SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
11
SJR
4.347
CiteScore
21.3
Categories
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)
Areas
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Years of issue
1924-2025
journal names
Biological Reviews
BIOL REV
Top-3 citing journals
Top-3 organizations
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79cc4/79cc4dc973567d5661032cb2316f6388c9b0e3eb" alt="University of Cambridge"
University of Cambridge
(100 publications)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2deb8/2deb849eddb54f068901f526da91e4fbadaaa75a" alt="University of Oxford"
University of Oxford
(61 publications)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9686/d9686c9d63e446169924ec3ebaf3758a1c98a899" alt="Australian National University"
Australian National University
(52 publications)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b387/5b387e47b02aa3a2adec55c310a71cb659d5c615" alt="University of Zurich"
University of Zurich
(21 publications)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9686/d9686c9d63e446169924ec3ebaf3758a1c98a899" alt="Australian National University"
Australian National University
(20 publications)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db78f/db78f4526e8df194a9a4bf4d11f9dc3767cf0517" alt="University of Exeter"
University of Exeter
(19 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 523
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Biological value of berry polyphenols and prospects for supercritical extraction application for their isolation: A review
Guseva E., Khromova N., Karetkin B., Artemiev A., Demkin K., Puzankova J., Shakir I., Panfilov V.
Plant polyphenols are known for their numerous health-promoting properties. This article reviews the current state of research in two related fields, namely beneficial effects of flavonoids for human health, e.g., gut microbiome, and supercritical fluid extraction applied to flavonoids of plant origin. The review covered research articles registered in eLIBRARY.RU, PubMed, and Science Direct in 2005–2025. Polyphenolic compounds obtained from various berries were reported to have a positive impact on gut microbiota, e.g., they stimulated the growth of lactobacilli, bifidobacteria, and other beneficial microorganisms, as well as improved the adhesion of probiotic and pathogenic microbes to intestinal epithelial cells.
The review revealed some promising application areas for berry extracts in the functional food industry. Polyphenols can be part of meat formulations due to their strong antioxidant activity. Their antimicrobial effect against a wide range of contaminants renders them good prospects in protecting food products from microbial spoilage. Supercritical extraction is a promising method that isolates biologically active substances from plant materials. The review summarizes its advantages and limitations, as well as the range of prospective co-solvents.
Ultrasonication, pulse electric field, and enzymic pretreatment make supercritical extraction more efficient. In general, this extraction method proved to be an excellent means of isolating flavonoids and related compounds from various plants and their parts.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Dietary consumption of pre-carcinogenic amines and mutagenicity in humans: An evidence-based study
Perveen I., Koser N., Khan R.S., Maqsood M., Saleem N., Alvi F.N., Aun S.M., Siddiqui M.F., Faridi T.A., Awan H.M., Saleem Y., Abbas N., Mazhar S., Nawaz S., Syed Q., et. al.
Dietary consumption of heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAA) is considered to be a high-risk factor that substantially contributes to the development of mutagenicity and carcinogenicity in humans. This study provides ample evidence for the plausible association between mutagenicity or carcinogenicity development and dietary intake of heterocyclic amines in humans. The current study intends to assess the degree of heterocyclic amine contaminants in high-temperature cooked meats, their subsequent food intake, and potential health risk estimations.
The meat samples were homogenized, filtered, extracted, and eluted. The list of heterocyclic amines to be identified and quantified included PhIP (2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b] pyridine), IQ (2-amino-3-methyl-imidazo[4,5-f] quinolone), and MeIQx (2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f] quinoxaline). They were simultaneously isolated and studied using the method of high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). The highest heterocyclic amine concentration was found in chicken (2705.99 ± 6.12 ng/g), beef (574.09 ± 1.52 ng/g), and mutton (342.41 ± 3.69 ng/g). PhIP (73%) was the main heterocyclic amine in chicken. The estimated daily dietary intake or exposure in chicken, mutton, and beef was 0.690, 0.050, and 0.144 ng/kg body weight, respectively. The values for margin of exposure were within the range identified by the European Food Safety Authority for mutton (102.06) and chicken (13.250), but not for beef (3.784).
This significantly high prevalence of heterocyclic amines and the associated health risks are sufficient to warn the public about the high dietary intake of meat and its carcinogenic health hazards. The mutational patterns induced by heterocyclic amines resemble those in human tumors, requiring the use of specific biomarkers like HAA-DNA and HAA-protein adducts. Future prospects are high for integrating these biomarkers into epidemiological studies, which could provide a comprehensive assessment of health risks associated with dietary heterocyclic aromatic amines in human cancer.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Predictive analytics of cattle behavior using machine learning techniques: A case study
El Moutaouakil K., Falih N., Doumi K.
Livestock management is a critical aspect of agricultural sustainability and food security. Today, there is a pressing need for advanced tools in cattle behavior analysis to improve livestock welfare and productivity. We aimed to enhance cattle behavior classification by using accelerometers fitted in wearable collars. Deep learning techniques were employed to classify behavioral patterns in cattle such as feeding, moving, and lying. Ultimately, our study sought to improve livestock management practices, including the monitoring of health and overall well-being.
The study was conducted in a local barn, where cattle were outfitted with specially designed collars with accelerometer sensors. These sensors recorded intricate movements, facilitating the collection of comprehensive behavioral data. Deep learning algorithms were used to process and analyze the accelerometer data, enabling precise classification of various behaviors exhibited by the cattle.
Our results showed the effectiveness of AI-driven classification techniques in distinguishing cattle behaviors with a high degree of accuracy. Our findings underscore the potential of deep learning techniques in optimizing livestock management practices.
This research significantly advances livestock management by offering a simple continuous monitoring solution for cattle behavior. Deep learning techniques not only enhance our understanding of cattle behavior but also pave the way for intelligent systems that empower farmers to make informed decisions. By promoting healthier and more productive livestock, this research contributes to the broader goal of enhancing global food security and sustainability in the livestock industry.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Fermented buttermilk drinks fortified by plant raw materials
Reshetnik E., Gribanova S., Derzhapolskaya Y., Li C., Liu L., Zhang G., Korneva N., Shkolnikov P.
