volume 75 issue 14 pages 4748-4760

Probing the Arenium-Ion (ProtonTransfer) versus the Cation-Radical (Electron Transfer) Mechanism of Scholl Reaction Using DDQ as Oxidant

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2010-06-24
scimago Q2
wos Q1
SJR0.737
CiteScore6.1
Impact factor3.6
ISSN00223263, 15206904
PubMed ID:  20575516
Organic Chemistry
Abstract
DDQ/H+ system readily oxidizes a variety of electron donors with oxidation potential as high as ∼1.7 V to the corresponding cation radicals. A re-examination of the controversial arenium-ion versus cation-radical mechanisms for Scholl reaction using DDQ/H+ together with commonly utilized FeCl3 as oxidants led us to demonstrate that the reaction proceeds largely via a cation-radical mechanism. The critical experimental evidence in support of a cation-radical pathway for the Scholl reaction includes the following: (i) There is no reaction in Scholl precursors in a mixture of dichloromethane and various acids (10% v/v). (ii) The necessity to use powerful oxidants such as ferric chloride (FeCl3) or DDQ/H+ for Scholl reactions is inconsistent with the arenium-ion mechanism in light of the fact that aromatization of the dihydro intermediates (formed via arenium-ion mechanism) can be easily accomplished with rather weak oxidants such as iodine or air. (iii) Various Scholl precursors with oxidation potentials ≤1.7 V vs SCE undergo ready oxidative C−C bond formation with DDQ/H+ as oxidant, whereas Scholl precursors with oxidation potentials greater than >1.7 V vs SCE do not react. (iv) Finally, the feasibility of the dicationic intermediate, formed by loss of two electrons, has been demonstrated by its generation from a tetraphenylene derivative using DDQ/H+ as an oxidant.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

5
10
15
20
25
Chemistry - A European Journal
23 publications, 10.22%
Journal of Organic Chemistry
21 publications, 9.33%
Angewandte Chemie
18 publications, 8%
Angewandte Chemie - International Edition
18 publications, 8%
Organic Letters
16 publications, 7.11%
Journal of the American Chemical Society
13 publications, 5.78%
Chemical Communications
13 publications, 5.78%
European Journal of Organic Chemistry
10 publications, 4.44%
RSC Advances
7 publications, 3.11%
Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis
5 publications, 2.22%
Chemistry - An Asian Journal
5 publications, 2.22%
Organic Chemistry Frontiers
4 publications, 1.78%
Chemical Science
4 publications, 1.78%
Synlett
4 publications, 1.78%
Synthesis
3 publications, 1.33%
Tetrahedron
3 publications, 1.33%
Tetrahedron Letters
3 publications, 1.33%
Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry
3 publications, 1.33%
Chemistry Letters
2 publications, 0.89%
Yuki Gosei Kagaku Kyokaishi/Journal of Synthetic Organic Chemistry
2 publications, 0.89%
Nature Communications
2 publications, 0.89%
Asian Journal of Organic Chemistry
2 publications, 0.89%
Chemical Reviews
2 publications, 0.89%
Organic Reaction Mechanisms
2 publications, 0.89%
Australian Journal of Chemistry
1 publication, 0.44%
Chinese Journal of Organic Chemistry
1 publication, 0.44%
Materials
1 publication, 0.44%
Nature Reviews Chemistry
1 publication, 0.44%
Scientific Reports
1 publication, 0.44%
5
10
15
20
25

Publishers

10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Wiley
98 publications, 43.56%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
56 publications, 24.89%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
33 publications, 14.67%
Elsevier
10 publications, 4.44%
Springer Nature
7 publications, 3.11%
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
7 publications, 3.11%
Oxford University Press
3 publications, 1.33%
The Society of Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Japan
2 publications, 0.89%
CSIRO Publishing
1 publication, 0.44%
Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry
1 publication, 0.44%
MDPI
1 publication, 0.44%
Pleiades Publishing
1 publication, 0.44%
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 0.44%
Walter de Gruyter
1 publication, 0.44%
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
1 publication, 0.44%
Science in China Press
1 publication, 0.44%
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
225
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Zhai L. et al. Probing the Arenium-Ion (ProtonTransfer) versus the Cation-Radical (Electron Transfer) Mechanism of Scholl Reaction Using DDQ as Oxidant // Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2010. Vol. 75. No. 14. pp. 4748-4760.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Zhai L., Shukla R., Wadumethrige S. H., Rathore R. P. S. Probing the Arenium-Ion (ProtonTransfer) versus the Cation-Radical (Electron Transfer) Mechanism of Scholl Reaction Using DDQ as Oxidant // Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2010. Vol. 75. No. 14. pp. 4748-4760.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1021/jo100611k
UR - https://doi.org/10.1021/jo100611k
TI - Probing the Arenium-Ion (ProtonTransfer) versus the Cation-Radical (Electron Transfer) Mechanism of Scholl Reaction Using DDQ as Oxidant
T2 - Journal of Organic Chemistry
AU - Zhai, Linyi
AU - Shukla, Ruchi
AU - Wadumethrige, Shriya H
AU - Rathore, R. P. S.
PY - 2010
DA - 2010/06/24
PB - American Chemical Society (ACS)
SP - 4748-4760
IS - 14
VL - 75
PMID - 20575516
SN - 0022-3263
SN - 1520-6904
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2010_Zhai,
author = {Linyi Zhai and Ruchi Shukla and Shriya H Wadumethrige and R. P. S. Rathore},
title = {Probing the Arenium-Ion (ProtonTransfer) versus the Cation-Radical (Electron Transfer) Mechanism of Scholl Reaction Using DDQ as Oxidant},
journal = {Journal of Organic Chemistry},
year = {2010},
volume = {75},
publisher = {American Chemical Society (ACS)},
month = {jun},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/jo100611k},
number = {14},
pages = {4748--4760},
doi = {10.1021/jo100611k}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Zhai, Linyi, et al. “Probing the Arenium-Ion (ProtonTransfer) versus the Cation-Radical (Electron Transfer) Mechanism of Scholl Reaction Using DDQ as Oxidant.” Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 75, no. 14, Jun. 2010, pp. 4748-4760. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo100611k.