Soloviev, Igor Igorevich
DSc in Physics and Mathematics
Publications
123
Citations
1 685
h-index
25
Laboratory of Superconducting and Quantum Technologies
Leading researcher
Laboratory of Nanostructure Physics at the Moscow State University
Leading researcher
Education
Lomonosov Moscow State University
2004 — 2007,
Postgraduate, Faculty of Physics
Lomonosov Moscow State University
1998 — 2004,
Specialist, Faculty of Physics
- Advanced Engineering Materials (1)
- Advanced Quantum Technologies (1)
- Applied Physics Letters (7)
- Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology (10)
- Chaos, Solitons and Fractals (1)
- Communications in Computer and Information Science (1)
- Communications Physics (1)
- Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics (1)
- Differential Equations (1)
- EPJ Web of Conferences (3)
- IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity (14)
- IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science (1)
- JETP Letters (7)
- Journal of Applied Physics (1)
- Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics (1)
- Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics (2)
- Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters (1)
- Journal of Physics: Conference Series (7)
- Journal of Surface Investigation (1)
- Low Temperature Physics (3)
- MATEC Web of Conferences (1)
- Mesoscience and Nanotechnology (2)
- Moscow University Physics Bulletin (English Translation of Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, Fizika) (4)
- Nano Letters (1)
- Nanobiotechnology Reports (1)
- Nanomaterials (7)
- NanoScience and Technology (1)
- Nanotechnology (1)
- Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications (3)
- Physical Review Applied (2)
- Physical Review B (4)
- Physical Review E (1)
- Physics of the Solid State (1)
- Physics of Wave Phenomena (1)
- Physics-Uspekhi (1)
- Quantum Science and Technology (1)
- Scientific Reports (3)
- Superconductor Science and Technology (14)
- Symmetry (2)
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Nazhestkin I.A., Bakurskiy S.V., Neilo A.A., Tarasova I.E., Ismailov N.G., Gurtovoi V.L., Egorov S.V., Lisitsyn S.A., Stolyarov V.S., Antonov V.N., Ryazanov V.V., Kupriyanov M.Y., Soloviev I.I., Klenov N.V., Yakovlev D.S.
The transport properties of a nanobridge superconducting quantum interference device made of Al/Pt bilayer have been studied. Measurement and approximation of the voltage‐field dependencies allow to estimate the inductance of the structure. It is found that this value significantly exceeds the expected geometric inductance and exhibits an atypical temperature dependence. To explain this effect, a microscopic model of electron transport in SN bilayers is developed, considering the proximity effect, and the available regimes of the current distribution are described. The measured properties may be indicative of the formation of high‐resistance aluminum with high values of kinetic inductance during the fabrication of Al/Pt bilayers.
Schegolev Andrey E., Bastrakova Marina V., Sergeev Michael A., Maksimovskaya Anastasia A., Klenov Nikolay V., Soloviev Igor
The extensive development of the field of spiking neural networks has led to many areas of research that have a direct impact on people’s lives. As the most bio-similar of all neural networks, spiking neural networks not only allow for the solution of recognition and clustering problems (including dynamics), but they also contribute to the growing understanding of the human nervous system. Our analysis has shown that hardware implementation is of great importance, since the specifics of the physical processes in the network cells affect their ability to simulate the neural activity of living neural tissue, the efficiency of certain stages of information processing, storage and transmission. This survey reviews existing hardware neuromorphic implementations of bio-inspired spiking networks in the ”semiconductor”, ”superconductor”, and ”optical” domains. Special attention is given to the potentials for effective ”hybrids” of different approaches.
Skryabina O.V., Bakurskiy S.V., Ruzhickiy V.I., Shishkin A., Klenov N.V., Soloviev I.I., Kupriyanov M.Y., Stolyarov V.S.
Abstract
We study the effect of electrode width on superconducting current transport in Nb–Au–Nb Josephson bridges. The critical current as well as the normal bridge resistance drop with decreasing electrode width on scales of a few
μ
m
, which are orders of magnitude larger than the estimated coherence length of the Au strip. We consider several physical reasons for such an anomalous influence of the width W of the superconducting electrode on the critical current
I
c
(AIWIc) and provide model fits for the resistive and superconducting properties of the bridges. The smooth dependence of the Nb–Au–Nb bridge parameters on the electrode width can be used to optimize the design of superconducting devices for specific applications.
Neilo A., Bakurskiy S., Klenov N., Soloviev I., Stolyarov V., Kupriyanov M.
The supercurrent in a Josephson SF1S1F2sIS spin valve (“S” is for superconductor, “F” is for ferromagnet, and “I” is for insulator) is studied theoretically. It is found that by rotating the magnetization of one of the ferromagnetic layers, a smooth switching of the system between two states with different critical currents is possible. The operating range of the device can be adjusted by varying the thickness of the intermediate s-layer. The proposed structure is a promising scalable control element for the use in superconducting electronics.
Bakurskiy Sergey, Ruzhickiy Vsevolod, Neilo Alexey, Klenov Nikolay, Soloviev Igor, Elistratova Anna, Shishkin Andrey, Stolyarov Vasily, Kupriyanov Mikhail
We have studied the Thouless energy in Josephson superconductor – normal metal – superconductor (SN-N-NS) bridges analytically and numerically, considering the influence of the sub-electrode regions. We have discovered a significant suppression of the Thouless energy with increasing interfacial resistance, consistent with experimental results. The analysis of the temperature dependence of the critical current in Josephson junctions in comparison with the expressions for the Thouless energy may allow the determination of the interface parameters of S and N-layers.
Zakharov R.V., Tikhonova O.V., Klenov N.V., Soloviev I.I., Antonov V.N., Yakovlev D.S.
AbstractA basic element of a quantum network based on two single‐mode waveguides is proposed with different frequencies connected by a solid‐state qubit. Using a simple example of a possible superconducting implementation, the usefulness of the simplifications used in the general theoretical consideration has been justified. The non‐classical field in a single‐mode with a frequency of is fed to the input of a qubit controller and transformed into a non‐classical field in an output single‐mode with a frequency of . The interface can establish a quantum connection between solid‐state and photonic flying qubits with adjustable pulse shapes and carrier frequencies. This allows quantum information to be transferred to other superconducting or atomic‐based quantum registers or chips. The peculiarities of the wave‐qubit interactions are described, showing how they help to control the quantum state of the non‐classical field. On this basis, the operating principles of solid‐state and flying qubits for the future quantum information platforms are considered.