The research featured fortified fermented drinks from pasteurized buttermilk with such natural additives as Jerusalem artichoke syrup and beetroot dietary fiber.
The optimal symbiotic culture included Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus: it provided rapid fermentation and a creamy, homogeneous structure with delta pH time = 3.5 h. Jerusalem artichoke syrup was added in amounts of 3, 6, and 9%. Its optimal share proved to be 6% by the weight of the finished product. Beet dietary fiber was added in amounts of 2, 4, and 6%, where the optimal amount was 4%. A higher percentage affected the consistency of the finished product but not its clotting or taste. The experimental drinks were produced by the tank method and fermented at 42 ± 2°C until dense clotting and titratable acidity = 72 ± 2°T. The finished product was stored at 4 ± 2°C. The shelf-life was 12 days for the sample with Jerusalem artichoke syrup and 14 days for the drink fortified with beetroot fiber. The physical and chemical indicators showed that the energy value of the fortified fermented buttermilk drinks was on average 45.3% lower compared to conventional fermented dairy drinks.
As a result of research, it has been established that the use of plant components, namely Jerusalem artichoke syrup and beet dietary fiber in the production technology of fermented milk drink from buttermilk makes it possible to obtain a finished product with improved consumer properties.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Stabilizing fish oil during storage with Satureja bachtiarica Bunge
Matbo A., Ghanbari M.M., Sekhavatizadeh S.S., Nikkhah M.
Fish oil is highly susceptible to lipid oxidation, which leads to safety loss during storage. Natural antioxidants can prevent lipid oxidation. Satureja bachtiarica Bunge, also known as savory, is an endemic species plant that contains the necessary bioactive compounds and possesses antioxidant activity suitable for this purpose. This study featured the effects of savory extract and its essential oil as stabilizing agents on kilka fish oil.
We assessed the oxidative stability of fish oil fortified with of savory extract and essential oil in amounts of 0.5 and 1%. Then we compared their oxidative activity with that of samples treated with a synthetic antioxidant during 35 days at 40°C. The fish oil samples were tested for antioxidant activity, acid degree value, thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances, para-anisidine value, conjugated dienoic acids, peroxide value, total oxidation value, and free fatty acids.
Savory essential oil at the concentration of 1% was more effective than other samples in reducing the rate of lipid oxidation in fish oil. On storage day 35, the control sample yielded the following data: peroxide value = 14.79 meq O2/kg, acid degree value = 32.49 mL/g, thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances = 5.82 mg MDA/g, para-anisidine value = 116.03, total oxidation index = 136.27. These results were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than those in the sample with 1 % savory essential oil: peroxide value = 9.52 meq O2/kg, acid degree value = 22.41 mL/g, thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances = 3.46 mg MDA/g, para-anisidine value = 78.3, total oxidation index = 108.09. The fish oil samples contained more unsaturated fatty acids (66.76–68.83%) than saturated fatty acids (31.13–32.6%).
Savory essential oil demonstrated good potential as an effective natural antioxidant that extends the shelf life of fish oil.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Optimizing the utilization of pomelo (Citrus maxima (Brum.) Merr.) seeds as a quality dietary fiber
Budianto B., Suparmi A., Susanti D.
Orange seeds, often overlooked as waste, have hidden potential since fiber derived from them contains numerous biochemical substances that can enhance the nutritional value of food. We aimed to investigate the impact of pomelo seed fiber on the biscuit dough’s properties (starch and gluten), physicochemical characteristics, and biochemistry, as well as the product’s shelf life.
We studied three types of samples: control (no dietary fiber), biscuits with dietary fiber from pomelo (Citrus maxima (Brum.) Merr.) seeds, and biscuits with wheat germ fiber. Scanning electron microscopy was employed to analyze rubbery starch and gluten in the dough, while response surface methods were used to optimize the biscuits’ strength via a central composite design. The product’s shelf life was determined based on microbial contamination levels. ANOVA test and Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference post hoc test were performed to assess the differences in physicochemical and biochemical properties.
Citrus seed fiber influenced rubbery starch and gluten properties, causing significant differences (p < 0.05) in fracturability, total dietary fiber, and Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity among the three samples. The biscuits enriched with citrus seed fiber contained flavonoid compounds and acylserotonin, with acyl-Nω-methylserotonin dominating in the C22 and C24 homologs. Despite varied evaluations in texture and aroma, the biscuits with citrus seed fiber were well-received for their taste and boasted an extended shelf life (> 12 months).
Dietary fiber obtained from C. maxima seeds not only enhanced the nutritional value of the biscuits but also paved the way for innovative healthy food opportunities.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
BOX-PCR and ERIC-PCR evaluation for genotyping Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in raw milk
Maurice Bilung L., Radzi E.S., Tahar A.S., Zulkharnain A., Ngui R., Apun K.
Over the past decade, the occurrence of milk-borne infections caused by Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) has adversely affected consumer health and the milk industry.
We aimed to detect and genotype the strains of E. coli and S. Typhimurium isolated from cow and goat milks using two genotyping tools, BOX-PCR and ERIC-PCR. A total of 200 cow and goat milk samples were collected from the dairy farms in Southern Sarawak, Malaysia.
First, E. coli and Salmonella spp. detected in the samples were characterized using PCRs to identify pathogenic strains, STEC and S. Typhimurium. Next, the bacterial strains were genotyped using ERIC-PCR and BOX-PCR to determine their genetic relatedness. Out of 200 raw milk samples, 46.5% tested positive for non-STEC, 39.5% showed the presence of S. Typhimurium, and 11% were positive for STEC. The two genotyping tools showed different discrimination indexes, with BOX-PCR exhibiting a higher index mean (0.991) compared to ERIC-PCR (0.937). This suggested that BOX-PCR had better discriminatory power for genotyping the bacteria.
