Research
2 publications, 1.5%
|
|
|
Chemistry of Materials
2 publications, 1.5%
|
|
|
Materials Chemistry Frontiers
2 publications, 1.5%
|
|
|
Science China Chemistry
2 publications, 1.5%
|
|
|
Small
2 publications, 1.5%
|
|
|
Chemical Reviews
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
|
Science
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
|
Journal of Chemical Physics
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
|
Macromolecules
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
|
Nature Reviews Materials
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
|
Matter
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
|
Trends in Chemistry
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
|
EnergyChem
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
|
Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
|
Publishers
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
39 publications, 29.32%
|
|
|
Wiley
30 publications, 22.56%
|
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
28 publications, 21.05%
|
|
|
Elsevier
22 publications, 16.54%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
8 publications, 6.02%
|
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
|
AIP Publishing
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
|
Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
|
MDPI
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
134
Total citations:
134
Citations from 2024:
47
(35%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Guillerm V., Maspoch D. Geometry Mismatch and Reticular Chemistry: Strategies To Assemble Metal–Organic Frameworks with Non-default Topologies // Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2019. Vol. 141. No. 42. pp. 16517-16538.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Guillerm V., Maspoch D. Geometry Mismatch and Reticular Chemistry: Strategies To Assemble Metal–Organic Frameworks with Non-default Topologies // Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2019. Vol. 141. No. 42. pp. 16517-16538.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1021/jacs.9b08754
UR - https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b08754
TI - Geometry Mismatch and Reticular Chemistry: Strategies To Assemble Metal–Organic Frameworks with Non-default Topologies
T2 - Journal of the American Chemical Society
AU - Guillerm, Vincent
AU - Maspoch, Daniel
PY - 2019
DA - 2019/09/27
PB - American Chemical Society (ACS)
SP - 16517-16538
IS - 42
VL - 141
PMID - 31560855
SN - 0002-7863
SN - 1520-5126
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2019_Guillerm,
author = {Vincent Guillerm and Daniel Maspoch},
title = {Geometry Mismatch and Reticular Chemistry: Strategies To Assemble Metal–Organic Frameworks with Non-default Topologies},
journal = {Journal of the American Chemical Society},
year = {2019},
volume = {141},
publisher = {American Chemical Society (ACS)},
month = {sep},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b08754},
number = {42},
pages = {16517--16538},
doi = {10.1021/jacs.9b08754}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Guillerm, Vincent, et al. “Geometry Mismatch and Reticular Chemistry: Strategies To Assemble Metal–Organic Frameworks with Non-default Topologies.” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 141, no. 42, Sep. 2019, pp. 16517-16538. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b08754.
Profiles