Open Access
Open access
npj Quantum Information, volume 4, issue 1, publication number 29

Quantum-enhanced magnetometry by phase estimation algorithms with a single artificial atom

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2018-06-29
Quartile SCImago
Q1
Quartile WOS
Q1
Impact factor7.6
ISSN20566387
Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
Computer Science (miscellaneous)
Computational Theory and Mathematics
Computer Networks and Communications
Abstract
Phase estimation algorithms are key protocols in quantum information processing. Besides applications in quantum computing, they can also be employed in metrology as they allow for fast extraction of information stored in the quantum state of a system. Here, we implement two suitably modified phase estimation procedures, the Kitaev and the semiclassical Fourier-transform algorithms, using an artificial atom realized with a superconducting transmon circuit. We demonstrate that both algorithms yield a flux sensitivity exceeding the classical shot-noise limit of the device, allowing one to approach the Heisenberg limit. Our experiment paves the way for the use of superconducting qubits as metrological devices which are potentially able to outperform the best existing flux sensors with a sensitivity enhanced by few orders of magnitude. Quantum computing algorithms can improve the performance of a superconducting magnetic field sensor beyond the classical limit. A qubit’s time evolution is often influenced by environmental factors like magnetic fields; measuring this evolution allows the magnetic field strength to be determined. Using classical methods, improvements in measurement performance can only scale with the square root of the total measurement time. However, by exploiting quantum coherence to use so-called phase estimation algorithms during the measurements, the scaling with measurement time can be driven beyond the classical limits. Andrey Lebedev at ETH Zurich and colleagues in Finland, Switzerland and Russia have applied this approach to superconducting qubits. They demonstrate both superior performance and improved scaling compared to the classical approach, and show that in principle superconducting qubits can become the highest-performing magnetic flux sensors.

Citations by journals

1
2
3
4
5
Physical Review A
Physical Review A, 5, 12.5%
Physical Review A
5 publications, 12.5%
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports, 4, 10%
Scientific Reports
4 publications, 10%
npj Quantum Information
npj Quantum Information, 3, 7.5%
npj Quantum Information
3 publications, 7.5%
Applied Physics Letters
Applied Physics Letters, 2, 5%
Applied Physics Letters
2 publications, 5%
Physical Review B
Physical Review B, 2, 5%
Physical Review B
2 publications, 5%
EPJ Quantum Technology
EPJ Quantum Technology, 2, 5%
EPJ Quantum Technology
2 publications, 5%
Nature Communications
Nature Communications, 2, 5%
Nature Communications
2 publications, 5%
Quantum Science and Technology
Quantum Science and Technology, 2, 5%
Quantum Science and Technology
2 publications, 5%
Optics Express
Optics Express, 2, 5%
Optics Express
2 publications, 5%
AIP Conference Proceedings
AIP Conference Proceedings, 2, 5%
AIP Conference Proceedings
2 publications, 5%
Physical Review Research
Physical Review Research, 1, 2.5%
Physical Review Research
1 publication, 2.5%
Reviews of Modern Physics
Reviews of Modern Physics, 1, 2.5%
Reviews of Modern Physics
1 publication, 2.5%
Physical Review Applied
Physical Review Applied, 1, 2.5%
Physical Review Applied
1 publication, 2.5%
AVS Quantum Science
AVS Quantum Science, 1, 2.5%
AVS Quantum Science
1 publication, 2.5%
International Journal of Quantum Information
International Journal of Quantum Information, 1, 2.5%
International Journal of Quantum Information
1 publication, 2.5%
Entropy
Entropy, 1, 2.5%
Entropy
1 publication, 2.5%
Mineral Economics
Mineral Economics, 1, 2.5%
Mineral Economics
1 publication, 2.5%
Metrologia
Metrologia, 1, 2.5%
Metrologia
1 publication, 2.5%
New Journal of Physics
New Journal of Physics, 1, 2.5%
New Journal of Physics
1 publication, 2.5%
Advanced Quantum Technologies
Advanced Quantum Technologies, 1, 2.5%
Advanced Quantum Technologies
1 publication, 2.5%
Annalen der Physik
Annalen der Physik, 1, 2.5%
Annalen der Physik
1 publication, 2.5%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1, 2.5%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
1 publication, 2.5%
PRX Quantum
PRX Quantum, 1, 2.5%
PRX Quantum
1 publication, 2.5%
1
2
3
4
5

Citations by publishers

2
4
6
8
10
12
Springer Nature
Springer Nature, 12, 30%
Springer Nature
12 publications, 30%
American Physical Society (APS)
American Physical Society (APS), 11, 27.5%
American Physical Society (APS)
11 publications, 27.5%
American Institute of Physics (AIP)
American Institute of Physics (AIP), 4, 10%
American Institute of Physics (AIP)
4 publications, 10%
IOP Publishing
IOP Publishing, 4, 10%
IOP Publishing
4 publications, 10%
Wiley
Wiley, 2, 5%
Wiley
2 publications, 5%
Optical Society of America
Optical Society of America, 2, 5%
Optical Society of America
2 publications, 5%
American Vacuum Society
American Vacuum Society, 1, 2.5%
American Vacuum Society
1 publication, 2.5%
World Scientific
World Scientific, 1, 2.5%
World Scientific
1 publication, 2.5%
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), 1, 2.5%
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
1 publication, 2.5%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 1, 2.5%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1 publication, 2.5%
2
4
6
8
10
12
  • We do not take into account publications that without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Danilin S. et al. Quantum-enhanced magnetometry by phase estimation algorithms with a single artificial atom // npj Quantum Information. 2018. Vol. 4. No. 1. 29
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Danilin S., LEBEDEV A., Vepsäläinen A., Lesovik G., BLATTER G., Paraoanu G. S. Quantum-enhanced magnetometry by phase estimation algorithms with a single artificial atom // npj Quantum Information. 2018. Vol. 4. No. 1. 29
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1038/s41534-018-0078-y
UR - https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs41534-018-0078-y
TI - Quantum-enhanced magnetometry by phase estimation algorithms with a single artificial atom
T2 - npj Quantum Information
AU - Danilin, S.
AU - LEBEDEV, A.V.
AU - Lesovik, G.B.
AU - BLATTER, G.
AU - Paraoanu, G. S.
AU - Vepsäläinen, A
PY - 2018
DA - 2018/06/29 00:00:00
PB - Springer Nature
IS - 1
VL - 4
SN - 2056-6387
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex Copy
@article{2018_Danilin,
author = {S. Danilin and A.V. LEBEDEV and G.B. Lesovik and G. BLATTER and G. S. Paraoanu and A Vepsäläinen},
title = {Quantum-enhanced magnetometry by phase estimation algorithms with a single artificial atom},
journal = {npj Quantum Information},
year = {2018},
volume = {4},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {jun},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs41534-018-0078-y},
number = {1},
doi = {10.1038/s41534-018-0078-y}
}
Found error?