volume 16 issue 8 pages 531-543

Opportunities and challenges in phenotypic drug discovery: an industry perspective

John G. Moffat 1
Fabien Vincent 2
Jonathan A Lee 3
Jörg Eder 4
Marco Prunotto 5
1
 
Biochemical & Cellular Pharmacology, Genentech, South San Francisco, USA
2
 
Discovery Sciences, Primary Pharmacology Group, Pfizer, Groton, USA
3
 
Department of Quantitative Biology, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
4
 
Novartis Institutes For BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2017-07-07
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR30.506
CiteScore181.8
Impact factor101.8
ISSN14741776, 14741784
PubMed ID:  28685762
Drug Discovery
General Medicine
Pharmacology
Abstract
There has been a resurgence in interest in phenotypic drug discovery (PDD) approaches in recent years based on their potential to address the incompletely understood complexity of diseases and their promise of delivering first-in-class drugs. However, PDD approaches can also present considerable challenges, and this article focuses on the lessons learned by researchers engaged in PDD in the pharmaceutical industry, and discusses how PDD can best deliver value to drug discovery portfolios. Phenotypic drug discovery (PDD) approaches do not rely on knowledge of the identity of a specific drug target or a hypothesis about its role in disease, in contrast to the target-based strategies that have been widely used in the pharmaceutical industry in the past three decades. However, in recent years, there has been a resurgence in interest in PDD approaches based on their potential to address the incompletely understood complexity of diseases and their promise of delivering first-in-class drugs, as well as major advances in the tools for cell-based phenotypic screening. Nevertheless, PDD approaches also have considerable challenges, such as hit validation and target deconvolution. This article focuses on the lessons learned by researchers engaged in PDD in the pharmaceutical industry and considers the impact of 'omics' knowledge in defining a cellular disease phenotype in the era of precision medicine, introducing the concept of a chain of translatability. We particularly aim to identify features and areas in which PDD can best deliver value to drug discovery portfolios and can contribute to the identification and the development of novel medicines, and to illustrate the challenges and uncertainties that are associated with PDD in order to help set realistic expectations with regard to its benefits and costs.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

5
10
15
20
25
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
24 publications, 3.09%
Drug Discovery Today
18 publications, 2.32%
Nature Communications
16 publications, 2.06%
SLAS Discovery
15 publications, 1.93%
Cell Chemical Biology
13 publications, 1.68%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
12 publications, 1.55%
Frontiers in Pharmacology
11 publications, 1.42%
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
11 publications, 1.42%
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
10 publications, 1.29%
Methods in Molecular Biology
10 publications, 1.29%
bioRxiv
10 publications, 1.29%
Molecules
9 publications, 1.16%
Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery
9 publications, 1.16%
Scientific Reports
8 publications, 1.03%
ChemMedChem
8 publications, 1.03%
ACS Chemical Biology
6 publications, 0.77%
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
6 publications, 0.77%
RSC Medicinal Chemistry
6 publications, 0.77%
Briefings in Bioinformatics
6 publications, 0.77%
Marine Drugs
5 publications, 0.64%
Pharmacology and Therapeutics
5 publications, 0.64%
iScience
5 publications, 0.64%
PLoS ONE
5 publications, 0.64%
Advanced Science
5 publications, 0.64%
Analytical Chemistry
5 publications, 0.64%
Cells
4 publications, 0.52%
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
4 publications, 0.52%
Nature Chemical Biology
4 publications, 0.52%
Biochemical Pharmacology
4 publications, 0.52%
5
10
15
20
25

Publishers

20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Elsevier
191 publications, 24.61%
Springer Nature
112 publications, 14.43%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
71 publications, 9.15%
Wiley
70 publications, 9.02%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
62 publications, 7.99%
MDPI
56 publications, 7.22%
Frontiers Media S.A.
41 publications, 5.28%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
21 publications, 2.71%
Taylor & Francis
16 publications, 2.06%
SAGE
15 publications, 1.93%
Oxford University Press
15 publications, 1.93%
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
10 publications, 1.29%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
8 publications, 1.03%
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
8 publications, 1.03%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
4 publications, 0.52%
American Society for Microbiology
4 publications, 0.52%
IntechOpen
4 publications, 0.52%
eLife Sciences Publications
3 publications, 0.39%
American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
2 publications, 0.26%
Mary Ann Liebert
2 publications, 0.26%
Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
2 publications, 0.26%
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
2 publications, 0.26%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
2 publications, 0.26%
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
1 publication, 0.13%
Beilstein-Institut
1 publication, 0.13%
The Company of Biologists
1 publication, 0.13%
F1000 Research
1 publication, 0.13%
IOS Press
1 publication, 0.13%
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
778
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Moffat J. G. et al. Opportunities and challenges in phenotypic drug discovery: an industry perspective // Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2017. Vol. 16. No. 8. pp. 531-543.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Moffat J. G., Vincent F., Lee J. A., Eder J., Prunotto M. Opportunities and challenges in phenotypic drug discovery: an industry perspective // Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2017. Vol. 16. No. 8. pp. 531-543.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1038/nrd.2017.111
UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2017.111
TI - Opportunities and challenges in phenotypic drug discovery: an industry perspective
T2 - Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
AU - Moffat, John G.
AU - Vincent, Fabien
AU - Lee, Jonathan A
AU - Eder, Jörg
AU - Prunotto, Marco
PY - 2017
DA - 2017/07/07
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 531-543
IS - 8
VL - 16
PMID - 28685762
SN - 1474-1776
SN - 1474-1784
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2017_Moffat,
author = {John G. Moffat and Fabien Vincent and Jonathan A Lee and Jörg Eder and Marco Prunotto},
title = {Opportunities and challenges in phenotypic drug discovery: an industry perspective},
journal = {Nature Reviews Drug Discovery},
year = {2017},
volume = {16},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {jul},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2017.111},
number = {8},
pages = {531--543},
doi = {10.1038/nrd.2017.111}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Moffat, John G., et al. “Opportunities and challenges in phenotypic drug discovery: an industry perspective.” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 16, no. 8, Jul. 2017, pp. 531-543. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2017.111.