Journal of Chemical Physics, volume 127, issue 2, pages 24103

Why does the B3LYP hybrid functional fail for metals?

Paier Joachim 1, 2
Marsman Martijn 1, 2
Kresse Georg 1, 2
1
 
Universität Wien Faculty of Physics, and , Sensengasse 8/12, A-1090 Wien, Austria
2
 
Center for Computational Materials Science Faculty of Physics, and , Sensengasse 8/12, A-1090 Wien, Austria
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2007-07-10
Quartile SCImago
Q1
Quartile WOS
Q1
Impact factor4.4
ISSN00219606, 10897690
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
General Physics and Astronomy
Abstract

The B3LYP hybrid functional has shown to successfully predict a wide range of molecular properties. For periodic systems, however, the failure to attain the exact homogeneous electron gas limit as well as the semiempirical construction turns out to be a major drawback of the functional. We rigorously assess the B3LYP functional for solids through calculations of lattice parameters, bulk moduli, and thermochemical properties (atomization energies and reaction energies). The theoretical lattice constants overestimate the experimental ones by approximately 1%, and hence behave similarly to the PBE gradient-corrected exchange-correlation functional. B3LYP atomization energies of solids are drastically worse than those of nonempirical hybrid Hartree-Fock/density functionals (HF/DFT) such as PBE0 and HSE03. These large errors can be traced back to the lack of a proper description of “free-electron-like” systems with a significant itinerant character (metals and small gap semiconductors). Similar calculations using the popular semiempirical B3PW91 hybrid functional, which fulfills the uniform electron gas limit, show a clear improvement over B3LYP regarding atomization energies. Finally, theoretical values for heats of formation for both the B3LYP as well as the B3PW91 functionals are presented. These document a most likely fortuitously good agreement with experiment for the B3LYP hybrid functional.

Citations by journals

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Journal of Chemical Physics
Journal of Chemical Physics, 36, 7.59%
Journal of Chemical Physics
36 publications, 7.59%
Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 30, 6.33%
Journal of Physical Chemistry C
30 publications, 6.33%
Physical Review B
Physical Review B, 29, 6.12%
Physical Review B
29 publications, 6.12%
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 27, 5.7%
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
27 publications, 5.7%
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 25, 5.27%
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
25 publications, 5.27%
Journal of Physics Condensed Matter
Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, 16, 3.38%
Journal of Physics Condensed Matter
16 publications, 3.38%
Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 15, 3.16%
Journal of Physical Chemistry A
15 publications, 3.16%
International Journal of Quantum Chemistry
International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 11, 2.32%
International Journal of Quantum Chemistry
11 publications, 2.32%
Chemical Reviews
Chemical Reviews, 9, 1.9%
Chemical Reviews
9 publications, 1.9%
Journal of Molecular Modeling
Journal of Molecular Modeling, 8, 1.69%
Journal of Molecular Modeling
8 publications, 1.69%
Applied Surface Science
Applied Surface Science, 8, 1.69%
Applied Surface Science
8 publications, 1.69%
Journal of the Electrochemical Society
Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 6, 1.27%
Journal of the Electrochemical Society
6 publications, 1.27%
Theoretical Chemistry Accounts
Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, 6, 1.27%
Theoretical Chemistry Accounts
6 publications, 1.27%
Computational and Theoretical Chemistry
Computational and Theoretical Chemistry, 6, 1.27%
Computational and Theoretical Chemistry
6 publications, 1.27%
Journal of Computational Chemistry
Journal of Computational Chemistry, 6, 1.27%
Journal of Computational Chemistry
6 publications, 1.27%
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Journal of the American Chemical Society, 6, 1.27%
Journal of the American Chemical Society
6 publications, 1.27%
Chemistry of Materials
Chemistry of Materials, 5, 1.05%
Chemistry of Materials
5 publications, 1.05%
Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 5, 1.05%
Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
5 publications, 1.05%
Physical Review Letters
Physical Review Letters, 5, 1.05%
Physical Review Letters
5 publications, 1.05%
Physical Review Materials
Physical Review Materials, 5, 1.05%
Physical Review Materials
5 publications, 1.05%
Journal of Molecular Structure
Journal of Molecular Structure, 5, 1.05%
Journal of Molecular Structure
5 publications, 1.05%
New Journal of Physics
New Journal of Physics, 5, 1.05%
New Journal of Physics
5 publications, 1.05%
Chemical Physics Letters
Chemical Physics Letters, 5, 1.05%
Chemical Physics Letters
5 publications, 1.05%
RSC Advances
RSC Advances, 5, 1.05%
RSC Advances
5 publications, 1.05%
Molecules
Molecules, 4, 0.84%
Molecules
4 publications, 0.84%
Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 4, 0.84%
Journal of Physical Chemistry B
4 publications, 0.84%
Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing
Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing, 3, 0.63%
Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing
3 publications, 0.63%
Physica Status Solidi (B): Basic Research
Physica Status Solidi (B): Basic Research, 3, 0.63%
Physica Status Solidi (B): Basic Research
3 publications, 0.63%
Organometallics
Organometallics, 3, 0.63%
Organometallics
3 publications, 0.63%
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40

