International Journal for Quality in Health Care, volume 19, issue 6, pages 349-357
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups
Allison Tong
1, 2
,
Peter Sainsbury
2, 3
,
Jonathan Craig
1, 2
3
Population Health, Sydney South West Area Health Service, NSW 2170, Australia
|
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2007-09-16
scimago Q2
SJR: 0.800
CiteScore: 4.9
Impact factor: 2.7
ISSN: 13534505, 14643677
PubMed ID:
17872937
General Medicine
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Health Policy
Abstract
Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design.To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies (in depth interviews and focus groups).We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane and Campbell Protocols, Medline, CINAHL, systematic reviews of qualitative studies, author or reviewer guidelines of major medical journals and reference lists of relevant publications for existing checklists used to assess qualitative studies. Seventy-six items from 22 checklists were compiled into a comprehensive list. All items were grouped into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Duplicate items and those that were ambiguous, too broadly defined and impractical to assess were removed.Items most frequently included in the checklists related to sampling method, setting for data collection, method of data collection, respondent validation of findings, method of recording data, description of the derivation of themes and inclusion of supporting quotations. We grouped all items into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting.The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.
Found
Found
Top-30
Journals
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
|
PLoS ONE
921 publications, 3.82%
|
|
BMJ Open
854 publications, 3.54%
|
|
BMC Health Services Research
568 publications, 2.35%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
536 publications, 2.22%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Nursing
515 publications, 2.13%
|
|
BMC Public Health
337 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Journal of Advanced Nursing
314 publications, 1.3%
|
|
Disability and Rehabilitation
280 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Healthcare
194 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Health Expectations
190 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
190 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Revista brasileira de enfermagem
188 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Supportive Care in Cancer
179 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Nursing Open
175 publications, 0.72%
|
|
BMC Nursing
173 publications, 0.72%
|
|
BMC Medical Education
151 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Palliative Medicine
146 publications, 0.6%
|
|
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
141 publications, 0.58%
|
|
BMC Palliative Care
134 publications, 0.56%
|
|
BMC Geriatrics
132 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Journal of Medical Internet Research
131 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Nurse Education Today
112 publications, 0.46%
|
|
JMIR Formative Research
111 publications, 0.46%
|
|
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
108 publications, 0.45%
|
|
BMC Primary Care
104 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Patient Education and Counseling
104 publications, 0.43%
|
|
BMC Psychiatry
98 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Journal of Nursing Management
96 publications, 0.4%
|
|
European Journal of Oncology Nursing
92 publications, 0.38%
|
|
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
Publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
|
|
Springer Nature
4712 publications, 19.52%
|
|
Wiley
3617 publications, 14.98%
|
|
Elsevier
3311 publications, 13.72%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1916 publications, 7.94%
|
|
SAGE
1626 publications, 6.74%
|
|
MDPI
1258 publications, 5.21%
|
|
BMJ
1155 publications, 4.78%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1046 publications, 4.33%
|
|
JMIR Publications
788 publications, 3.26%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
628 publications, 2.6%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
499 publications, 2.07%
|
|
Oxford University Press
447 publications, 1.85%
|
|
SciELO
262 publications, 1.09%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
234 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
177 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Associacao Brasileira de Enfermagem
144 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
132 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Emerald
120 publications, 0.5%
|
|
F1000 Research
117 publications, 0.48%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
86 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
86 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
71 publications, 0.29%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
64 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
61 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
51 publications, 0.21%
|
|
American Speech Language Hearing Association
51 publications, 0.21%
|
|
CMA Impact Inc.
46 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Royal College of General Practitioners
39 publications, 0.16%
|
|
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
34 publications, 0.14%
|
|
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Tong A. et al. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups // International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2007. Vol. 19. No. 6. pp. 349-357.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Tong A., Sainsbury P., Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups // International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2007. Vol. 19. No. 6. pp. 349-357.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
TI - Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups
T2 - International Journal for Quality in Health Care
AU - Tong, Allison
AU - Sainsbury, Peter
AU - Craig, Jonathan
PY - 2007
DA - 2007/09/16
PB - Oxford University Press
SP - 349-357
IS - 6
VL - 19
PMID - 17872937
SN - 1353-4505
SN - 1464-3677
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2007_Tong,
author = {Allison Tong and Peter Sainsbury and Jonathan Craig},
title = {Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups},
journal = {International Journal for Quality in Health Care},
year = {2007},
volume = {19},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
month = {sep},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042},
number = {6},
pages = {349--357},
doi = {10.1093/intqhc/mzm042}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Tong, Allison, et al. “Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.” International Journal for Quality in Health Care, vol. 19, no. 6, Sep. 2007, pp. 349-357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
Found error?
Found error?
Publisher
scimago Q2
SJR
0.800
CiteScore
4.9
Impact factor
2.7
ISSN
13534505
(Print)
14643677
(Electronic)