Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, volume 73, issue 12, pages 1653-1660

Evidence for the Domains Supporting the Construct of Intrinsic Capacity

Matteo Cesari 1, 2, 3, 4
Islene Araujo de Carvalho 5
Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan 5
C. B. Cooper 6
Finbarr C. Martin 7
Jean-Yves Reginster 8
Bruno Vellas 1, 2
J Beard 5
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2018-02-02
scimago Q1
SJR1.285
CiteScore10.0
Impact factor4.3
ISSN10795006, 1758535X
Geriatrics and Gerontology
Aging
Abstract
Healthy ageing can be defined as "the process of developing and maintaining the functional ability that enables wellbeing in older age". Functional ability (i.e., the health-related attributes that enable people to be and to do what they have reason to value) is determined by intrinsic capacity (i.e., the composite of all the physical and mental capacities of an individual), the environment (i.e., all the factors in the extrinsic world that form the context of an individual's life), and the interactions between the two. This innovative model recently proposed by the World Health Organization has the potential to substantially modify the way in which clinical practice is currently conducted, shifting from disease-centered toward function-centered paradigms. By overcoming the multiple limitations affecting the construct of disease, this novel framework may allow the worldwide dissemination of a more proactive and function-based approach toward achieving optimal health status. In order to facilitate the translation of the current theoretical model into practice, it is important to identify the inner nature of its constituting constructs. In this article, we consider intrinsic capacity. Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework as background and taking into account available evidence, five domains (i.e., locomotion, vitality, cognition, psychological, sensory) are identified as pivotal for capturing the individual's intrinsic capacity (and therefore also reserves) and, through this, pave the way for its objective measurement.

Top-30

Journals

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40

Publishers

20
40
60
80
100
120
20
40
60
80
100
120
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?