Pashin D.S., Bastrakova M.V., Rybin D.A., Soloviev I.I., Klenov N.V., Schegolev A.E.
In this article, we consider designs of simple analog artificial neural networks based on adiabatic Josephson cells with a sigmoid activation function. A new approach based on the gradient descent method is developed to adjust the circuit parameters, allowing efficient signal transmission between the network layers. The proposed solution is demonstrated on the example of a system that implements XOR and OR logical operations.
Kalashnikov D.S., Ruzhitskiy V.I., Shishkin A.G., Golovchanskiy I.A., Kupriyanov M.Y., Soloviev I.I., Roditchev D., Stolyarov V.S.
AbstractThe ongoing progress of superconducting logic systems with Josephson junctions as base elements requires the development of compatible cryogenic memory. Long enough junctions subject to magnetic field host quantum phase 2π-singularities—Josephson vortices. Here, we report the realization of the superconducting memory cell whose state is encoded by the number of present Josephson vortices. By integrating the junction into a coplanar resonator and by applying a microwave excitation well below the critical current, we are able to control the state of the system in an energy-efficient and non-destructive manner. The memory effect arises due to the presence of the natural edge barrier for Josephson vortices. The performance of the device is evaluated, and the routes for creating scalable cryogenic memories directly compatible with superconducting microwave technologies are discussed.
Neilo A., Bakurskiy S., Klenov N., Soloviev I., Kupriyanov M.
We have studied the proximity effect in an SF1S1F2s superconducting spin valve consisting of a massive superconducting electrode (S) and a multilayer structure formed by thin ferromagnetic (F1,2) and superconducting (S1, s) layers. Within the framework of the Usadel equations, we have shown that changing the mutual orientation of the magnetization vectors of the F1,2 layers from parallel to antiparallel serves to trigger superconductivity in the outer thin s-film. We studied the changes in the pair potential in the outer s-film and found the regions of parameters with a significant spin-valve effect. The strongest effect occurs in the region of parameters where the pair-potential sign is changed in the parallel state. This feature reveals new ways to design devices with highly tunable inductance and critical current.
Pashin D.S., Pikunov P.V., Bastrakova M.V., Schegolev A.E., Klenov N.V., Soloviev I.I.
Josephson digital or analog ancillary circuits are an essential part of a large number of modern quantum processors. The natural candidate for the basis of tuning, coupling, and neromorphic co-processing elements for processors based on flux qubits is the adiabatic (reversible) superconducting logic cell. Using the simplest implementation of such a cell as an example, we have investigated the conditions under which it can optionally operate as an auxiliary qubit while maintaining its “classical” neural functionality. The performance and temperature regime estimates obtained confirm the possibility of practical use of a single-contact inductively shunted interferometer in a quantum mode in adjustment circuits for q-processors.
Khismatullin G.S., Klenov N.V., Soloviev I.I.
Adiabatic superconducting logic circuits can ensure the practical implementation of operations with the energy dissipation below the Landauer limit. However, applications of the existing solutions are limited because of two contradictory requirements of a high energy efficiency and a sufficiently fast response of devices. Josephson junctions with a negative critical current (π junctions) allow one to obtain a certain form of the potential energy of superconducting circuits and, as a result, a practically required degree of control of dynamic processes in the proposed reversible logic cells. The features of the current transport and balance of Josephson phases in circuits with π junctions make it possible to improve the coupling between the parts of a reversible computer by a factor more than 2. At the same time, the continuous evolution of the state is ensured at higher critical currents and higher characteristic voltages of the main Josephson junctions of adiabatic superconducting logic cells, which allows an increase in the response rate.
Schegolev A.E., Klenov N.V., Gubochkin G.I., Kupriyanov M.Y., Soloviev I.I.
The imitative modelling of processes in the brain of living beings is an ambitious task. However, advances in the complexity of existing hardware brain models are limited by their low speed and high energy consumption. A superconducting circuit with Josephson junctions closely mimics the neuronal membrane with channels involved in the operation of the sodium-potassium pump. The dynamic processes in such a system are characterised by a duration of picoseconds and an energy level of attojoules. In this work, two superconducting models of a biological neuron are studied. New modes of their operation are identified, including the so-called bursting mode, which plays an important role in biological neural networks. The possibility of switching between different modes in situ is shown, providing the possibility of dynamic control of the system. A synaptic connection that mimics the short-term potentiation of a biological synapse is developed and demonstrated. Finally, the simplest two-neuron chain comprising the proposed bio-inspired components is simulated, and the prospects of superconducting hardware biosimilars are briefly discussed.
Neilo A., Bakurskiy S., Klenov N., Soloviev I., Kupriyanov M.
We have theoretically studied the transport properties of the SIsNSOF structure consisting of thick (S) and thin (s) films of superconductor, an insulator layer (I), a thin film of normal metal with spin–orbit interaction (SOI) (NSO), and a monodomain ferromagnetic layer (F). The interplay between superconductivity, ferromagnetism, and spin–orbit interaction allows the critical current of this Josephson junction to be smoothly varied over a wide range by rotating the magnetization direction in the single F-layer. We have studied the amplitude of the spin valve effect and found the optimal ranges of parameters.
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Zhao M., Wang Y., Gao X., Yuan P., Wang S., Niu M., You L., Ren J., Li L.
Abstract
We present a non-return-to-zero (NRZ) superconductive voltage driver (SVD) for interfacing single flux quantum (SFQ) circuits with semiconductor circuits. The NRZ SVD design consists an encoding module, splitter networks, sixteen RS flip-flops (RSFFs), and a sixteen-stage DC SQUID array (DSA). By employing an asymmetric SQUID structure, the SVD achieved a simulated output swing of 4.3 mV. The impedance and quality factor formulas of the DSA were provided. We solved the issue of slower fall time caused by the asymmetric SQUID by inserting a termination resistor into the DSA to reduce its quality factor. By using this damped asymmetric DSA, the NRZ SVD can reach up to 30 Gbps in simulation. The test chip of the NRZ SVD was fabricated using the SIMIT’s Nb03P process (JC
= 6 kA cm−2) and measured in a liquid helium dewar. The SVD achieved a measured output swing of up to 6.8 mV, which is relatively high compared to the published reports. Eye diagrams at 5 Gbps and 10 Gbps were clearly opened, demonstrating a very low bit error rate. The test circuit for the NRZ SVD can support up to 15 Gbps with a
2
9
−
1
pseudo-random bit sequence (PRBS-9) input and 20 Gbps with a sinusoidal input.