Our study provides information on the safety of milk sourced from dairy farms, underscoring the importance of regular inspections and surveillance at the farm level to minimize the risk of E. coli and Salmonella outbreaks from milk consumption.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
The phytochemical composition of Kuzbass medicinal plants studied by spectrophotometry and chromatography
Velichkovich N., Dunchenko N., Stepanova A., Kozlova O., Faskhutdinova E., Yustratov V., Luzyanin S.
Flavonoids are plant polyphenols that exhibit biological activity with antibacterial, antiviral, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimutagenic, and anticarcinogenic effects. The medicinal plants of Kuzbass have high contents of flavonoids and other polyphenolic compounds. Therefore, they can be used in medicinal preparations to prevent or treat serious diseases.
We studied the following plants collected in Kuzbass: common thyme (Thymus vulgaris Linn., leaves and stems), woolly burdock (Arctium tomentosum Mill., roots), alfalfa (Medicago sativa L., leaves and stems), common lungwort (Pulmonaria officinalis L., leaves and stems), common yarrow (Achillea millefolium L., leaves and stems), red clover (Trifolium pratense L., leaves and stems), common ginseng (Panax ginseng, roots), sweetvetch (Hedysarum neglectum Ledeb., roots), and cow parsnip (Heracleum sibiricum L., inflorescences, leaves, and stems). To extract flavonoids, we used ethanol at concentrations of 40, 55, 60, 70, and 75%. Spectrophotometry was used to determine total flavonoids, while high-performance liquid chromatography was employed to study the qualitative and quantitative composition of the extracts.
The highest yield of flavonoids was found in H. sibiricum leaves (at all concentrations except 70%), followed by the 55% and 70% ethanol extracts of T. vulgaris leaves and stems, as well as the 75% ethanol extract of A. millefolium leaves and stems. Thus, these plants have the greatest potential in being used in medicines. High-performance liquid chromatography showed the highest contents of polyphenolic compounds in the samples of P. officinalis, A. millefolium, T. vulgaris, and T. pratense.
Our results can be used in further research to produce new medicinal preparations based on the medicinal plants of Kuzbass.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Aurelia aurita jellyfish collagen: Recovery properties
Barzkar N., Sukhikh S., Zhikhreva A., Cheliubeeva E., Kapitunova A., Malkov D., Babich O., Kulikova Y.
Wound and burn healing is a complex physiological process that can be facilitated by medications based on marine collagen. In this regard, biomass of the Aurelia aurita jellyfish is a promising alternative source of medical collagen. As the global incidence of burns and wounds continues to grow, new healing methods have become a relevant area of medical science.
This study featured acetic acid as a means of marine collagen extraction from A. aurita biomass. The physical and chemical properties of jellyfish collagen were determined gravimetrically and included such indicators as water solubility and water holding capacity. The molecular weight was defined by gel electrophoresis. The spectral studies relied on the method of UV spectroscopy. The regenerative experiments included such parameters as cytotoxicity, antioxidant properties, adhesion, and wound healing rate, as well as a quantitative PCR analysis.
The optimal conditions for maximal collagen yield were as follows: 0.5 M acetic acid and 48 h extraction time. However, the collagen yield was very low (≤ 0.0185%). The high water holding capacity showed good prospects for A. aurita collagen to be used as hemostatic sponge. The acid-soluble collagen sample had a molecular weight of 100–115 kDa, which made it possible to classify it as type I. A. aurita jellyfish collagen revealed no cytotoxic properties; it had no effect on adhesion, migration, and proliferation of keratinocytes, neither did it affect the expression of cell differentiation markers.
The wound healing model proved that the marine collagen had regenerative properties as it was able to increase the wound healing rate by 24.5%. Therefore, collagen extracted from the biomass of A. aurita jellyfish d emonstrated good p rospects for cosmetology and regenerative medicine.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Ultra-high-pressure homogenization in chicory root juice production
Aksu M.I., Erkovan H.I., Erkovan S.
The demand for freshly squeezed natural fruit juices has increased in recent years, however their shelf life is quite short. Thermal processes applied to extend the shelf life of such products and increase their storage stability cause significant losses in color and other sensory properties, depending on the temperature applied. Therefore, the preference for high-pressure homogenization as an alternative to thermal processes is on the rise. We aimed to determine effects of ultra-high-pressure homogenization and production stages on some quality properties of chicory root juice.
Ultra-high-pressure homogenization was applied at the pressure levels of 0 (Control), 50, 100, 150, and 200 MPA. The samples also included juice after homogenization with an ULTRA-TURRAX disperser and after a water bath.
Ultra-high-pressure homogenization affected such quality characteristics of chicory root juice as total soluble solids (p < 0.01), pH (p < 0.01), L* (p < 0.01), a* (p < 0.01), b* (p < 0.01), a*/b* (p < 0.01), chroma (p < 0.01), hue angle (p < 0.01), and total color difference ΔE (p < 0.01). Higher levels of ultra-high-pressure homogenization pressure increased pH (p < 0.05), a* values (p < 0.05), and the a/b* ratio (p < 0.05) but reduced L* (p < 0.05), b* (p < 0.05), chroma (p < 0.05), and hue angle (p < 0.05) values of the juice samples. Thus, the use of ultra-high-pressure homogenization (100 and 200 MPa) contributed to improving the total soluble solids and redness values of chicory root juice.
Our study showed that the ultra-high-pressure homogenization process improved the quality of chicory root juice.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Multi-objective development of novel egg free cakes using quinoa protein and its quality attributes
Mohamed R.K., Ahmed Z.S., Abozed S.S.
This study explores the potential of utilizing quinoa protein as an egg substitute in bakery products for customers with health, culture/religion, or dietary restrictions.
