Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q4
Impact factor
2
SJR
0.637
CiteScore
2.7
Categories
Medicine (miscellaneous)
Health Informatics
Areas
Medicine
Years of issue
2017-2025
journal names
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR FORM RES
Top-3 citing journals

JMIR Formative Research
(840 citations)

Journal of Medical Internet Research
(764 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Harvard University
(69 publications)

University of Washington
(57 publications)

University of Toronto
(53 publications)

Harvard University
(67 publications)

University of Washington
(54 publications)

University of Toronto
(49 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 3680
Q1

Biocontrol insects have stronger effects than non-biocontrol insects on plants
Stiling P., Lajeunesse M.J.
Q1
BioControl
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Developmental time, potential food sources and predatory behaviour of the invasive pest species Thrips parvispinus
Le Hesran S., Sewkaransing D., Kuoh H.E., Messelink G.J.
Abstract
Biological control of invasive thrips is a challenge in many agricultural systems, partly because of a lack of knowledge about their life cycle and interactions with their environment. Thrips parvispinus Karny (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) is an invasive species causing damage to many crops worldwide and on which our knowledge is still limited. We studied the developmental time of T. parvispinus under three different fluctuating temperature regimes, its predatory behaviour against the eggs of a phytoseiid predatory mite and the effect of different food sources on its oviposition rate. We showed that T. parvispinus adult females and L2 larvae can feed on a limited number of Amblyseius swirskii Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae) eggs and that their predatory behaviour is significantly affected by the nutritional quality of the host plant and the presence of pollen. Additionally, the oviposition rate of T. parvispinus females over six days was not positively affected by the presence of Typha angustifolia pollen, Artemia cysts or prey mites on bean leaves. Finally, we showed that the developmental time of T. parvispinus is relatively fast and comparable to that of the invasive thrips species Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Our study provides further insight into the feeding behaviour of T. parvispinus as an omnivorous pest species and its interactions with its predators. Thrips parvispinus is unlikely to have a negative effect on phytoseiid mite populations and the use of supplementary food to support predatory mites in the crop does not seem to pose a risk of significantly increasing T. parvispinus populations.
Q1

Potential of an entomopathogenic fungus from the Cladosporium cladosporioides species complex for aphid control: insights from biological parameters and bioassays
Silva C.A., Godoy L., Ahumada M.I., Carvajal M., Chorbadjian R.A.
Q1
BioControl
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Beauveria bassiana-based management of Thrips palmi in greenhouse
Mushyakhwo K., Maxwell L.A., Nai Y., Srinivasan R., Hwang S.
Thrips palmi Karny (melon thrips) damages over 200 plant species through direct feeding and vectoring tospoviruses. Excessive use of pesticides has led to melon thrips resistance development, necessitating the exploration of sustainable alternative control options. Entomopathogenic fungi (EPFs) can potentially be an effective alternative biocontrol agent to control melon thrips. In this study, the virulence of nine indigenous EPFs isolates was tested against the second instar larvae and adult melon thrips under laboratory conditions. The promising EPFs were selected and compared to commercial Beauveria bassiana A1 and imidacloprid on susceptible pepper plants infested with melon thrips under greenhouse conditions. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation was also performed. The results indicated that, out of the nine EPFs, B. bassiana-NCHU-157 (Bb-NCHU-157) caused the highest mortality in both larval (35%) and adult (98%) thrips at seven days post-inoculation, followed by Metarhizium lepidiotae-NCHU-9 (Ml-NCHU-9), which exhibited 31% larval and 81% adult mortality. Germ tube and appressorium formation were observed under the SEM after 36 h post-inoculation (hpi) for Ml-NCHU-9 and 48 hpi for Bb-NCHU-157 on adult melon thrips, respectively. While all biocontrol treatments were less effective than imidacloprid at suppressing thrips populations, both Bb-NCHU-157 and Ml-NCHU-9 were able to control the thrips population by up to 60% compared to the non-treated control under greenhouse conditions. However, there was no significant difference among Bb-NCHU-157, Ml-NCHU-9, and commercial biopesticide B. bassiana A1 treatments, highlighting the potential of these two indigenous isolates, Bb-NCHU-157 and Ml-NCHU-9, as viable biocontrol agents for melon thrips management.
Q1

