том 3 издание 5 страницы 338-354

The Chicxulub impact and its environmental consequences

Joanna V Morgan 1
Timothy J. Bralower 2
Julia Brugger 3, 4
Kai Wünnemann 5, 6
Тип публикацииJournal Article
Дата публикации2022-04-12
scimago Q1
wos Q1
БС1
SJR13.465
CiteScore70.0
Impact factor71.5
ISSN2662138X
Pollution
Atmospheric Science
Earth-Surface Processes
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Краткое описание
The extinction of the dinosaurs and around three-quarters of all living species was almost certainly caused by a large asteroid impact 66 million years ago. Seismic data acquired across the impact site in Mexico have provided spectacular images of the approximately 200-kilometre-wide Chicxulub impact structure. In this Review, we show how studying the impact site at Chicxulub has advanced our understanding of formation of large craters and the environmental and palaeontological consequences of this impact. The Chicxulub crater’s asymmetric shape and size suggest an oblique impact and an impact energy of about 1023 joules, information that is important for quantifying the climatic effects of the impact. Several thousand gigatonnes of asteroidal and target material were ejected at velocities exceeding 5 kilometres per second, forming a fast-moving cloud that transported dust, soot and sulfate aerosols around the Earth within hours. These impact ejecta and soot from global wildfires blocked sunlight and caused global cooling, thus explaining the severity and abruptness of the mass extinction. However, it remains uncertain whether this impact winter lasted for many months or for more than a decade. Further combined palaeontological and proxy studies of expanded Cretaceous–Palaeogene transitions should further constrain the climatic response and the precise cause and selectivity of the extinction. The Chicxulub impact 66 million years ago caused catastrophic environmental changes, leading to the extinction of three-quarters of plant and animal species, including the dinosaurs. This Review explores how the Chicxulub impact structure provides insight into cratering processes and events leading to the Cretaceous–Palaeogene extinction.
Найдено 
Найдено 

Топ-30

Журналы

1
2
3
Journal of South American Earth Sciences
3 публикации, 5.26%
Earth-Science Reviews
3 публикации, 5.26%
Cretaceous Research
3 публикации, 5.26%
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
3 публикации, 5.26%
Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology
2 публикации, 3.51%
Meteoritics and Planetary Science
2 публикации, 3.51%
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
2 публикации, 3.51%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
2 публикации, 3.51%
Global and Planetary Change
2 публикации, 3.51%
Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version)
2 публикации, 3.51%
Scientific Reports
1 публикация, 1.75%
Geoscience Frontiers
1 публикация, 1.75%
Cambridge Prisms Extinction
1 публикация, 1.75%
Frontiers in Earth Science
1 публикация, 1.75%
Acta Palaeobotanica
1 публикация, 1.75%
Nature Geoscience
1 публикация, 1.75%
Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
1 публикация, 1.75%
Biological Reviews
1 публикация, 1.75%
PNAS Nexus
1 публикация, 1.75%
Science advances
1 публикация, 1.75%
Interpretation
1 публикация, 1.75%
Geological Society Special Publication
1 публикация, 1.75%
BMC Genomics
1 публикация, 1.75%
Nature Communications
1 публикация, 1.75%
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
1 публикация, 1.75%
Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology
1 публикация, 1.75%
Evolving Earth
1 публикация, 1.75%
Paleobiology
1 публикация, 1.75%
Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
1 публикация, 1.75%
1
2
3

Издатели

5
10
15
20
25
Elsevier
23 публикации, 40.35%
Springer Nature
7 публикаций, 12.28%
American Geophysical Union
5 публикаций, 8.77%
Wiley
4 публикации, 7.02%
Oxford University Press
3 публикации, 5.26%
Cambridge University Press
2 публикации, 3.51%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
2 публикации, 3.51%
Science in China Press
2 публикации, 3.51%
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 публикация, 1.75%
Walter de Gruyter
1 публикация, 1.75%
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
1 публикация, 1.75%
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
1 публикация, 1.75%
Geological Society of London
1 публикация, 1.75%
Mary Ann Liebert
1 публикация, 1.75%
5
10
15
20
25
  • Мы не учитываем публикации, у которых нет DOI.
  • Статистика публикаций обновляется еженедельно.

Вы ученый?

Создайте профиль, чтобы получать персональные рекомендации коллег, конференций и новых статей.
Метрики
57
Поделиться
Цитировать
ГОСТ |
Цитировать
Morgan J. V. et al. The Chicxulub impact and its environmental consequences // Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 2022. Vol. 3. No. 5. pp. 338-354.
ГОСТ со всеми авторами (до 50) Скопировать
Morgan J. V., Bralower T. J., Brugger J., Wünnemann K. The Chicxulub impact and its environmental consequences // Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 2022. Vol. 3. No. 5. pp. 338-354.
RIS |
Цитировать
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1038/s43017-022-00283-y
UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00283-y
TI - The Chicxulub impact and its environmental consequences
T2 - Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
AU - Morgan, Joanna V
AU - Bralower, Timothy J.
AU - Brugger, Julia
AU - Wünnemann, Kai
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/04/12
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 338-354
IS - 5
VL - 3
SN - 2662-138X
ER -
BibTex |
Цитировать
BibTex (до 50 авторов) Скопировать
@article{2022_Morgan,
author = {Joanna V Morgan and Timothy J. Bralower and Julia Brugger and Kai Wünnemann},
title = {The Chicxulub impact and its environmental consequences},
journal = {Nature Reviews Earth & Environment},
year = {2022},
volume = {3},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {apr},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00283-y},
number = {5},
pages = {338--354},
doi = {10.1038/s43017-022-00283-y}
}
MLA
Цитировать
Morgan, Joanna V., et al. “The Chicxulub impact and its environmental consequences.” Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, vol. 3, no. 5, Apr. 2022, pp. 338-354. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00283-y.