Quinoa protein was prepared from quinoa seed by alkaline solubilization followed by isoelectric precipitation and drying. Four different formulations of egg-free cakes were prepared by incorporating quinoa protein in egg equivalents of 50 g (Formulation 1), 75 g (Formulation 2), 100 g (Formulation 3), and 150 g (Formulation 4). The research involved Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and revealed such functional properties as proximate composition, physical properties, color, texture, microstructure, and sensory characteristics for the batters and the cakes.
The incorporation of different quinoa protein concentrations significantly (p < 0.05) affected all the functional properties of the batters and the cakes. Such variables as crude protein and ash increased while moisture and fat contents decreased. The baking loss went down as the share of quinoa protein went up. The structural analysis showed an increase in gumminess and chewiness accompanied by a decrease in cohesiveness and elasticity. The analysis also revealed hardness and non-uniform changes. The lightness (L*) and yellowness (b*) of the cake surface and crumb decreased while the redness (a*) increased.
The cakes prepared according to Formulation 4 with the greatest share of quinoa protein had a high nutritional value with reasonable concentrations of essential amino acids in general and a high level of lysine in particular. The same sample also received the highest score for overall sensory properties. The sensory assessment proved that quinoa protein could meet consumer expectations of egg-free cakes.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Innovative physical techniques in freeze-drying
Andreeva O., Shorstkii I.
Malnutrition is a global problem that is caused by insufficient sources of vitamins, microelements, and other nutrients. This creates a need for developing long-term preservation techniques. One of the solutions is to pre-treat food materials before freeze-drying by applying advanced and safe electrophysical techniques instead of traditional thermomechanical methods.
We reviewed three of the most promising electrophysical techniques (low-temperature plasma, ultrasound, and pulsed electric field) which have proven effective for a wide range of food materials. In particular, we focused on their mechanism of action and the equipment required, drawing on successful laboratory and large-scale studies in Russia and abroad.
The electrophysical techniques under review had an etching effect on the material, caused electroporation, and changed the material’s internal structure. In addition to these effects, we described their process and technology, as well as their advantages and disadvantages in industrial applications.
Based on literature analysis, we stressed the importance of developing innovative electrophysical techniques for the food industry. These techniques should ensure high energy efficiency of the freeze-drying process and maintain good quality characteristics of food products.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Lycopene from tomato biomass: Extraction and stabilization
Murillo Vazquez R.N., Pacheco Moises F.P., Nardello-Rataj V., Carbajal Arizaga G.G.
Lycopene and other carotenoids have a significant added value in the food and cosmetic industries due to their nutraceutical properties and antioxidant activity. The extraction and stabilization of these compounds remain challenging due to their sensitivity to light, temperature fluctuations, and oxidation. This article introduces a sustainable method of extracting lycopene from tomato waste (Solanum lycopersicum L.) using layered double hydroxide nanoparticles to stabilize lycopene.
We used tomato juice and lycopene as a positive control, while ZnAl was a negative control. The experimental samples included 75 and 100 mg of zinc salt per 1 mL of tomato juice, which were labeled as ZnAl75J and ZnAl100J.
Zinc and aluminum salts developed insoluble hydroxides, which precipitated lycopene from tomato juice, thus forming composites. The composites proved to be efficient means of encapsulating lycopene as they recovered 97% lycopene present in tomato juice. The physicochemical properties of the organic material enhanced resistance to thermal degradation and acted as an extended-release antioxidant. ZnAl100J, which contained a lot of lycopene, inhibited 89% of DPPH• in 24 h and showed a value higher than IC50 for ABTS•+, which was 0.02 μg/mL of TEAC ABTS•+. ZnAl75J composites showed a higher protection against oxidation and a higher sun protection factor value (3.08) at 15% concentration.
The composites could be used as an active ingredient in a wide range of formulations that require antioxidant and photosensitizing properties, or simply as encapsulators and carriers of lycopene.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Autumn and winter diet of wood pigeon (Columba palumbus) in the Central Ciscaucasia
Kaledin A., Malovichko L., Rezanov A., Drozdova L., Kentbaeva B.
The wood pigeon (Columba palumbus) is the largest pigeon in Russia: an adult bird weighs max. 620 g. Its population in Central Ciscaucasia is quite numerous, which makes it a popular object of sports hunting. However, very little is known about its diet and feeding habits. This article describes the seasonal features of C. palumbus diet during the hunting season in the Stavropol Region, Russia.
The study relied on the analysis of foods extracted from 66 crops and stomachs of wood pigeons killed by hunters or hit by road vehicles in various biotopes in 25 districts of the Stavropol Region.
In the steppe areas, wood pigeons usually inhabit summer gardens, orchards, vineyards, and green belts along fields, roads, and railways. Wood pigeons are phytophages, which means they feed on plants. Their autumn diet includes sunflower seeds (17.98% occurrence rate, 19.68% total diet), corn grains (15.11 and 9.56%, respectively), wheat (14.39 and 9.98%), flax (6.47 and 10.4%), and millet (2.88 and 4.82%), as well as seeds of wild plants, e.g., wild vetch (7.19 and 3.14%), catchweed (5.75 and 6.25%), trailing bindweed (2.88 and 4.27%), etc.
The wood pigeon inhabits all districts of the Stavropol Region, which makes it a promising game bird species. In addition to cultivated plants, e.g., wheat, sunflower, peas, and corn, wood pigeons feed on a wide range of weeds. The research results contribute to scientific data on C. palumbus as a game bird and cast light upon some of its feeding patterns.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82504/82504f12ad32e76a1d5fd78944fb97b1507f92db" alt="Kemerovo State University"
Physicochemical, rheological, and microbiological properties of honey-fortified probiotic drinkable yogurt
Albay Z., Celebi M., Simsek B.
This study aimed to investigate the physicochemical, rheological, and microbiological attributes of drinkable yogurts prepared with three distinct types of honey (flower, pine, and thyme) in amounts of 10 and 20% and probiotic cultures (Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium spp.).