Effects of clonal integration on the invasive weed Alternanthera philoxeroides and its native congener varied with plant–herbivore coevolutionary history: implications for management
Huang Z., Guo W., Tang J., Li X.
Clonal invaders can cope with herbivory via clonal integration, but how the impacts of clonal integration are affected by plant-herbivore coevolution history is still poorly understood. Alternanthera philoxeroides (Caryophyllales: Amaranthaceae) is an amphibious clonal invader. The beetle Agasicles hygrophila (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) was introduced to control A. philoxeroides, and also feeds on the native Alternanthera sessilis (Caryophyllales: Amaranthaceae) in China. We grew the apical and basal parts of A. philoxeroides and A. sessilis, connected or disconnected with the stolon, and exposed apical parts to A. hygrophila or the native beetle Cassida piperata (Coleoptera: Cassididae) that also feeds on both plants. Both beetles significantly reduced the stem length, belowground biomass and photosynthesis of both plants without clonal integration, and flea beetles had a stronger negative impact on A. philoxeroides than did tortoise beetles. The stem length, stem diameter, belowground and/or aboveground biomass and photosynthetic parameters of apical parts of plants under attack by their corresponding coevolved beetle were 27% ~ 391% higher with clonal integration compared to without. In contrast, when the two plants were attacked by the corresponding beetle without coevolution, the same parameters in either apical or basal parts were unchanged or significantly lower under clonal integration than no integration. These results indicate that artificial disrupting of clonal integration combined with biological control may suppress clonal plants like A. philoxeroides more effectively. Compared with coevolved monophagous herbivores, some oligophagous herbivores in invaded ranges might have a stronger potential to influence the clonal integration capacity of invasive aliens.
Q1

Nesidiocoris tenuis, Macrolophus pygmaeus (Hemiptera: Miridae) and (Z)-3-hexenyl propanoate induce systemic resistance against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne spp. in tomatoes
Fullana A.M., Giné A., Urbaneja A., Pérez-Hedo M., Sorribas F.J., Expósito A.
Abstract
The management of Meloidogyne spp. in tomato crops presents significant challenges for sustainable agriculture. This study evaluates the potential of Nesidiocoris tenuis, Macrolophus pygmaeus, and (Z)-3-hexenyl propanoate—two zoophytophagous mirid species and one of the herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs) they trigger—to induce systemic resistance against Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica in tomato plants (cv. Bodar). To this end, we assess the expression of the PIN2 and PR1 genes, related to the jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA) pathways, respectively. Exposure of tomato plants to 15 nymphs of either N. tenuis or M. pygmaeus for 24 or 48 h, and to (Z)-3-hexenyl propanoate for 24 h, before inoculation with 200 second-stage juveniles of the nematodes significantly reduced nematode infectivity and reproduction. Notably, PIN2 gene expression in leaves was upregulated nine- and 14-fold by N. tenuis and M. pygmaeus, respectively, zero days after nematode inoculation (DANI) and was repressed by the nematode seven DANI with a nine-fold decrease, but not when the plants were exposed to M. pygmaeus or N. tenuis, indicating a strong early defense response. However, PR1 expression levels showed no significant changes, suggesting a predominant role of the JA pathway over the SA pathway in the induced resistance. We conclude that induction of systemic resistance in tomato plants by N. tenuis, M. pygmaeus, and (Z)-3-hexenyl propanoate before nematode exposure is a promising strategy for nematode management, at least to suppress nematode infection by the primary inoculum and later reproduction.
Q1

Benefits of mixed diets for predatory ladybirds: meta-analysis of laboratory experiments
Reznik S.Y.
The development of cost-effective methods for laboratory and mass rearing of biological control agents necessarily includes the selection of the optimal diet. Experiments with some predatory coccinellids revealed so-called ‘additive effects’: feeding on mixed foods ensures lower mortality, faster larval development and adult maturation, higher fecundity, etc., than feeding on each of the components. These effects were demonstrated for eight of the 11 studied species (although not for all used combinations of foods). Meta-analysis shows that significant additive effect was found in 29.3% of 140 cases resulted from experiments with 11 species of predatory Coccinellidae performed in 21 published studies. However, if (1) one of the two mixed foods was artificial or factitious or if (2) one of the two mixed foods (that of higher quality) was limitedly provided, or if (3) the beneficial effect of mixed foods was estimated by fecundity, rate of maturation, or other indicators of reproductive activity, the probability of detection of a beneficial additive effect increased up to about 50%. These results could be used for the planning of further studies on the selection of optimal diets for laboratory and mass rearing of predatory ladybirds. In particular, a combination of a limited supply of an expensive high quality food with unlimited cheap low quality food could be the most promising and cost-effective approach.
Q1

Thrips biological control agent shows greater niche overlap with invasive alligatorweed than conventional agent in current and future climate scenarios
Schmid S.A., Sánchez-Restrepo A.F., Sosa A.J., Turnage G., Ervin G.N.
Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. (Amaranthaceae: Caryophyllales) is an aquatic invasive weed from South America with a long history of biological control. The well-studied Agasicles hygrophila Selman & Vogt, 1971 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) successfully controls A. philoxeroides in some parts of its invaded range, but is unsuitable in other areas due to its intolerance to cold temperatures. Amynothrips andersoni O’Neill, 1968 (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae) has shown greater tolerance to cold temperatures, but no research has been conducted to determine its ecological niche with respect to A. philoxeroides. The aim of this study is to predict the environmental niches of A. andersoni and A. hygrophila and their overlap with that of A. philoxeroides in the North and South America under current and future climate scenarios. Accordingly, niche models were constructed in MaxEnt for all three species using environmental variables from the current climate and under two future climate scenarios (SSP1-2.6 and SSP5-8.5) for the year 2040. The niche overlap between the two biological control agents and the host were estimated for all three scenarios. Under both future climate scenarios, the total niche of A. philoxeroides is predicted to decrease by up to 10% whereas niche area is expected to increase by up to 10% for A. andersoni and A. hygrophila. Amynothrips andersoni had a greater niche overlap with A. philoxeroides than did A. hygrophila under all three scenarios, suggesting it is currently more widely suitable for A. philoxeroides biological control and should continue to be in 2040.
Q1

