Ways to be Blameworthy

Mason E.
Publication typeBook
Publication date2019-02-28
Abstract

This book examines the relationship between our deontic notions, rightness and wrongness, and our responsibility notions, praise- and blameworthiness. The book presents a pluralistic view of both our deontic concepts and our responsibility concepts, identifying three different ways to be blameworthy. First, ordinary blameworthiness is essentially connected to subjective rightness and wrongness. Subjective obligation and ordinary blameworthiness apply only to those who are within our moral community, that is to say, those who understand and share our value system. By contrast, the second sort of blameworthiness, detached blameworthiness, can apply even when the agent is outside our moral community, and has no sense that her act is morally wrong. We blame agents for acting objectively wrongly, even if we do not have any view about their state of mind in so doing. Finally, the third sort of blameworthiness is ‘extended blameworthiness’, which applies in some contexts where the agent has acted wrongly, and understands the wrongness, but has acted wrongly entirely inadvertently. In such cases the agent is not personally at fault but the social context may be such that she should take responsibility, and thus become blameworthy.

Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
Philosophical Studies
4 publications, 4.44%
European Journal of Philosophy
4 publications, 4.44%
Criminal Law and Philosophy
3 publications, 3.33%
The Monist
2 publications, 2.22%
Public Affairs Quarterly
2 publications, 2.22%
Philosophical Psychology
2 publications, 2.22%
Utilitas
2 publications, 2.22%
Business and Information Systems Engineering
1 publication, 1.11%
Southern Journal of Philosophy
1 publication, 1.11%
Philosophy Compass
1 publication, 1.11%
Mind
1 publication, 1.11%
Hypatia
1 publication, 1.11%
Moral Philosophy and Politics
1 publication, 1.11%
Science and Engineering Ethics
1 publication, 1.11%
Nous-Supplement: Philosophical Issues
1 publication, 1.11%
Open Mind
1 publication, 1.11%
Ethics and Information Technology
1 publication, 1.11%
Nous-Supplement: Philosophical Perspectives
1 publication, 1.11%
Australasian Journal of Philosophy
1 publication, 1.11%
Journal of Medical Ethics
1 publication, 1.11%
1
2
3
4

Publishers

10
20
30
40
50
60
Oxford University Press
59 publications, 65.56%
Springer Nature
12 publications, 13.33%
Wiley
8 publications, 8.89%
Cambridge University Press
3 publications, 3.33%
Taylor & Francis
3 publications, 3.33%
University of Illinois Press
2 publications, 2.22%
Walter de Gruyter
1 publication, 1.11%
MIT Press
1 publication, 1.11%
BMJ
1 publication, 1.11%
10
20
30
40
50
60
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
90
Share