Asaka K., Yoshikawa N., Yamanashi Y.
Abstract
tochastic computing (SC) is a form of probabilistic computation that encodes information in the probability of a ``1’’ appearing within a finite-length binary sequence. SC has been investigated for applications in various fields that do not require deterministic and precise computation. A superconducting single-flux-quantum (SFQ) circuit is considered a promising candidate for implementing SC hardware due to its high-speed operation and probabilistic behavior. In this study, we propose a novel large fan-out signal splitter to enable large-scale SFQ-based stochastic arithmetic circuits, addressing the issue of computation accuracy degradation caused by correlations between binary sequences. The proposed signal splitter generates uncorrelated output binary sequences by utilizing superconductor random number generators frequency-synchronized to the input binary sequence. Moreover, the fan-out can be easily increased by simply adding more superconductor random number generators. We implemented a four-output stochastic number signal splitter using the 10 kA/cm^2 Nb four-layer superconducting circuit fabrication process. Its operation was successfully demonstrated by measuring the average voltage at the input and outputs under continuous high-speed binary sequence input. Correct operation was confirmed at the input frequency of up to 32.4 GHz. The proposed signal splitter uniquely leverages the properties of superconducting circuits, where flux quanta determined by fundamental physical constants serve as the information carrier. We believe this development will significantly advance the realization of practical SFQ-based SC systems.
Schneider M.L., Jué E.M., Pufall M.R., Segall K., Anderson C.W.
Abstract
Neuromorphic computing takes biological inspiration to the device level aiming to improve computational efficiency and capabilities. One of the major issues that arises is the training of neuromorphic hardware systems. Typically training algorithms require global information and are thus inefficient to implement directly in hardware. In this paper we describe a set of reinforcement learning based, local weight update rules and their implementation in superconducting hardware. Using SPICE circuit simulations, we implement a small-scale neural network with a learning time of order one nanosecond per update. This network can be trained to learn new functions simply by changing the target output for a given set of inputs, without the need for any external adjustments to the network. Further, this architecture does not require programing explicit weight values in the network, alleviating a critical challenge with analog hardware implementations of neural networks.


Hovhannisyan R.A., Grebenchuk S.Y., Larionov S.A., Shishkin A.G., Grebenko A.K., Kupchinskaya N.E., Dobrovolskaya E.A., Skryabina O.V., Aladyshkin A.Y., Dremov V.V., Golovchanskiy I.A., Samokhvalov A.V., Mel’nikov A.S., Roditchev D., Stolyarov V.S.


Wanta G.C., Kurniawan C., Wibowo N.A.
Abstract
Spintronic device development relies on an understanding of magnetization dynamics in permalloy thin films, as it reveals the material's properties and magnetization reversal mechanism through the propagation of the domain wall controlled by the external magnetic field pulse. This study explores the impact of Gaussian magnetic pulse width and height on magnetization rate in permalloy thin films using micromagnetic simulations based on the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) equation. The examined Gaussian magnetic pulse heights were 200 mT and 500 mT, respectively, and the corresponding pulse width varied from 200 to 2000 ps. The size of the permalloy thin film also varied. After exposure to a Gaussian magnetic pulse, the magnetic moments become magnetized and oscillate. Oscillation or ringing can result from the interaction between the magnetic pulse and spin and is impacted by a low damping value. The magnetization reversal rate will reach a constant value at each critical pulse width. The amplitude of the magnetic field and thin film sizes influence the critical pulse width. The primary component influencing the permalloy thin film magnetic energy during the magnetization reversal is demagnetization energy, which leads to the onset of a single domain. The study suggests that spintronic devices can modify read-write data on the permalloy thin film using either a high-intensity magnetic field with a short pulse duration or a low-intensity magnetic field with a longer pulse duration. Nonetheless, it is essential to take into account the size of the thin layer to enhance the efficiency of spintronic devices.

Nothing found, try to update filter.
Yakovlev D.S., Frolov A.V., Nazhestkin I.A., Temiryazev A.G., Orlov A.P., Shvartzberg J., Dizhur S.E., Gurtovoi V.L., Hovhannisyan R., Stolyarov V.S.
AbstractTopological insulator nanostructures became an essential platform for studying novel fundamental effects emerging at the nanoscale. However, conventional nanopatterning techniques, based on electron beam lithography and reactive ion etching of films, have inherent limitations of edge precision, resolution, and modification of surface properties, all of which are critical factors for topological insulator materials. In this study, an alternative approach for the fabrication of ultrathin Bi2Se3 nanoribbons is introduced by utilizing a diamond tip of an atomic force microscope (AFM) to cut atomically thin exfoliated films. This study includes an investigation of the magnetotransport properties of ultrathin Bi2Se3 topological insulator nanoribbons with controlled cross‐sections at ultra‐low 14 mK) temperatures. Current‐dependent magnetoresistance oscillations are observed with the weak antilocalization effect, confirming the coherent propagation of 2D electrons around the nanoribbon surface's perimeter and the robustness of topologically protected surface states. In contrast to conventional lithography methods, this approach does not require a highly controlled clean room environment and can be executed under ambient conditions. Importantly, this method facilitates the precise patterning and can be applied to a wide range of 2D materials.
Hyyppä E., Vepsäläinen A., Papič M., Chan C.F., Inel S., Landra A., Liu W., Luus J., Marxer F., Ockeloen-Korppi C., Orbell S., Tarasinski B., Heinsoo J.