Recent advances in experimental design of synthetic microbial communities for biocontrol application
Karmakar B., Thakuria D., Begum R.H., Joga R.J.
In recent years, synthetic microbial communities (SMC) have garnered significant attention as a promising approach to harness the collective capabilities of multiple microbial species across diverse applications, including plant disease management. Advances in omics technologies have provided deeper insights into the complex interactions between plant microbiomes and their surrounding environments. Notably, significant progress has been made in the design and engineering of SMC that exhibit synergistic interactions, demonstrating great potential in managing phytopathogens. Novel tools, such as automated design and artificial intelligence, are increasingly being integrated to enhance the precision and efficiency of SMC engineering. Given the complexity of natural and agricultural plant-associated systems, along with the multitude of variables that influence SMC performance, developing a universal rationale for engineering SMC for biocontrol application remains challenging. This review discusses the design perspective of SMC for biocontrol application, their underlying design principles, critical considerations, and current research endeavors. Additionally, it briefly contemplates the challenges and prospects of SMC application in plant disease management.
Q1

Paenibacillus polymyxa improves glutathione reductase activity and reduces Fusarium verticillioides incidence in maize grains
Marins M.S., Guimarães R.A., Figueiredo J.E., Alves T.H., de Fátima Dias Diniz G., Cota L.V., de Oliveira-Paiva C.A., Pfenning L.H.
Fusarium verticillioides (Hypocreales: Nectriaceae) infects maize, causing stalk rot disease and producing toxins that accumulate in grains. The antifungal activity of seven strains of Paenibacillus polymyxa (Bacillales: Paenibacillaceae) against F. verticillioides was evaluated in vitro using the microbiological growth media potato dextrose agar, malt extract agar, and crushed maize grains. The strain LIS03, which demonstrated the strongest antagonistic activity, was selected for further investigation based on its ability to reduce the severity of stalk rot disease and induce plant-defense enzymes in maize. In the greenhouse, seed inoculation and plant spraying (V4 phenological stage) with LIS03 prior to F. verticillioides injection in the stem were evaluated regarding the activity of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) and glutathione reductase (GR) in maize leaves. PAL activity significantly increased in plants inoculated with LIS03 at three and nine days post-inoculation (dpi). In contrast, plants simultaneously inoculated with LIS03 and the pathogen showed an increase of 82% in GR activity 12 dpi. Higher GR activity was correlated with reduced stalk rot severity at 6 dpi (r = − 0.53). In the field, the combination of seed inoculation followed by plant spraying, as well as plant spraying alone, resulted in a 33% reduction in disease severity. Only seed inoculation led to an 18.7% decrease. Although the grains did not show symptoms of fungal diseases in the field experiment, a culture-based blotter test revealed a high incidence of F. verticillioides. The blotter test also showed that grains from silks sprayed with LIS03 presented a reduction of 16% and 25% in the incidence of F. verticillioides in naturally infected and artificially inoculated plants, respectively. These results with P. polymyxa provide a promising avenue for developing biological control strategies for controlling maize diseases caused by F. verticillioides.
Q1

Effect of artificial sugar supply on ant-aphid interactions in protected horticulture
Foronda J., Rodríguez E., Soler J.J., González M., del Mar Téllez M., Robles-Vallet C., Barranco P., Ruano F.
Ants tending aphid colonies may reduce the effectiveness of aphid natural enemies, which can result in additional plant damage. However, their mutualistic interaction is complex, and depending on the quantity and quality of the sugar that aphids produce, it may change to a predator–prey interaction. This study aims to test this hypothesis by providing ants with a high-quality sugar supply with the prediction that ants with an extra sugar source should more often prey on aphids and, therefore, the abundance of aphids on plants should decrease. We carried out an experiment on pepper plants infested with Aphis gossypii Glover (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in greenhouses with naturally occurring Tapinoma ibericum Santschi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in three different periods. Results showed a significant reduction in aphid abundance and greater aphid predation by ants in plants with an artificial sugar supply. However, the expected effects varied among greenhouses and seasons. A negative effect on aphid abundance was mainly detected in autumn, whereas the largest effect on aphid predation by ants was detected in summer when lower ant activity on the plants occurred. Although our results show that artificial sugar supply changes ant behavior from tending to preying on aphids, the large variation observed indicates that other unconsidered factors influence its effectiveness. Future research should focus on understanding factors driving variations across locations and seasons. Additionally, the effect of sugar feeders and their disruption of the ant-aphid mutualism may improve the access of biological control agents to aphid colonies, which is worth testing.
Q1

