volume 4 issue 2 pages 90-98

Quantifying the chemical beauty of drugs

G Richard Bickerton 1
Gaia V Paolini 2
Jérémy Besnard 1
Sorel Mureşan 3
Andrew L Hopkins 1
2
 
Gaia Paolini Ltd, Bridge, UK
3
 
DECS Computational Compound Sciences, Computational Chemistry, AstraZeneca R&D Mölndal, Mölndal, Sweden
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2012-01-24
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR6.710
CiteScore28.1
Impact factor20.2
ISSN17554330, 17554349
PubMed ID:  22270643
General Chemistry
General Chemical Engineering
Abstract
Drug-likeness is a key consideration when selecting compounds during the early stages of drug discovery. However, evaluation of drug-likeness in absolute terms does not reflect adequately the whole spectrum of compound quality. More worryingly, widely used rules may inadvertently foster undesirable molecular property inflation as they permit the encroachment of rule-compliant compounds towards their boundaries. We propose a measure of drug-likeness based on the concept of desirability called the quantitative estimate of drug-likeness (QED). The empirical rationale of QED reflects the underlying distribution of molecular properties. QED is intuitive, transparent, straightforward to implement in many practical settings and allows compounds to be ranked by their relative merit. We extended the utility of QED by applying it to the problem of molecular target druggability assessment by prioritizing a large set of published bioactive compounds. The measure may also capture the abstract notion of aesthetics in medicinal chemistry. Drug-likeness is a key consideration when selecting compounds during the early stages of drug discovery, but its evaluation in absolute terms does not adequately reflect the spectrum of compound quality. Here, an intuitive and transparent quantitative measure of drug-likeness is proposed that attempts to capture the abstract notion of aesthetics in medicinal chemistry.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

20
40
60
80
100
120
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
120 publications, 7.18%
Journal of Cheminformatics
55 publications, 3.29%
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
40 publications, 2.39%
Scientific Reports
35 publications, 2.09%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
29 publications, 1.74%
Molecules
28 publications, 1.68%
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
28 publications, 1.68%
Drug Discovery Today
25 publications, 1.5%
Frontiers in Pharmacology
21 publications, 1.26%
Chemical Science
21 publications, 1.26%
Nature Machine Intelligence
20 publications, 1.2%
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
18 publications, 1.08%
Molecular Informatics
18 publications, 1.08%
ACS Omega
16 publications, 0.96%
Nature Communications
16 publications, 0.96%
Molecular Diversity
15 publications, 0.9%
ChemistrySelect
15 publications, 0.9%
Briefings in Bioinformatics
15 publications, 0.9%
PLoS ONE
14 publications, 0.84%
Bioinformatics
14 publications, 0.84%
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
13 publications, 0.78%
Journal of Molecular Structure
13 publications, 0.78%
Pharmaceuticals
12 publications, 0.72%
RSC Advances
11 publications, 0.66%
Nucleic Acids Research
11 publications, 0.66%
Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery
11 publications, 0.66%
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
11 publications, 0.66%
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
10 publications, 0.6%
Biomolecules
9 publications, 0.54%
20
40
60
80
100
120

Publishers

50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Springer Nature
312 publications, 18.67%
Elsevier
307 publications, 18.37%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
228 publications, 13.64%
Wiley
149 publications, 8.92%
MDPI
133 publications, 7.96%
Taylor & Francis
85 publications, 5.09%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
77 publications, 4.61%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
70 publications, 4.19%
Oxford University Press
46 publications, 2.75%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
45 publications, 2.69%
Frontiers Media S.A.
37 publications, 2.21%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
21 publications, 1.26%
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
19 publications, 1.14%
Hindawi Limited
12 publications, 0.72%
F1000 Research
6 publications, 0.36%
IOP Publishing
6 publications, 0.36%
World Scientific
5 publications, 0.3%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
5 publications, 0.3%
Research Square Platform LLC
5 publications, 0.3%
SAGE
4 publications, 0.24%
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
4 publications, 0.24%
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
4 publications, 0.24%
Pleiades Publishing
4 publications, 0.24%
Walter de Gruyter
3 publications, 0.18%
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
3 publications, 0.18%
OOO Zhurnal "Mendeleevskie Soobshcheniya"
3 publications, 0.18%
PeerJ
2 publications, 0.12%
Rockefeller University Press
2 publications, 0.12%
Higher Education Press
2 publications, 0.12%
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
1.7k
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Bickerton G. R. et al. Quantifying the chemical beauty of drugs // Nature Chemistry. 2012. Vol. 4. No. 2. pp. 90-98.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Bickerton G. R., Paolini G. V., Besnard J., Mureşan S., Hopkins A. L. Quantifying the chemical beauty of drugs // Nature Chemistry. 2012. Vol. 4. No. 2. pp. 90-98.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1038/nchem.1243
UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1243
TI - Quantifying the chemical beauty of drugs
T2 - Nature Chemistry
AU - Bickerton, G Richard
AU - Paolini, Gaia V
AU - Besnard, Jérémy
AU - Mureşan, Sorel
AU - Hopkins, Andrew L
PY - 2012
DA - 2012/01/24
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 90-98
IS - 2
VL - 4
PMID - 22270643
SN - 1755-4330
SN - 1755-4349
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2012_Bickerton,
author = {G Richard Bickerton and Gaia V Paolini and Jérémy Besnard and Sorel Mureşan and Andrew L Hopkins},
title = {Quantifying the chemical beauty of drugs},
journal = {Nature Chemistry},
year = {2012},
volume = {4},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {jan},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1243},
number = {2},
pages = {90--98},
doi = {10.1038/nchem.1243}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Bickerton, G. Richard, et al. “Quantifying the chemical beauty of drugs.” Nature Chemistry, vol. 4, no. 2, Jan. 2012, pp. 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1243.