Improving the speed and fidelity of quantum logic gates is essential to reach quantum advantage with future quantum computers. However, fast logic gates lead to increased leakage errors in superconducting quantum processors based on qubits with low anharmonicity, such as transmons. To reduce leakage errors, we propose and experimentally demonstrate two new analytical methods, Fourier ansatz spectrum tuning derivative removal by adiabatic gate (FAST DRAG) and higher-derivative (HD) DRAG, both of which enable shaping single-qubit control pulses in the frequency domain to achieve stronger suppression of leakage transitions compared to previously demonstrated pulse shapes. Using the new methods to suppress the ef transition of a transmon qubit with an anharmonicity of −212 MHz, we implement RX(π/2) gates achieving a leakage error below 3.0×10−5 down to a gate duration of 6.25 ns without the need for iterative closed-loop optimization. The obtained leakage error represents a 20-fold reduction in leakage compared to a conventional cosine DRAG pulse. Employing the FAST DRAG method, we further achieve an error per gate of (1.56±0.07)×10−4 at a 7.9-ns gate duration, outperforming conventional pulse shapes both in terms of error and gate speed. Furthermore, we study error-amplifying measurements for the characterization of temporal microwave control-pulse distortions, and demonstrate that non-Markovian coherent errors caused by such distortions may be a significant source of error for sub-10-ns single-qubit gates unless corrected using predistortion.
Published by the American Physical Society
2024
Zakharov R.V., Tikhonova O.V., Klenov N.V., Soloviev I.I., Antonov V.N., Yakovlev D.S.
AbstractA basic element of a quantum network based on two single‐mode waveguides is proposed with different frequencies connected by a solid‐state qubit. Using a simple example of a possible superconducting implementation, the usefulness of the simplifications used in the general theoretical consideration has been justified. The non‐classical field in a single‐mode with a frequency of is fed to the input of a qubit controller and transformed into a non‐classical field in an output single‐mode with a frequency of . The interface can establish a quantum connection between solid‐state and photonic flying qubits with adjustable pulse shapes and carrier frequencies. This allows quantum information to be transferred to other superconducting or atomic‐based quantum registers or chips. The peculiarities of the wave‐qubit interactions are described, showing how they help to control the quantum state of the non‐classical field. On this basis, the operating principles of solid‐state and flying qubits for the future quantum information platforms are considered.
Kozlov S., Lesueur J., Roditchev D., Feuillet-Palma C.
AbstractThe electron transport in current-biased superconducting nano-bridges is determined by the motion of the quantum vortex confined in the internal disorder landscape. Here we consider theoretically a simple case of a single or two neighbouring linear defects crossing a nano-bridge. The strong anharmonicity of the vortex motion along the defect leads, upon radio frequency (RF) excitation, to fractional Shapiro steps. In the case of two defects, the vortex motion becomes correlated, characterised by metastable states that can be locked to the RF-drive. The lock-unlock process causes sudden voltage jumps and drops in the voltage-current characteristics that can be observed in experiments. We analyse the parameters that promote these metastable dynamic states and discuss their possible experimental realisations.
Uludağ R.B., Çağdaş S., İşler Y.S., Şengör N.S., Akturk I.
Abstract
Neuromorphic systems are designed to emulate the principles of biological information processing, with the goals of improving computational efficiency and reducing energy usage. A critical aspect of these systems is the fidelity of neuron models and neural networks to their biological counterparts. In this study, we implemented the Izhikevich neuron model on Intel's Loihi 2 neuromorphic processor. The Izhikevich neuron model offers a more biologically accurate alternative to the simpler Leaky-Integrate and Fire (LIF) model, which is natively supported by Loihi 2. We compared these two models within a basic two-layer network, examining their energy consumption, processing speeds, and memory usage. Furthermore, to demonstrate Loihi 2's ability to realize complex neural structures, we implemented a basal ganglia circuit to perform a Go/No-Go decision-making task. Our findings demonstrate the practicality of customizing neuron models on Loihi 2, thereby paving the way for constructing Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) that better replicate biological neural networks and have the potential to simulate complex cognitive processes.
Hovhannisyan R.A., Golod T., Krasnov V.M.
The utilization of Josephson vortices as information carriers in superconducting digital electronics is hindered by the lack of reliable displacement and localization mechanisms. In this Letter, we experimentally investigate planar Nb junctions with an intrinsic phase shift and nonreciprocity induced by trapped Abrikosov vortices. We demonstrate that the entrance of a single Josephson vortex into such junctions triggers the switching between metastable ±π semifluxon states. We showcase controllable manipulation between these states using short current pulses and achieve a nondestructive readout by a nearby junction. Our observations pave the way toward ultrafast and energy-efficient digital Josephson electronics.
Published by the American Physical Society
2024
Abramson J., Adler J., Dunger J., Evans R., Green T., Pritzel A., Ronneberger O., Willmore L., Ballard A.J., Bambrick J., Bodenstein S.W., Evans D.A., Hung C., O’Neill M., Reiman D., et. al.
AbstractThe introduction of AlphaFold 21 has spurred a revolution in modelling the structure of proteins and their interactions, enabling a huge range of applications in protein modelling and design2–6. Here we describe our AlphaFold 3 model with a substantially updated diffusion-based architecture that is capable of predicting the joint structure of complexes including proteins, nucleic acids, small molecules, ions and modified residues. The new AlphaFold model demonstrates substantially improved accuracy over many previous specialized tools: far greater accuracy for protein–ligand interactions compared with state-of-the-art docking tools, much higher accuracy for protein–nucleic acid interactions compared with nucleic-acid-specific predictors and substantially higher antibody–antigen prediction accuracy compared with AlphaFold-Multimer v.2.37,8. Together, these results show that high-accuracy modelling across biomolecular space is possible within a single unified deep-learning framework.
Bal M., Murthy A.A., Zhu S., Crisa F., You X., Huang Z., Roy T., Lee J., Zanten D.V., Pilipenko R., Nekrashevich I., Lunin A., Bafia D., Krasnikova Y., Kopas C.J., et. al.
AbstractWe present a transmon qubit fabrication technique that yields systematic improvements in T1 relaxation times. We encapsulate the surface of niobium and prevent the formation of its lossy surface oxide. By maintaining the same superconducting metal and only varying the surface, this comparative investigation examining different capping materials, such as tantalum, aluminum, titanium nitride, and gold, as well as substrates across different qubit foundries demonstrates the detrimental impact that niobium oxides have on coherence times of superconducting qubits, compared to native oxides of tantalum, aluminum or titanium nitride. Our surface-encapsulated niobium qubit devices exhibit T1 relaxation times 2–5 times longer than baseline qubit devices with native niobium oxides. When capping niobium with tantalum, we obtain median qubit lifetimes above 300 μs, with maximum values up to 600 μs. Our comparative structural and chemical analysis provides insight into why amorphous niobium oxides may induce higher losses compared to other amorphous oxides.
