How reliable are DFT transition structures? Comparison of GGA, hybrid-meta-GGA and meta-GGA functionals
Тип публикации: Journal Article
Дата публикации: 2011-01-01
SCImago Q2
WOS Q2
БС1
SJR: 0.475
CiteScore: 5.2
Impact factor: 2.7
ISSN: 14770520, 14770539
PubMed ID:
20976314
Organic Chemistry
Biochemistry
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
Краткое описание
There have been many comparisons of computational methods applied to ground states, but studies of organic reactions usually require calculations on transition states, and these provide a different test of the methods. We present calculations of the geometries of nineteen covalent-bond forming transition states using HF and twelve different functionals, including GGA, hybrid-GGA and hybrid meta-GGA approaches. For the calculation of the TS geometries, the results suggest that B3LYP is only slightly less accurate than newer, computationally more expensive methods, and is less sensitive to choice of integration grid. We conclude that the use of B3LYP and related functionals is still appropriate for many studies of organic reaction mechanisms.
Найдено
Ничего не найдено, попробуйте изменить настройки фильтра.
Для доступа к списку цитирований публикации необходимо авторизоваться.
Для доступа к списку профилей, цитирующих публикацию, необходимо авторизоваться.
Топ-30
Журналы
|
5
10
15
20
25
|
|
|
Journal of Organic Chemistry
22 публикации, 9.69%
|
|
|
Journal of the American Chemical Society
14 публикаций, 6.17%
|
|
|
RSC Advances
14 публикаций, 6.17%
|
|
|
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
8 публикаций, 3.52%
|
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry A
7 публикаций, 3.08%
|
|
|
Chemistry - A European Journal
7 публикаций, 3.08%
|
|
|
Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry
7 публикаций, 3.08%
|
|
|
Journal of Molecular Modeling
6 публикаций, 2.64%
|
|
|
Computational and Theoretical Chemistry
6 публикаций, 2.64%
|
|
|
Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
5 публикаций, 2.2%
|
|
|
Angewandte Chemie
5 публикаций, 2.2%
|
|
|
Angewandte Chemie - International Edition
5 публикаций, 2.2%
|
|
|
Fuel
4 публикации, 1.76%
|
|
|
Tetrahedron
4 публикации, 1.76%
|
|
|
Journal of Computational Chemistry
4 публикации, 1.76%
|
|
|
ACS Omega
4 публикации, 1.76%
|
|
|
Chemical Science
4 публикации, 1.76%
|
|
|
Structural Chemistry
3 публикации, 1.32%
|
|
|
Tetrahedron Asymmetry
3 публикации, 1.32%
|
|
|
ChemistrySelect
3 публикации, 1.32%
|
|
|
International Journal of Quantum Chemistry
3 публикации, 1.32%
|
|
|
ACS Catalysis
3 публикации, 1.32%
|
|
|
Molecular Physics
3 публикации, 1.32%
|
|
|
Molecules
2 публикации, 0.88%
|
|
|
Catalysts
2 публикации, 0.88%
|
|
|
Theoretical Chemistry Accounts
2 публикации, 0.88%
|
|
|
Journal of Organometallic Chemistry
2 публикации, 0.88%
|
|
|
European Journal of Organic Chemistry
2 публикации, 0.88%
|
|
|
ChemPhysChem
2 публикации, 0.88%
|
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
|
Издатели
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
69 публикаций, 30.4%
|
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
40 публикаций, 17.62%
|
|
|
Elsevier
39 публикаций, 17.18%
|
|
|
Wiley
39 публикаций, 17.18%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
17 публикаций, 7.49%
|
|
|
MDPI
6 публикаций, 2.64%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
4 публикации, 1.76%
|
|
|
AIP Publishing
3 публикации, 1.32%
|
|
|
IOP Publishing
2 публикации, 0.88%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
2 публикации, 0.88%
|
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
1 публикация, 0.44%
|
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
1 публикация, 0.44%
|
|
|
SAGE
1 публикация, 0.44%
|
|
|
The Society of Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Japan
1 публикация, 0.44%
|
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
1 публикация, 0.44%
|
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
1 публикация, 0.44%
|
|
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
- Мы не учитываем публикации, у которых нет DOI.
- Статистика публикаций обновляется еженедельно.
Вы ученый?
Создайте профиль, чтобы получать персональные рекомендации коллег, конференций и новых статей.
Войти с ORCID
Метрики
227
Всего цитирований:
227
Цитирований c 2025:
16
(7.05%)
Цитировать
ГОСТ |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Цитировать
ГОСТ
Скопировать
Simón Rubio L., Goodman J. How reliable are DFT transition structures? Comparison of GGA, hybrid-meta-GGA and meta-GGA functionals // Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry. 2011. Vol. 9. No. 3. pp. 689-700.
ГОСТ со всеми авторами (до 50)
Скопировать
Simón Rubio L., Goodman J. How reliable are DFT transition structures? Comparison of GGA, hybrid-meta-GGA and meta-GGA functionals // Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry. 2011. Vol. 9. No. 3. pp. 689-700.
Цитировать
RIS
Скопировать
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1039/C0OB00477D
UR - https://doi.org/10.1039/C0OB00477D
TI - How reliable are DFT transition structures? Comparison of GGA, hybrid-meta-GGA and meta-GGA functionals
T2 - Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry
AU - Simón Rubio, Luis
AU - Goodman, Jonathan
PY - 2011
DA - 2011/01/01
PB - Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
SP - 689-700
IS - 3
VL - 9
PMID - 20976314
SN - 1477-0520
SN - 1477-0539
ER -
Цитировать
BibTex (до 50 авторов)
Скопировать
@article{2011_Simón Rubio,
author = {Luis Simón Rubio and Jonathan Goodman},
title = {How reliable are DFT transition structures? Comparison of GGA, hybrid-meta-GGA and meta-GGA functionals},
journal = {Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry},
year = {2011},
volume = {9},
publisher = {Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)},
month = {jan},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1039/C0OB00477D},
number = {3},
pages = {689--700},
doi = {10.1039/C0OB00477D}
}
Цитировать
MLA
Скопировать
Simón Rubio, Luis, and Jonathan Goodman. “How reliable are DFT transition structures? Comparison of GGA, hybrid-meta-GGA and meta-GGA functionals.” Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, vol. 9, no. 3, Jan. 2011, pp. 689-700. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0OB00477D.
Ошибка в публикации?