volume 50 issue 1 pages 74-82

Comparison of Shape-Matching and Docking as Virtual Screening Tools

Paul Hawkins 1
A.Geoffrey Skillman 1
Anthony Nicholls 1
1
 
OpenEye Scientific Software, 3600 Cerrillos Road, Suite 1107, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87507
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2006-12-13
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR1.801
CiteScore11.5
Impact factor6.8
ISSN00222623, 15204804
PubMed ID:  17201411
Drug Discovery
Molecular Medicine
Abstract
Ligand docking is a widely used approach in virtual screening. In recent years a large number of publications have appeared in which docking tools are compared and evaluated for their effectiveness in virtual screening against a wide variety of protein targets. These studies have shown that the effectiveness of docking in virtual screening is highly variable due to a large number of possible confounding factors. Another class of method that has shown promise in virtual screening is the shape-based, ligand-centric approach. Several direct comparisons of docking with the shape-based tool ROCS have been conducted using data sets from some of these recent docking publications. The results show that a shape-based, ligand-centric approach is more consistent than, and often superior to, the protein-centric approach taken by docking.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

20
40
60
80
100
120
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
119 publications, 13.74%
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
47 publications, 5.43%
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
43 publications, 4.97%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
24 publications, 2.77%
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
21 publications, 2.42%
Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters
18 publications, 2.08%
Molecules
16 publications, 1.85%
Journal of Cheminformatics
16 publications, 1.85%
Methods in Molecular Biology
16 publications, 1.85%
Scientific Reports
15 publications, 1.73%
ChemMedChem
14 publications, 1.62%
Molecular Informatics
13 publications, 1.5%
Future Medicinal Chemistry
11 publications, 1.27%
Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry
11 publications, 1.27%
ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
11 publications, 1.27%
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
10 publications, 1.15%
Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
9 publications, 1.04%
Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery
9 publications, 1.04%
Lipophilicity in Drug Action and Toxicology
9 publications, 1.04%
Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry
8 publications, 0.92%
Frontiers in Chemistry
7 publications, 0.81%
Medicinal Chemistry Research
7 publications, 0.81%
Methods
7 publications, 0.81%
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
7 publications, 0.81%
Chemical Biology and Drug Design
6 publications, 0.69%
Frontiers in Pharmacology
5 publications, 0.58%
Molecular Diversity
5 publications, 0.58%
Drug Discovery Today
5 publications, 0.58%
Bioorganic Chemistry
5 publications, 0.58%
20
40
60
80
100
120

Publishers

50
100
150
200
250
American Chemical Society (ACS)
214 publications, 24.71%
Elsevier
148 publications, 17.09%
Springer Nature
145 publications, 16.74%
Wiley
91 publications, 10.51%
MDPI
57 publications, 6.58%
Taylor & Francis
43 publications, 4.97%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
33 publications, 3.81%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
23 publications, 2.66%
Frontiers Media S.A.
17 publications, 1.96%
Oxford University Press
13 publications, 1.5%
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
6 publications, 0.69%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
5 publications, 0.58%
American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
4 publications, 0.46%
F1000 Research
4 publications, 0.46%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
4 publications, 0.46%
Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
3 publications, 0.35%
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
3 publications, 0.35%
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
2 publications, 0.23%
Mary Ann Liebert
2 publications, 0.23%
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2 publications, 0.23%
OOO Zhurnal "Mendeleevskie Soobshcheniya"
2 publications, 0.23%
American Society for Microbiology
2 publications, 0.23%
Pesticide Science Society of Japan
2 publications, 0.23%
AIP Publishing
2 publications, 0.23%
IOP Publishing
2 publications, 0.23%
Impact Journals
1 publication, 0.12%
PeerJ
1 publication, 0.12%
Portland Press
1 publication, 0.12%
The Royal Society
1 publication, 0.12%
50
100
150
200
250
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
866
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Hawkins P., Skillman A., Nicholls A. Comparison of Shape-Matching and Docking as Virtual Screening Tools // Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2006. Vol. 50. No. 1. pp. 74-82.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Hawkins P., Skillman A., Nicholls A. Comparison of Shape-Matching and Docking as Virtual Screening Tools // Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2006. Vol. 50. No. 1. pp. 74-82.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1021/jm0603365
UR - https://doi.org/10.1021/jm0603365
TI - Comparison of Shape-Matching and Docking as Virtual Screening Tools
T2 - Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
AU - Hawkins, Paul
AU - Skillman, A.Geoffrey
AU - Nicholls, Anthony
PY - 2006
DA - 2006/12/13
PB - American Chemical Society (ACS)
SP - 74-82
IS - 1
VL - 50
PMID - 17201411
SN - 0022-2623
SN - 1520-4804
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2006_Hawkins,
author = {Paul Hawkins and A.Geoffrey Skillman and Anthony Nicholls},
title = {Comparison of Shape-Matching and Docking as Virtual Screening Tools},
journal = {Journal of Medicinal Chemistry},
year = {2006},
volume = {50},
publisher = {American Chemical Society (ACS)},
month = {dec},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/jm0603365},
number = {1},
pages = {74--82},
doi = {10.1021/jm0603365}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Hawkins, Paul, et al. “Comparison of Shape-Matching and Docking as Virtual Screening Tools.” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 50, no. 1, Dec. 2006, pp. 74-82. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm0603365.