Shrestha S.B., Timcheck J., Frady P., Campos-Macias L., Davies M.
Karimov T., Ostrovskii V., Rybin V., Druzhina O., Kolev G., Butusov D.
Josephson junctions (JJs) are superconductor-based devices used to build highly sensitive magnetic flux sensors called superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs). These sensors may vary in design, being the radio frequency (RF) SQUID, direct current (DC) SQUID, and hybrid, such as D-SQUID. In addition, recently many of JJ’s applications were found in spiking models of neurons exhibiting nearly biological behavior. In this study, we propose and investigate a new circuit model of a sensory neuron based on DC SQUID as part of the circuit. The dependence of the dynamics of the designed model on the external magnetic flux is demonstrated. The design of the circuit and derivation of the corresponding differential equations that describe the dynamics of the system are given. Numerical simulation is used for experimental evaluation. The experimental results confirm the applicability and good performance of the proposed magnetic-flux-sensitive neuron concept: the considered device can encode the magnetic flux in the form of neuronal dynamics with the linear section. Furthermore, some complex behavior was discovered in the model, namely the intermittent chaotic spiking and plateau bursting. The proposed design can be efficiently applied to developing the interfaces between circuitry and spiking neural networks. However, it should be noted that the proposed neuron design shares the main limitation of all the superconductor-based technologies, i.e., the need for a cryogenic and shielding system.
Birge N.O., Satchell N.
The past two decades have seen an explosion of work on Josephson junctions containing ferromagnetic materials. Such junctions are under consideration for applications in digital superconducting logic and memory. In the presence of the exchange field, spin–singlet Cooper pairs from conventional superconductors undergo rapid phase oscillations as they propagate through a ferromagnetic material. As a result, the ground-state phase difference across a ferromagnetic Josephson junction oscillates between 0 and π as a function of the thickness of the ferromagnetic material. π-junctions have been proposed as circuit elements in superconducting digital logic and in certain qubit designs for quantum computing. If a junction contains two or more ferromagnetic layers whose relative magnetization directions can be controlled by a small applied magnetic field, then the junction can serve as the foundation for a memory cell. Success in all of those applications requires careful choices of ferromagnetic materials. Often, materials that optimize magnetic properties do not optimize supercurrent propagation, and vice versa. In this review, we discuss the significant progress that has been made in identifying and testing a wide range of ferromagnetic materials in Josephson junctions over the past two decades. The review concentrates on ferromagnetic metals, partly because eventual industrial applications of ferromagnetic Josephson junctions will most likely start with metallic ferromagnets (either in all metal junctions or junctions containing an insulating layer). We will briefly mention work on non-metallic barriers, including ferromagnetic insulators, and some of the exciting work on spin–triplet supercurrent in junctions containing non-collinear magnetic inhomogeneity.
Total publications
123
Total citations
1685
Citations per publication
13.7
Average publications per year
4.39
Average coauthors
5.3
Publications years
1998-2025 (28 years)
h-index
25
i10-index
55
m-index
0.89
o-index
62
g-index
34
w-index
4
Metrics description
h-index
A scientist has an h-index if h of his N publications are cited at least h times each, while the remaining (N - h) publications are cited no more than h times each.
i10-index
The number of the author's publications that received at least 10 links each.
m-index
The researcher's m-index is numerically equal to the ratio of his h-index to the number of years that have passed since the first publication.
o-index
The geometric mean of the h-index and the number of citations of the most cited article of the scientist.
g-index
For a given set of articles, sorted in descending order of the number of citations that these articles received, the g-index is the largest number such that the g most cited articles received (in total) at least g2 citations.
w-index
If w articles of a researcher have at least 10w citations each and other publications are less than 10(w+1) citations, then the researcher's w-index is equal to w.
Top-100
Fields of science
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
|
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
|
Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 45, 36.59%
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
45 publications, 36.59%
|
Condensed Matter Physics
|
Condensed Matter Physics, 37, 30.08%
Condensed Matter Physics
37 publications, 30.08%
|
General Physics and Astronomy
|
General Physics and Astronomy, 32, 26.02%
General Physics and Astronomy
32 publications, 26.02%
|
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
|
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 22, 17.89%
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
22 publications, 17.89%
|
General Materials Science
|
General Materials Science, 20, 16.26%
General Materials Science
20 publications, 16.26%
|
Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
|
Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous), 19, 15.45%
Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
19 publications, 15.45%
|
Materials Chemistry
|
Materials Chemistry, 13, 10.57%
Materials Chemistry
13 publications, 10.57%
|
Metals and Alloys
|
Metals and Alloys, 13, 10.57%
Metals and Alloys
13 publications, 10.57%
|
Ceramics and Composites
|
Ceramics and Composites, 13, 10.57%
Ceramics and Composites
13 publications, 10.57%
|
General Chemical Engineering
|
General Chemical Engineering, 6, 4.88%
General Chemical Engineering
6 publications, 4.88%
|
General Medicine
|
General Medicine, 5, 4.07%
General Medicine
5 publications, 4.07%
|
Multidisciplinary
|
Multidisciplinary, 3, 2.44%
Multidisciplinary
3 publications, 2.44%
|
General Mathematics
|
General Mathematics, 3, 2.44%
General Mathematics
3 publications, 2.44%
|
Bioengineering
|
Bioengineering, 3, 2.44%
Bioengineering
3 publications, 2.44%
|
Energy Engineering and Power Technology
|
Energy Engineering and Power Technology, 3, 2.44%
Energy Engineering and Power Technology
3 publications, 2.44%
|
General Chemistry
|
General Chemistry, 2, 1.63%
General Chemistry
2 publications, 1.63%
|
Chemistry (miscellaneous)
|
Chemistry (miscellaneous), 2, 1.63%
Chemistry (miscellaneous)
2 publications, 1.63%
|
Computer Science (miscellaneous)
|
Computer Science (miscellaneous), 2, 1.63%
Computer Science (miscellaneous)
2 publications, 1.63%
|
Mechanical Engineering
|
Mechanical Engineering, 2, 1.63%
Mechanical Engineering
2 publications, 1.63%
|
Surfaces, Coatings and Films
|
Surfaces, Coatings and Films, 1, 0.81%
Surfaces, Coatings and Films
1 publication, 0.81%
|
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
|
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, 1, 0.81%
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
1 publication, 0.81%
|
Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
|
Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 1, 0.81%
Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
1 publication, 0.81%
|
Materials Science (miscellaneous)
|
Materials Science (miscellaneous), 1, 0.81%
Materials Science (miscellaneous)
1 publication, 0.81%
|
Mechanics of Materials
|
Mechanics of Materials, 1, 0.81%
Mechanics of Materials
1 publication, 0.81%
|
Computational Mathematics
|
Computational Mathematics, 1, 0.81%
Computational Mathematics
1 publication, 0.81%
|
Radiation
|
Radiation, 1, 0.81%
Radiation
1 publication, 0.81%
|
Nuclear and High Energy Physics
|
Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 1, 0.81%
Nuclear and High Energy Physics
1 publication, 0.81%
|
Nuclear Energy and Engineering
|
Nuclear Energy and Engineering, 1, 0.81%
Nuclear Energy and Engineering
1 publication, 0.81%
|
Biomedical Engineering
|
Biomedical Engineering, 1, 0.81%
Biomedical Engineering
1 publication, 0.81%
|
Analysis
|
Analysis, 1, 0.81%
Analysis
1 publication, 0.81%
|
Engineering (miscellaneous)
|
Engineering (miscellaneous), 1, 0.81%
Engineering (miscellaneous)
1 publication, 0.81%
|
Show all (1 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
Journals
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
|
Superconductor Science and Technology
14 publications, 11.38%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity
14 publications, 11.38%
|
|
Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology
10 publications, 8.13%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
7 publications, 5.69%
|
|
