Nature, volume 522, issue 7555, pages 212-215
Reducing the energy cost of human walking using an unpowered exoskeleton
Steven H. Collins
1
,
M Bruce Wiggin
2
,
GREGORY S. SAWICKI
2
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2015-04-01
PubMed ID:
25830889
Multidisciplinary
Abstract
With efficiencies derived from evolution, growth and learning, humans are very well-tuned for locomotion1. Metabolic energy used during walking can be partly replaced by power input from an exoskeleton2, but is it possible to reduce metabolic rate without providing an additional energy source? This would require an improvement in the efficiency of the human–machine system as a whole, and would be remarkable given the apparent optimality of human gait. Here we show that the metabolic rate of human walking can be reduced by an unpowered ankle exoskeleton. We built a lightweight elastic device that acts in parallel with the user's calf muscles, off-loading muscle force and thereby reducing the metabolic energy consumed in contractions. The device uses a mechanical clutch to hold a spring as it is stretched and relaxed by ankle movements when the foot is on the ground, helping to fulfil one function of the calf muscles and Achilles tendon. Unlike muscles, however, the clutch sustains force passively. The exoskeleton consumes no chemical or electrical energy and delivers no net positive mechanical work, yet reduces the metabolic cost of walking by 7.2 ± 2.6% for healthy human users under natural conditions, comparable to savings with powered devices. Improving upon walking economy in this way is analogous to altering the structure of the body such that it is more energy-effective at walking. While strong natural pressures have already shaped human locomotion, improvements in efficiency are still possible. Much remains to be learned about this seemingly simple behaviour. The attachment of a simple, unpowered, mechanical exoskeleton to the foot and ankle results in a net saving of 7% of the metabolic energy expended in human walking. Walking is the most commonplace of activities, yet we know remarkably little about it and no robot has yet reproduced the grace and poise of a human walk. Steven Collins et al. now show that the attachment of a simple mechanical exoskeleton to the foot and ankle results in a 7% reduction of the metabolic energy expended in walking. This work shows that net energy input is not a fundamental requirement for reducing the metabolic cost of human walking, and that reducing calf muscle forces — while also fulfilling normal ankle functions and minimizing penalties associated with added mass or restricted motions — can be beneficial.
Found
Found
Top-30
Journals
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
|
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
32 publications, 3.99%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
29 publications, 3.62%
|
|
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
25 publications, 3.12%
|
|
PLoS ONE
20 publications, 2.49%
|
|
Scientific Reports
17 publications, 2.12%
|
|
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
14 publications, 1.75%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Robotics
14 publications, 1.75%
|
|
IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics
14 publications, 1.75%
|
|
Biosystems and Biorobotics
14 publications, 1.75%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
13 publications, 1.62%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
11 publications, 1.37%
|
|
IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics
11 publications, 1.37%
|
|
Science Robotics
10 publications, 1.25%
|
|
Gait and Posture
9 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Mechanism and Machine Theory
9 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Journal of Biomechanics
9 publications, 1.12%
|
|
IEEE Access
9 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
9 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Journal of Experimental Biology
8 publications, 1%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics
8 publications, 1%
|
|
Royal Society Open Science
7 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Wearable Technologies
7 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Frontiers in Robotics and AI
7 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference
7 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics
6 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
6 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Sensors
6 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Micromachines
5 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Nature
5 publications, 0.62%
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
Publishers
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
279 publications, 34.79%
|
|
Springer Nature
130 publications, 16.21%
|
|
Elsevier
87 publications, 10.85%
|
|
MDPI
45 publications, 5.61%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
29 publications, 3.62%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
24 publications, 2.99%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
23 publications, 2.87%
|
|
ASME International
18 publications, 2.24%
|
|
Wiley
18 publications, 2.24%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
16 publications, 2%
|
|
IOP Publishing
14 publications, 1.75%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
14 publications, 1.75%
|
|
SAGE
13 publications, 1.62%
|
|
The Royal Society
12 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
11 publications, 1.37%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
8 publications, 1%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
7 publications, 0.87%
|
|
American Physiological Society
7 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Human Kinetics
4 publications, 0.5%
|
|
AIP Publishing
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Oxford University Press
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Emerald
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Fuji Technology Press
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
EDP Sciences
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
S. Karger AG
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Collins S. H., Wiggin M. B., SAWICKI G. S. Reducing the energy cost of human walking using an unpowered exoskeleton // Nature. 2015. Vol. 522. No. 7555. pp. 212-215.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Collins S. H., Wiggin M. B., SAWICKI G. S. Reducing the energy cost of human walking using an unpowered exoskeleton // Nature. 2015. Vol. 522. No. 7555. pp. 212-215.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1038/nature14288
UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14288
TI - Reducing the energy cost of human walking using an unpowered exoskeleton
T2 - Nature
AU - Collins, Steven H.
AU - Wiggin, M Bruce
AU - SAWICKI, GREGORY S.
PY - 2015
DA - 2015/04/01
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 212-215
IS - 7555
VL - 522
PMID - 25830889
SN - 0028-0836
SN - 1476-4687
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2015_Collins,
author = {Steven H. Collins and M Bruce Wiggin and GREGORY S. SAWICKI},
title = {Reducing the energy cost of human walking using an unpowered exoskeleton},
journal = {Nature},
year = {2015},
volume = {522},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {apr},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14288},
number = {7555},
pages = {212--215},
doi = {10.1038/nature14288}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Collins, Steven H., et al. “Reducing the energy cost of human walking using an unpowered exoskeleton.” Nature, vol. 522, no. 7555, Apr. 2015, pp. 212-215. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14288.
Found error?
Found error?
Publisher
Journal
scimago Q1
SJR
18.509
CiteScore
90.0
Impact factor
50.5
ISSN
00280836
(Print)
14764687
(Electronic)