Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, volume 18, issue 18, pages 12964-12975

Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein–ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power

Zhe Wang 1
Huiyong Sun 1
Xinsheng Yao 2
Dan Li 1
Lei Xu 3
Yongdan Li 4
Sheng Tian 4
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2016-04-07
Quartile SCImago
Q1
Quartile WOS
Q2
Impact factor3.3
ISSN14639076, 14639084
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
General Physics and Astronomy
Abstract

We evaluated the capabilities of ten molecular docking programs to predict the ligand binding poses (sampling power) and rank the binding affinities (scoring power).

Top-30

Journals

10
20
30
40
50
60
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
51 publications, 7.41%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
25 publications, 3.63%
Molecules
23 publications, 3.34%
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
21 publications, 3.05%
Briefings in Bioinformatics
17 publications, 2.47%
Scientific Reports
14 publications, 2.03%
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 publications, 2.03%
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
13 publications, 1.89%
Methods in Molecular Biology
11 publications, 1.6%
Frontiers in Pharmacology
9 publications, 1.31%
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
9 publications, 1.31%
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
9 publications, 1.31%
ACS Omega
8 publications, 1.16%
Journal of Cheminformatics
8 publications, 1.16%
Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
7 publications, 1.02%
Bioorganic Chemistry
7 publications, 1.02%
Frontiers in Chemistry
6 publications, 0.87%
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
6 publications, 0.87%
PLoS ONE
6 publications, 0.87%
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
6 publications, 0.87%
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
6 publications, 0.87%
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
6 publications, 0.87%
RSC Advances
5 publications, 0.73%
Heliyon
5 publications, 0.73%
Journal of Molecular Structure
5 publications, 0.73%
Chemical Biology and Drug Design
5 publications, 0.73%
Journal of Physical Chemistry B
5 publications, 0.73%
Chemical Science
5 publications, 0.73%
Pharmaceuticals
4 publications, 0.58%
10
20
30
40
50
60

Publishers

20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Elsevier
151 publications, 21.95%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
114 publications, 16.57%
Springer Nature
93 publications, 13.52%
MDPI
67 publications, 9.74%
Wiley
53 publications, 7.7%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
36 publications, 5.23%
Taylor & Francis
31 publications, 4.51%
Frontiers Media S.A.
23 publications, 3.34%
Oxford University Press
21 publications, 3.05%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
17 publications, 2.47%
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
10 publications, 1.45%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
7 publications, 1.02%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
6 publications, 0.87%
American Society for Microbiology
5 publications, 0.73%
Hindawi Limited
4 publications, 0.58%
Impact Journals
3 publications, 0.44%
World Scientific
3 publications, 0.44%
Pleiades Publishing
3 publications, 0.44%
SAGE
2 publications, 0.29%
American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
1 publication, 0.15%
1 publication, 0.15%
IOS Press
1 publication, 0.15%
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
1 publication, 0.15%
PeerJ
1 publication, 0.15%
Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
1 publication, 0.15%
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
1 publication, 0.15%
Cairo University
1 publication, 0.15%
Biophysical Society
1 publication, 0.15%
Korean Society of Industrial Engineering Chemistry
1 publication, 0.15%
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Wang Z. et al. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein–ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power // Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2016. Vol. 18. No. 18. pp. 12964-12975.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Wang Z., Sun H., Yao X., Li D., Xu L., Li Y., Tian S., Hou T. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein–ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power // Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2016. Vol. 18. No. 18. pp. 12964-12975.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1039/C6CP01555G
UR - https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CP01555G
TI - Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein–ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power
T2 - Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
AU - Tian, Sheng
AU - Wang, Zhe
AU - Sun, Huiyong
AU - Yao, Xinsheng
AU - Li, Dan
AU - Xu, Lei
AU - Li, Yongdan
AU - Hou, Tingjun
PY - 2016
DA - 2016/04/07
PB - Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
SP - 12964-12975
IS - 18
VL - 18
SN - 1463-9076
SN - 1463-9084
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex Copy
@article{2016_Wang,
author = {Sheng Tian and Zhe Wang and Huiyong Sun and Xinsheng Yao and Dan Li and Lei Xu and Yongdan Li and Tingjun Hou},
title = {Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein–ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power},
journal = {Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics},
year = {2016},
volume = {18},
publisher = {Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)},
month = {apr},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CP01555G},
number = {18},
pages = {12964--12975},
doi = {10.1039/C6CP01555G}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Wang, Zhe, et al. “Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein–ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 18, no. 18, Apr. 2016, pp. 12964-12975. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CP01555G.
Found error?
Profiles