The endophytic bacterium Bacillus subtilis R8 as a prospective biocontrol agent for managing tea blister blight and enhancing tea yield
Do Q.T.
Blister blight, caused by the fungus Exobasidium vexans, is a major disease affecting tea plants. This study aimed to isolate and evaluate the efficacy of endophytic bacterial strains as potential biocontrol agents against the disease. Thirteen endophytic bacterial strains were isolated from healthy tea plants collected in Thach That, Hanoi, Vietnam. Six of these strains exhibited antagonistic effects against E. vexans, with strains R8 and S2 showing the highest inhibition. Heat-treated bacterial supernatants lost their antifungal activity, indicating that the inhibitory compounds were protein-based. Strain R8, identified as Bacillus subtilis, also demonstrated plant growth-promoting traits, including the production of Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and phosphate solubilization. Greenhouse trials showed that both chemical fungicides and antagonistic bacteria significantly reduced disease incidence, with the preventative application of chemical fungicide being the most effective (control efficacy of about 91.05%), followed by preventative inoculation with antagonistic bacteria (82.77%). Additionally, treated plots yielded significantly more fresh tea shoots, with an increase of 19.02% and 21.17% for antagonistic bacteria and chemical fungicide treatments, respectively, compared to the control. These findings suggest that B. subtilis R8 holds promise as a biocontrol agent, providing both disease suppression and yield enhancement in tea cultivation.
Q1

Beauveria bassiana biocontrol with neem oil adjuvant is effective for the management of the cassava mosaic virus vector Bemisia tabaci in field trials
Wichienchote N., Jaiyen S., Wasuwan R., Seepiban C., Charoenvilaisiri S., Tanticharoen M., Amnuaykanjanasin A.
Cassava mosaic disease causes major losses of cassava crops in Southeast Asia. The disease is caused by the cassava mosaic virus, which is primarily transmitted by the tobacco whitefly (Bemisia tabaci). Chemical insecticides are widely used to control whitefly populations. However, their effectiveness is limited by environmental issues and whitefly resistance. Biocontrol agents such as entomopathogenic fungi are alternatives to chemical insecticides. We conducted two cassava field trials of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana for the control of whitefly populations. Comparison between plants treated with B. bassiana, buprofezin, or a combination of B. bassiana-buprofezin or B. bassiana-neem oil adjuvant, were tested in the same field. The whitefly adult populations were lowest in the B. bassiana/neem oil treatment group, with up to 86% reduction compared with the control six months after application. Natural enemies of insect pests were unaffected in the B. bassiana/neem oil and B. bassiana-only treatments. Our study revealed that integrated pest management using B. bassiana and neem oil was effective for controlling whiteflies and maintaining the natural balance of insects in cassava fields.
Q1

Laboratory and field studies to assess the efficacy of the predatory mite Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) recki (Acari: Phytoseiidae) introduced via banker plants to control the mite pest Aculops lycopersici (Acari: Eriophyidae) on tomato
Gard B., Bardel A., Douin M., Perrin B., Tixier M.
The predatory mites (Phytoseiidae) tested to date cannot effectively control the mite pest Aculops lycopersici (Acari: Eriophyidae) due to the unfavorable characteristics of tomato leaves and stems. However, recent studies show that the phytoseiid, Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) recki, can feed on this pest. Because T. (A.) recki is naturally present in high densities on Mentha suaveolens and Phlomis fruticosa, we performed preliminary studies using these species as banker plants in laboratory and greenhouse conditions. In laboratory conditions, we analyzed the effect of banker plants inoculated with T. (A.) recki and co-planted with tomato plants (infested or not with A. lycopersici) at two banker to tomato plants ratios. T. (A.) recki dispersed and established on tomato plants. Higher predator densities were observed on infested plants when M. suaveolens was used as a banker plant with a ratio of one banker plant to two tomato plants. In greenhouse conditions, predators were introduced on tomato plants (infested with A. lycopersici) via branches of banker plants at two densities. T. (A.) recki significantly reduced the length and intensity of stem russeting and A. lycopersici densities. The number of T. (A.) recki on tomato plants was the highest using branches of M. suaveolens at the higher densities released. These results underscore the efficacy of T. (A.) recki in controlling A. lycopersici and open new avenues for the use of M. suaveolens as a reservoir of this predator.
Q1

