Nature, volume 442, issue 7099, pages 180-183

Ultrasensitive solution-cast quantum dot photodetectors

Gerasimos Konstantatos 1
Ian Howard 1
Armin Fischer 1
Sjoerd Hoogland 1
Jason Clifford 1
Ethan Klem 1
Larissa Levina 1
Edward H Sargent 1
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2006-07-13
Journal: Nature
Q1
Q1
SJR18.509
CiteScore90.0
Impact factor50.5
ISSN00280836, 14764687
Multidisciplinary
Abstract
The best electronic and optoelectronic devices are built via semiconductor crystal growth on a single-crystal substrate. Over 100 papers have been published in recent years in Nature on alternative devices, produced instead from the solution phase. They have some advantages over conventional crystalline semiconductor devices: ease of fabrication, physical flexibility and — most important — low cost. The problem was the poor electronic performance of solution-processed devices, compared with single-crystal counterparts. But that could change now: a team from the University of Toronto reports that one such system — colloidal quantum dots of lead sulphide — can actually outperform the state-of-the-art crystalline alternative. A solution-processed electronic device that uses colloidal quantum dots of lead sulphide outperforms the state-of-the-art crystalline alternatives, with ease of fabrication, physical flexibility, large device areas and low cost among its benefits. Solution-processed electronic1 and optoelectronic2,3,4,5 devices offer low cost, large device area, physical flexibility and convenient materials integration compared to conventional epitaxially grown, lattice-matched, crystalline semiconductor devices. Although the electronic or optoelectronic performance of these solution-processed devices is typically inferior to that of those fabricated by conventional routes, this can be tolerated for some applications in view of the other benefits. Here we report the fabrication of solution-processed infrared photodetectors that are superior in their normalized detectivity (D*, the figure of merit for detector sensitivity) to the best epitaxially grown devices operating at room temperature. We produced the devices in a single solution-processing step, overcoating a prefabricated planar electrode array with an unpatterned layer of PbS colloidal quantum dot nanocrystals. The devices showed large photoconductive gains with responsivities greater than 103 A W-1. The best devices exhibited a normalized detectivity D* of 1.8 × 1013 jones (1 jones = 1 cm Hz1/2 W-1) at 1.3 µm at room temperature: today's highest performance infrared photodetectors are photovoltaic devices made from epitaxially grown InGaAs that exhibit peak D* in the 1012 jones range at room temperature, whereas the previous record for D* from a photoconductive detector lies at 1011 jones. The tailored selection of absorption onset energy through the quantum size effect, combined with deliberate engineering of the sequence of nanoparticle fusing and surface trap functionalization, underlie the superior performance achieved in this readily fabricated family of devices.

Top-30

Journals

10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Advanced Materials
87 publications, 5.36%
ACS Nano
66 publications, 4.07%
Nano Letters
65 publications, 4%
Journal of Physical Chemistry C
57 publications, 3.51%
ACS applied materials & interfaces
55 publications, 3.39%
Applied Physics Letters
54 publications, 3.33%
Journal of Materials Chemistry C
50 publications, 3.08%
Nanoscale
47 publications, 2.9%
Advanced Functional Materials
45 publications, 2.77%
Nanotechnology
34 publications, 2.09%
Advanced Optical Materials
33 publications, 2.03%
Chemistry of Materials
32 publications, 1.97%
Journal of the American Chemical Society
31 publications, 1.91%
Small
27 publications, 1.66%
Nature Communications
25 publications, 1.54%
ACS Photonics
21 publications, 1.29%
Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
19 publications, 1.17%
Scientific Reports
17 publications, 1.05%
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
16 publications, 0.99%
RSC Advances
16 publications, 0.99%
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics
15 publications, 0.92%
Organic Electronics
15 publications, 0.92%
ACS Applied Electronic Materials
15 publications, 0.92%
Journal of Applied Physics
14 publications, 0.86%
Nature Photonics
14 publications, 0.86%
Nanomaterials
13 publications, 0.8%
Nature Nanotechnology
13 publications, 0.8%
Journal of Alloys and Compounds
13 publications, 0.8%
Langmuir
12 publications, 0.74%
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90

Publishers

50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
American Chemical Society (ACS)
417 publications, 25.69%
Wiley
304 publications, 18.73%
Elsevier
202 publications, 12.45%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
181 publications, 11.15%
Springer Nature
167 publications, 10.29%
AIP Publishing
85 publications, 5.24%
IOP Publishing
60 publications, 3.7%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
45 publications, 2.77%
MDPI
32 publications, 1.97%
Optica Publishing Group
18 publications, 1.11%
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
10 publications, 0.62%
American Physical Society (APS)
9 publications, 0.55%
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
9 publications, 0.55%
Walter de Gruyter
8 publications, 0.49%
Pleiades Publishing
7 publications, 0.43%
Cambridge University Press
6 publications, 0.37%
Taylor & Francis
6 publications, 0.37%
Japan Society of Applied Physics
5 publications, 0.31%
Oxford University Press
3 publications, 0.18%
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
3 publications, 0.18%
World Scientific
3 publications, 0.18%
Tsinghua University Press
3 publications, 0.18%
Trans Tech Publications
3 publications, 0.18%
Hindawi Limited
2 publications, 0.12%
American Vacuum Society
2 publications, 0.12%
The Electrochemical Society
2 publications, 0.12%
Annual Reviews
2 publications, 0.12%
Beilstein-Institut
1 publication, 0.06%
EDP Sciences
1 publication, 0.06%
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Konstantatos G. et al. Ultrasensitive solution-cast quantum dot photodetectors // Nature. 2006. Vol. 442. No. 7099. pp. 180-183.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Konstantatos G., Howard I., Fischer A., Hoogland S., Clifford J., Klem E., Levina L., Sargent E. H. Ultrasensitive solution-cast quantum dot photodetectors // Nature. 2006. Vol. 442. No. 7099. pp. 180-183.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1038/nature04855
UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04855
TI - Ultrasensitive solution-cast quantum dot photodetectors
T2 - Nature
AU - Konstantatos, Gerasimos
AU - Howard, Ian
AU - Fischer, Armin
AU - Hoogland, Sjoerd
AU - Clifford, Jason
AU - Klem, Ethan
AU - Levina, Larissa
AU - Sargent, Edward H
PY - 2006
DA - 2006/07/13
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 180-183
IS - 7099
VL - 442
SN - 0028-0836
SN - 1476-4687
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2006_Konstantatos,
author = {Gerasimos Konstantatos and Ian Howard and Armin Fischer and Sjoerd Hoogland and Jason Clifford and Ethan Klem and Larissa Levina and Edward H Sargent},
title = {Ultrasensitive solution-cast quantum dot photodetectors},
journal = {Nature},
year = {2006},
volume = {442},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {jul},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04855},
number = {7099},
pages = {180--183},
doi = {10.1038/nature04855}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Konstantatos, Gerasimos, et al. “Ultrasensitive solution-cast quantum dot photodetectors.” Nature, vol. 442, no. 7099, Jul. 2006, pp. 180-183. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04855.
Found error?