Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
Impact factor
0.6
SJR
0.485
CiteScore
0.8
Categories
Philosophy
Areas
Arts and Humanities
Years of issue
2011-2024
journal names
Nous-Supplement: Philosophical Issues
Philosophical Issues
PHILOS ISSUES
Top-3 citing journals

Synthese
(806 citations)

Philosophical Studies
(650 citations)

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
(305 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
(19 publications)

University of Arizona
(13 publications)

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
(13 publications)

University of Glasgow
(6 publications)

University of Johannesburg
(4 publications)

University of Oxford
(4 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 707
Q2

Production and Characterization of Regenerated Cellulose Fiber Derived From Herbaceous Plants (Poaceae) With Ionic Liquids
Kashimoto A., Yagi S., Wataoka I., Okahisa Y.
ABSTRACTIn many countries around the world, weed infestations poses a significant obstacle to agricultural production and economic activity. However, these weeds are only considered for extermination, and their vast biomass is not utilized effectively. In this study, we attempted to convert weeds into regenerated cellulose fibers for high‐added value and effective use. Cellulose pulp obtained from herbaceous plants (Poaceae) of Andropogon virginicus and Miscanthus sinensis was dissolved in an ionic liquid (1‐butyl‐3‐methylimidazolium chloride) to regenerate cellulose fibers. The properties and morphology of the regenerated cellulose fibers were evaluated, and the structure of the cellulose pulp obtained as an intermediate product was analyzed. The different extraction rates of these weeds resulted in differences in the degree of polymerization of the cellulose pulp. However, the regenerated cellulose fibers were successfully spun in both species. As the speed increased, the regenerated cellulose fibers became smoother, the fiber diameter decreased, and their mechanical properties improved. The regenerated celluloses fiber obtained from M. sinensis were comparable to rayon, an existing cellulose fiber, and exhibited similar values of fiber strength and modulus. These results indicated that the production of regenerated cellulose fibers from unused weeds was effective. This study demonstrates the potential of this materials as a new raw material.
Q2

Integrated Control of Verbesina encelioides in Common Bean Fields in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia
Fufa A., Tessema T., Bekeko Z., Mesfin T.
ABSTRACTVerbesina encelioides is known to threaten the performance of crops like common bean in central rift valley of Ethiopia. A field experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of management on V. encelioides and common bean yield components and yield at Adamitulu and Melkassa. A randomized complete block design with four replications and twelve treatments was applied. Treatments included pre and postemergence herbicides (s‐metolachlor, pendimethalin, and sodium acifluorfen + clodinafop propargyl) and hand weeding. The density and biomass of V. encelioides were reduced by up to 94% and 81%, respectively, due to integrated control treatments. Beside the weed‐free plot, the use of s‐metolachlor plus hand weeding and pendimethalin plus hand weeding produced the lowest (3%–10%) weed index. Whereas these integrated controls gave the highest (74%–81%) weed control efficiency. Weed‐free plots yielded the highest grain (3.11 and 2.71 t/ha), followed by s‐metolachlor with two hand weedings (3.00 and 2.63 t/ha), while weedy check (0.49 and 0.45 t/ha) and sole pendimethalin 1.5 l/ha (1.28 and 1.12 t/ha) produced the least grain yield at Melkassa and Adamitulu, respectively. The use of s‐metolachlor plus one‐hand weeding, followed by two‐hand weeding, produced a maximum benefit‐cost ratio of 28.41 and 26.95 and an acceptable maximum marginal rate of return of 5689.06 and 5057.27 ETB, respectively. Thus, it is recommended that smetolachlor be used with one‐hand weeding followed by two‐hand weeding or sodium acifluorfen + clodinafop propargyl at 1 l/ha to achieve effective control, higher yield, and economic benefit in common bean production systems.
Q2