Effective control of insect pests through intercropping of cabbage with barley and buckwheat
Sekine T., Oe T., Komagata Y., Itabashi T.
Barley intercropping is an effective strategy for managing multiple insect pests in cabbage fields. We hypothesized that combining barley with flowering plants can increase pest suppression by enhancing parasitism and predation effects in cabbage fields. This study aimed to evaluate whether the spatial arrangements of flowering plants in a cabbage–barley intercropping system can enhance pest control. We also assessed the roles of predation by ground-dwelling predators, such as carabid beetles, and flight disruption, using Pieris rapae crucivora Boisduval (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) as the target pest. Over two years, planting flowering plants (buckwheat, lacy phacelia, and coriander) around barley-intercropped cabbage showed inconsistent pest suppression compared with those around barley intercropping alone. However, a significant increase in multiple pest suppression and parasitism by two species of parasitoid wasps was observed when cabbage was intercropped with a mixture of barley and buckwheat. This suggests that the proximity of cabbage, barley, and flowering plants plays a key role in pest control. In planter experiments, the carabid beetle Chlaenius micans (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Carabidae) was able to prey on larval P. rapae crucivora on cabbage plants. Additionally, the flight activity of P. rapae crucivora seemed to be disturbed by the intercropped barley in cabbage fields. These findings highlight the importance of both top-down and bottom-up effects in suppressing pest populations in cabbage–barley–buckwheat intercropping systems.
Top-100
Citing journals
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
|
JMIR Formative Research
840 citations, 4.94%
|
|
Journal of Medical Internet Research
764 citations, 4.5%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
290 citations, 1.71%
|
|
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
254 citations, 1.49%
|
|
Digital Health
239 citations, 1.41%
|
|
JMIR Research Protocols
211 citations, 1.24%
|
|
PLoS ONE
190 citations, 1.12%
|
|
JMIR Human Factors
186 citations, 1.09%
|
|
BMC Public Health
152 citations, 0.89%
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
144 citations, 0.85%
|
|
Healthcare
142 citations, 0.84%
|
|
BMJ Open
137 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychiatry
130 citations, 0.76%
|
|
JMIR Mental Health
127 citations, 0.75%
|
|
Frontiers in Digital Health
117 citations, 0.69%
|
|
BMC Health Services Research
113 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Scientific Reports
104 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Sensors
91 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
88 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Cureus
87 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
81 citations, 0.48%
|
|
International Journal of Medical Informatics
80 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Internet Interventions
80 citations, 0.47%
|
|
PLOS Digital Health
78 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Nutrients
71 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
71 citations, 0.42%
|
|
npj Digital Medicine
68 citations, 0.4%
|
|
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
67 citations, 0.39%
|
|
JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
65 citations, 0.38%
|
|
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
64 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
60 citations, 0.35%
|
|
JMIR Cancer
59 citations, 0.35%
|
|
AIDS and Behavior
57 citations, 0.34%
|
|
JMIR Medical Informatics
57 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
55 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Patient Education and Counseling
49 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Heliyon
49 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
48 citations, 0.28%
|
|
JMIR Aging
48 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
47 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science
46 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Trials
43 citations, 0.25%
|
|
IEEE Access
42 citations, 0.25%
|
|
BMC Psychiatry
41 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Interactive Journal of Medical Research
41 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Affective Disorders
40 citations, 0.24%
|
|
JMIR Serious Games
38 citations, 0.22%
|
|
BMC Digital Health
38 citations, 0.22%
|
|
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
35 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Communications in Computer and Information Science
34 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Sustainability
32 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Contemporary Clinical Trials
30 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
30 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Supportive Care in Cancer
29 citations, 0.17%
|
|
JAMA network open
29 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Journal of Eating Disorders
28 citations, 0.16%
|
|
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
27 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Frontiers in Medicine
26 citations, 0.15%
|
|
JAMIA Open
26 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Personalized Medicine
25 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Psychiatry Research
25 citations, 0.15%
|
|
BMC Medical Education
25 citations, 0.15%
|
|
JMIR Medical Education
25 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
23 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Behaviour and Information Technology
23 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
23 citations, 0.14%
|
|
JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
23 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Mayo Clinic Proceedings Digital Health
23 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Advances in Healthcare Information Systems and Administration
23 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Medicine (United States)
22 citations, 0.13%
|
|
PLOS Global Public Health
22 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Nicotine and Tobacco Research
21 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of General Internal Medicine
21 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Advanced Nursing
21 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Health Expectations
21 citations, 0.12%
|
|
AIDS Care - Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV
21 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Cancers
21 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Vaccines
21 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
20 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Medical Systems
20 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Current HIV/AIDS Reports
20 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Procedia Computer Science
20 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Current Psychology
20 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Cancer Medicine
20 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Translational Behavioral Medicine
20 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Children
20 citations, 0.12%
|
|
JMIR Infodemiology
20 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry
19 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
19 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Health Informatics Journal
19 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of American College Health
19 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Health Communication
19 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Current Psychiatry Reports
19 citations, 0.11%
|
|
BMC Primary Care
19 citations, 0.11%
|
|
JMIR Cardio
19 citations, 0.11%
|
|
CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing
18 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Harm Reduction Journal
18 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Preventive Medicine
18 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Appetite
18 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Addiction science & clinical practice
18 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
|
|
JMIR Publications
3801 citations, 22.37%
|
|
Springer Nature
2784 citations, 16.38%
|
|
Elsevier
2054 citations, 12.09%
|
|
MDPI
1226 citations, 7.21%
|
|
Wiley
809 citations, 4.76%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
786 citations, 4.62%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
760 citations, 4.47%
|
|
SAGE
759 citations, 4.47%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
427 citations, 2.51%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
335 citations, 1.97%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
303 citations, 1.78%
|
|
Oxford University Press
291 citations, 1.71%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
283 citations, 1.67%
|
|
BMJ
223 citations, 1.31%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
193 citations, 1.14%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
138 citations, 0.81%
|
|
IGI Global
128 citations, 0.75%
|
|
Emerald
99 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
84 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
69 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
61 citations, 0.36%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