The control sample was brighter while the yogurt containing 20% pine honey was more yellow during storage (21 days). The samples’ serum separation quantities rose together with the honey ratio. All the honey-fortified drinkable yogurts were found to be non-Newtonian pseudoplastic liquids that are thixotropic. However, as the honey ratio increased, the apparent viscosity and consistency coefficients increased, too. After 21 days of storage, L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium spp. counts rose to more than 5.0 log CFU/mL in the experimental yogurts containing honey (except for the sample with 20% flower honey). The panelists preferred the 10% honey-fortified drinkable yogurts over the others. The yogurts with flower honey were mostly favored, followed by pine and thyme honeys. Although honey contributed to the properties of drinkable yogurt, adding more than 10% of honey degraded the product’s quality and acceptability.
In conclusion, 10% is an optimal amount for flower and pine honey, with a smaller amount recommended for thyme honey. More research is needed on honey-fortified drinkable yogurt for its commercial production.
Top-100
Citing journals
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
|
|
PLoS ONE
3811 citations, 1.43%
|
|
Animal Behaviour
3246 citations, 1.21%
|
|
Scientific Reports
2978 citations, 1.11%
|
|
Ecology and Evolution
2790 citations, 1.04%
|
|
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
2638 citations, 0.99%
|
|
Biological Reviews
2243 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Journal of Experimental Biology
2144 citations, 0.8%
|
|
Behavioral Ecology
1966 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Evolution; international journal of organic evolution
1954 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
1891 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
1737 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Oecologia
1432 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
1420 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
1266 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Hydrobiologia
1181 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
1127 citations, 0.42%
|
|
New Phytologist
1062 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Biological Conservation
1022 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Functional Ecology
1021 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Nature
1013 citations, 0.38%
|
|
American Naturalist
1009 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
1003 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Forest Ecology and Management
955 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Ethology
946 citations, 0.35%
|
|
PeerJ
935 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journal of Animal Ecology
934 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journal of Morphology
875 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Oikos
874 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Marine Biology
869 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Ecology
868 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Molecular Ecology
867 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Global Change Biology
838 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Ecological Indicators
825 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
793 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Ecology Letters
735 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Zoology
710 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Ecography
704 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Biogeography
699 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Freshwater Biology
690 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Insect Physiology
676 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology
670 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Fish Biology
668 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Ecology
668 citations, 0.25%
|
|
American Journal of Botany
657 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Frontiers in Marine Science
608 citations, 0.23%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
595 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Ecosphere
585 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Experimental Zoology
583 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Science
575 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Physiology
563 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Frontiers in Plant Science
558 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Royal Society Open Science
558 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Biological Chemistry
554 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Current Biology
536 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Applied Ecology
525 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Global Ecology and Biogeography
510 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Nature Communications
503 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Trends in Ecology and Evolution
497 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Behavioural Processes
493 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Biological Invasions
489 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Marine Ecology - Progress Series
488 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Thermal Biology
485 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Biodiversity and Conservation
479 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
478 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Plant and Soil
474 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Insects
467 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Developmental Biology
465 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Landscape Ecology
463 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Zoology
458 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Vegetation Science
442 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Animals
437 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Anatomical Record
437 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Global Ecology and Conservation
433 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Biology Letters
433 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Diversity and Distributions
429 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Avian Biology
417 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
410 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
395 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Heredity
393 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology
393 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Theoretical Biology
393 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
383 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Comparative Neurology
382 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Ibis
378 citations, 0.14%
|
|
![]() Journal of Comparative Physiology B: Biochemical, Systemic, and Environmental Physiology
376 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Ecological Entomology
376 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Diversity
375 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
366 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Annals of Botany
364 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology
362 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology
362 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Plant Ecology
361 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Forests
360 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
348 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology
342 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Frontiers in Microbiology
336 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Frontiers in Physiology
334 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Cell and Tissue Research
334 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Aquaculture
333 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Evolutionary Ecology
332 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
|
Citing publishers
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
|
|
Wiley
57974 citations, 21.68%
|
|
Elsevier
57450 citations, 21.49%
|
|
Springer Nature
45249 citations, 16.92%
|
|
Oxford University Press
10748 citations, 4.02%
|
|
MDPI
8616 citations, 3.22%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
7179 citations, 2.69%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
6787 citations, 2.54%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
6363 citations, 2.38%
|
|
The Royal Society
6187 citations, 2.31%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
6096 citations, 2.28%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
4568 citations, 1.71%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
2630 citations, 0.98%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
2320 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
1623 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1298 citations, 0.49%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
1240 citations, 0.46%
|
|
PeerJ
1216 citations, 0.45%
|
|
SAGE
1138 citations, 0.43%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
1043 citations, 0.39%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
1008 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Inter-Research Science Center
837 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
807 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Annual Reviews
754 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
708 citations, 0.26%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
642 citations, 0.24%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
619 citations, 0.23%
|
|
SciELO
555 citations, 0.21%
|
|
IOP Publishing
508 citations, 0.19%
|
|
American Physiological Society
439 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Brill
434 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
396 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
385 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Ornithologists' Union
382 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Copernicus
381 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Entomological Society of America
378 citations, 0.14%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
363 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
343 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
342 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
309 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
272 citations, 0.1%
|
|
S. Karger AG
223 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Magnolia Press
221 citations, 0.08%
|
|
EDP Sciences
219 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Geological Society of London
199 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
161 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Arachnological Society
146 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
144 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Museum and Institute of Zoology at the Polish Academy of Sciences
136 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
135 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Wilson Ornithological Society
132 citations, 0.05%
|
|
IntechOpen
132 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Geophysical Union
128 citations, 0.05%
|
|
AIP Publishing
122 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
118 citations, 0.04%
|
|
International Association for Plant Taxonomy
113 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Portland Press
111 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Zoological Society of Japan
102 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Scientific Societies
102 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
101 citations, 0.04%
|
|
BMJ
97 citations, 0.04%
|
|
International Association for Great Lakes Research
95 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Society for the Study of Reproduction
90 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Bioscientifica
89 citations, 0.03%
|
|
81 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
81 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
77 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
77 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Biology Centre, AS CR
76 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles
73 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Herpetologists League
71 citations, 0.03%
|
|
F1000 Research
71 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Nordic Council for Wildlife Research
69 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Endocrine Society
68 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Society for Neuroscience
68 citations, 0.03%
|
|
World Scientific
65 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Humboldt Field Research Institute
64 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
63 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academia Brasileira de Ciencias
61 citations, 0.02%
|
|
National Research Council Canada
60 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IGI Global
59 citations, 0.02%
|
|
National Inquiry Services Center (NISC)
59 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of Colorado
58 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board
57 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Northeast Forestry University
57 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Microbiology Society
56 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
55 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
55 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Museum of Natural History (BioOne sponsored)
54 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Brazilian Association for Ecological Science and Conservation
53 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
51 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
51 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Waterbird Society
51 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Soil Science Society of America
49 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB)
48 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Impact Journals
47 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
47 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Norwegian Polar Institute
45 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Emerald
43 citations, 0.02%
|
|
National Shellfisheries Association, Inc.
