volume 121 issue 5 pages 1065-1073

Validity and reliability of measuring resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity using short sampling durations in healthy humans

KARAMBIR NOTAY 1
Jeremy D. Seed 1
Anthony V. Incognito 1
CONNOR J. DOHERTY 1
Massimo Nardone 1
Matthew J. Burns 1
Philip J. Millar 1, 2
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2016-11-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR1.078
CiteScore6.0
Impact factor3.3
ISSN87507587, 15221601, 00218987
Physiology
Physiology (medical)
Abstract

Resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) demonstrates high intraindividual reproducibility when sampled over 5–30 min epochs, although shorter sampling durations are commonly used before and during a stress to quantify sympathetic responsiveness. The purpose of the present study was to examine the intratest validity and reliability of MSNA sampled over 2 and 1 min and 30 and 15 s epoch durations. We retrospectively analyzed 68 resting fibular nerve microneurographic recordings obtained from 53 young, healthy participants (37 men; 23 ± 6 yr of age). From a stable 7-min resting baseline, MSNA (burst frequency and incidence, normalized mean burst amplitude, total burst area) was compared among each epoch duration and a standard 5-min control. Bland-Altman plots were used to determine agreement and bias. Three sequential MSNA measurements were collected using each sampling duration to calculate absolute and relative reliability (coefficients of variation and intraclass correlation coefficients). MSNA values were similar among each sampling duration and the 5-min control (all P > 0.05), highly correlated ( r = 0.69–0.93; all P < 0.001), and demonstrated no evidence of fixed bias (all P > 0.05). A consistent proportional bias ( P < 0.05) was present for MSNA burst frequency (all sampling durations) and incidence (1 min and 30 and 15 s), such that participants with low and high average MSNA underestimated and overestimated the true value, respectively. Reliability decreased progressively using the 30- and 15-s sampling durations. In conclusion, short 2 and 1 min and 30 s sampling durations can provide valid and reliable measures of MSNA, although increased sample size may be required for epochs ≤30 s, due to poorer reliability.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology
9 publications, 18.75%
American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology
8 publications, 16.67%
Journal of Physiology
6 publications, 12.5%
Journal of Applied Physiology
6 publications, 12.5%
Journal of Neurophysiology
3 publications, 6.25%
Frontiers in Neuroscience
2 publications, 4.17%
Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism
1 publication, 2.08%
Journal of the American Heart Association
1 publication, 2.08%
Hypertension
1 publication, 2.08%
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
1 publication, 2.08%
Frontiers in Physiology
1 publication, 2.08%
Nature
1 publication, 2.08%
European Journal of Applied Physiology
1 publication, 2.08%
Clinical Autonomic Research
1 publication, 2.08%
Physiological Reports
1 publication, 2.08%
Experimental Physiology
1 publication, 2.08%
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
1 publication, 2.08%
Biophysics Reviews
1 publication, 2.08%
Journal of Affective Disorders
1 publication, 2.08%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
30
American Physiological Society
26 publications, 54.17%
Wiley
9 publications, 18.75%
Frontiers Media S.A.
3 publications, 6.25%
Springer Nature
3 publications, 6.25%
Elsevier
3 publications, 6.25%
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
2 publications, 4.17%
Canadian Science Publishing
1 publication, 2.08%
AIP Publishing
1 publication, 2.08%
5
10
15
20
25
30
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
48
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
NOTAY K. et al. Validity and reliability of measuring resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity using short sampling durations in healthy humans // Journal of Applied Physiology. 2016. Vol. 121. No. 5. pp. 1065-1073.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
NOTAY K., Seed J. D., Incognito A. V., DOHERTY C. J., Nardone M., Burns M. J., Millar P. J. Validity and reliability of measuring resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity using short sampling durations in healthy humans // Journal of Applied Physiology. 2016. Vol. 121. No. 5. pp. 1065-1073.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00736.2016
UR - https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00736.2016
TI - Validity and reliability of measuring resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity using short sampling durations in healthy humans
T2 - Journal of Applied Physiology
AU - NOTAY, KARAMBIR
AU - Seed, Jeremy D.
AU - Incognito, Anthony V.
AU - DOHERTY, CONNOR J.
AU - Nardone, Massimo
AU - Burns, Matthew J.
AU - Millar, Philip J.
PY - 2016
DA - 2016/11/01
PB - American Physiological Society
SP - 1065-1073
IS - 5
VL - 121
PMID - 27687563
SN - 8750-7587
SN - 1522-1601
SN - 0021-8987
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2016_NOTAY,
author = {KARAMBIR NOTAY and Jeremy D. Seed and Anthony V. Incognito and CONNOR J. DOHERTY and Massimo Nardone and Matthew J. Burns and Philip J. Millar},
title = {Validity and reliability of measuring resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity using short sampling durations in healthy humans},
journal = {Journal of Applied Physiology},
year = {2016},
volume = {121},
publisher = {American Physiological Society},
month = {nov},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00736.2016},
number = {5},
pages = {1065--1073},
doi = {10.1152/japplphysiol.00736.2016}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
NOTAY, KARAMBIR, et al. “Validity and reliability of measuring resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity using short sampling durations in healthy humans.” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 121, no. 5, Nov. 2016, pp. 1065-1073. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00736.2016.