volume 1 issue 1 pages 75-94

The evolution of lithium-ion battery recycling

Xiaotu Ma 1
Zifei Meng 1
Marilena Velonia Bellonia 2
Jeffrey Spangenberger 3
Gavin Harper 4, 5
Eric Gratz 6
Elsa Olivetti 7
Renata Arsenault 8
Yan Wang 1
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2025-01-15
SJR
CiteScore
Impact factor
ISSN30050685
Abstract
Demand for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is increasing owing to the expanding use of electrical vehicles and stationary energy storage. Efficient and closed-loop battery recycling strategies are therefore needed, which will require recovering materials from spent LIBs and reintegrating them into new batteries. In this Review, we outline the current state of LIB recycling, evaluating industrial and developing technologies. Among industrial technologies, pyrometallurgy can be broadly applied to diverse electrode materials but requires operating temperatures of over 1,000 °C and therefore has high energy consumption. Hydrometallurgy can be performed at temperatures below 200 °C and has material recovery rates of up to 93% for lithium, nickel and cobalt, but it produces large amounts of wastewater. Developing technologies such as direct recycling and upcycling aim to increase the efficiency of LIB recycling and rely on improved pretreatment processes with automated disassembly and cleaner mechanical separation. Additionally, the range of materials recovered from spent LIBs is expanding from the cathode materials recycled with established methods to include anode materials, electrolytes, binders, separators and current collectors. Achieving an efficient recycling ecosystem will require collaboration between recyclers, battery manufacturers and electric vehicle manufacturers to aid the design and automation of battery disassembly lines. Recycling techniques are essential to addressing the challenge of resource sustainability associated with the rising demand for lithium-ion batteries. This Review discusses industrial and developing technologies for recycling and using recovered materials from spent lithium-ion batteries.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
Chemical Engineering Journal
5 publications, 6.33%
Joule
4 publications, 5.06%
Energy Storage Materials
3 publications, 3.8%
Nature Reviews Clean Technology
3 publications, 3.8%
Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy
3 publications, 3.8%
Separation and Purification Technology
3 publications, 3.8%
Green Chemistry
2 publications, 2.53%
Journal of Power Sources
2 publications, 2.53%
JOM
2 publications, 2.53%
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
2 publications, 2.53%
Batteries
2 publications, 2.53%
Energy for Sustainable Development
1 publication, 1.27%
Environmental Science & Technology
1 publication, 1.27%
World Electric Vehicle Journal
1 publication, 1.27%
Sustainability
1 publication, 1.27%
Progress in Materials Science
1 publication, 1.27%
Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry
1 publication, 1.27%
Next Materials
1 publication, 1.27%
Environments - MDPI
1 publication, 1.27%
Chem
1 publication, 1.27%
Energy and Environmental Science
1 publication, 1.27%
Solid State Ionics
1 publication, 1.27%
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1 publication, 1.27%
Journal of Hazardous Materials
1 publication, 1.27%
Matter
1 publication, 1.27%
Nano Energy
1 publication, 1.27%
Frontiers in Energy Research
1 publication, 1.27%
Future Batteries
1 publication, 1.27%
Chemical Engineering Science
1 publication, 1.27%
Coatings
1 publication, 1.27%
1
2
3
4
5

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Elsevier
36 publications, 45.57%
Springer Nature
11 publications, 13.92%
MDPI
10 publications, 12.66%
Wiley
8 publications, 10.13%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
6 publications, 7.59%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
6 publications, 7.59%
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 publication, 1.27%
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
1 publication, 1.27%
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
79
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Ma X. et al. The evolution of lithium-ion battery recycling // Nature Reviews Clean Technology. 2025. Vol. 1. No. 1. pp. 75-94.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Ma X., Meng Z., Bellonia M. V., Spangenberger J., Harper G., Gratz E., Olivetti E., Arsenault R., Wang Y. The evolution of lithium-ion battery recycling // Nature Reviews Clean Technology. 2025. Vol. 1. No. 1. pp. 75-94.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1038/s44359-024-00010-4
UR - https://www.nature.com/articles/s44359-024-00010-4
TI - The evolution of lithium-ion battery recycling
T2 - Nature Reviews Clean Technology
AU - Ma, Xiaotu
AU - Meng, Zifei
AU - Bellonia, Marilena Velonia
AU - Spangenberger, Jeffrey
AU - Harper, Gavin
AU - Gratz, Eric
AU - Olivetti, Elsa
AU - Arsenault, Renata
AU - Wang, Yan
PY - 2025
DA - 2025/01/15
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 75-94
IS - 1
VL - 1
SN - 3005-0685
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2025_Ma,
author = {Xiaotu Ma and Zifei Meng and Marilena Velonia Bellonia and Jeffrey Spangenberger and Gavin Harper and Eric Gratz and Elsa Olivetti and Renata Arsenault and Yan Wang},
title = {The evolution of lithium-ion battery recycling},
journal = {Nature Reviews Clean Technology},
year = {2025},
volume = {1},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {jan},
url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s44359-024-00010-4},
number = {1},
pages = {75--94},
doi = {10.1038/s44359-024-00010-4}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Ma, Xiaotu, et al. “The evolution of lithium-ion battery recycling.” Nature Reviews Clean Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, Jan. 2025, pp. 75-94. https://www.nature.com/articles/s44359-024-00010-4.