Implementation of Conventional and Smart Weed Management Strategies in Sustainable Agricultural Production
Xuan T.D., Khanh T.D., Minh T.T.
ABSTRACTConventional weed management is known for the use of selective herbicides, tackling issues of herbicide‐resistant weeds, and endeavors to reduce reliance on herbicides, such as employing biological control of weeds and incorporating allelopathy. These strategies are integrated with traditional and other conventional weed management techniques. New challenges in agricultural production, such as declining population involved in agriculture, global warming, and climate changes make conventional weed management inadequate. Rapid advancements over the past decade in artificial intelligence (AI), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), cameras, and sensors, necessitate the development and implementation of smart weed management (SWM) approaches for the 21st century. Wise weed management practices can control weeds and reduce emissions of methane (CH4), carbon dioxide (CO2), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Minimizing the use of herbicides in tandem with the application of smart technologies, like weed mapping and identifying spatial variability of weeds using proximal and remote sensors, multispectral and RGB cameras, can effectively manage weeds while also reducing labor costs. The SWM strategies also encompass the integrated use of organic herbicides, bioherbicidal products, and the judicious application of both organic fertilizers and inorganic fertilizers for weed management. Some approaches, such as alternate wetting and drying (AWD), can contribute to both SWM and carbon credits to farmers. The utilization of computing power, weed control robotics, and big data, combined with the education of the next generation of weed scientists and efforts to shift growers' attitudes and behaviors in weed management, may vary among countries. It requires active collaboration between agricultural extensionists and policymakers.
Q2

Volume Contents
Q2
Weed Biology and Management
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

Guest reviewers
Q2
Weed Biology and Management
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

Keyword Index
Q2
Weed Biology and Management
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

Author Index
Q2
Weed Biology and Management
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

Effect of vermicompost, intercropping, and seedbed types on Striga hermonthica infestation and sorghum production in East Hararghe, Ethiopia
Ebbisa A.F., Dechassa N., Bekeko Z., Liben F.
AbstractStriga hermonthica is the most devastating parasitic weed affecting the productivity of cereal crops in Sub‐Saharan Africa. The key challenge for controlling this weed is identifying the optimal management strategies that simultaneously reduce Striga infection while boosting crop productivity. This study aimed to evaluate the potential role of intercropping, vermicompost, and seedbed types on the level of S. hermonthica infestation and sorghum productivity in 2021 and 2022 years. The treatments consisted of three factors: (i) three sowing methods (sole‐cropped sorghum (SS), intercropped sorghum with Babile‐1 (SB1), and Babile‐2 (SB2) groundnut varieties); (ii) four levels of vermicompost (0, 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5 t/ha); and (iii) two seedbed types (open‐furrow and tied‐ridge). The results indicated that pure‐stand sorghum in open‐furrow planting without fertilizer had the tallest height (60 cm), the heaviest dry weight (39 g) as well as the highest Area under Striga Number Progress Curve (ASNPC) (>1200) in the first year with substantial reduction in successive year. The combination of 4.5 t/ha vermicompost, tied‐ridge, and groundnut intercropping gave the maximum sorghum panicle weight (151 g/plant), stover yield (14.21 t/ha), and grain yield (6.01 t/ha) in the year 2022. The greatest grain yield observed at 4.5 t/ha vermicompost under tied‐ridge with SB2 was nearly three times higher than the plot without vermicompost application. This treatment combination significantly suppresses S. hermonthica infestation while improving sorghum yield attributes. Thus, it could reduce food insecurity in the lowlands of Ethiopia via improving sorghum productivity, resources use efficiency, and soil health.
Q2

Effects of burial in soil on seed longevity and germinability of the winter annual weed wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum)
Nozarpour E., Edalat M., Soltani E., Baskin C.C., Baskin J.M., Kazemeini S.A.
AbstractHordeum spontaneum is a winter annual weed that reduces crop yields in Iran. The aim of this study was to quantitatively analyze the effects of burial on seed longevity and germinability and of water potential and temperature on germination. Seeds were placed in nylon‐mesh bags and buried in soil in a semi‐arid region on 1 July 2018 and exposed to natural temperature regimes. After 2 months of burial, seed viability started to decline with a slope of 0.0169%, and after 9 months all seeds were nonviable. Fresh seeds were dormant, but became non‐dormant during summer via dry after‐ripening. Thus, by late autumn (December) the seeds germinated to 100% in dark at 5 and 15°C. The base, optimum, and ceiling temperatures were 0.27, 17.5, and 25°C, respectively, at a water potential of 0 MPa. The hydrotime constant was 50.6–426.9 MPa h, base water potential −1.23 to −0.333 MPa and hydrothermal constant 1350.5 MPa °C h. These results can be used to predict timing and extent of weed emergence of H. spontaneum in crops and in planning for sustainable management strategies.
Q2