Applied Physics Letters
7 publications, 5.69%
|
|
JETP Letters
7 publications, 5.69%
|
|
Nanomaterials
7 publications, 5.69%
|
|
Moscow University Physics Bulletin (English Translation of Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, Fizika)
4 publications, 3.25%
|
|
Physical Review B
4 publications, 3.25%
|
|
Low Temperature Physics
3 publications, 2.44%
|
|
Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications
3 publications, 2.44%
|
|
EPJ Web of Conferences
3 publications, 2.44%
|
|
Scientific Reports
3 publications, 2.44%
|
|
Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics
2 publications, 1.63%
|
|
Physical Review Applied
2 publications, 1.63%
|
|
Symmetry
2 publications, 1.63%
|
|
Mesoscience and Nanotechnology
2 publications, 1.63%
|
|
Journal of Surface Investigation
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Quantum Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Chaos, Solitons and Fractals
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
MATEC Web of Conferences
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Physics of Wave Phenomena
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Communications in Computer and Information Science
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Nano Letters
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Physics-Uspekhi
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Physics of the Solid State
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Differential Equations
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Journal of Applied Physics
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Physical Review E
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Nanotechnology
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Advanced Engineering Materials
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
NanoScience and Technology
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Communications Physics
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Advanced Quantum Technologies
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Nanobiotechnology Reports
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Show all (9 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
Citing journals
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity
240 citations, 14.24%
|
|
Superconductor Science and Technology
166 citations, 9.85%
|
|
Journal not defined
|
Journal not defined, 113, 6.71%
Journal not defined
113 citations, 6.71%
|
Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology
95 citations, 5.64%
|
|
JETP Letters
86 citations, 5.1%
|
|
Physical Review B
82 citations, 4.87%
|
|
Nanomaterials
65 citations, 3.86%
|
|
Applied Physics Letters
64 citations, 3.8%
|
|
Journal of Applied Physics
53 citations, 3.15%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
47 citations, 2.79%
|
|
Physical Review Applied
41 citations, 2.43%
|
|
Письма в Журнал экспериментальной и теоретической физики
37 citations, 2.2%
|
|
Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics
30 citations, 1.78%
|
|
Low Temperature Physics
29 citations, 1.72%
|
|
Moscow University Physics Bulletin (English Translation of Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, Fizika)
26 citations, 1.54%
|
|
Chaos, Solitons and Fractals
20 citations, 1.19%
|
|
Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications
15 citations, 0.89%
|
|
Nanotechnology
14 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Symmetry
14 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Uspekhi Fizicheskih Nauk
14 citations, 0.83%
|
|
APL Materials
13 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Journal of Surface Investigation
12 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Physics of the Solid State
12 citations, 0.71%
|
|
NanoScience and Technology
12 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Журнал Экспериментальной и Теоретической Физики
12 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Communications in Computer and Information Science
11 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Nano Letters
11 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics
9 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Physical Review Letters
9 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Springer Series in Materials Science
9 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Communications Physics
9 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
9 citations, 0.53%
|
|
AIP Conference Proceedings
8 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Mesoscience and Nanotechnology
8 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Nature Communications
7 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Journal of Materials Chemistry C
7 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Quantum Science and Technology
7 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Physics of Wave Phenomena
7 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Differential Equations
7 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Scientific Reports
7 citations, 0.42%
|
|
European Physical Journal B
7 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Sensors
7 citations, 0.42%
|
|
IEEE Microwave Magazine
7 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Nanobiotechnology Reports
7 citations, 0.42%
|
|
New Journal of Physics
6 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Understanding Complex Systems
6 citations, 0.36%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science
6 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Physical Review Research
6 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Physics of Metals and Metallography
5 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics
5 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Communications Materials
5 citations, 0.3%
|
|
ACS Applied Nano Materials
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Physics Condensed Matter
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Advanced Functional Materials
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Nature Electronics
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Advanced Engineering Materials
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Физика металлов и металловедение
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Electromagnetic Science
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Micromachines
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Physical Review X
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Physical Review A
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Physical Review E
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Condensed Matter
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Laser Physics Letters
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Physical Review Materials
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Physics-Uspekhi
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Annals of Physics
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Physica Scripta
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Science China Materials
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Russian Microelectronics
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Coatings
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Technical Physics Letters
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Materials
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Advanced Physics Research
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Engineering Research Express
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
APL Machine Learning
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Поверхность Рентгеновские синхротронные и нейтронные исследования
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
npj Unconventional Computing
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Solid State Phenomena
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
IEICE Transactions on Electronics
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Nature Nanotechnology
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Ultramicroscopy
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
npj Quantum Materials
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Optics Letters
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Applied Physics Reviews
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
ACM Computing Surveys
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
|
Publishers
5
10
15
20
25
|
|
IOP Publishing
23 publications, 18.7%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
20 publications, 16.26%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
15 publications, 12.2%
|
|
AIP Publishing
11 publications, 8.94%
|
|
Beilstein-Institut
10 publications, 8.13%
|
|
MDPI
9 publications, 7.32%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
7 publications, 5.69%
|
|
Springer Nature
6 publications, 4.88%
|
|
Elsevier
4 publications, 3.25%
