International Journal for Quality in Health Care, volume 19, issue 6, pages 349-357

Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups

Allison Tong 1, 2
Peter Sainsbury 2, 3
Jonathan Craig 1, 2
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2007-09-16
scimago Q2
SJR0.800
CiteScore4.9
Impact factor2.7
ISSN13534505, 14643677
General Medicine
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Health Policy
Abstract
Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design.To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies (in depth interviews and focus groups).We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane and Campbell Protocols, Medline, CINAHL, systematic reviews of qualitative studies, author or reviewer guidelines of major medical journals and reference lists of relevant publications for existing checklists used to assess qualitative studies. Seventy-six items from 22 checklists were compiled into a comprehensive list. All items were grouped into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Duplicate items and those that were ambiguous, too broadly defined and impractical to assess were removed.Items most frequently included in the checklists related to sampling method, setting for data collection, method of data collection, respondent validation of findings, method of recording data, description of the derivation of themes and inclusion of supporting quotations. We grouped all items into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting.The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000

Publishers

500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?