volume 12 issue 40 pages 12899

Scoring functions and their evaluation methods for protein–ligand docking: recent advances and future directions

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2010-08-23
scimago Q2
wos Q2
SJR0.698
CiteScore5.3
Impact factor2.9
ISSN14639076, 14639084
PubMed ID:  20730182
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
General Physics and Astronomy
Abstract
The scoring function is one of the most important components in structure-based drug design. Despite considerable success, accurate and rapid prediction of protein-ligand interactions is still a challenge in molecular docking. In this perspective, we have reviewed three basic types of scoring functions (force-field, empirical, and knowledge-based) and the consensus scoring technique that are used for protein-ligand docking. The commonly-used assessment criteria and publicly available protein-ligand databases for performance evaluation of the scoring functions have also been presented and discussed. We end with a discussion of the challenges faced by existing scoring functions and possible future directions for developing improved scoring functions.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
38 publications, 9.27%
Molecules
14 publications, 3.41%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
12 publications, 2.93%
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
11 publications, 2.68%
Methods in Molecular Biology
9 publications, 2.2%
Scientific Reports
7 publications, 1.71%
PLoS ONE
7 publications, 1.71%
Journal of Computational Chemistry
7 publications, 1.71%
Medical Advancements in Aging and Regenerative Technologies
7 publications, 1.71%
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
6 publications, 1.46%
Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
6 publications, 1.46%
Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery
6 publications, 1.46%
Journal of Cheminformatics
5 publications, 1.22%
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
5 publications, 1.22%
Future Medicinal Chemistry
4 publications, 0.98%
Frontiers in Chemistry
4 publications, 0.98%
Drug Discovery Today
4 publications, 0.98%
Methods
4 publications, 0.98%
Molecular Informatics
4 publications, 0.98%
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science
4 publications, 0.98%
Chemical Biology and Drug Design
4 publications, 0.98%
Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics
4 publications, 0.98%
ACS Omega
4 publications, 0.98%
Briefings in Bioinformatics
4 publications, 0.98%
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
3 publications, 0.73%
Frontiers in Pharmacology
3 publications, 0.73%
Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry
3 publications, 0.73%
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
3 publications, 0.73%
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
3 publications, 0.73%
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40

Publishers

10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Elsevier
69 publications, 16.83%
Springer Nature
68 publications, 16.59%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
60 publications, 14.63%
Wiley
36 publications, 8.78%
MDPI
31 publications, 7.56%
Taylor & Francis
20 publications, 4.88%
IGI Global
17 publications, 4.15%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
15 publications, 3.66%
Frontiers Media S.A.
11 publications, 2.68%
Oxford University Press
11 publications, 2.68%
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
9 publications, 2.2%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
7 publications, 1.71%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
6 publications, 1.46%
Hindawi Limited
6 publications, 1.46%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
5 publications, 1.22%
Walter de Gruyter
3 publications, 0.73%
Pharmaceutical Society of Korea
2 publications, 0.49%
IOP Publishing
2 publications, 0.49%
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
2 publications, 0.49%
Cambridge University Press
2 publications, 0.49%
IntechOpen
2 publications, 0.49%
Beilstein-Institut
1 publication, 0.24%
Mary Ann Liebert
1 publication, 0.24%
The Royal Society
1 publication, 0.24%
World Scientific
1 publication, 0.24%
Biophysical Society of China
1 publication, 0.24%
SAGE
1 publication, 0.24%
Pleiades Publishing
1 publication, 0.24%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1 publication, 0.24%
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
410
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Huang S., Grinter S., Zou X. Scoring functions and their evaluation methods for protein–ligand docking: recent advances and future directions // Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2010. Vol. 12. No. 40. p. 12899.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Huang S., Grinter S., Zou X. Scoring functions and their evaluation methods for protein–ligand docking: recent advances and future directions // Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2010. Vol. 12. No. 40. p. 12899.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1039/c0cp00151a
UR - https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cp00151a
TI - Scoring functions and their evaluation methods for protein–ligand docking: recent advances and future directions
T2 - Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
AU - Huang, Sheng-You
AU - Grinter, S
AU - Zou, Xiaoqin
PY - 2010
DA - 2010/08/23
PB - Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
SP - 12899
IS - 40
VL - 12
PMID - 20730182
SN - 1463-9076
SN - 1463-9084
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2010_Huang,
author = {Sheng-You Huang and S Grinter and Xiaoqin Zou},
title = {Scoring functions and their evaluation methods for protein–ligand docking: recent advances and future directions},
journal = {Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics},
year = {2010},
volume = {12},
publisher = {Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)},
month = {aug},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cp00151a},
number = {40},
pages = {12899},
doi = {10.1039/c0cp00151a}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Huang, Sheng-You, et al. “Scoring functions and their evaluation methods for protein–ligand docking: recent advances and future directions.” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 12, no. 40, Aug. 2010, p. 12899. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cp00151a.