|
|
EDP Sciences
4 publications, 3.25%
|
|
Wiley
2 publications, 1.63%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
2 publications, 1.63%
|
|
Treatise
2 publications, 1.63%
|
|
Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk Journal
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
|
Organizations from articles
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
104 publications, 84.55%
|
|
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
35 publications, 28.46%
|
|
Dukhov Research Institute of Automatics
28 publications, 22.76%
|
|
University of Twente
20 publications, 16.26%
|
|
Moscow Technical University of Communication and Informatics
17 publications, 13.82%
|
|
National University of Science & Technology (MISiS)
15 publications, 12.2%
|
|
Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
15 publications, 12.2%
|
|
Organization not defined
|
Organization not defined, 14, 11.38%
Organization not defined
14 publications, 11.38%
|
Osipyan Institute of Solid State Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
13 publications, 10.57%
|
|
Lukin Scientific Research Institute of Physical Problems of NRC «Kurchatov Institute»
9 publications, 7.32%
|
|
École supérieure de physique et de chimie industrielles de la Ville de Paris
8 publications, 6.5%
|
|
Paris Sciences et Lettres
8 publications, 6.5%
|
|
Kotelnikov Institute of Radioengineering and Electronics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
7 publications, 5.69%
|
|
Chalmers University of Technology
7 publications, 5.69%
|
|
Sorbonne University
7 publications, 5.69%
|
|
Russian Quantum Center
6 publications, 4.88%
|
|
Kazan Federal University
5 publications, 4.07%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
4 publications, 3.25%
|
|
Institute for Physics of Microstructures of the Russian Academy of Sciences
4 publications, 3.25%
|
|
MIREA — Russian Technological University
4 publications, 3.25%
|
|
Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University n.a. R.E. Alekseev
4 publications, 3.25%
|
|
European Organization for Nuclear Research
4 publications, 3.25%
|
|
Institute of Nanotechnology of Microelectronics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
3 publications, 2.44%
|
|
Technical University of Denmark
3 publications, 2.44%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
3 publications, 2.44%
|
|
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
2 publications, 1.63%
|
|
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research
2 publications, 1.63%
|
|
National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"
2 publications, 1.63%
|
|
Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute of NRC «Kurchatov Institute»
2 publications, 1.63%
|
|
Orel State University
2 publications, 1.63%
|
|
University of Tübingen
2 publications, 1.63%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research
2 publications, 1.63%
|
|
National Research Nuclear University MEPhI
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Ural Federal University
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Tomsk State University
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Saint Petersburg State University
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Udmurt federal research center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Baku State University
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Institute of Physics of the Ministry of Science and Education of the Republic of Azerbaijan
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Basque Foundation for Science
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Centro de Física de Materiales
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Leibniz Institute of Photonic Technology
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
University of the Basque Country
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Technical University of Darmstadt
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
University of Augsburg
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
University of Sheffield
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Valencia
1 publication, 0.81%
|
|
Show all (19 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
Countries from articles
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
|
Russia
|
Russia, 114, 92.68%
Russia
114 publications, 92.68%
|
USA
|
USA, 34, 27.64%
USA
34 publications, 27.64%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 20, 16.26%
Netherlands
20 publications, 16.26%
|
Country not defined
|
Country not defined, 12, 9.76%
Country not defined
12 publications, 9.76%
|
France
|
France, 10, 8.13%
France
10 publications, 8.13%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 8, 6.5%
Germany
8 publications, 6.5%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 8, 6.5%
Sweden
8 publications, 6.5%
|
Moldova
|
Moldova, 4, 3.25%
Moldova
4 publications, 3.25%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 4, 3.25%
Switzerland
4 publications, 3.25%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 3, 2.44%
Denmark
3 publications, 2.44%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 3, 2.44%
Romania
3 publications, 2.44%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 1.63%
Austria
2 publications, 1.63%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.81%
Portugal
1 publication, 0.81%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 1, 0.81%
Azerbaijan
1 publication, 0.81%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 1, 0.81%
United Kingdom
1 publication, 0.81%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 1, 0.81%
Spain
1 publication, 0.81%
|
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
Citing organizations
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
180 citations, 10.68%
|
|
Organization not defined
|
Organization not defined, 137, 8.13%
Organization not defined
137 citations, 8.13%
|
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
84 citations, 4.99%
|
|
Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
46 citations, 2.73%
|
|
Dukhov Research Institute of Automatics
44 citations, 2.61%
|
|
University of Twente
38 citations, 2.26%
|
|
Kotelnikov Institute of Radioengineering and Electronics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
35 citations, 2.08%
|
|
National University of Science & Technology (MISiS)
34 citations, 2.02%
|
|
Osipyan Institute of Solid State Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
34 citations, 2.02%
|
|
Kazan Federal University
30 citations, 1.78%
|
|
Chalmers University of Technology
30 citations, 1.78%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
29 citations, 1.72%
|
|
Moscow Technical University of Communication and Informatics
26 citations, 1.54%
|
|
Institute for Physics of Microstructures of the Russian Academy of Sciences
18 citations, 1.07%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research
17 citations, 1.01%
|
|
École supérieure de physique et de chimie industrielles de la Ville de Paris
14 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Stockholm University
14 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Russian Quantum Center
13 citations, 0.77%
|
|
National Institute of Standards and Technology
13 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Paris Sciences et Lettres
13 citations, 0.77%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
12 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Michigan State University
12 citations, 0.71%
|
|
P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
11 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Sorbonne University
11 citations, 0.65%
|
|
University of Salerno
11 citations, 0.65%
|
|
University of Tübingen
10 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
10 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Istituto Nanoscienze
10 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Scuola Normale Superiore
10 citations, 0.59%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
10 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University n.a. R.E. Alekseev
9 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Kazan E.K. Zavoisky Physical-Technical Institute of the Kazan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
9 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Lukin Scientific Research Institute of Physical Problems of NRC «Kurchatov Institute»
9 citations, 0.53%
|
|
University of Southern California
9 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
9 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Nagoya University
9 citations, 0.53%
|
|
MIREA — Russian Technological University
8 citations, 0.47%
|
|
National Institute for Nuclear Physics
8 citations, 0.47%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
8 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research
7 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Orel State University
7 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