51 citations, 0.3%
|
|
F1000 Research
41 citations, 0.24%
|
|
SciELO
38 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
36 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
30 citations, 0.18%
|
|
S. Karger AG
29 citations, 0.17%
|
|
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
24 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Medknow
23 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Annual Reviews
19 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
18 citations, 0.11%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
17 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Psychiatric Association Publishing
17 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IOS Press
16 citations, 0.09%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
16 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IntechOpen
16 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Human Kinetics
15 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
13 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
13 citations, 0.08%
|
|
IOP Publishing
11 citations, 0.06%
|
|
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
11 citations, 0.06%
|
|
10 citations, 0.06%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
10 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Royal College of Psychiatrists
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Diabetes Association
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Massachusetts Medical Society
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Scientific Scholar
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Associacao Brasileira de Enfermagem
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Speech Language Hearing Association
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society for Nutrition
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
AOSIS
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Diabetes Technology Society
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Guilford Publications
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
EDP Sciences
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
PeerJ
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The American Academy of Sleep Medicine
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Public Health Association
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Media Sphere Publishing House
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
RCNi
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
SLACK
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Journal of Graduate Medical Education
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Eco-Vector LLC
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society of Hematology
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
International Medical Informatics Association
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS)
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
OAE Publishing Inc.
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Tech Science Press
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
XMLink
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IMR Press
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Physiological Society
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Moffitt Cancer Center
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Knowledge E DMCC
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
PANORAMA Publishing House
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japan Society for Occupational Health
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
AMO Publisher
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
King Saud University
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Royal Society
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO)
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
Harvard University
69 publications, 2.02%
|
|
University of Washington
57 publications, 1.67%
|
|
University of Toronto
53 publications, 1.55%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
49 publications, 1.43%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
48 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Stanford University
44 publications, 1.29%
|
|
University of Michigan
44 publications, 1.29%
|
|
New York University
37 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
37 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Northwestern University
36 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of British Columbia
36 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Sydney
34 publications, 0.99%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
32 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Yale University
31 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
31 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University College London
29 publications, 0.85%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
29 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Duke University
27 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Emory University
27 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Boston University
26 publications, 0.76%
|
|
University of Melbourne
25 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
25 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Oxford
24 publications, 0.7%
|
|
King's College London
24 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Twente
22 publications, 0.64%
|
|
University of Cambridge
22 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Brown University
22 publications, 0.64%
|
|
University of Alberta
22 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
20 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Southern California
20 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
20 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Leiden University Medical Center
20 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
20 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
20 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Oslo
19 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Columbia University
19 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
19 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
19 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
19 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
19 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
18 publications, 0.53%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
18 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Imperial College London
17 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Oslo University Hospital
17 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Maastricht University
17 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Ohio State University
17 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of South Florida
17 publications, 0.5%
|
|
McGill University
17 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Auckland
16 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
16 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Dartmouth College
16 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
16 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Florida
16 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Utah
16 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
15 publications, 0.44%
|
|
National University of Singapore
15 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Michigan State University
15 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Dalhousie University
15 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Arizona
15 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Ottawa
15 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Medical University of South Carolina
15 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
14 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
14 publications, 0.41%
|
|
George Washington University
14 publications, 0.41%
|
|
McMaster University
14 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
14 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Uppsala University
13 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of New South Wales
13 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
13 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
13 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
13 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Florida State University
13 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Queensland
13 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Tufts University
13 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Chicago
13 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Minnesota
13 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University Medical Center Utrecht
13 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Tilburg University
13 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Rochester
13 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
13 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
13 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
12 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Monash University
12 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Arizona State University
12 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Calgary
12 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Rochester Medical Center
12 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Université de Montréal