Resistance profile study of SU‐resistant Sagittaria trifolia in a comparison of seedlings and tuber‐derived plants
Ohta K., Sada Y.
AbstractSagittaria trifolia, a perennial weed of Alismataceae in Japanese rice paddies, has a single ALS gene, and both target and non‐target‐site resistance are known in the SU resistance of this species. In this study, the target‐site resistance profile at the whole‐plant and enzyme levels was investigated using self‐pollinated S1 seedlings from a parent plant heterozygous for a Pro197Ser ALS mutation and their clonal tubers. Our objectives were to reveal differences and similarities between whole‐plant resistance of seedlings to imazosulfuron and that of tuber‐derived plants and to correlate the whole‐plant responses to enzymatic inhibition, as well as to quantify the effects of mutant ALS allele stacking. Genotyping confirmed a Mendelian segregation ratio (1:2:1) among S1 plants for wild‐type, heterozygous, and homozygous ALS mutations. Enzymatic assays showed that resistance correlated with the number of mutant alleles, and heterozygous plants exhibited a double‐sigmoid curve plateauing at 50%, indicating the function of a 50:50 wild‐type to mutant enzyme ratio. Studies of tuber‐derived plants showed that resistance increased with more mutant alleles, but with a disproportionate jump over 3000‐fold from wild‐type to heterozygous, and only 5‐fold from heterozygous to homozygous, indicating a saturating tendency in the stacking effect of mutations. The dose response of S1 seedlings was consistent with Mendelian segregation of genotypes and suggested a similar saturation of resistance increase due to allele stacking as observed in tubers, with comparable dose–response patterns across identical genotypes.
Q2

Herbicide evaluation in direct seeded rice in the middle Gangetic plains of India
Upadhaya B., Tiwari R.K., Kishor K., Harsha B.R., Singh S.K., Kumar S., Kumar S.
AbstractA field experiment was conducted in Samastipur district of Bihar, India during kharif season of 2021 and 2022 to identify suitable herbicides for control of composite weed flora in direct seeded rice. Compared to weedy check, application of bispyribac sodium + pyrazosulfuron ethyl as tank mixture effectively reduced weed density at 50 days after seeding during both the cropping season (82% and 86%, respectively) and weed dry weight (7.62 and 7.18 g m−2, respectively) over control and as a result yielded maximum during both the cropping season (47.92 and 51.32 q ha−1, respectively). Based on overall performance, bispyribac sodium + pyrazosulfuron ethyl may be considered as viable weed management option in direct seeded rice for the rice growers of middle Indo‐Gangetic region.
Q2

Distributions of exotic herbaceous species along a roadside on Chichijima, the Ogasawara Islands, and their relationship with human disturbance
Eguchi A., Hata K., Numata S.
AbstractOceanic islands are a major tourist destination, and the invasion of exotic plants on oceanic islands is a serious problem. To discuss how exotic herbaceous plant invasion is driven by human disturbance on an oceanic island, we assessed the distribution patterns of exotic herbaceous species along a metropolitan road, including parking lots, on the island of Chichijima in the Ogasawara Islands of Japan in the North Pacific Ocean. We observed 16 exotic herbaceous species representing seven families, and all the species have also been recorded in surveys 25 years ago. Species richness (number of species per plot) ranged from 0 to 9 with an average of 2.49. Distance from a parking lot was significantly negatively related to the distribution patterns of seven species and positively related to three species, pointing to parking lots being critical nodes along the dispersal pathways of exotic herbaceous species in Chichijima. Although roads are well known to play an important role as corridors for the invasion and seed dispersal of exotic plants, our results suggest that it would also be important to consider the location of parking lots to understand the distribution of exotic herbaceous species in road networks. We suggest that intensive weed management near parking lots and car wash protocols on Chichijima may be effective in halting exotic species spread.
Q2

