Reducing false positive rate of docking-based virtual screening by active learning
Machine learning-based scoring functions (MLSFs) have become a very favorable alternative to classical scoring functions because of their potential superior screening performance. However, the information of negative data used to construct MLSFs was rarely reported in the literature, and meanwhile the putative inactive molecules recorded in existing databases usually have obvious bias from active molecules. Here we proposed an easy-to-use method named AMLSF that combines active learning using negative molecular selection strategies with MLSF, which can iteratively improve the quality of inactive sets and thus reduce the false positive rate of virtual screening. We chose energy auxiliary terms learning as the MLSF and validated our method on eight targets in the diverse subset of DUD-E. For each target, we screened the IterBioScreen database by AMLSF and compared the screening results with those of the four control models. The results illustrate that the number of active molecules in the top 1000 molecules identified by AMLSF was significantly higher than those identified by the control models. In addition, the free energy calculation results for the top 10 molecules screened out by the AMLSF, null model and control models based on DUD-E also proved that more active molecules can be identified, and the false positive rate can be reduced by AMLSF.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
2
|
|
|
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
2 publications, 11.76%
|
|
|
Drug Discovery Today
2 publications, 11.76%
|
|
|
Molecular Diversity
2 publications, 11.76%
|
|
|
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
1 publication, 5.88%
|
|
|
Molecules
1 publication, 5.88%
|
|
|
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
1 publication, 5.88%
|
|
|
Plants
1 publication, 5.88%
|
|
|
Journal of Advanced Research
1 publication, 5.88%
|
|
|
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
1 publication, 5.88%
|
|
|
Methods in Molecular Biology
1 publication, 5.88%
|
|
|
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
1 publication, 5.88%
|
|
|
Chemical Science
1 publication, 5.88%
|
|
|
1
2
|
Publishers
|
1
2
3
4
|
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
4 publications, 23.53%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
4 publications, 23.53%
|
|
|
Elsevier
3 publications, 17.65%
|
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
2 publications, 11.76%
|
|
|
MDPI
2 publications, 11.76%
|
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
1 publication, 5.88%
|
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1 publication, 5.88%
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.