Open Access
Open access
volume 13 issue 3 pages e069180

Application of complexity theory in health and social care research: a scoping review

Áine Carroll 1, 2, 3, 4
Claire Collins 5, 6
Jane McKenzie 5, 6
Diarmuid Stokes 2, 7
Andrew Darley 1, 2
1
 
School of Medicine
3
 
Academic Department
4
 
National Rehabilitation University Hospital
5
 
Henley Business School
7
 
College of Health Sciences
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2023-03-15
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR1.016
CiteScore4.5
Impact factor2.3
ISSN20446055
General Medicine
Abstract
Background

Complexity theory has been chosen by many authors as a suitable lens through which to examine health and social care. Despite its potential value, many empirical investigations apply the theory in a tokenistic manner without engaging with its underlying concepts and underpinnings.

Objectives

The aim of this scoping review is to synthesise the literature on empirical studies that have centred on the application of complexity theory to understand health and social care provision.

Methods

This scoping review considered primary research using complexity theory-informed approaches, published in English between 2012 and 2021. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, PSYCHINFO, the NHS Economic Evaluation Database, and the Health Economic Evaluations Database were searched. In addition, a manual search of the reference lists of relevant articles was conducted. Data extraction was conducted using Covidence software and a data extraction form was created to produce a descriptive summary of the results, addressing the objectives and research question. The review used the revised Arksey and O’Malley framework and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).

Results

2021 studies were initially identified with a total of 61 articles included for extraction. Complexity theory in health and social care research is poorly defined and described and was most commonly applied as a theoretical and analytical framework. The full breadth of the health and social care continuum was not represented in the identified articles, with the majority being healthcare focused.

Discussion

Complexity theory is being increasingly embraced in health and care research. The heterogeneity of the literature regarding the application of complexity theory made synthesis challenging. However, this scoping review has synthesised the most recent evidence and contributes to translational systems research by providing guidance for future studies.

Conclusion

The study of complex health and care systems necessitates methods of interpreting dynamic prcesses which requires qualitative and longitudinal studies with abductive reasoning. The authors provide guidance on conducting complexity-informed primary research that seeks to promote rigor and transparency in the area.

Registration

The scoping review protocol was registered at Open Science Framework, and the review protocol was published at BMJ Open (https://bit.ly/3Ex1Inu).

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
Paramedicine
1 publication, 5%
Journal of CME
1 publication, 5%
Archives of Public Health
1 publication, 5%
Digital Society
1 publication, 5%
BMC Health Services Research
1 publication, 5%
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
1 publication, 5%
Pediatric Research
1 publication, 5%
Frontiers in Public Health
1 publication, 5%
Medicina Clinica
1 publication, 5%
Advances in Electronic Government, Digital Divide, and Regional Development
1 publication, 5%
Evaluation
1 publication, 5%
Medicina Clínica (English Edition)
1 publication, 5%
Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics
1 publication, 5%
Rare
1 publication, 5%
Learning Health Systems
1 publication, 5%
International Journal for Advancing Practice
1 publication, 5%
Current Issues in Tourism
1 publication, 5%
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
1 publication, 5%
African Journal of Primary Health Care and Family Medicine
1 publication, 5%
1

Publishers

1
2
3
4
5
Springer Nature
5 publications, 25%
Elsevier
4 publications, 20%
SAGE
2 publications, 10%
Taylor & Francis
2 publications, 10%
IGI Global
2 publications, 10%
MDPI
1 publication, 5%
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 publication, 5%
Wiley
1 publication, 5%
Mark Allen Group
1 publication, 5%
AOSIS
1 publication, 5%
1
2
3
4
5
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
20
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Carroll Á. et al. Application of complexity theory in health and social care research: a scoping review // BMJ Open. 2023. Vol. 13. No. 3. p. e069180.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Carroll Á., Collins C., McKenzie J., Stokes D., Darley A. Application of complexity theory in health and social care research: a scoping review // BMJ Open. 2023. Vol. 13. No. 3. p. e069180.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069180
UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069180
TI - Application of complexity theory in health and social care research: a scoping review
T2 - BMJ Open
AU - Carroll, Áine
AU - Collins, Claire
AU - McKenzie, Jane
AU - Stokes, Diarmuid
AU - Darley, Andrew
PY - 2023
DA - 2023/03/15
PB - BMJ
SP - e069180
IS - 3
VL - 13
PMID - 36921939
SN - 2044-6055
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2023_Carroll,
author = {Áine Carroll and Claire Collins and Jane McKenzie and Diarmuid Stokes and Andrew Darley},
title = {Application of complexity theory in health and social care research: a scoping review},
journal = {BMJ Open},
year = {2023},
volume = {13},
publisher = {BMJ},
month = {mar},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069180},
number = {3},
pages = {e069180},
doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069180}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Carroll, Áine, et al. “Application of complexity theory in health and social care research: a scoping review.” BMJ Open, vol. 13, no. 3, Mar. 2023, p. e069180. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069180.