Differences in soil seed longevity for two subspecies of the invasive weed, Chrysanthemoides monilifera (Asteraceae)
French K., Ashcroft M.B., Panetta F.D., Raghu S., Cherry H.
AbstractThe persistence of a soil seed bank influences weed management options. However, for many species, the degree of persistence of a soil seed bank is unknown. We assessed how long seeds remain in the soil for two invasive weeds, Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp. monilifera (boneseed) and C. monilifera subsp. rotundata (bitou bush), as seeds of these species were predicted to have different longevity in the soil associated with differences in seed coat thickness. Seeds of both subspecies were buried at two depths at two sites in eastern Australia. Seeds were tested for germinability and viability regularly over an 8‐year period. Freshly collected seeds had quite low viability, and there was a rapid decline in viability in the first couple of years after burial, with C. m. rotundata declining faster than C. m. monilifera. Some seeds, however, remained viable in the soil at some sites for up to 8 years, with high site‐to‐site variability. The variability in viability from site to site may be due to the length of time soils remain moist: a combination of rainfall quantity and humidity levels. The low numbers of seeds remaining viable at 8 years indicate progressively lower probabilities of recruitment at sites following weed control but also suggest that monitoring for both subspecies needs to occur for a long period to minimize the risk of reinfestation from the seed bank.
Q2

Field validation of 4,8‐dihydroxy‐1‐tetrahydronaphthone phytotoxicity on forestland weeds and physiological mechanism analysis on Lindernia procumbens
Yang L., Wang J., Hu Q., Liu Y., Ruan X., Qu A., Wang Q.
Abstract4,8‐Dihydroxy‐1‐tetrahydronaphthone (4,8‐DHT), an allelochemical, was isolated from the Carya cathayensis epicarp and was discovered to have phytotoxicity in laboratory tests. In this study, field experiments were designed to assess the phytotoxicity of 4,8‐DHT on weeds in Cerasus yedoensis and Lagerstroemia indica forestlands after pre‐ and post‐emergence application, in addition to physiological effect on Lindernia procumbens were also measured. The phytotoxic results of 4,8‐DHT demonstrated that the total inhibition rate of weeds was 81.3% and 68.2% in C. yedoensis forestland and L. indica forestland after pre‐emergence applied for 24 days in 2021, and enhanced by 9.9% and 27.8% compared with post‐emergence treatment. Especially, in C. yedoensis forestland, a high concentration of 4,8‐DHT sprayed at the pre‐emergence stage after 8 days had a significant inhibition rate on all weeds except Cyperus rotundus, and was still above 80.0% after 24 days of exposure. Comprehensive control efficacy of 4,8‐DHT indicates that pre‐emergence application is more favorable for weeds control. Physiological analysis showed that 4,8‐DHT stimulated the contents of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and proline and declined in the activities of antioxidant enzymes, meanwhile, accompanied by a decrease in the root vitality and chlorophyll content in L. procumbens. These results warrant further investigations of 4,8‐DHT applied in early pre‐emergence as a potential source of weed control agent.
Q2

