Open Access
Benchmarking organic mixed conductors for transistors
2
Department of Bioelectronics, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines, CMP-EMSE, MOC, Gardanne, France
|
3
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2017-11-24
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 4.761
CiteScore: 23.4
Impact factor: 15.7
ISSN: 20411723
PubMed ID:
29176599
General Chemistry
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
General Physics and Astronomy
Abstract
Organic mixed conductors have garnered significant attention in applications from bioelectronics to energy storage/generation. Their implementation in organic transistors has led to enhanced biosensing, neuromorphic function, and specialized circuits. While a narrow class of conducting polymers continues to excel in these new applications, materials design efforts have accelerated as researchers target new functionality, processability, and improved performance/stability. Materials for organic electrochemical transistors (OECTs) require both efficient electronic transport and facile ion injection in order to sustain high capacity. In this work, we show that the product of the electronic mobility and volumetric charge storage capacity (µC*) is the materials/system figure of merit; we use this framework to benchmark and compare the steady-state OECT performance of ten previously reported materials. This product can be independently verified and decoupled to guide materials design and processing. OECTs can therefore be used as a tool for understanding and designing new organic mixed conductors. Organic materials that support both electronic and ionic transport hold promise for applications in bioelectronics and energy storage. Here, Inal et al. use transistors to quantify the materials performance of organic mixed conductors in terms of the product of charge mobility and volumetric capacitance.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
|
|
|
Advanced Materials
48 publications, 10.08%
|
|
|
Advanced Functional Materials
36 publications, 7.56%
|
|
|
ACS applied materials & interfaces
30 publications, 6.3%
|
|
|
Journal of Materials Chemistry C
25 publications, 5.25%
|
|
|
Advanced Electronic Materials
20 publications, 4.2%
|
|
|
Chemistry of Materials
16 publications, 3.36%
|
|
|
Nature Communications
11 publications, 2.31%
|
|
|
Science advances
9 publications, 1.89%
|
|
|
Small
8 publications, 1.68%
|
|
|
Nature Materials
8 publications, 1.68%
|
|
|
Advanced Science
8 publications, 1.68%
|
|
|
Journal of the American Chemical Society
8 publications, 1.68%
|
|
|
Materials Horizons
8 publications, 1.68%
|
|
|
Advanced Materials Interfaces
7 publications, 1.47%
|
|
|
Angewandte Chemie - International Edition
7 publications, 1.47%
|
|
|
Angewandte Chemie
7 publications, 1.47%
|
|
|
ACS Applied Electronic Materials
7 publications, 1.47%
|
|
|
Advanced Materials Technologies
6 publications, 1.26%
|
|
|
Chemical Reviews
6 publications, 1.26%
|
|
|
npj Flexible Electronics
5 publications, 1.05%
|
|
|
ACS Materials Letters
5 publications, 1.05%
|
|
|
Flexible and Printed Electronics
5 publications, 1.05%
|
|
|
Organic Electronics
5 publications, 1.05%
|
|
|
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
5 publications, 1.05%
|
|
|
Matter
5 publications, 1.05%
|
|
|
ACS Nano
4 publications, 0.84%
|
|
|
Chemical Society Reviews
4 publications, 0.84%
|
|
|
Nanoscale
4 publications, 0.84%
|
|
|
Applied Physics Reviews
3 publications, 0.63%
|
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
|
Publishers
|
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
|
|
|
Wiley
175 publications, 36.76%
|
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
104 publications, 21.85%
|
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
59 publications, 12.39%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
42 publications, 8.82%
|
|
|
Elsevier
38 publications, 7.98%
|
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
12 publications, 2.52%
|
|
|
MDPI
10 publications, 2.1%
|
|
|
AIP Publishing
6 publications, 1.26%
|
|
|
IOP Publishing
6 publications, 1.26%
|
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
6 publications, 1.26%
|
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
3 publications, 0.63%
|
|
|
Cambridge University Press
2 publications, 0.42%
|
|
|
Annual Reviews
2 publications, 0.42%
|
|
|
Japan Society of Applied Physics
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
|
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
|
Ural Federal University
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
|
Science in China Press
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
|
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
476
Total citations:
476
Citations from 2024:
156
(32.78%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Inal S. et al. Benchmarking organic mixed conductors for transistors // Nature Communications. 2017. Vol. 8. No. 1. 1767
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Inal S., Malliaras G. G., Rivnay J. Benchmarking organic mixed conductors for transistors // Nature Communications. 2017. Vol. 8. No. 1. 1767
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1038/s41467-017-01812-w
UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01812-w
TI - Benchmarking organic mixed conductors for transistors
T2 - Nature Communications
AU - Inal, Sahika
AU - Malliaras, George G
AU - Rivnay, Jonathan
PY - 2017
DA - 2017/11/24
PB - Springer Nature
IS - 1
VL - 8
PMID - 29176599
SN - 2041-1723
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2017_Inal,
author = {Sahika Inal and George G Malliaras and Jonathan Rivnay},
title = {Benchmarking organic mixed conductors for transistors},
journal = {Nature Communications},
year = {2017},
volume = {8},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {nov},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01812-w},
number = {1},
pages = {1767},
doi = {10.1038/s41467-017-01812-w}
}