43 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society for Nutrition
43 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
|
Publishing organizations
20
40
60
80
100
|
|
University of Cambridge
100 publications, 3.26%
|
|
University of Oxford
61 publications, 1.99%
|
|
Australian National University
52 publications, 1.69%
|
|
University of Zurich
47 publications, 1.53%
|
|
University College London
37 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Sorbonne University
36 publications, 1.17%
|
|
University of Bristol
36 publications, 1.17%
|
|
University of Exeter
35 publications, 1.14%
|
|
University of Western Australia
33 publications, 1.07%
|
|
University of Helsinki
32 publications, 1.04%
|
|
University of New South Wales
31 publications, 1.01%
|
|
University of Toronto
31 publications, 1.01%
|
|
University of Florida
31 publications, 1.01%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
29 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Manchester
29 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Sydney
29 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Melbourne
29 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Liverpool
27 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Harvard University
27 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of St Andrews
27 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Queensland
25 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of California, Davis
25 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Göttingen
24 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
23 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Aarhus University
23 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Leeds
23 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Sheffield
23 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Imperial College London
22 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
22 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Cornell University
22 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Monash University
22 publications, 0.72%
|
|
McGill University
22 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Ege University
21 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Ghent University
21 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
21 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Michigan
21 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of British Columbia
21 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Doñana Biological Station
21 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Otago
20 publications, 0.65%
|
|
James Cook University
20 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Stellenbosch University
20 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Oregon State University
20 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Newcastle University
20 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
19 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Adelaide
19 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
19 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Vienna
19 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Lund University
18 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Glasgow
18 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
18 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Reading
18 publications, 0.59%
|
|
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research
18 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Aix-Marseille University
17 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Stockholm University
17 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Macquarie University
17 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Aberdeen
17 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Tübingen
16 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Lisbon
16 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Dalhousie University
16 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Natural Environment Research Council
16 publications, 0.52%
|
|
National University of Singapore
15 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Birmingham
15 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Washington
15 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
15 publications, 0.49%
|
|
American Museum of Natural History
15 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Groningen
15 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
15 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
14 publications, 0.46%
|
|
ETH Zurich
14 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Yale University
14 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Tasmania
14 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
14 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Chicago
14 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
13 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Curtin University
13 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of the Witwatersrand
13 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Colorado State University
13 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
13 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
13 publications, 0.42%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
13 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
13 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Porto
13 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Alberta
13 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
13 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of York
13 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
12 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Charles University
12 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of New England
12 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Cape Town
12 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Agricultural Research Council of South Africa
12 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Duke University
12 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
12 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
12 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
12 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Minnesota
12 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Cardiff University
12 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of East Anglia
12 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Carleton University
12 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
12 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Uppsala University
11 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
|
|
University of Zurich
21 publications, 3.68%
|
|
Australian National University
20 publications, 3.5%
|
|
University of Exeter
19 publications, 3.33%
|
|
Sorbonne University
18 publications, 3.15%
|
|
University of Cambridge
17 publications, 2.98%
|
|
University of New South Wales
16 publications, 2.8%
|
|
University of Oxford
15 publications, 2.63%
|
|
University of St Andrews
13 publications, 2.28%
|
|
University of Florida
13 publications, 2.28%
|
|
University of Western Australia
12 publications, 2.1%
|
|
University of Helsinki
11 publications, 1.93%
|
|
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
11 publications, 1.93%
|
|
University of Sydney
11 publications, 1.93%
|
|
University of Queensland
11 publications, 1.93%
|
|
University of Toronto
11 publications, 1.93%
|
|
Ghent University
10 publications, 1.75%
|
|
University College London
10 publications, 1.75%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
10 publications, 1.75%
|
|
University of Melbourne
10 publications, 1.75%
|
|
Monash University
10 publications, 1.75%
|
|
Oregon State University
10 publications, 1.75%
|
|
University of Bristol
10 publications, 1.75%
|
|
University of British Columbia
10 publications, 1.75%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
10 publications, 1.75%
|
|
Aix-Marseille University
9 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Aarhus University
9 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Macquarie University
9 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Harvard University
9 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior
9 publications, 1.58%
|
|
University of Lisbon
8 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
8 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Cornell University
8 publications, 1.4%
|
|
University of Otago
8 publications, 1.4%
|
|
University of Tasmania
8 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Newcastle University
8 publications, 1.4%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
8 publications, 1.4%
|
|
University of Göttingen
8 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Bielefeld University
8 publications, 1.4%
|
|
University of Vienna
8 publications, 1.4%
|
|
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research
8 publications, 1.4%
|
|
UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
8 publications, 1.4%
|
|
University of Tübingen
7 publications, 1.23%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
7 publications, 1.23%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
7 publications, 1.23%
|
|
University of California, Davis
7 publications, 1.23%
|
|
Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries
7 publications, 1.23%
|
|
University of Konstanz
7 publications, 1.23%
|
|
University of East Anglia
7 publications, 1.23%
|
|
Paris Sciences et Lettres
7 publications, 1.23%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
6 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn
6 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Charles University
6 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Deakin University
6 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Wollongong
6 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Flinders University
6 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
6 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Washington
6 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
6 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
6 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
6 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Jagiellonian University
6 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Groningen
6 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Barcelona
6 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Alberta
6 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Granada
6 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Carleton University
6 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Doñana Biological Station
6 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
6 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of the French Antilles
6 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Haifa
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Stockholm University
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
ETH Zurich
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Milan
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Durham University
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Liverpool
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Technical University of Denmark
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Manchester
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Adelaide
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Curtin University
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Murdoch University
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of New England
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Auburn University
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Arizona State University
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Colorado State University
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Aberdeen
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Eötvös Loránd University (University of Budapest)
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Paris Cité University
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Institut Universitaire de France
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Berlin Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Porto
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Coimbra
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Valencia
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Tennessee
5 publications, 0.88%
|
|
A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of the Russian Academy of Sciences
4 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 712, 23.19%
United Kingdom
712 publications, 23.19%
|
USA
|
USA, 690, 22.48%
USA
690 publications, 22.48%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 303, 9.87%
Australia
303 publications, 9.87%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 225, 7.33%
Germany
225 publications, 7.33%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 192, 6.25%
Canada
192 publications, 6.25%
|
France
|
France, 186, 6.06%
France
186 publications, 6.06%
|
China
|
China, 116, 3.78%
China
116 publications, 3.78%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 111, 3.62%
Spain
111 publications, 3.62%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 96, 3.13%
Netherlands
96 publications, 3.13%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 94, 3.06%
Switzerland
94 publications, 3.06%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 89, 2.9%
Sweden
89 publications, 2.9%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 82, 2.67%
South Africa
82 publications, 2.67%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 68, 2.21%
Italy
68 publications, 2.21%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 67, 2.18%
Denmark
67 publications, 2.18%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 63, 2.05%
Brazil
63 publications, 2.05%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 62, 2.02%
Finland
62 publications, 2.02%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 61, 1.99%
Belgium
61 publications, 1.99%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 59, 1.92%
New Zealand
59 publications, 1.92%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 53, 1.73%
Austria
53 publications, 1.73%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 50, 1.63%
Portugal
50 publications, 1.63%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 49, 1.6%
Norway
49 publications, 1.6%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 44, 1.43%
Czech Republic
44 publications, 1.43%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 41, 1.34%
Israel
41 publications, 1.34%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 34, 1.11%
Poland
34 publications, 1.11%
|
India
|
India, 33, 1.07%
India
33 publications, 1.07%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 27, 0.88%
Russia
27 publications, 0.88%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 27, 0.88%
Turkey
27 publications, 0.88%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 26, 0.85%
Japan
26 publications, 0.85%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 23, 0.75%
Mexico
23 publications, 0.75%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 21, 0.68%
Singapore
21 publications, 0.68%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 20, 0.65%
Argentina
20 publications, 0.65%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 19, 0.62%
Chile
19 publications, 0.62%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 18, 0.59%
Hungary
18 publications, 0.59%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 18, 0.59%
Ireland
18 publications, 0.59%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 13, 0.42%
Greece
13 publications, 0.42%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 12, 0.39%
Panama
12 publications, 0.39%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 11, 0.36%
Estonia
11 publications, 0.36%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 9, 0.29%
Malaysia
9 publications, 0.29%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 9, 0.29%
Republic of Korea
9 publications, 0.29%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 7, 0.23%
Colombia
7 publications, 0.23%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 7, 0.23%
Costa Rica
7 publications, 0.23%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 7, 0.23%
Slovenia
7 publications, 0.23%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 7, 0.23%
Croatia
7 publications, 0.23%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 4, 0.13%
Bulgaria
4 publications, 0.13%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 4, 0.13%
Ghana
4 publications, 0.13%
|
Greenland
|
Greenland, 4, 0.13%
Greenland
4 publications, 0.13%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 4, 0.13%
Latvia
4 publications, 0.13%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 4, 0.13%
Lithuania
4 publications, 0.13%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 4, 0.13%
Romania
4 publications, 0.13%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 4, 0.13%
Slovakia
4 publications, 0.13%
|
Monaco
|
Monaco, 3, 0.1%
Monaco
3 publications, 0.1%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 3, 0.1%
Pakistan
3 publications, 0.1%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 3, 0.1%
Thailand
3 publications, 0.1%
|
Czechoslovakia
|
Czechoslovakia, 3, 0.1%
Czechoslovakia
3 publications, 0.1%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 2, 0.07%
Ukraine
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Bolivia
|
Bolivia, 2, 0.07%
Bolivia
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 2, 0.07%
Vietnam
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2, 0.07%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 2, 0.07%
Luxembourg
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 2, 0.07%
Morocco
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Myanmar
|
Myanmar, 2, 0.07%
Myanmar
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 2, 0.07%
Nigeria
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 2, 0.07%
Saudi Arabia
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 2, 0.07%
Serbia
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 2, 0.07%
Tanzania
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
Trinidad and Tobago, 2, 0.07%
Trinidad and Tobago
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 2, 0.07%
Philippines
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 2, 0.07%
Ecuador
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Jamaica
|
Jamaica, 2, 0.07%
Jamaica
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Belize
|
Belize, 1, 0.03%
Belize