Effect of different weed control techniques on the leaf yield and nutritional qualities of Ocimum sanctum
Osadebe V.O., Ukwu U.N., Dauda N., Nwamba I.M., Ede A.E., Enyi J.I., Onah A.I.
AbstractOcimum sanctum is a leaf‐vegetable and spice crop with several nutritional, therapeutic, and curative properties. Economic losses due to weeds have posed a major challenge to farmers, who have adopted different techniques to manage weeds without regard to its effect on the crop's nutritional qualities. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of weed control techniques on weed eradication, leaf yield, and nutritional qualities of O. sanctum. Nine weed control techniques comprising black, red, and transparent polyethylene mulches, rice husk and sawdust mulches, daily removal of weed (DROW), hoe‐weeded, application of Haloxyfop post‐emergence herbicide spray (PEHS), and un‐weeded were investigated in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Significant variations in leaf‐yield and nutritional qualities among the different weed control techniques were recorded. Leaf yield was higher in plots treated with rice husk and black polyethylene mulches. Haloxyfop PEHS and transparent polyethylene mulch were superior in enhancing the proximate and vitamin contents of O. sanctum while black polyethylene and DROW were more efficient in weed control compared with the other weed control techniques. The use of polyethylene mulch as an effective weed management option offers numerous benefits for agriculture and gardening. Its ability to conserve moisture, suppress weed growth, and improve the crop microclimate, makes it a sustainable and cost‐effective option for farmers globally. Additionally, the use of herbicide to exploit plant biosynthetic pathways could lead to the unearthing of chemical innovations that could in addition to eradicating weed, also improve the nutritional qualities of crop.
Top-100
Citing journals
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
|
Synthese
806 citations, 7.66%
|
|
Philosophical Studies
650 citations, 6.17%
|
|
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
305 citations, 2.9%
|
|
Erkenntnis
303 citations, 2.88%
|
|
Inquiry (United Kingdom)
211 citations, 2%
|
|
Episteme
183 citations, 1.74%
|
|
Nous
179 citations, 1.7%
|
|
Nous-Supplement: Philosophical Issues
149 citations, 1.42%
|
|
Philosophical Quarterly
146 citations, 1.39%
|
|
Acta Analytica
140 citations, 1.33%
|
|
Philosophy Compass
134 citations, 1.27%
|
|
Australasian Journal of Philosophy
125 citations, 1.19%
|
|
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly
121 citations, 1.15%
|
|
Philosophia (United States)
116 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Philosophical Psychology
108 citations, 1.03%
|
|
Analysis
105 citations, 1%
|
|
Mind
103 citations, 0.98%
|
|
European Journal of Philosophy
99 citations, 0.94%
|
|
Mind and Language
77 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Review of Philosophy and Psychology
77 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Nous-Supplement: Philosophical Perspectives
72 citations, 0.68%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
70 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Philosophy
69 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
68 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Theoria
66 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Analytic Philosophy
63 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Philosophical Explorations
62 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Dialectica
60 citations, 0.57%
|
|
The Philosophical Review
59 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences
57 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Metaphilosophy
56 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Ethics
48 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Ratio
46 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Topoi
44 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Southern Journal of Philosophy
43 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Around the Tree
42 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
39 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of the American Philosophical Association
37 citations, 0.35%
|
|
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
36 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Dialogue-Canadian Philosophical Review
35 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society
33 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Consciousness and Cognition
33 citations, 0.31%
|
|
International Journal of Philosophical Studies
32 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Philosophical Logic
32 citations, 0.3%
|
|
American Philosophical Quarterly
31 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Asian Journal of Philosophy
30 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Ethics
29 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Social Epistemology
28 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
27 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
27 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
25 citations, 0.24%
|
|
International Journal for the Study of Skepticism
24 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Utilitas
24 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Irrationality, Transcendence and the Circle-Squaring Problem
24 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Res Philosophica
23 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Manuscrito
21 citations, 0.2%
|
|
European Journal for Philosophy of Science
21 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Axiomathes
20 citations, 0.19%
|
|
The Monist
18 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume
18 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Economics and Philosophy
16 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Linguistics and Philosophy
16 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Philosophy and Technology
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Grazer Philosophische Studien
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Social Choice and Welfare
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Ratio Juris
13 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Criminal Law and Philosophy
13 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Metaphysica
13 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Disputatio
12 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Legal Theory
12 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal for General Philosophy of Science
12 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Philosophical Papers
12 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Social Philosophy and Policy
12 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Res Publica
12 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Emotion in Language
12 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Neuroscience of Consciousness
11 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Cognition
11 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Politics, Philosophy and Economics
11 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Hypatia
10 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Philosophy of Science
10 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Kriterion
10 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Philosophy
10 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today
10 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Political Studies
9 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Minds and Machines
9 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Review of Symbolic Logic
9 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
8 citations, 0.08%
|
|
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
8 citations, 0.08%
|
|
International Theory
8 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Outstanding Contributions to Logic
8 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Philosophy of the Social Sciences
8 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology
8 citations, 0.08%
|
|
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science
8 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement
8 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Law and Philosophy Library
8 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Journal of Economic Theory
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Journal of Political Philosophy
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Thought
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Revus
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
British Journal of Aesthetics
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
|
|
Springer Nature
2897 citations, 27.52%
|
|
Wiley
1673 citations, 15.89%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
1184 citations, 11.25%
|
|
Oxford University Press
1050 citations, 9.97%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
732 citations, 6.95%
|
|
Elsevier
171 citations, 1.62%
|
|
SAGE