12 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
11 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Manchester
11 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Birmingham
11 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Deakin University
11 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of California, Davis
11 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Bristol
11 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Baylor College of Medicine
11 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
11 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Waterloo
11 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Tokyo
11 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
11 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Kentucky
11 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Connecticut
11 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
Harvard University
67 publications, 2.06%
|
|
University of Washington
54 publications, 1.66%
|
|
University of Toronto
49 publications, 1.51%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
46 publications, 1.42%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
45 publications, 1.39%
|
|
Stanford University
42 publications, 1.29%
|
|
University of Michigan
40 publications, 1.23%
|
|
New York University
35 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
35 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of British Columbia
34 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Northwestern University
32 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Yale University
31 publications, 0.96%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
31 publications, 0.96%
|
|
University of Sydney
29 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
28 publications, 0.86%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
27 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University College London
26 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Emory University
26 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Duke University
25 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
25 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Boston University
23 publications, 0.71%
|
|
King's College London
22 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Alberta
22 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Oxford
21 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Melbourne
21 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Brown University
21 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Twente
20 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Cambridge
20 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
19 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
19 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
19 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Southern California
18 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Columbia University
18 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
18 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
18 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Imperial College London
17 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
17 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
17 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Leiden University Medical Center
17 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
16 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Ohio State University
16 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of South Florida
16 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
16 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
16 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
16 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Oslo
15 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Dartmouth College
15 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Ottawa
15 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Medical University of South Carolina
15 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Maastricht University
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
National University of Singapore
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
McGill University
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Utah
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Uppsala University
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of New South Wales
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Michigan State University
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Dalhousie University
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Tufts University
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Arizona
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Chicago
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Florida
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Rochester
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Florida State University
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
George Washington University
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Tilburg University
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Calgary
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Rochester Medical Center
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Manchester
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Auckland
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Monash University
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Queensland
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Arizona State University
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Bristol
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
McMaster University
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Tokyo
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Connecticut
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Oslo University Hospital
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Cornell University
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Birmingham
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
New York University Langone Health
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Boston Children's Hospital
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of California, Davis
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Baylor College of Medicine
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Minnesota
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Université de Montréal
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Virginia
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
|
USA
|
USA, 559, 16.34%
USA
559 publications, 16.34%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 108, 3.16%
United Kingdom
108 publications, 3.16%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 103, 3.01%
Canada
103 publications, 3.01%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 81, 2.37%
Netherlands
81 publications, 2.37%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 72, 2.1%
Australia
72 publications, 2.1%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 47, 1.37%
Germany
47 publications, 1.37%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 38, 1.11%
Norway
38 publications, 1.11%
|
China
|
China, 34, 0.99%
China
34 publications, 0.99%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 31, 0.91%
Sweden
31 publications, 0.91%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 28, 0.82%
Japan
28 publications, 0.82%
|
France
|
France, 24, 0.7%
France
24 publications, 0.7%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 24, 0.7%
Denmark
24 publications, 0.7%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 21, 0.61%
Switzerland
21 publications, 0.61%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 17, 0.5%
Italy
17 publications, 0.5%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 14, 0.41%
Belgium
14 publications, 0.41%
|
India
|
India, 14, 0.41%
India
14 publications, 0.41%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 14, 0.41%
Spain
14 publications, 0.41%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 14, 0.41%
Singapore
14 publications, 0.41%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 13, 0.38%
New Zealand
13 publications, 0.38%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 12, 0.35%
Saudi Arabia
12 publications, 0.35%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 12, 0.35%
South Africa
12 publications, 0.35%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 11, 0.32%
Ireland
11 publications, 0.32%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 10, 0.29%
Israel
10 publications, 0.29%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 10, 0.29%
Finland
10 publications, 0.29%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 7, 0.2%
Brazil
7 publications, 0.2%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 7, 0.2%
Malaysia
7 publications, 0.2%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 7, 0.2%
Tanzania
7 publications, 0.2%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 7, 0.2%
Uganda
7 publications, 0.2%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 6, 0.18%
Nigeria
6 publications, 0.18%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 6, 0.18%
Thailand
6 publications, 0.18%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 5, 0.15%
Bangladesh
5 publications, 0.15%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 5, 0.15%