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 1, 0.03%
Benin
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 1, 0.03%
Venezuela
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Gabon
|
Gabon, 1, 0.03%
Gabon
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 1, 0.03%
Georgia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 1, 0.03%
Egypt
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 1, 0.03%
Zambia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.03%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.03%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.03%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 1, 0.03%
Cameroon
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.03%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
Côte d'Ivoire, 1, 0.03%
Côte d'Ivoire
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.03%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 1, 0.03%
Mongolia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
New Caledonia
|
New Caledonia, 1, 0.03%
New Caledonia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Isle of Man
|
Isle of Man, 1, 0.03%
Isle of Man
1 publication, 0.03%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.03%
UAE
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Senegal
|
Senegal, 1, 0.03%
Senegal
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.03%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 1, 0.03%
Uganda
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.03%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.03%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.03%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
USSR
|
USSR, 1, 0.03%
USSR
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Show all (64 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|
|
USA
|
USA, 196, 34.33%
USA
196 publications, 34.33%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 139, 24.34%
United Kingdom
139 publications, 24.34%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 110, 19.26%
Australia
110 publications, 19.26%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 84, 14.71%
Germany
84 publications, 14.71%
|
France
|
France, 68, 11.91%
France
68 publications, 11.91%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 63, 11.03%
Canada
63 publications, 11.03%
|
China
|
China, 61, 10.68%
China
61 publications, 10.68%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 50, 8.76%
Spain
50 publications, 8.76%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 34, 5.95%
Brazil
34 publications, 5.95%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 33, 5.78%
Switzerland
33 publications, 5.78%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 32, 5.6%
Netherlands
32 publications, 5.6%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 31, 5.43%
Italy
31 publications, 5.43%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 26, 4.55%
Denmark
26 publications, 4.55%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 25, 4.38%
Portugal
25 publications, 4.38%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 25, 4.38%
Belgium
25 publications, 4.38%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 25, 4.38%
Sweden
25 publications, 4.38%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 23, 4.03%
Czech Republic
23 publications, 4.03%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 22, 3.85%
Norway
22 publications, 3.85%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 21, 3.68%
Austria
21 publications, 3.68%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 21, 3.68%
New Zealand
21 publications, 3.68%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 21, 3.68%
Poland
21 publications, 3.68%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 19, 3.33%
Finland
19 publications, 3.33%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 18, 3.15%
South Africa
18 publications, 3.15%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 17, 2.98%
Russia
17 publications, 2.98%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 15, 2.63%
Israel
15 publications, 2.63%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 13, 2.28%
Mexico
13 publications, 2.28%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 13, 2.28%
Japan
13 publications, 2.28%
|
India
|
India, 12, 2.1%
India
12 publications, 2.1%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 10, 1.75%
Chile
10 publications, 1.75%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 9, 1.58%
Panama
9 publications, 1.58%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 8, 1.4%
Argentina
8 publications, 1.4%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 7, 1.23%
Republic of Korea
7 publications, 1.23%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 7, 1.23%
Singapore
7 publications, 1.23%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 6, 1.05%
Hungary
6 publications, 1.05%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 6, 1.05%
Ireland
6 publications, 1.05%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 6, 1.05%
Croatia
6 publications, 1.05%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 5, 0.88%
Estonia
5 publications, 0.88%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 5, 0.88%
Malaysia
5 publications, 0.88%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 4, 0.7%
Ghana
4 publications, 0.7%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 4, 0.7%
Greece
4 publications, 0.7%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 4, 0.7%
Colombia
4 publications, 0.7%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 4, 0.7%
Slovenia
4 publications, 0.7%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 3, 0.53%
Costa Rica
3 publications, 0.53%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 3, 0.53%
Turkey
3 publications, 0.53%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 2, 0.35%
Ukraine
2 publications, 0.35%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 2, 0.35%
Bulgaria
2 publications, 0.35%
|
Greenland
|
Greenland, 2, 0.35%
Greenland
2 publications, 0.35%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 2, 0.35%
Latvia
2 publications, 0.35%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 2, 0.35%
Lithuania
2 publications, 0.35%
|
Monaco
|
Monaco, 2, 0.35%
Monaco
2 publications, 0.35%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.35%
Romania
2 publications, 0.35%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 2, 0.35%
Saudi Arabia
2 publications, 0.35%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 2, 0.35%
Thailand
2 publications, 0.35%
|
Belize
|
Belize, 1, 0.18%
Belize
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 1, 0.18%
Benin
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Bolivia
|
Bolivia, 1, 0.18%
Bolivia
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.18%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Gabon
|
Gabon, 1, 0.18%
Gabon
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 1, 0.18%
Cameroon
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1, 0.18%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.18%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.18%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.18%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 1, 0.18%
Mongolia
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Myanmar
|
Myanmar, 1, 0.18%
Myanmar
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.18%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.18%
|
New Caledonia
|
New Caledonia, 1, 0.18%
New Caledonia
1 publication, 0.18%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.18%
UAE
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.18%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Senegal
|
Senegal, 1, 0.18%
Senegal
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.18%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 1, 0.18%
Slovakia
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.18%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 1, 0.18%
Uganda
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.18%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 1, 0.18%
Ecuador
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Show all (46 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|
1 profile journal article
Lavrov Andrey
🥼 🤝
PhD in Biological/biomedical sciences
28 publications,
313 citations
h-index: 10
Research interests
Cytology
Developmental biology
Evolutionary biology
Evolutionary developmental biology
Zoology
1 profile journal article
Begall Sabine
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7076e/7076e5f543097f355c32d05d649e8300ad10c8fd" alt="University of Duisburg-Essen"
University of Duisburg-Essen
90 publications,
1 798 citations
h-index: 23
1 profile journal article
Gostyńska Julia
2 publications,
14 citations
h-index: 1
1 profile journal article
Dalecky Ambroise
30 publications,
990 citations
h-index: 15
1 profile journal article
Chen Xin
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfe42/cfe42577895447c63d0fe357c06a47ba8d6155b5" alt="University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science"
University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science
12 publications,
222 citations
h-index: 5
1 profile journal article
Zlobin Ilya
36 publications,
473 citations
h-index: 13
1 profile journal article
Ponge Jean-François
186 publications,
6 462 citations
h-index: 46