93 citations, 0.88%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
76 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
67 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Duke University Press
64 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Brill
55 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
54 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
33 citations, 0.31%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
29 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Philosophy Documentation Center, Saint Louis University
27 citations, 0.26%
|
|
University of Pittsburgh
27 citations, 0.26%
|
|
MDPI
26 citations, 0.25%
|
|
SciELO
25 citations, 0.24%
|
|
The Philosophy Centre of the University of Lisbon
17 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Emerald
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
12 citations, 0.11%
|
|
CAIRN
9 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Edinburgh University Press
8 citations, 0.08%
|
|
IGI Global
8 citations, 0.08%
|
|
University of Illinois Press
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Academy of Management
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Revus Klub
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
MIT Press
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Associazone culturale Pragma
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Tomsk State Pedagogical University
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
BMJ
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Japan Association for Philosophy of Science
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Philosophy of Science Society, Japan
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IOS Press
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Royal Society
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Annual Reviews
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
S. Karger AG
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
National Library of Serbia
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
OpenEdition
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
University of Michigan Library
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japanese Political Science Association
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
World Scientific
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of Bialystok
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Associacao Nacional de Pos-graduacao e Pesquisa em Educacao
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Vilnius University Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Societe Belge de Philosophie
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Project MUSE
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Pennsylvania State University Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IMR Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
EDP Sciences
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Imprint Academic
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Les Laboratoires Servier
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
American Accounting Association
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Springer Publishing Company
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Early Childhood Australia
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Universidad EAFIT
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Numdam (Numerisation de Documents Anciens Mathematiques)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
White Horse Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
electronic proceedings in theoretical computer science, eptcs
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Open Library of Humanities
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
University of Massachusetts
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Vilniaus Universiteto Leidykla
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Bibliopolis, Edizioni Di Filosofia E Scienze
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Universities Federation for Animal Welfare
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
University Pub. Group
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Sirey
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Association Centre Sevres
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
JMIR Publications
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
F1000 Research
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
IntechOpen
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Guilford Publications
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
The Japanese Association for the Integrated Study of Dietary Habits
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (68 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
|
Publishing organizations
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
19 publications, 2.47%
|
|
University of Arizona
13 publications, 1.69%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
13 publications, 1.69%
|
|
Princeton University
12 publications, 1.56%
|
|
New York University
12 publications, 1.56%
|
|
Brown University
11 publications, 1.43%
|
|
Harvard University
10 publications, 1.3%
|
|
University of Oxford
9 publications, 1.17%
|
|
King's College London
9 publications, 1.17%
|
|
University of Glasgow
9 publications, 1.17%
|
|
University of Southern California
8 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Northwestern University
8 publications, 1.04%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
8 publications, 1.04%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
7 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
7 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Australian National University
6 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Stanford University
6 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University College London
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Ohio State University
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of St Andrews
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Dartmouth College
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Miami
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Rochester
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Helsinki
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Oslo
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Cornell University
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Columbia University
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Duke University
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Michigan
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Zurich
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Nottingham
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Florida State University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Southampton
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Fordham University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Reading
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Stirling
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Lund University
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Stockholm University
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Aarhus University
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
William Marsh Rice University
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
National University of Singapore
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Yale University
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Charles Sturt University
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Georgetown University
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Yonsei University
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Arizona State University
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Syracuse University
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of California, Davis
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Autonomous University of Madrid
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Leibniz University Hannover
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Minnesota
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Hamburg University
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Cardiff University
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Leeds
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Calgary
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Sussex
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Oviedo
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Tennessee
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Bilkent University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Ege University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Tübingen
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Lisbon
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
ETH Zurich
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Umeå University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Geneva
