On the caveats of AI autophagy
Xiaodan Xing
1, 2
,
Fadong Shi
1
,
Jiahao Huang
1, 2
,
Yinzhe Wu
1, 2
,
Yang Nan
1, 2
,
Sheng Zhang
1, 2
,
Yingying Fang
1, 2
,
Michael Roberts
3, 4
,
Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb
3
,
Javier Del Ser
5, 6
,
Guang Yang
1, 2, 7, 8
3
5
7
Cardiovascular Research Centre, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
|
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2025-02-10
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 5.876
CiteScore: 37.6
Impact factor: 23.9
ISSN: 25225839
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and large models are producing realistic outputs across various domains, such as images, text, speech and music. Creating these advanced generative models requires significant resources, particularly large and high-quality datasets. To minimize training expenses, many algorithm developers use data created by the models themselves as a cost-effective training solution. However, not all synthetic data effectively improve model performance, necessitating a strategic balance in the use of real versus synthetic data to optimize outcomes. Currently, the previously well-controlled integration of real and synthetic data is becoming uncontrollable. The widespread and unregulated dissemination of synthetic data online leads to the contamination of datasets traditionally compiled through web scraping, now mixed with unlabelled synthetic data. This trend, known as the AI autophagy phenomenon, suggests a future where generative AI systems may increasingly consume their own outputs without discernment, raising concerns about model performance, reliability and ethical implications. What will happen if generative AI continuously consumes itself without discernment? What measures can we take to mitigate the potential adverse effects? To address these research questions, this Perspective examines the existing literature, delving into the consequences of AI autophagy, analysing the associated risks and exploring strategies to mitigate its impact. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive perspective on this phenomenon advocating for a balanced approach that promotes the sustainable development of generative AI technologies in the era of large models. With widespread generation and availability of synthetic data, AI systems are increasingly trained on their own outputs, leading to various technical and ethical challenges. The authors analyse this development and discuss measures to mitigate the potential adverse effects of ‘AI eating itself’.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
|
|
|
Human Relations
1 publication, 14.29%
|
|
|
Neurocomputing
1 publication, 14.29%
|
|
|
Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift fur Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung
1 publication, 14.29%
|
|
|
Journal of the Operational Research Society
1 publication, 14.29%
|
|
|
Medical Oncology
1 publication, 14.29%
|
|
|
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease
1 publication, 14.29%
|
|
|
Anesthesiology and Perioperative Science
1 publication, 14.29%
|
|
|
1
|
Publishers
|
1
2
3
|
|
|
Springer Nature
3 publications, 42.86%
|
|
|
Elsevier
2 publications, 28.57%
|
|
|
SAGE
1 publication, 14.29%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 14.29%
|
|
|
1
2
3
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
7
Total citations:
7
Citations from 2024:
7
(100%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Xing X. et al. On the caveats of AI autophagy // Nature Machine Intelligence. 2025. Vol. 7. No. 2. pp. 172-180.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Xing X., Shi F., Huang J., Wu Y., Nan Y., Zhang S., Fang Y., Roberts M., Schönlieb C., Del Ser J., Yang G. On the caveats of AI autophagy // Nature Machine Intelligence. 2025. Vol. 7. No. 2. pp. 172-180.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1038/s42256-025-00984-1
UR - https://www.nature.com/articles/s42256-025-00984-1
TI - On the caveats of AI autophagy
T2 - Nature Machine Intelligence
AU - Xing, Xiaodan
AU - Shi, Fadong
AU - Huang, Jiahao
AU - Wu, Yinzhe
AU - Nan, Yang
AU - Zhang, Sheng
AU - Fang, Yingying
AU - Roberts, Michael
AU - Schönlieb, Carola-Bibiane
AU - Del Ser, Javier
AU - Yang, Guang
PY - 2025
DA - 2025/02/10
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 172-180
IS - 2
VL - 7
SN - 2522-5839
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2025_Xing,
author = {Xiaodan Xing and Fadong Shi and Jiahao Huang and Yinzhe Wu and Yang Nan and Sheng Zhang and Yingying Fang and Michael Roberts and Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb and Javier Del Ser and Guang Yang},
title = {On the caveats of AI autophagy},
journal = {Nature Machine Intelligence},
year = {2025},
volume = {7},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {feb},
url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s42256-025-00984-1},
number = {2},
pages = {172--180},
doi = {10.1038/s42256-025-00984-1}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Xing, Xiaodan, et al. “On the caveats of AI autophagy.” Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 7, no. 2, Feb. 2025, pp. 172-180. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42256-025-00984-1.