Association of ultra-processed food intake with risk of inflammatory bowel disease: prospective cohort study
Objective
To evaluate the relation between intake of ultra-processed food and risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
Design
Prospective cohort study.
Setting
21 low, middle, and high income countries across seven geographical regions (Europe and North America, South America, Africa, Middle East, south Asia, South East Asia, and China).
Participants
116 087 adults aged 35-70 years with at least one cycle of follow-up and complete baseline food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) data (country specific validated FFQs were used to document baseline dietary intake). Participants were followed prospectively at least every three years.
Main outcome measures
The main outcome was development of IBD, including Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis. Associations between ultra-processed food intake and risk of IBD were assessed using Cox proportional hazard multivariable models. Results are presented as hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals.
Results
Participants were enrolled in the study between 2003 and 2016. During the median follow-up of 9.7 years (interquartile range 8.9-11.2 years), 467 participants developed incident IBD (90 with Crohn’s disease and 377 with ulcerative colitis). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, higher intake of ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of incident IBD (hazard ratio 1.82, 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 2.72 for ≥5 servings/day and 1.67, 1.18 to 2.37 for 1-4 servings/day compared with <1 serving/day, P=0.006 for trend). Different subgroups of ultra-processed food, including soft drinks, refined sweetened foods, salty snacks, and processed meat, each were associated with higher hazard ratios for IBD. Results were consistent for Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis with low heterogeneity. Intakes of white meat, red meat, dairy, starch, and fruit, vegetables, and legumes were not associated with incident IBD.
Conclusions
Higher intake of ultra-processed food was positively associated with risk of IBD. Further studies are needed to identify the contributory factors within ultra-processed foods.
Study registration
ClinicalTrials.gov
Top-30
Journals
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
|
Nutrients
30 publications, 10.83%
|
|
|
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
10 publications, 3.61%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Nutrition
9 publications, 3.25%
|
|
|
Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
9 publications, 3.25%
|
|
|
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
8 publications, 2.89%
|
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
7 publications, 2.53%
|
|
|
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
5 publications, 1.81%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Immunology
4 publications, 1.44%
|
|
|
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology and Hepatology
4 publications, 1.44%
|
|
|
Gastroenterology
4 publications, 1.44%
|
|
|
Biomedicines
4 publications, 1.44%
|
|
|
United European Gastroenterology Journal
4 publications, 1.44%
|
|
|
Gut
4 publications, 1.44%
|
|
|
Gut Microbes
4 publications, 1.44%
|
|
|
American Journal of Gastroenterology
4 publications, 1.44%
|
|
|
Microorganisms
3 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
European Journal of Nutrition
3 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
3 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
Aktuelle Ernahrungsmedizin Klinik und Praxis
3 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
Food and Function
3 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
Gastroenterology Clinics of North America
3 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
Cureus
3 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
Nutrition Reviews
3 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
World Journal of Gastroenterology
3 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
3 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
Autoimmunity Reviews
3 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
Bailliere's Best Practice and Research in Clinical Gastroenterology
2 publications, 0.72%
|
|
|
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
2 publications, 0.72%
|
|
|
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN
2 publications, 0.72%
|
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
Publishers
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
|
Elsevier
57 publications, 20.58%
|
|
|
MDPI
53 publications, 19.13%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
37 publications, 13.36%
|
|
|
Wiley
22 publications, 7.94%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
18 publications, 6.5%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
17 publications, 6.14%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
9 publications, 3.25%
|
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
8 publications, 2.89%
|
|
|
BMJ
8 publications, 2.89%
|
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
6 publications, 2.17%
|
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
5 publications, 1.81%
|
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
4 publications, 1.44%
|
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
4 publications, 1.44%
|
|
|
S. Karger AG
3 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
American Society for Nutrition
2 publications, 0.72%
|
|
|
SAGE
2 publications, 0.72%
|
|
|
Cambridge University Press
2 publications, 0.72%
|
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
2 publications, 0.72%
|
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
1 publication, 0.36%
|
|
|
Portland Press
1 publication, 0.36%
|
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
1 publication, 0.36%
|
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
1 publication, 0.36%
|
|
|
Hindawi Limited
1 publication, 0.36%
|
|
|
CAIRN
1 publication, 0.36%
|
|
|
RCNi
1 publication, 0.36%
|
|
|
The Royal College of Surgeons of England
1 publication, 0.36%
|
|
|
Annual Reviews
1 publication, 0.36%
|
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 0.36%
|
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
1 publication, 0.36%
|
|
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.