Open Access
Open access
Scientific Reports, volume 9, issue 1, publication number 5142

Exponential consensus ranking improves the outcome in docking and receptor ensemble docking

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2019-03-26
Quartile SCImago
Q1
Quartile WOS
Q2
Impact factor4.6
ISSN20452322
Multidisciplinary
Abstract
Consensus-scoring methods are commonly used with molecular docking in virtual screening campaigns to filter potential ligands for a protein target. Traditional consensus methods combine results from different docking programs by averaging the score or rank of each molecule obtained from individual programs. Unfortunately, these methods fail if one of the docking programs has poor performance, which is likely to occur due to training-set dependencies and scoring-function parameterization. In this work, we introduce a novel consensus method that overcomes these limitations. We combine the results from individual docking programs using a sum of exponential distributions as a function of the molecule rank for each program. We test the method over several benchmark systems using individual and ensembles of target structures from diverse protein families with challenging decoy/ligand datasets. The results demonstrate that the novel method outperforms the best traditional consensus strategies over a wide range of systems. Moreover, because the novel method is based on the rank rather than the score, it is independent of the score units, scales and offsets, which can hinder the combination of results from different structures or programs. Our method is simple and robust, providing a theoretical basis not only for molecular docking but also for any consensus strategy in general.

Top-30

Journals

2
4
6
8
10
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
10 publications, 10%
Scientific Reports
5 publications, 5%
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
5 publications, 5%
Molecules
4 publications, 4%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
3 publications, 3%
Doklady of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
3 publications, 3%
Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery
2 publications, 2%
Frontiers in Chemistry
2 publications, 2%
Molecular Informatics
2 publications, 2%
ACS Omega
2 publications, 2%
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
2 publications, 2%
Mathematical Biology and Bioinformatics
2 publications, 2%
Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry
1 publication, 1%
Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry
1 publication, 1%
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
1 publication, 1%
Modern Physics Letters B
1 publication, 1%
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
1 publication, 1%
Biomedicines
1 publication, 1%
Frontiers in Immunology
1 publication, 1%
Biomolecules
1 publication, 1%
International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management
1 publication, 1%
Molecular Diversity
1 publication, 1%
Chemistry Africa
1 publication, 1%
MethodsX
1 publication, 1%
Arabian Journal of Chemistry
1 publication, 1%
iScience
1 publication, 1%
Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences
1 publication, 1%
Pharmacia
1 publication, 1%
PLoS Computational Biology
1 publication, 1%
2
4
6
8
10

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Springer Nature
19 publications, 19%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
14 publications, 14%
MDPI
13 publications, 13%
Elsevier
11 publications, 11%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
6 publications, 6%
Taylor & Francis
5 publications, 5%
Wiley
5 publications, 5%
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
4 publications, 4%
Frontiers Media S.A.
3 publications, 3%
Publishing House Belorusskaya Nauka
3 publications, 3%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
2 publications, 2%
Institute of Mathematical Problems of Biology of RAS (IMPB RAS)
2 publications, 2%
IOS Press
1 publication, 1%
World Scientific
1 publication, 1%
King Saud University
1 publication, 1%
Pensoft Publishers
1 publication, 1%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 1%
eLife Sciences Publications
1 publication, 1%
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
1 publication, 1%
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
1 publication, 1%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Palacio Rodríguez K. et al. Exponential consensus ranking improves the outcome in docking and receptor ensemble docking // Scientific Reports. 2019. Vol. 9. No. 1. 5142
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Palacio Rodríguez K., Lans I., Cavasotto C. N., Cossio P. Exponential consensus ranking improves the outcome in docking and receptor ensemble docking // Scientific Reports. 2019. Vol. 9. No. 1. 5142
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1038/s41598-019-41594-3
UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41594-3
TI - Exponential consensus ranking improves the outcome in docking and receptor ensemble docking
T2 - Scientific Reports
AU - Palacio Rodríguez, Karen
AU - Lans, Isaias
AU - Cavasotto, Claudio N.
AU - Cossio, Pilar
PY - 2019
DA - 2019/03/26
PB - Springer Nature
IS - 1
VL - 9
SN - 2045-2322
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex Copy
@article{2019_Palacio Rodríguez,
author = {Karen Palacio Rodríguez and Isaias Lans and Claudio N. Cavasotto and Pilar Cossio},
title = {Exponential consensus ranking improves the outcome in docking and receptor ensemble docking},
journal = {Scientific Reports},
year = {2019},
volume = {9},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {mar},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41594-3},
number = {1},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-019-41594-3}
}
Found error?