Greece
5 publications, 0.15%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 5, 0.15%
UAE
5 publications, 0.15%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 5, 0.15%
Republic of Korea
5 publications, 0.15%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 4, 0.12%
Portugal
4 publications, 0.12%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 4, 0.12%
Iran
4 publications, 0.12%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 4, 0.12%
Tunisia
4 publications, 0.12%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 4, 0.12%
Turkey
4 publications, 0.12%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 3, 0.09%
Argentina
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 3, 0.09%
Vietnam
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 3, 0.09%
Iceland
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 3, 0.09%
Qatar
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 3, 0.09%
Luxembourg
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 3, 0.09%
Philippines
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 3, 0.09%
Ethiopia
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 0.06%
Austria
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 2, 0.06%
Indonesia
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 2, 0.06%
Jordan
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 2, 0.06%
Kenya
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 2, 0.06%
Colombia
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 2, 0.06%
Malta
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 2, 0.06%
Mexico
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Palestine
|
Palestine, 2, 0.06%
Palestine
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 2, 0.06%
Poland
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Sierra Leone
|
Sierra Leone, 2, 0.06%
Sierra Leone
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.03%
Russia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Albania
|
Albania, 1, 0.03%
Albania
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 1, 0.03%
Bahrain
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 1, 0.03%
Egypt
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 1, 0.03%
Zambia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 1, 0.03%
Cameroon
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.03%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.03%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 0.03%
Latvia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 1, 0.03%
Malawi
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.03%
Peru
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.03%
Romania
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Suriname
|
Suriname, 1, 0.03%
Suriname
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.03%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.03%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.03%
Chile
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.03%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Kosovo
|
Kosovo, 1, 0.03%
Kosovo
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Show all (43 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
|
USA
|
USA, 472, 14.55%
USA
472 publications, 14.55%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 89, 2.74%
United Kingdom
89 publications, 2.74%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 87, 2.68%
Canada
87 publications, 2.68%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 63, 1.94%
Netherlands
63 publications, 1.94%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 57, 1.76%
Australia
57 publications, 1.76%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 40, 1.23%
Germany
40 publications, 1.23%
|
China
|
China, 30, 0.92%
China
30 publications, 0.92%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 29, 0.89%
Sweden
29 publications, 0.89%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 26, 0.8%
Norway
26 publications, 0.8%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 25, 0.77%
Japan
25 publications, 0.77%
|
France
|
France, 20, 0.62%
France
20 publications, 0.62%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 19, 0.59%
Switzerland
19 publications, 0.59%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 15, 0.46%
Denmark
15 publications, 0.46%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 14, 0.43%
Italy
14 publications, 0.43%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 13, 0.4%
Belgium
13 publications, 0.4%
|
India
|
India, 13, 0.4%
India
13 publications, 0.4%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 11, 0.34%
Spain
11 publications, 0.34%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 11, 0.34%
Saudi Arabia
11 publications, 0.34%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 11, 0.34%
Singapore
11 publications, 0.34%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 11, 0.34%
South Africa
11 publications, 0.34%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 10, 0.31%
Ireland
10 publications, 0.31%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 9, 0.28%
Israel
9 publications, 0.28%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 9, 0.28%
Finland
9 publications, 0.28%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 8, 0.25%
New Zealand
8 publications, 0.25%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 7, 0.22%
Malaysia
7 publications, 0.22%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 6, 0.18%
Brazil
6 publications, 0.18%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 6, 0.18%
Nigeria
6 publications, 0.18%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 6, 0.18%
Thailand
6 publications, 0.18%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 5, 0.15%
UAE
5 publications, 0.15%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 5, 0.15%
Republic of Korea
5 publications, 0.15%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 5, 0.15%
Tanzania
5 publications, 0.15%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 5, 0.15%
Uganda
5 publications, 0.15%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 4, 0.12%
Bangladesh
4 publications, 0.12%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 4, 0.12%
Iran
4 publications, 0.12%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 4, 0.12%
Tunisia
4 publications, 0.12%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 4, 0.12%
Turkey
4 publications, 0.12%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 3, 0.09%
Portugal
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 3, 0.09%
Vietnam
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 3, 0.09%
Greece
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 3, 0.09%
Iceland
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 2, 0.06%
Argentina
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 2, 0.06%
Indonesia
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 2, 0.06%
Jordan
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 2, 0.06%
Qatar
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 2, 0.06%
Kenya
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 2, 0.06%
Colombia
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 2, 0.06%
Luxembourg
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 2, 0.06%
Malta
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 2, 0.06%
Mexico
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Palestine
|
Palestine, 2, 0.06%
Palestine
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 2, 0.06%
Poland
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Sierra Leone
|
Sierra Leone, 2, 0.06%
Sierra Leone
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 2, 0.06%
Ethiopia
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.03%
Russia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 0.03%
Austria
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Albania
|
Albania, 1, 0.03%
Albania
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 1, 0.03%
Bahrain
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 1, 0.03%
Egypt
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 1, 0.03%
Zambia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 1, 0.03%
Cameroon
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.03%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 0.03%
Latvia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 1, 0.03%
Malawi
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.03%
Peru
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.03%
Romania
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Suriname
|
Suriname, 1, 0.03%
Suriname
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.03%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.03%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.03%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Kosovo
|
Kosovo, 1, 0.03%
Kosovo
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Show all (40 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
3 profile journal articles
Wyka Katarzyna
20 publications,
178 citations
h-index: 8
2 profile journal articles
Bird Victoria
79 publications,
1 135 citations
h-index: 18
1 profile journal article
Buckingham Sarah
29 publications,
421 citations
h-index: 10
1 profile journal article
Rouyard Thomas
14 publications,
109 citations
h-index: 6
1 profile journal article
Wittich Walter
184 publications,
2 333 citations
h-index: 23
1 profile journal article
Oliphant Catherine
1 publication,
4 citations
h-index: 1
1 profile journal article
YAVUZ INAL
23 publications,
181 citations
h-index: 7