7 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Northwestern University
7 citations, 0.42%
|
|
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
7 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Yokohama National University
7 citations, 0.42%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
7 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
6 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Kazan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
6 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
6 citations, 0.36%
|
|
University of Bordeaux
6 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
6 citations, 0.36%
|
|
National Institute of Optics
6 citations, 0.36%
|
|
University of the Basque Country
6 citations, 0.36%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
6 citations, 0.36%
|
|
University of Rochester
6 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
6 citations, 0.36%
|
|
National Research Nuclear University MEPhI
5 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
5 citations, 0.3%
|
|
V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
5 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Institute of Nanotechnology of Microelectronics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
5 citations, 0.3%
|
|
University of Isfahan
5 citations, 0.3%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
5 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
5 citations, 0.3%
|
|
University of Palermo
5 citations, 0.3%
|
|
San Diego State University
5 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Tohoku University
5 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Technical University of Darmstadt
5 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Forschungszentrum Jülich
5 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
A.V. Gaponov-Grekhov Institute of Applied Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Saint Petersburg State University
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
M. Akmullah Bashkir State Pedagogical University
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Ufa University of Science and Technology
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Donostia International Physics Center
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Centro de Física de Materiales
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
European Organization for Nuclear Research
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
ShanghaiTech University
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Technical University of Denmark
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
University of Sannio
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Princeton University
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Leiden University
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
University of Augsburg
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Purdue University
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Valencia
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
University of Belgrade
4 citations, 0.24%
|
|
M.N. Mikheev Institute of Metal Physics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Ural Federal University
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute of NRC «Kurchatov Institute»
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Belarusian State University of Informatics and Radioelectronics
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Udmurt federal research center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Khajeh Nasir Toosi University of Technology
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Basque Foundation for Science
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
ETH Zurich
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Aalto University
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
South China Normal University
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
University of Basel
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
National Institute for Materials Science
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
University of Cambridge
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
|
Citing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
|
Russia
|
Russia, 327, 19.41%
Russia
327 citations, 19.41%
|
USA
|
USA, 190, 11.28%
USA
190 citations, 11.28%
|
Country not defined
|
Country not defined, 94, 5.58%
Country not defined
94 citations, 5.58%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 69, 4.09%
Germany
69 citations, 4.09%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 49, 2.91%
Sweden
49 citations, 2.91%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 45, 2.67%
Netherlands
45 citations, 2.67%
|
China
|
China, 42, 2.49%
China
42 citations, 2.49%
|
France
|
France, 40, 2.37%
France
40 citations, 2.37%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 39, 2.31%
Italy
39 citations, 2.31%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 34, 2.02%
Japan
34 citations, 2.02%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 18, 1.07%
United Kingdom
18 citations, 1.07%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 15, 0.89%
Switzerland
15 citations, 0.89%
|
Moldova
|
Moldova, 13, 0.77%
Moldova
13 citations, 0.77%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 12, 0.71%
Australia
12 citations, 0.71%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 10, 0.59%
Ukraine
10 citations, 0.59%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 8, 0.47%
Iran
8 citations, 0.47%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 8, 0.47%
Spain
8 citations, 0.47%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 7, 0.42%
Denmark
7 citations, 0.42%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 6, 0.36%
Canada
6 citations, 0.36%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 6, 0.36%
Finland
6 citations, 0.36%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 5, 0.3%
Israel
5 citations, 0.3%
|
India
|
India, 5, 0.3%
India
5 citations, 0.3%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 5, 0.3%
Norway
5 citations, 0.3%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 4, 0.24%
Hungary
4 citations, 0.24%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 4, 0.24%
Serbia
4 citations, 0.24%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 4, 0.24%
Turkey
4 citations, 0.24%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 4, 0.24%
Czech Republic
4 citations, 0.24%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 3, 0.18%
Belarus
3 citations, 0.18%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 3, 0.18%
Austria
3 citations, 0.18%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 3, 0.18%
Azerbaijan
3 citations, 0.18%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 3, 0.18%
Egypt
3 citations, 0.18%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 3, 0.18%
New Zealand
3 citations, 0.18%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 2, 0.12%
Poland
2 citations, 0.12%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 2, 0.12%
Republic of Korea
2 citations, 0.12%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.12%
Romania
2 citations, 0.12%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 2, 0.12%
Singapore
2 citations, 0.12%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 2, 0.12%
Slovenia
2 citations, 0.12%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 2, 0.12%
South Africa
2 citations, 0.12%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.06%
Estonia
1 citation, 0.06%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.06%
Portugal
1 citation, 0.06%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.06%
Argentina
1 citation, 0.06%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 1, 0.06%
Armenia
1 citation, 0.06%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.06%
Vietnam
1 citation, 0.06%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.06%
Greece
1 citation, 0.06%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.06%
Morocco
1 citation, 0.06%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.06%
Mexico
1 citation, 0.06%
|
Show all (16 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated daily.
This section displays the profiles of scientists registered on the platform. To display the full list, invite your colleagues to register.
Михаил Юрьевич Куприянов, Сергей Викторович Бакурский, Николай Викторович Кленов, Игорь Игоревич Соловьев, Александр Львович Гудков, Валерий Владимирович Рязанов
RU2554612C2,
2014
Михаил Юрьевич Куприянов, Сергей Викторович Бакурский, Николай Викторович Кленов, Игорь Игоревич Соловьев
RU2554614C2,
2015
Михаил Юрьевич Куприянов, Сергей Викторович Бакурский, Николай Викторович Кленов, Игорь Игоревич Соловьев
RU2620027C1,
2017
Андрей Евгеньевич Щеголев, Игорь Игоревич Соловьев, Николай Викторович Кленов, Сергей Викторович Бакурский, Виталий Владимирович Больгинов, Максим Валерьевич Терешонок, Михаил Юрьевич Куприянов
RU2734581C1,
2020