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of New South Wales
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Fribourg
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Neuchâtel
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Université Catholique de Louvain
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Manchester
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Michigan State University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Birmingham
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Sydney
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
California Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Auckland
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Melbourne
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Monash University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Wollongong
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Australian Catholic University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Canberra
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
|
University of Glasgow
6 publications, 5.41%
|
|
University of Oxford
4 publications, 3.6%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
4 publications, 3.6%
|
|
University of Helsinki
3 publications, 2.7%
|
|
University of Zurich
3 publications, 2.7%
|
|
Northwestern University
3 publications, 2.7%
|
|
Brown University
3 publications, 2.7%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
University of Nottingham
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Georgetown University
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Harvard University
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
University of Arizona
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Leibniz University Hannover
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Cardiff University
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Lund University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Stockholm University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
ETH Zurich
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Umeå University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of New South Wales
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Université Catholique de Louvain
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Aarhus University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Oslo
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
King's College London
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Manchester
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Florida State University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
William Marsh Rice University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
National University of Singapore
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Southampton
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Cornell University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Yale University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Australian Catholic University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Charles Sturt University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Canberra
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Yonsei University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
New York University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Tufts University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of California, Davis
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Autonomous University of Madrid
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Trinity College Dublin
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of St Andrews
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Minnesota
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Innsbruck
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Bielefeld University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Leeds
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Vienna
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Sheffield
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Fordham University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Widener University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Toronto Metropolitan University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Barcelona
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Brandon University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Sussex
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Miami
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Cincinnati
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Rochester
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Samford University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Houston
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Show all (37 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
|
USA
|
USA, 274, 35.58%
USA
274 publications, 35.58%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 70, 9.09%
United Kingdom
70 publications, 9.09%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 14, 1.82%
Australia
14 publications, 1.82%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 11, 1.43%
Germany
11 publications, 1.43%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 6, 0.78%
Canada
6 publications, 0.78%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 6, 0.78%
Switzerland
6 publications, 0.78%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 5, 0.65%
Norway
5 publications, 0.65%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 5, 0.65%
Republic of Korea
5 publications, 0.65%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 5, 0.65%
Sweden
5 publications, 0.65%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 4, 0.52%
Mexico
4 publications, 0.52%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 4, 0.52%
Netherlands
4 publications, 0.52%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 4, 0.52%
Finland
4 publications, 0.52%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 3, 0.39%
South Africa
3 publications, 0.39%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 0.26%
Austria
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 2, 0.26%
Belgium
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.26%
Denmark
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 2, 0.26%
Spain
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 2, 0.26%
Italy
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 2, 0.26%
Singapore
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 0.26%
Turkey
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.13%
Portugal
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 1, 0.13%
Iran
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.13%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.13%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.13%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 1, 0.13%
New Zealand
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.13%
Chile
1 publication, 0.13%
|
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
|
USA
|
USA, 38, 34.23%
USA
38 publications, 34.23%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 24, 21.62%
United Kingdom
24 publications, 21.62%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 5, 4.5%
Germany
5 publications, 4.5%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 3, 2.7%
Australia
3 publications, 2.7%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 3, 2.7%
Finland
3 publications, 2.7%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 3, 2.7%
Switzerland
3 publications, 2.7%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 3, 2.7%
Sweden
3 publications, 2.7%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 3, 2.7%
South Africa
3 publications, 2.7%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 1.8%
Austria
2 publications, 1.8%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 2, 1.8%
Italy
2 publications, 1.8%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 2, 1.8%
Canada
2 publications, 1.8%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 2, 1.8%
Netherlands
2 publications, 1.8%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 2, 1.8%
Republic of Korea
2 publications, 1.8%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.9%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.9%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.9%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.9%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.9%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.9%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 1, 0.9%
Spain
1 publication, 0.9%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.9%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.9%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.9%
Norway
1 publication, 0.9%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.9%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.9%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.9%
Chile
1 publication, 0.9%
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|