Citations by publishers

20
40
60
80
100
120
140
American Chemical Society (ACS)
American Chemical Society (ACS), 121, 25.53%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
121 publications, 25.53%
Elsevier
Elsevier, 61, 12.87%
Elsevier
61 publications, 12.87%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), 47, 9.92%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
47 publications, 9.92%
Springer Nature
Springer Nature, 46, 9.7%
Springer Nature
46 publications, 9.7%
American Physical Society (APS)
American Physical Society (APS), 41, 8.65%
American Physical Society (APS)
41 publications, 8.65%
American Institute of Physics (AIP)
American Institute of Physics (AIP), 40, 8.44%
American Institute of Physics (AIP)
40 publications, 8.44%
Wiley
Wiley, 32, 6.75%
Wiley
32 publications, 6.75%
IOP Publishing
IOP Publishing, 26, 5.49%
IOP Publishing
26 publications, 5.49%
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), 10, 2.11%
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
10 publications, 2.11%
The Electrochemical Society
The Electrochemical Society, 7, 1.48%
The Electrochemical Society
7 publications, 1.48%
Taylor & Francis
Taylor & Francis, 7, 1.48%
Taylor & Francis
7 publications, 1.48%
Science in China Press, 2, 0.42%
Science in China Press
2 publications, 0.42%
Annual Reviews
Annual Reviews, 2, 0.42%
Annual Reviews
2 publications, 0.42%
Canadian Science Publishing
Canadian Science Publishing, 1, 0.21%
Canadian Science Publishing
1 publication, 0.21%
Mineralogical Society of America
Mineralogical Society of America, 1, 0.21%
Mineralogical Society of America
1 publication, 0.21%
The Royal Society
The Royal Society, 1, 0.21%
The Royal Society
1 publication, 0.21%
Frontiers Media S.A.
Frontiers Media S.A., 1, 0.21%
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 publication, 0.21%
Pleiades Publishing
Pleiades Publishing, 1, 0.21%
Pleiades Publishing
1 publication, 0.21%
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS), 1, 0.21%
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
1 publication, 0.21%
Chinese Physical Society
Chinese Physical Society, 1, 0.21%
Chinese Physical Society
1 publication, 0.21%
Hindawi Limited
Hindawi Limited, 1, 0.21%
Hindawi Limited
1 publication, 0.21%
Optical Society of India
Optical Society of India, 1, 0.21%
Optical Society of India
1 publication, 0.21%
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
  • We do not take into account publications that without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Paier J. et al. Why does the B3LYP hybrid functional fail for metals? // Journal of Chemical Physics. 2007. Vol. 127. No. 2. p. 24103.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Paier J., Marsman M., Kresse G. Why does the B3LYP hybrid functional fail for metals? // Journal of Chemical Physics. 2007. Vol. 127. No. 2. p. 24103.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1063/1.2747249
UR - https://doi.org/10.1063%2F1.2747249
TI - Why does the B3LYP hybrid functional fail for metals?
T2 - Journal of Chemical Physics
AU - Paier, Joachim
AU - Marsman, Martijn
AU - Kresse, Georg
PY - 2007
DA - 2007/07/10 00:00:00
PB - American Institute of Physics (AIP)
SP - 24103
IS - 2
VL - 127
SN - 0021-9606
SN - 1089-7690
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex Copy
@article{2007_Paier,
author = {Joachim Paier and Martijn Marsman and Georg Kresse},
title = {Why does the B3LYP hybrid functional fail for metals?},
journal = {Journal of Chemical Physics},
year = {2007},
volume = {127},
publisher = {American Institute of Physics (AIP)},
month = {jul},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1063%2F1.2747249},
number = {2},
pages = {24103},
doi = {10.1063/1.2747249}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Paier, Joachim, et al. “Why does the B3LYP hybrid functional fail for metals?.” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 127, no. 2, Jul. 2007, p. 24103. https://doi.org/10.1063%2F1.2747249.
Found error?