Baricitinib in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial and updated meta-analysis

Horby P.W., Emberson J.R., Mafham M., Campbell M., Peto L., Pessoa-Amorim G., Spata E., Staplin N., Lowe C., Chadwick D.R., Brightling C., Stewart R., Collini P., Ashish A., Green C.A., Prudon B., Felton T., Kerry A., Baillie J.K., Buch M.H., Day J.N., Faust S.N., Jaki T., Jeffery K., Juszczak E., Knight M., Lim W.S., Montgomery A., Mumford A., Rowan K., Thwaites G., Haynes R., Landray M.J.
Publication typePosted Content
Publication date2022-03-03
Abstract
SUMMARY
Background

We evaluated the use of baricitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor, for the treatment of patients admitted to hospital because of COVID-19.

Methods

This randomised, controlled, open-label platform trial (Randomised Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy [RECOVERY]), is assessing multiple possible treatments in patients hospitalised for COVID-19. Eligible and consenting patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to either usual standard of care alone (usual care group) or usual care plus baricitinib 4 mg once daily by mouth for 10 days or until discharge if sooner (baricitinib group). The primary outcome was 28-day mortality assessed in the intention-to-treat population. A meta-analysis was conducted that included the results from the RECOVERY trial and all previous randomised controlled trials of baricitinib or other JAK inhibitor in patients hospitalised with COVID-19. The RECOVERY trial is registered with ISRCTN (50189673) and clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04381936).

Findings

Between 2 February 2021 and 29 December 2021, 8156 patients were randomly allocated to receive usual care plus baricitinib versus usual care alone. At randomisation, 95% of patients were receiving corticosteroids and 23% receiving tocilizumab (with planned use within the next 24 hours recorded for a further 9%). Overall, 513 (12%) of 4148 patients allocated to baricitinib versus 546 (14%) of 4008 patients allocated to usual care died within 28 days (age-adjusted rate ratio 0·87; 95% CI 0·77-0·98; p=0·026). This 13% proportional reduction in mortality was somewhat smaller than that seen in a meta-analysis of 8 previous trials of a JAK inhibitor (involving 3732 patients and 425 deaths) in which allocation to a JAK inhibitor was associated with a 43% proportional reduction in mortality (rate ratio 0.57; 95% CI 0.45-0.72). Including the results from RECOVERY into an updated meta-analysis of all 9 completed trials (involving 11,888 randomised patients and 1484 deaths) allocation to baricitinib or other JAK inhibitor was associated with a 20% proportional reduction in mortality (rate ratio 0.80; 95% CI 0.71-0.89; p<0.001). In RECOVERY, there was no significant excess in death or infection due to non-COVID-19 causes and no excess of thrombosis, or other safety outcomes.

Interpretation

In patients hospitalised for COVID-19, baricitinib significantly reduced the risk of death but the size of benefit was somewhat smaller than that suggested by previous trials. The total randomised evidence to date suggests that JAK inhibitors (chiefly baricitinib) reduce mortality in patients hospitalised for COVID-19 by about one-fifth.

Funding

UK Research and Innovation (Medical Research Council) and National Institute of Health Research (Grant ref: MC_PC_19056).

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
European Respiratory Journal
2 publications, 5.88%
Viruses
2 publications, 5.88%
Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology
2 publications, 5.88%
Journal of Clinical Medicine
2 publications, 5.88%
Journal of Clinical Investigation
1 publication, 2.94%
Life
1 publication, 2.94%
Vaccines
1 publication, 2.94%
Molecules
1 publication, 2.94%
Frontiers in Pharmacology
1 publication, 2.94%
Biomedicines
1 publication, 2.94%
Nature
1 publication, 2.94%
Nature Reviews Nephrology
1 publication, 2.94%
Nature Reviews Immunology
1 publication, 2.94%
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
1 publication, 2.94%
Antibiotics
1 publication, 2.94%
Current Issues in Molecular Biology
1 publication, 2.94%
Journal of Personalized Medicine
1 publication, 2.94%
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
1 publication, 2.94%
British Medical Bulletin
1 publication, 2.94%
Microorganisms
1 publication, 2.94%
Cells
1 publication, 2.94%
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
1 publication, 2.94%
Clinical Infectious Diseases
1 publication, 2.94%
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
1 publication, 2.94%
Pharmaceutics
1 publication, 2.94%
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
1 publication, 2.94%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
1 publication, 2.94%
BMJ
1 publication, 2.94%
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
1 publication, 2.94%
1
2

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
MDPI
17 publications, 50%
Springer Nature
3 publications, 8.82%
Oxford University Press
3 publications, 8.82%
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
2 publications, 5.88%
Hindawi Limited
2 publications, 5.88%
BMJ
2 publications, 5.88%
Elsevier
2 publications, 5.88%
American Society for Clinical Investigation
1 publication, 2.94%
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 publication, 2.94%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1 publication, 2.94%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
34
Share